Connect with us

ASIA

Attacks on Russians, Pakistanis and Chinese are beginning of a new pattern

Published

on

Over one year after the Taliban’s ascent to power in Afghanistan, the security situation has somehow been getting inferior and more attacks against foreign missions have occurred. The economic situation is dire too and there is continuing migration and internal displacement as well.

Since seizing power on August 15 2021, the Taliban have repeatedly claimed they have achieved full territorial control, established security and removed “islands of illegitimate power”.

However, while physical security has improved by some measures but a significant rise in attacks by the Islamic State (IS) also known as Daesh group, targeting Shia and other minorities is one of many reminders that Afghanistan is far from secure.  IS also carried suicide attacks mimicking Taliban tactics to target high-profile Taliban members and supporters.

Taliban had once said that they will eliminate Daesh within a month and assured of a strong war against the group. But the situation is quite different at the moment. The Daesh, besides Afghan targets, also carried out deadly attacks against Russians, Pakistanis and Chinese.

Vicious nature of the ongoing conflict

Indeed, Afghanistan is in a transition period, and new non-state actors are emerging. IS is a cover umbrella at the moment, and there is not enough understanding or evidence of the new actors, which is complicating the already vicious nature of the ongoing conflicts in the war-hit country. Undoubtedly, attacks on Russians, Pakistanis and Chinese are the beginning of a new pattern.

Just one day before the attack on a Chinese hotel in downtown Kabul, China’s Ambassador to Afghanistan Wang Yu met with Taliban’s Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Stanekzai and called for improved security at the embassy in Kabul. Stanekzai said at the meeting the security of foreign diplomatic missions in Afghanistan is their priority.

The meeting was necessary if we take note of the patterns of the recent attacks on Russian and Pakistan embassies. Two Russian embassy staff was among at least six people killed in a suicide bombing in 5th September. Many more were wounded. The attack is the first on a foreign mission in Afghanistan since the Taliban swept to power last year.

The second bombing was against the Pakistani embassy in December 3 that claimed by the Daesh group. The Taliban claimed they have arrested a member of the militant Islamic State group behind the shooting that left one security guard critically injured.

The target was Head of Mission Ubaidur Rehman Nizamani, who remained unhurt in the attack, and Pakistan strongly condemned the attack, but added the embassy would continue to function normally and there were no plans to withdraw diplomats from Kabul.

After these two attacks, China was worried, knowing that Daesh has a history of complicated untraceable attacks and China could be the next target.

China urged citizens to leave Afghanistan

China advised its citizens in Afghanistan to leave the country “as soon as possible,” following a coordinated attack again carried out by Daesh militants on a Chinese-owned hotel in the heart of Kabul.

The evacuation order is aimed at a great setback for Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers who seek foreign investments to improve its fragile economy. China is among few embassies that remained open and active in Afghanistan since Taliban takeover of the country more than a year ago.

Daesh, a key rival of the Taliban, posted pictures of its two fighters who carried out Monday’s attack on Longan Hotel, which left three assailants dead. Emergency hospital said they received 21 casualties, where three of them died upon arrival. Five Chinese citizens were among those wounded in the attack.

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin called the attack “egregious in nature” and said China was “deeply shocked.”

Wang called for a “thorough investigation” and urged the Taliban government “to take resolute and strong measures to ensure the safety of Chinese citizens, institutions and projects in Afghanistan.”

“In view of the current security situation in Afghanistan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs once again advised Chinese citizens and institutions in Afghanistan to evacuate from Afghanistan as soon as possible,” Wang said.

China’s interest in Afghanistan

The Taliban has to maintain security of the Chinese firms who have tentatively sought to pursue opportunities in exploiting Afghanistan’s vast, undeveloped resource deposits, especially the Mes Aynak mine that is believed to hold the world’s largest copper deposit.

In October, Taliban government spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid highlighted China as a key part of Afghanistan’s economic development. In return, China vowed to help improve Afghanistan’s economy and called on the United States to unfreeze Afghan assets held abroad and end sanctions on the Taliban government.

China also has economic and mining interests in Afghanistan. China apparently showed willingness to help Taliban in the most proper way in almost all areas, but Beijing wants Taliban commitments to prevent China’s Uyghur opponents from setting up operations in Afghanistan. However, before receiving any threat from the specific group, Daesh was the first to announce hostility with China. Though the Daesh attack did not cause much harm, it was significant as it marked the first major attack on Chinese interests in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. Taliban need to deal with the group as several hundreds have been killed in Daesh attacks since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan last year.

Afghanistan needs an anti-terror security belt

As we said that Afghanistan is in a transition period, and there are many non-state actors where the Taliban really don’t have enough knowledge about them, have made it difficult for the Taliban to follow the security dynamics in the context of changing the geopolitical environment of Asia on a daily basis. The Taliban are also so busy in other issues that they can’t just examine the threats, or cannot predict specific targets based on intelligence information. Afghanistan needs an anti-terror security belt to fight Daesh group.

Meanwhile, the US providing Taliban with $40 millions UN managed cash per months to counter terrorism. It is understandable that the US want to contain and control the Taliban; however, this could be backfiring sans a proper mechanism and analyzing of security threats.

 

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey