Asia
Afghanistan and Iran display political maturity to end border-dispute
Afghanistan and Iran have been able to immediately put a full stop to the recent border skirmishes and both sides called it a mistake while Tehran says it was a “brief conflict”.
Three days ago, the security forces of Afghanistan and Iran embroiled in a new clash, marked by the exchange of gunfire and military tension that also left several people dead and injured.
The clashes that underlie an age-old issue of waters on Afghanistan’s Helmand River, claimed the lives of two Iranian border guards and one Taliban forces.
The Helmand River is Afghanistan’s largest river that provides Iran with 22 cubic meters of water per second under a 1973 agreement. However, the flow of water has dropped significantly and Taliban blame drought and climate change as the key reason. Taliban said they are committed to the water treaty with Iran but says they are also scrambling with water shortages.

The Commander of the Ground Forces of Iran and other officials visited the Sistan Region of South-Eastern Iran to investigate the field conditions of the Iran-Afghanistan border areas. (Iran Press)
However, Iran sees the situation from a different perspective and blames Afghanistan’s dam construction for exacerbating drought conditions in both sides of the neighboring countries.
Iran, in particular, is not happy with a Kajak dam built on the Helmand River that has altered the river’s course and prevented water from reaching Iran.
Political maturity
Whatever might be claimed and visible positions as some certain external circles already started jubilating on the border dispute between Afghanistan and Iran, the two neighboring countries exhibited immense adulthood to overcome the quarrel.
Taliban and Iranian officials immediately restrained from releasing infuriating statements, and both sides pledged to stop repeating the same mistake.
Iran’s Interior Minister, Ahmad Vahidi has described clashes on the border as a “brief conflict” and said the problem has been resolved after negotiations with the Taliban.
Vahidi tried well to downplay the severity of the clash, and stated that currently there is no problem and the border is open and in peace.
But he blamed the Afghan border guards for starting the battle, and said they were given an appropriate response.
The Taliban also said that they want to have good ties with Iran, adding the border clashes was a mistake. Taliban’s spokesman Bilal Karimi said that Islamic Emirate does not want tensions with anyone, including its neighbors, and called the border fighting a “small dispute”.
“We are in contact with Iranian officials and if there is any issue we will resolve it collectively,” Karimi added.
No proxies at all
It is important that Iran and Afghanistan should pay extreme attention to issues such as recent border conflict that should not lead to a proxy war between the neighboring countries.
“Taliban and Iranian officials have shown the courage to resolve the border dispute without harming their ties, and this is a great development on relations between the two countries,” said a political expert.
Speaking to Harici, Jamil Hadiri said that every dispute between Kabul and Tehran should be resolved through dialogues and diplomatic approach before the enemies use the opportunity against both of them.
“It was a big mistake to see direct clashes between security forces of the two countries, but at the same time, it was great to see the ability and willingness from the two sides in resolving the quarrel in just a day,” Hadiri said.
Many clashes erupted between Afghanistan and Iran
Since August 2021 when the Islamic Emirate swept into power, there have been many clashes with Iran, but the recent one was deadly.
Taliban and Iranian border guards fought five times in the past 21 months and the first clash was on December 1, 2021, in Shaghalak area in Nimroz province. Officials from both sides confirmed the clash and said it erupted due to “misunderstandings” between the border guards of the two countries. No casualties reported from the incident.
On April 21, 2022, clashes erupted again between Taliban and Iranian security forces near the Islam Qala border. The third time was on July 23, 2022, and the clashes took place near Hirmand border town.
In February 2023, another clash took place and the recent one was on Saturday, May 27, when the border guards of the sides engaged in deadly fighting in Pul-e-Abrisham border crossing in Nimroz province, west of Afghanistan.
Drought is another headache
Drought and climate change have been one of the biggest drivers of conflict between Afghanistan and Iran.
Iran has been scrambling with drought in the last 30 years and as a last resort, warned Afghan leaders to unlock the flow of water to Iran, or face some serious action.

Nimroz residents have been suffering from water shortage since last five years.
The Taliban treated the warning as a wake-up call and wanted swift responses to Iran authorities with military action in case of any attacks.
Taliban leadership time and again says drought is hitting harder areas bordering Iran, especially Nimroz province.
Some residents in Nimroz told Harici that dozens of families were forced to leave their homes and migrated to other places even to other provinces due to drought and non-availability of water.
We have been facing drought in the last five years, said Syiar Khan, a resident of Nimroz province. Speaking to Harici, he said that he lives in the Nad Ali area but other relatives of his, including his older brother, migrated to Kabul due to lack of water. “We are farmers, and water is our basic need. I have lost all of my income in the last five years and I am also considering leaving Zaranj city to another province,” Khan added.
“We purchase one tanker of potable water against 400Afs, and this is very costly at a time when the economy is very bad,” said another resident Amir Gul.
Gul called on the Taliban leadership to help remove water shortages in the province through any possible way and release water from Kajaki dam if necessary.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
