Connect with us

America

Dimon advises stocking bullets, not Bitcoin, amid economic and security concerns

Published

on

Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of the international investment bank JPMorgan Chase, offered striking assessments on a wide array of topics, from the US economy and national security to technological advancements and leadership, during an interview with Fox Business at the Reagan National Economy Forum last week.

Dimon specifically addressed the Senate bill concerning spending cuts and the continuation of tax rates, emphasizing the importance of stability to enable business investment and foster growth.

‘I am excited that they passed the bill’

Commenting on the Senate bill, which some senators criticized for insufficient spending cuts, Dimon stated, “First of all, I am excited that they passed the bill.”

Noting that House Speaker Mike Johnson did “an incredible job” on this matter, Dimon expressed that the Senate should also finalize the bill.

Dimon assessed, “Increasing stability, ensuring tax rates continue, and allowing small and large businesses to invest is genuinely important for growth. If we look back at the 2017 bill, it brought trillions of dollars back to the US and created numerous jobs and significant growth. Those examining these figures are not actually articulating what they represent. So, it will work.”

Dimon later suggested that instead of implementing cuts in areas such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, the focus should be on enhancing efficiency, adding, “I think it is better for them to conclude this matter as effectively as possible. The smaller the deficit, the better.”

When queried about his confidence in the extension of tax cuts, Dimon replied, “Not so much for JPMorgan. However, if you converse with small businesses uncertain whether their rate will be 28% or 40%, they require it. If you speak with numerous companies engaged in substantial R&D or significant equipment expenditure, they need certainty.”

He stressed that uncertainty must be dispelled promptly to prevent the postponement of investments.

‘Bond markets will face a challenging period’

Addressing concerns regarding debt and budget deficits, Dimon described this as a “major issue” and a “genuine problem.”

Dimon cautioned, “One day, bond markets will face a challenging period. I do not know if it will be in six months or six years. Therefore, I believe we need to concentrate on this.”

Asserting that the primary focus should be on growth, pro-business policies, appropriate regulations, permit reforms, and the reduction of bureaucracy, Dimon said, “Achieve this growth. That is the optimal path. Then, reform certain programs that everyone acknowledges can be appropriately reformed.”

When asked to clarify his statement about a potential “break” in the bond market, Dimon explained, “What the public needs to comprehend is that approximately $30 trillion worth of securities are traded daily. These are investors from across the globe. Foreigners hold $35 trillion in American securities. They possess roughly another $30 trillion in private investments in the US. People vote with their feet and will scrutinize the country, the rule of law, inflation rates, central bank policies, what they wish to hedge against, and what they do not.”

Dimon stated that these rates are not dictated by central banks but can be influenced, “If people decide that the American dollar is not where it ought to be, yes, you could see spreads widen, credit spreads widen. And that develops into a problem.”

Recalling that this scenario occurred previously during the COVID period, in 2019 and 2020, Dimon remarked, “It will happen again, I can almost guarantee you. I just do not know precisely when or what the trigger will be.”

Dimon noted that such volatility would adversely affect small businesses raising capital and credit markets, rather than large banks.

Growth expectation for the second half of the year

When asked about growth expectations for the latter half of the year, Dimon indicated that his own economists project a figure around 1.5%, but he himself is uncertain.

Stating he did not concur with Kevin Hassett’s 4% growth forecast, Dimon commented, “I hope he is correct. I simply do not know.”

Also touching upon JPMorgan’s own growth figures, Dimon explained that the company’s success stems from 15 years of continuous investments, new branches, new bankers, and dedicated customer service.

Dimon said, “Profits fluctuate for many different reasons, but we enjoy undertaking this, and we are quite confident that we can expand our company.”

Expressing that they encounter significant competition, including from fintech companies and foreign banks, Dimon observed, “I always examine those who outperform us and the reasons for their success; I do not merely focus on our own performance.”

‘Stablecoins, data, and real-time payments have a future’

Responding to a question about the impact of stablecoin legislation on banks, Dimon replied, “Firstly, we have a JPMorgan Coin. If by crypto you mean stablecoins, moving data, real-time payments, and combining data and payments, these elements are real. We will be at the forefront of this.”

Stating that JPMorgan Coin can currently move money and data, and that they plan to open it to external use in the future, Dimon highlighted the importance of legal regulations such as anti-money laundering (AML), the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols.

Dimon said, “We already transfer $10 trillion daily, and that is digital. There will be very beneficial applications for blockchain.”

Noting that JPMorgan invests approximately $20 billion in technology, Dimon specified that this expenditure covers areas such as networks, large data centers, artificial intelligence policies (mentioning that billions have already been allocated to AI alone), and cybersecurity (billions of dollars to protect customers).

China observations and US internal problems

Sharing observations from his recent visit to China, Dimon acknowledged that cyberattacks are a significant issue but stated, “I am not afraid of them.”

Observing that China is forging its own path with substantial investments in areas like artificial intelligence, automobiles, and robotics, Dimon remarked, “They will possess 30% or 40% of new pharmaceuticals in a short period. They are proceeding in their own way. However, they also have vulnerabilities. They still contend with considerable poverty. They exist in a very challenging neighborhood. Many of their neighbors are rearming. They must contend with us. We remain the most prosperous economy on the planet.”

Emphasizing that his primary concern is not China, but the US’s “inability to resolve its own internal problems,” Dimon asserted, “If America manages its affairs correctly—deregulation, permits, education, pro-business policies, economic expansion, aiding low-income individuals through economic growth, rectifying immigration—we will be in an excellent position. In 30 or 40 years, we will be the preeminent military and economic power. If not, the world will be a vastly different place from what we experience today.”

‘We should stock bullets, tanks, and missiles, not Bitcoin’

Also addressing national security policies, Dimon stated that the world relies on the US military umbrella, and this is significant.

“It becomes a problem if countries begin to look elsewhere for their national security. This is directly linked to their economic security,” Dimon said, underscoring the importance of issues such as investment, development finance, and the education of American values, in addition to trade.

When asked what should be stocked, referencing a prior statement, Dimon replied, “I said we should stock bullets, tanks, and missiles, not Bitcoin.”

Stressing that the most crucial element for national security is resilient supply chains, Dimon declared, “From medical supplies to everything that goes into our F-35s, rare earth elements, and related items. Things like two-nanometer AI chips. Yes, we assert this is important for American national security. We require resilient supply chains.”

He added that the military needs greater flexibility and multi-year budgeting.

‘Markets are complacent’

To a final question regarding the current state of the markets, Dimon responded, “Complacent. Prices are high; things appear to be progressing smoothly. Prices somewhat indicate a soft landing. I hope that is accurate. I am merely informing people that the probability of this occurring is lower than others perceive, and it will be a surprise. Numerous factors are in motion, from deficits to geopolitics and trade. It is complex, and things can go awry. And when things go awry, it is usually a surprise.”

He further noted that his role is not to predict the future but to be prepared to serve customers regardless of what the future may hold.

America

Musk appointed co-director of Pentagon future warfare initiative

Published

on

The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has assumed the co-directorship of a Pentagon initiative focused on the future of warfare, known as “Project Meridian”.

Musk’s new role was announced by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.

Musk, who has long expressed his conviction that wars will ultimately be fought with autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles, will advise the project as co-director alongside Palmer Luckey, founder of defence start-up Anduril, and former Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich.

In a memorandum issued at the Pentagon, Hegseth stated that the group would “examine the battlefields of the future” and “determine which weapons and technologies warfighters must employ to achieve dominance in these environments.”

During his “State of the Force” address at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Hegseth said:

“The best predictors of future conflict do not reside exclusively within the Pentagon. Obvious biases and risks arise when we task ourselves with both framing the questions and answering them.”

Hegseth stated that this initiative would commence immediately and that, following his address, he would convene with Musk, Luckey, and Gingrich at a secure location.

Project Meridian will have 120 days to “ruthlessly map the trajectory of wars, domains, and technologies”, a process that will culminate in the public disclosure of its findings alongside a classified annex.

Hegseth outlined an expansive mandate extending “from beneath the surface of the Earth to beyond the Moon.”

Rather than formulating new military strategies or policies, the panel will seek to identify “the domains we must seize and the capabilities we must master”, focusing on the effort to “discover, develop, and field” the weapons and systems that next-generation American troops may require.

The group is expected to submit a report containing recommendations to him by the end of January.

In 2024, Musk remarked: “Future wars will be entirely about drones and hypersonic missiles.” This was merely one of several similar statements he has made in recent years.

For Musk, whose oversight role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) ended in turmoil and escalated into a dispute with President Donald Trump over Trump’s spending bill, this appointment marks his formal return to government in an official capacity.

Musk and Trump ultimately reconciled, and Musk attended a meeting on artificial intelligence safety at the White House this week alongside other technology leaders.

Meridian forms part of a broader push announced by Hegseth to restructure the military around autonomous warfare and rapidly advancing technologies.

Hegseth announced the establishment of the Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM), a new four-star combatant command endowed with what he termed “service-like authorities” to scale autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force.

The Department of War will also begin phasing in new occupational frameworks across all military branches to establish specialised career tracks for what Hegseth described as “the next generation of autonomous warfighters.”

“We should have conceived an Autonomous Warfare Command a decade ago,” Hegseth said, explaining that Meridian aims to gaze far enough ahead to enable the military to anticipate the next technological shift rather than lag behind.

Continue Reading

America

Pentagon breach exposes personal records of three million people

Published

on

A cyberattack targeting the US Department of War’s personnel database has resulted in the leak of personal information belonging to approximately 3 million people.

Speaking to ABC News, a Pentagon official stated that the system accessed by unauthorised individuals contained the records of 2,760,000 living persons and 294,000 deceased individuals.

The Military Times portal, which first broke the news, had reported the number of affected individuals as approximately 4 million based on two sources. The Pentagon official subsequently conveyed different figures to ABC News.

