Connect with us

Asia

IS-K Moscow attack gives another turn to global strategic battling

Published

on

The recent Islamic States Khurasan IS-K firing against occupants of a concert hall in Moscow, the capital city of Russia, has not only jolted the world but it is now giving new turns and directions to global strategic battling which is still controlled by two traditional rival US and Russian Federation (successor of USSR). Whatever may be directions and targets of follow up of Moscow firing incidents but its epicenter wouldn’t be other than border regions between former British India and Afghanistan, dominated by Pushtoons.

No one can deny the fact that worriers Pushtoons are no more independent as they have been made slaves and hostages by spy masters of US led allies through Saudi Arab and Pakistan on the sacred name of Islam and Jihad. The Islamic States (IS) also called Daesh is the latest virgin of Mujahideen, sponsored, trained, financed and encouraged by US led allies against former Soviet Union. The IS came into being at the time when at last moment of first decade of millennium, US lead allies made fed up by continuous resistance by Taliban in war devastated Afghanistan.

At early stages, the IS focused almost its attentions and strategies against Shia Iran whereas it was engaged in efforts for the survival of Syrian government. Despite wholehearted support of US led allies especially Saudi led Arab world, the IS had failed in Syrian war. IS militants after its failure, returned to war devastated Afghanistan at the time when Pakistan also pulled al-Qaeda remains out of tribal regions with commencing of military operation Zarb-i-Azab on June 15, 2014 last. Making Afghanistan as its base camp like of al-Qaeda, the IS had made hells lives of all those progressive, nationalists, democrats and moderate Pushtoon elders who are known for opposition to extremism and terrorism. At this stage, the IS constituted 40-member council (Shura) for making its decisions and strategies. Majority of 40-member council were those who remain on important offices in banned Tehrik Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Still the IS is commanded by Pakistani origin Taliban who are in cordial and friendly links with Taliban (Emirate Islami Afghanistan) governing Afghanistan. The Emirate Islami has already declared Afghanistan as a free and safe place for likeminded militants from all over the world.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin lights a candle during his visit to a church of the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence outside Moscow on March 24, 2024, during a national day of mourning following the attack in the Crocus City Hall, POOL / AFP.

IS-K and the regional countries

It doesn’t mean that with killing of Osama Bin Laden and Aiman Al Zawahiri, al-Qaeda lost its existence or its contacts with other hardliners, operating/active on soil of Afghanistan since the so-called cold war. Taliban regime in Afghanistan like of late 90’s, once again give another life to almost alleged terrorists groups especially Arabs and Central Asians. Similarly like of past, the US still maintaining dual standards on the issue of Muslim extremism. Through one or the other ways, the US spy masters are still in command of influencing Taliban (both Afghani and Pakistani), al-Qaeda and its affiliated groups from different countries through its experienced and tested allies like Pakistan and Saudis like Afghan Mujahideen. In 2019, the US helped Afghan in joint combating against IS in Afghanistan’s eastern zone bordering with Pakistan. Over three thousand IS militants, mostly Pakistanis have been arrested during the crackdown but the Emirate Islami accredited itself for their release after returning into power on August 15th 2021 last.

The CAR militants like Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Ittehad Islami Jihad (Youghour), militants associated with East Turkistan Islamic Movement and others having a major space in IS. All these groups remained in good terms. Like Pakistani militants associated with both Pakistani and Afghan Taliban, a large number of CAR militants already slipped to IS. There are also reports of Afghan Taliban and Mujahideen’s joining of IS. Some of these Afghan Taliban disheartened when they were neglected in appointment against choice political, civil and military offices. Whereas someone fell victims of perks and power.

Russia doubts IS did Moscow attack

It comes as another uncertainty when Russia on Monday apparently doubt on assertions by the US that the Islamic State (ISIS) extremist group was responsible for the attack on a concert hall that killed 137 people and wounded 182 more.

The Friday night attack marked as the deadliest inside Russia in the two decades as four IS militants stormed into the Crocus City Hall and immediately want on rampage and brought everyone under fire.

IS-K claimed responsibility for the attack, but Russian officials yet to conform it was the work of Daesh rather they said that these four terrorist were arrested while trying to escape to Ukraine. President Vladimir Putin has not publicly mentioned IS-K in connection with the attackers, who said that some people on “the Ukrainian side” had been prepared to spirit the gunmen across the border.

However, Ukraine had denied any role in the attack, but Russia’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova said the US was spreading a version of the “bogeyman” of IS-K to cover its “wards” in Kyiv and reminded readers that Washington supported the “mujahideen” fighters who fought Soviet forces in the 1980s.

A man suspected of taking part in the attack of a concert hall that killed 137 people, sits in the defendant cage as he waits for his pre-trial detention hearing at the Basmanny District Court.

Afghanistan claims of stern action against IS  

Though apparently, the Emirate Islami Afghanistan is making claims of stern action against the IS militants but it seems hard as  it (Emirate) didn’t wants to harm all those who either played a role either in Afghan war against former USSR or War on terror, declared by US against al-Qaeda lead militants after 9/11. Taliban regime time and again making claims of strengthening its intelligence network again IS but all these foreign groups and individuals have already established better understanding with Afghan Taliban, majority of whom are now in occupation of important offices.

Despite its fueling politico-economic and security issues, Pakistan is still in a bid to get superiority in the region. US and China’s are compelled to have relations with Pakistan. Economically and politically, Pakistan seems in loss in race against India. India is considered biggest consumer market in Asia; therefore, China didn’t afford Pakistan-China hostilities. The new government of Shehbaz Sharif is making its best to have cordial relations between New Delhi and Islamabad but Pakistan’s powerful military establishment is thinking on other lines. Russian Federation President Putin has declared Emergency and War like situation, by saying that NATO troops are in Ukraine. In such a circumstance it could be hard for Pakistan to stay away from another round of Soviet-US tussles. There are apprehensions that like of so-called cold war, Afghanistan, especially Pushtoons dominated areas on both sides of Pak-Afghan border would again be front line in the new battle, commencing through IS.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey