MIDDLE EAST
After 12 years, is another protest Tahrir possible in Egypt?
Published
on
Hosni Mubarak’s 30-year rule in Egypt came to an end with the popular movement that finalized on January 25th 2011. After the initial wave of protests, which lasted for 18 days, Mubarak was compelled to resign on February 11th.
In 2013, a new round of actions and military intervention brought an end to Mohammed Morsi’s administration, which had been elected to power after Hosni Mubarak. The leader of the military coup during the polls in May 2014, Defense Minister Abdel Fattah Al Sisi, won the presidency with 90 percent of the vote while just 45 percent of eligible voters cast ballots.
The “crazy projects” of the Sisi administration, such the construction of a new headquarters in the Egyptian capital Cairo, had a major impact on the nation’s economy in the past ten years, when the Egyptian army was swiftly modernized and significant resources were allocated to this sector.
The Russian-Ukrainian war, the pandemic, and other health concerns caught the Egyptian economy off unprepared. The foreign capital that Russian and Ukrainian tourists had brought to Egypt was lost. Foreign investors withdrew about $25 billion in fresh capital from the Egyptian market in less than a year. Egypt’s currency, the lira, dropped by 50% from the previous year as it quickly lost value against the US dollar.
Due to the rapid currency increase, import prices increased. Accessing basic consumer goods has been more difficult for the underprivileged. Meat and eggs are now often regarded as high-end goods. The middle class’s standard of living has declined.
In Egypt, a nation of 104 million people where 70% of the populace receives bread subsidies, the grain crisis has also turned into a serious national security concern.
Egypt called the IMF for the fourth time in the previous six years due to these challenging circumstances. The Sisi administration, which took $3 billion, was forced to agree to the IMF’s stringent requirements.
The IMF’s requirements include privatization, a cessation of currency manipulation, and limitations on the military’s influence over the economy. The swift fall of the lira was the first sign that letting exchange rates float
What kind of future has in wait for Egypt, the center of the Arab world, where skyscrapers are rising on one side but poverty is spreading on the other?
Will the deteriorating economic situation lead to a new Tahrir uprising?
How eager are Egyptians to demand their rights in the squares in light of the bitter experience of the last 10 years, when social upheavals quickly turned into civil wars?
It appears that the huge winds of revolution have temporarily turned to a disappointment. However, it is absolutely impossible to lose belief in the Nile River’s never-ending flow.
12 years had passed since December 25th 2011, when tens of thousands of people started to swarm the Tahrir Square,. We questioned Dalia Ziada, the director of the Center for Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East Studies, on the state of Egypt’s economy and the broken ties between Egypt and Turkey.
- “Things are difficult, but we are in control of it and we will be able to overcome it,” said President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi in Military Academy. As I understand President Sisi is trying to give message to Egyptian to be relax and calm So, what kind of economic challenges Egypt is currently facing. During the past few months, the dollar has been in rise. What is the current pressing economic issue, and what steps will Cairo take to overcome it?
It is a very good question to start the conversation with, because this is what is preoccupying the minds of everyone right now either in Egypt or worldwide but specifically in Egypt. Because this time, unlike before, the crisis is too complicated in many ways because it is in a sense a combined crisis. It is not new, it is not made by the Covid or by the Russia-Ukraine War but these recent global events have enhanced the crisis that has been in place since the 1960s or even 1950s in Egypt.
I call it the chronic crisis of the Egyptian economy. So, right now we are facing this challenge, which we are at a crossroads. Perhaps the economic plan or macroeconomic policy at that time did not start on the right foot. They first started as a communist republic and started to apply socialist policies. And then years later they said let’s have try on liberal market policies. And then all this has changed and we ended up with a very distorted macroeconomic system that we had to deal with throughout the 1990s and 2000s. In addition, of course to a long heritage of administrative and financial corruption. All this led to the image of the distorted economy or macroeconomic systems that we are having in Egypt today. So, the two crises that came each other, the Covid- and then the Russian Ukraine War, have brought Egypt at a crossroads. So now you have either to deal with this chronic crisis and solve it for good and start a whole new macroeconomic system or you just turn a blind eye to what’s going on and keep going on like this. And sooner or later this will lead to the collapse of the macroeconomic system and the entire political stability that we have been trying to keep for a while.
In the past week we have seen several statements by the senior state officials starting from the President, the Prime Minister, assuring the public that everything is fine while trying to keep it under control but unfortunately this is not translated on the ground. When you tell this to me as a citizen, I get happy and excited, but when I go out to the street to buy food or do any other activity that I used to do as a middle-class person, it has simply become too difficult. For example, in Türkiye and in many other countries when there is a such case of inflation, they are always accompanied by raises in salaries and the minimum wage, we do not have this here in Egypt because the country is already in deep debt and they cannot even afford an increase in salaries. On the contrary they are talking about removing subsidies on essential household commodities goods like the bread, cooking oil and energy which also will end up in more inflation. There is zero control over the market.
- What is the army’s role in economy? It is being criticized by the West.
This military-owned enterprises issue is somehow complicated for someone who does not understand how things are working in Egypt. The military is I would call, the backbone of the Egyptian State both politically and economically. In other words, the civilian government here in Egypt can’t do without the military being involved, as a safety net or as an insurance I would say in both politics and economy. Of course, like from a democratic point of view this is completely wrong and it should change one day if we really want Egypt to become a democratic country. But are we ready for this now? Unfortunately, no. The economic reform that the IMF is currently requesting, are very tough on the Egyptian market and for the merchants and the manufacturers, as much as they are on the Egyptian people itself. And the only entity in the country that have an autonomous economic system of its own and that is not affected by what is happening in the market is the military. And they have enterprises that can fill the gap between what the civilian government can offer and what the people need. Because this gap is believe me, really big. Only entity in Egypt right now that can fill in this gap, is the military. So, in the long run, yes the military should get completely out of the market and allow private investors to do their work and for the market to be liberated because this is essential if we really want to develop the Egyptian economy and the Egyptian political life in general. But right now, it would be a very tough decision with all the mess that we are having in especially in the economic arena.
- If I remember it correctly Egypt took IMF loan four times … Well, didn’t IMF’s credit programs work in Egypt?
Since the 1960s we have been receiving loans from the IMF. It is not only the recent ones but in these ones are very different. I would speak specifically and make a very quick comparison between the current loan that is three billion dollars over 48 months. And the previous loans which comprised of about twenty billion dollars, came in three parts like first twelve billion dollars, and then two emergency loans of the IMF that are I think something around five and two billion dollars, totaling in twenty billion dollars in these past six years. And why is these six years in particular being important because they are the years when we have this new regime in Egypt of President Al-Sisi. Before that it was a different state and a completely different scenario in politics and macroeconomics. The first loan which was given to us in 2016, was based on some policies that I think worked very much in the favor of the Egyptian people. That is not only serving to rescue the state from collapse. But they included some policies, which I think is because of Christine Lagarde’s activist spirit, which was towards development and socio-economic wellbeing, all tied together. So, this loan helped Egypt to improve its infrastructure in a very positive way, and provided a good support to the poor and social development in general in Egypt. For example, these programs were made for the Haya Karima, which means “Dignified Life”, for the people who cannot afford a living and also for urban redevelopment for the people who are living in slums.
So, all these definitely had a good effect in improving the standard of living in Egypt, and also for attracting foreign investors until the start of the Russia-Ukraine War. Although it is happening in a very distant geography it affected us dramatically, because Egypt relays on Russia, Ukraine and Belarus in two basic sectors, the food sector and the tourism sector. So, the shockwave of the Russia Ukraine war on Egypt was much bigger than it was on any other country I assume, so we ended up having falling again into this loop of crises. So now we are asking for a new loan, but this new loan is very strict in applying the policies that seek structural reform including of course the military withdrawal from the market and slowing down the national projects which was made by the former loans, which may actually risk the gains that we have got from the 2016 loan. This is what is making the most Egyptians pessimistic I would say, about the new loan.
- Economic issues may be caused by the Coronavirus era or the conflict in Eastern Europe, and the devastation it caused on a worldwide scale is evident. Particularly in Europe, one might observe several protests against the government in France or England. I’m not sure how these public protests will affect or will change politics in Europe, but I wonder if social movements could start in the Middle East again, especially in Egypt after the so called Arab Spring. Is there any possibility in Cairo or the other capitals in the Middle East?
Why people came out against Mubarak at that time, was partly due to similar policies like privatization, selling state-owned assets to foreign investors etc. So, of course this question came to the minds of many observers and analysts that the Egyptians will go out against Al-Sisi to protest his policies and actually I am talking to from Cairo right now. and from what I am seeing is that people throughout the past 10 years, is that we have gone through a lot including political transitions, the lack of security and stability at certain times, and now with the economic crisis, I think the people are very much in a case of fatigue that may not be able take such an action. They are also having a general mindset in the street is that “Yes we know we are suffering, and it is not good” and many people completely disagree with the policies of the government, especially in the economic part of the equation. But they are making this compromise “if we go to the street now and make a protest this will lead to chaos again and the chaos will lead to more economic trouble and more economic complications and will take another 10 years to get over these complications”. So, they are waiting to see what the government can really do with this crisis. I do not think they may come out anytime soon. If we also look in the past protesters that happened over the past 10 years since the Arab Spring up till now it is not the poor. It is always the middle class. It is the middle class, the educated the employees, the bureaucrats that are the ones who come out to the streets and make real protests that make real changes.
- I would like to ask to you the current feelings of the middle class? After 10 years what is their mood?
Now the middle class is very depressed in many ways. One of them of course is economic as we are speaking about the economic part here. But also, another part is political because we had these high hopes about a more democratic country, more freedoms, more human rights or better performance by the government on human rights. Unfortunately, today we are still struggling with the same issues we have been struggling with 10 years ago, regarding freedom of speech, human rights democratization. And even when changes happen and things open up a little bit, they get closed again by economic crises or security issues like fighting against terrorism etc. So, the depression is coming from the fact that we fear that these dreams will be forgotten, in the process of doing economic reform, or facing security challenges. But hopefully people will keep pressing in a positive way not in a destructive way to make this happen in the future. But this all sticks us again to the point that you can advocate for you know democracy human rights in a country that is stable with a good economy. But usually when these things are not well, the security is not good enough and economy is not good enough. As human rights activists or civil rights activists we do not get the popular support needed to help our work. So, this is basically the main challenge here.
- There is rapprochement process between the Arab nations between Türkiye and Arab World and also we can add Iran to this list. So, how do you evaluate this process? What king obstacles we have between Ankara and Cairo?
Great question actually. Let me start by saying that I am very happy with the new foreign policies of president Erdogan of Türkiye has been adopting in the past two years, which is mainly about approaching Arab countries of all over the Arab geography, and also communicating on a basis of fixing ties regardless of the ideological differences, either on the Mediterranean or in the Middle East and Türkiye, since I consider Türkiye a part of the Middle East of course. The good thing here is that most of the Arabs do not look at Türkiye in the same negative light that they look at Iran for example. For most Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia, which is the biggest Gulf country and one of the main leaders in the region right, now Iran is still seen as an enemy. But while it is not that much in countries in North Africa, but Türkiye for everyone has always been a friend. Of course before past seven or eight years of diplomatic and media rivalries, but before that Türkiye has always been integral to this region and a very important partner and an important regional player in the region. For Egypt and Türkiye in particular, the relationship is even more critical than any other country. That is not only because of the geographic proximity between the two countries, which allows lots of opportunities for economic cooperation between the two countries given the fact that Egypt is literally at the gates of Africa, and Türkiye is literally at the gates of Europe, but we can do a lot of things together. Again unfortunately because of political differences in the past eight or nine years, all this potential was hindered for no good reason. We could have been able to communicate and cooperate for so long. But also there is this religious and historical factors. There is a lot of cultural similarities between Türkiye and Egypt. Of course, this applies to most of the countries in North Africa are heavily influenced by the Turkish culture. And this is making or creating a space for understanding that you would not see in other countries. So despite of course the political tensions that happened in the last decade or so between the two governments, still the people have a lot in very much in communication and in understanding with each other for example between Türkiye and its neighbors in in Syria or Iraq etc. Although they are closer like right on your border but if you look at the North Africa side, the understanding and communication was much better. After the historic handshake between the two Presidents Al-Sisi and Erdogan, actually hopes were very high here in Egypt as well that maybe finally we have come to the point of proper communication and things show are moving in the right direction. But sadly, none of this is happening. It has been two months now and there is no follow-up from the intelligence bureaus in both countries or even a follow-up by the Foreign Ministries in both countries. Things are still same.
- The process has frozen. What is the expectations of Cairo from Ankara?
I think the main reason why these talks are frozen, is because there are three main files that are still open and it is somehow very difficult for both countries to come to a compromise. Number one is Libya of course. Libya is the country that shares the longest border with Egypt. For Egypt, here the state considers Libya national strategic depth. So any actions that happens there directly affects us. Now I can see more tolerance to the fact that Türkiye have its troops in Libya, and is trying to make agreements with Libya. There is some kind of more tolerance here than it was in 2020 when there was these clashes and Egypt was very angry for the presence of the Turkish troops are there. But now there is this greater tolerance because the state of Egypt started to understand that Türkiye is not a threat to our national security, which I think is very important point that Türkiye was able to communicate clearly to the Egyptian officials here.
On the other hand, Türkiye and Egypt still support two different sides in the Libyan conflict. And Egypt cannot afford not to support the Eastern factions, because they are controlling Egypt’s Western border and they are preventing the smuggling of weapons into Egyptian Western desert, or preventing terrorism from leaking into Egypt. So, they cannot afford actually losing them at the same time Türkiye is believing that Tripoli is the legitimate government and they continue to support it because it is recognized by the UN, and also Türkiye has geo-economic or geopolitical interests over the Tripoli based government, so it makes sense for them to support it. With all these complications I think like to get to a compromise on the Libya issue, needs lots of talks between two sides.
“Egypt involved in Türkiye – Greece conflict”
Another critical issue of course is the Eastern Mediterranean. As we have seen in the past three years Egypt in particular got heavily involved in the conflict between Greece and Türkiye. Since the time of Mubarak we were always avoiding in intervening in this conflict. Even in 2005 when Greece started to ask Egypt to sign agreements or delimitation, Egypt has always used to say “No go first solve your problem with Türkiye, and then come back to us and then we can talk”. This is out of respect to Türkiye’s borders or out of respect to Türkiye’s rights in the Mediterranean. But unfortunately amidst the political tensions that happened in the past seven or eight years, has made it easier for Greece to request to make such requests to Cairo, and made it even more possible for Cairo to respond positively to these requests and we ended up having this agreement with Greece and the Greek Cyprus in in 2020, followed by the formation of the Eastern Mediterranean gas Forum which is sadly has excluded Türkiye or I would say unfairly has excluded Türkiye although it is the country with the longest shoreline in the Mediterranean. Despite the agreements that Egypt has signed with the Greek Cyprus and Greece, Egypt has always been careful not to trespass the area that Türkiye refers to has its Maritime Zone which is also a positive indication. So I think although Egypt is having this agreement towards Greece now and Greek Cyprus and other players or other actors in the Mediterranean, this should not prevent Egypt from having a similar agreement with Türkiye. For sure either on delimitation or we call it Maritime agreement, or whatever we call it but we should have some kind of an agreement on what is happening in the Mediterranean with Türkiye. And again this needs a lot of communication and lots of negotiations. The third and final issue which is not as big as the first two in my opinion, is the Muslim Brotherhood issue. Egypt insists all the members of the Muslim Brotherhood, whether they are the people who are in the armed movement and or the peaceful members of the Muslim Brotherhood who did not practice any acts of violence be sent back to Egypt to be punished. At the same time Türkiye sees it in a humanitarian perspective and does not see a good reason to send back the people who were only practicing political opposition against Egypt and not really has not been involved in acts of violence. Two states needs to come to an agreement on this too but I think this this particular part is much more marginal than the two first two big issues of the Eastern Mediterranean and Libya.
You may like
-
Gaza ceasefire talks postponed until after U.S. elections
-
Netanyahu dampens prospects for ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon
-
Doha talks on Gaza ceasefire produced no result
-
Israeli parliament votes for ban on UNRWA activities
-
Iran: Left hand continues to embrace the Arabs, right hand clashes with Israel
-
We asked experts about BRICS – 2: Can Türkiye join BRICS?
With Donald Trump’s victory in the recent U.S. elections, the Israeli government appears to be formalizing a genocidal policy toward Gaza, a plan it had previously avoided official acknowledgment of due to concerns over potential sanctions from the Biden administration. However, with Trump’s return to office, the Benjamin Netanyahu administration seems emboldened to pursue this course, which it has been implementing de facto.
The Netanyahu government has allegedly begun enacting the “Generals’ Plan,” a strategy aimed at dividing northern Gaza into two zones, establishing a military blockade in one part, and labeling civilians who refuse to leave as “Hamas militants,” effectively legitimizing their targeting.
According to a report on Israeli state television KAN, a senior military official disclosed that a new corridor will be created in northern Gaza, cutting Gaza City off from Beit Lahiya and Jibaliya.
Humanitarian aid will be prohibited from entering these isolated zones, and displaced Palestinians will not be permitted to return to these areas “for the time being.”
On October 6, the Israeli army escalated ground attacks on Jibaliya and Beit Lahiya, continuing its restrictions on aid access and forcibly displacing residents. More than 1,800 Palestinians have reportedly lost their lives, and thousands have been displaced since these renewed military actions.
These measures align with the objectives of the Generals’ Plan, which aims to expel Palestinians from northern Gaza, enforce a siege, and deny basic necessities—food, fuel, and clean water—to residents who remain. The Israeli government, mindful of potential backlash from the Biden administration and the prospect of an arms embargo, has previously denied implementing this plan. However, buoyed by Trump’s election, Netanyahu’s administration may feel empowered to pursue this agenda more openly.
Giora Eiland, the plan’s architect, shared further details of this policy with the Associated Press (AP). According to Eiland, Palestinians would be given one week to vacate northern Gaza, including Gaza City. Following this period, the area would be declared a closed military zone, where access to essential resources—food, water, medicine, and fuel—would be completely blocked. Those who remain in the zone would be designated as “militants”, thus facing life-threatening consequences.
At last former President Donald Trump succeeded in materializing his dreams of re-entering into White House by defeating his staunch rival Democratic Party’s Kamala Harris in 47th Presidential polls. Trump has won the polls with a landslide victory of 278 “electoral college” votes compared to 238 of Harris. Trump’s return to assume the most powerful and prestigious, but globally important office, on January 20th, 2025, with a stock of challenges and hopes of billions who want to live with peace and tranquility throughout the world.
Though Trump during his election campaign has time and again assured American’s of focusing on internal issues, especially making secure the US geographical borders and addressing economic issues but he has to address and help in settling important global issues like fighting in Palestine, Ukraine and issues related to Afghanistan, in particular, people from Pakistan and Afghanistan who are ahead with serious issues of terrorism and extremism from last four and half a decades.
Compared with outgoing President Joe Biden, Donald Trump having a soft corner for Russian President Mr. Putin. The Ukraine war is now going to complete its second year, and it has badly affected US led ally’s economic situation and its relations with Russia and several other countries.
Trump has time and again not only made reservations over the Ukraine war, but he also named Mr. Putin as his friend. Now there are strong hopes of ending the war in Ukraine whenever Trump gets reoccupation of a powerful chair in White House.
Almost all global community are against continuous of Israel war in Gaza
Similarly, almost all members of the global community are unhappy with continuous Israeli aggression against Palestinians. No one can disagree with the fact that hardliners from Hammas and Hizballah are responsible for commenting on the war in Palestine and provoking the Jewish to target the innocent Palestinians, but now the world is unhappy with Israeli brutalities against innocent and helpless Palestinians.
It is also a fact that whoever is occupant of White House in the United States is definitely supporting and helping Israel. On such grounds, continuous violence against Palestinians is also damaging the reputation of the Americans. On such grounds, Trump is expected to play a role. Trump has already declared no to wars in his election campaign.
Trump opened the door of talks with Taliban to end war in Afghanistan
No one can ignore the fact that it was Trump who in his previous period instructed his aide Zalmay Khalilzad for ending the conflict in Afghanistan. For those purposes Khalilzad had not only made shuttles visits to Pakistan, Afghanistan and several other countries of the region, but he had got the credentials for signing of Doha accord on February 29th, 2020. People from war devastated Afghanistan have attached great hopes with this internationally recognized agreement but unfortunately its outcomes remain the same as of Geneva 2010 accord, when line of Pakistan patronized Mujahideen have refused to let the UN peace maker Benon Seven to transfer power from Dr. Najibullah to broad based representative government in Kabul. Now despite making commitments and signing the historic documents in Doha, the Taliban leaders are reluctant to go for an inclusive government and honor the human and women rights.
At the moment, Afghanistan looks like a big prison where the inmates are living with peace, but they live like hostages. They are deprived of their basic human rights. Even the lives of people both men and women, are at mercy of the Taliban. Besides banning women education, these Taliban rulers are making changes from time to time in curricula and giving more preferences to Islamic education rather than general science and ordinary education. The schools are closed and converted into seminaries.
Terrorism and extremism trends in the region. Pakistan’s security on the verge of collapse
Beside Afghanistan, the situation in Pakistan is also deteriorating day by day. Instead of strengthening State organs, an anarchy like situation is developing where the gun toting militants are including the Socio-economic, administrative and all other sectors. Divisions and distances in state organs are affecting the democratic organs. The legacy of US sponsored and introduced Jihad against the former USSR now leads to strengthening of terrorism and extremism trends in the region. Al Qaeda and its affiliated militant groups are now sheltering in places under the control of the IS also known as the Daesh terrorist group. The IS has established its hideouts throughout the country especially in the regions bordering with Iran and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Frequent deadly attacks against Chinese nationals in Pakistan are also becoming a question mark on US policies.
Compared to the past, the present situation is different as now the US has established its presence and influence throughout the world. On such grounds, the newly elected US president Donald Trump had to play the role in settling almost all of these issues if he was really interested in improving the image of Americans throughout the world.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dismissed Defense Minister Yoav Gallant after a prolonged period of disagreements between them. In Gallant’s place, Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz has been appointed as the new defense minister, while Gideon Saar, previously a political rival to Netanyahu and now an ally, will fill Katz’s former post.
In a statement issued by the Prime Minister’s Office, Netanyahu remarked, “The trust between us (Gallant and me) has been shaken. I have attempted multiple times to bridge the gap, but it has only widened.”
In a video message following his decision, Netanyahu elaborated that initial “trust” between him and Gallant during the early stages of the Gaza conflict had deteriorated in recent months. Netanyahu argued that Gallant’s decisions and public statements were increasingly at odds with cabinet directives and even accused him of “indirectly aiding Israel’s enemies.”
Following this, Gallant formally submitted his resignation.
This is not the first time Netanyahu has sought Gallant’s removal. In March 2023, Netanyahu attempted to dismiss Gallant after he publicly criticized the judicial reform initiative. That attempt was aborted due to widespread protests.
Far-right support
Netanyahu’s decision has received backing from far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, while former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett condemned Netanyahu’s government as “a crazy and sick government working against the state and its soldiers.” Opposition parties have also called for protests against Gallant’s dismissal.
In response, thousands of Israelis gathered in Tel Aviv, West Jerusalem, and Haifa, demanding Netanyahu’s resignation.
‘We will regret it for years to come’
Protests centered on Tiger Street in Tel Aviv, a symbol of the public’s opposition to the Netanyahu government’s judicial overhaul. One demonstrator, Iftak Brill, criticized Netanyahu’s motives, stating, “The prime minister fired Gallant to prolong the war and push forward with destructive policies.” Brill expressed deep concern over the impact of these policies, including Netanyahu’s alleged rejection of a prisoner swap deal advocated by U.S. President Joe Biden and others.
Another protester, Shahul Navon, a former Israeli army soldier, criticized Netanyahu’s leadership, stating, “Netanyahu has given a great gift to our enemies by appointing Gallant.” Navon noted that the demonstrators were united against what he described as a descent into authoritarianism under Netanyahu’s rule.
Trump’s footsteps in the Israeli genocide
Trump’s 75-day transition team
A ‘holy alliance’ in the Bundestag: Anti-semitism law unites AfD and Greens
Australia panics over Trump
Trump promises peace: Will see his action in 2025
MOST READ
-
ASIA1 week ago
China loses a third of its billionaires as economy stagnates
-
AMERICA2 days ago
The ‘third candidate’ in the U.S. elections: Jill Stein
-
DIPLOMACY2 weeks ago
Brazil does not support Venezuela’s entry to the BRICS
-
OPINION1 week ago
Democrats panic in the home stretch… Is Trump really ahead?
-
INTERVIEW2 weeks ago
We asked experts about BRICS – 1: Can the independent BRICS payment system succeed?
-
EUROPE2 weeks ago
Nationwide strikes rock Greece: Ferry and public sector workers demand change
-
AMERICA6 days ago
American billionaires’ presidential preferences
-
OPINION1 week ago
Is BRICS a Global South version of the G7?