The leak encompasses Social Security numbers and duty information belonging to military personnel and civilian employees. According to an official notification examined by Military Times, the compromised records may also include names, dates of birth, contact information, sex, race, and military occupational specialties.

The unauthorised access to the information system of the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) lasted for approximately nine months, between October 2025 and 16 July 2026.

ABC News reported that the access in question was obtained by a small number of third-party users. The vulnerability was closed after it was identified.

The DMDC is considered one of the Pentagon’s primary personnel records centres. More than 60 million records belonging to active-duty personnel, reservists, civilian staff, contractors, retirees, veterans, and military family members are stored at the centre.

The Pentagon has not detected any evidence that the leaked data has been misused. Military Times reported that affected individuals were offered identity restoration and credit history monitoring services.

A similar data breach previously occurred on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) recruitment website, FBIJobs.gov. According to information obtained by ABC News from internal communications and sources, the FBI is considering the possibility that data belonging to its entire staff may have been stolen.

The New York Times (NYT) examined a portion of the stolen FBI records. Home addresses, telephone numbers, official email addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, hiring dates, and emergency contact details for relatives were identified within these documents.

The database also contained unit designations, duty roles, and information regarding the supervisors of personnel. Some records revealed assignments within counterintelligence and counternarcotics units, as well as departments examining threats originating from Russia, China, and Iran.

Ciaran Martin, the former head of the UK National Cyber Security Centre, noted that this type of breach could directly affect the FBI’s operational capabilities.

The hacker group known as ShinyHunters had announced that it had seized medical data and security clearance records alongside files belonging to tens of thousands of active and former FBI employees.

Experts evaluating the matter for the NYT warned that this information could be used to track agents, threaten their families, or compile dossiers by foreign intelligence services.

The ShinyHunters group initially threatened to release the data unless the bureau withdrew an advisory it had published concerning the group’s attack methods.

The group later asserted that it had never intended to leak the information and characterised its action as an advertising campaign.

In a report published in May, Reuters noted that the personal data of US military personnel had been used in surveillance and attack preparations.

According to the agency, Washington’s adversaries gained the ability to pinpoint areas where troops were concentrated by exploiting commercially available location data. US lawmakers at the time criticised the Pentagon for failing to adequately protect the personal data of military personnel.

Continue Reading

America

Canada diversifies oil and gas exports away from US

Published

on

US President Donald Trump’s trade policy and the Washington administration’s push to increase Venezuelan oil imports are prompting Canada to diversify its energy exports.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, recent developments are accelerating Canada’s development of new oil and natural gas projects.

Steps taken by the Ottawa administration, which aspires to become an energy superpower, are seen as potentially strengthening the country’s position in global markets.

In Canada, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer and fifth-largest natural gas producer, the energy sector accounts for approximately one-fifth of total exports.

Almost all of the country’s natural gas exports and approximately 90% of its oil exports go to the US.

The newspaper writes that the trade war with Washington and the atmosphere of confrontation entered into with Iran have heightened Canada’s desire to turn to alternative markets outside the US.

Officials plan to increase shipments of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European and Asian markets.

Accelerating infrastructure investments in line with this target, Canada is also shortening approval processes. The government is prioritising the construction of an oil pipeline extending specifically to the west coast.

According to the newspaper’s estimate, if major pipeline projects are implemented, Canada’s daily oil transport capacity could rise to 6.8 million barrels by 2034.

Routes heading to the west coast will make up approximately 30% of this capacity.

The Canadian administration is simultaneously advancing LNG export projects. According to the report, these investments could allow approximately 55% of Canadian natural gas exports to be directed to markets outside the US by the early or mid-2030s.

While the government expands tax incentives for the oil and natural gas sector, the province of Alberta also plans to overhaul its royalty system.

However, the newspaper notes that implementing the new projects requires heavy investment, and the process depends on the final decisions taken by producers as well as the completion of regulatory approval processes.

The expansion of pipeline and LNG infrastructure could gradually reduce Canada’s dependence on the US market while raising its share in the global energy market.

The Canadian Prime Minister’s demand to reduce reliance on the US market had also come to the fore in July.

According to Carney’s statement, the province of Alberta submitted a plan for a pipeline spanning more than 1,000 kilometres to the west coast of British Columbia.

Targeted for completion by September 2027, the line will reach the Pacific coast by following an existing corridor through the mountainous terrain.

This shift in energy comes at a time of strained relations with the US. Donald Trump said that if Canada obtains associate member status in the European Union, he could halt trade with Europe in certain sectors and impose high tariffs.

As reported by the Associated Press, Trump characterised such a rapprochement as a “potentially hostile act”.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had proposed opening the path for Canada to become the EU’s first associate member. The terms of this associate membership status, which is not defined in EU treaties, are not yet clear and require the approval of member states to enter into force.

Canada, which does not seek full membership, aims for maximum rapprochement with the EU.

Following Trump’s return to the White House, relations between Washington and Ottawa deteriorated. The Trump administration, which repeatedly called on Canada to become the “51st state” of the US, introduced additional tariffs.

In July, the US began imposing 50% tariffs on certain Canadian-origin goods.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey