Connect with us

Asia

Australia and UK to sign ‘historic’ 50-year submarine agreement

Published

on

Australia and the UK announced on Friday that they will sign a 50-year bilateral agreement to reinforce the existing AUKUS submarine deal with the US. This step was taken amid concerns that a potential Donald Trump administration might not remain committed to the agreement.

In a statement, the UK said, “The new 50-year AUKUS agreement will support the submarine programs of the UK and Australia, provide employment for tens of thousands of people in the UK and Australia, increase the industrial capacity of both countries, and deliver submarines that will ensure the security of the UK and our allies.”

In 2021, a multi-billion dollar trilateral agreement was signed under AUKUS, focusing on Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines. However, the future of the deal came into question after Elbridge Colby, former US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development, initiated a review in June that could jeopardize the 368 billion Australian dollar plan.

Details of the new bilateral agreement, to be signed on Saturday, emerged following talks between foreign and defense ministers in Sydney as part of the annual Australia-UK Ministerial (AUKMIN) consultations.

UK Shadow Secretary of State for Defence John Healey described the new deal as “historic” and a sign of the UK’s “AUKUS commitment for the next half-century.”

“This is an agreement to build the most powerful and advanced attack submarines our two navies have ever possessed,” Healey said at a joint press conference. “This agreement will outlive us politicians and will protect the security of our children and grandchildren,” he added.

Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Richard Marles also praised the agreement, stating, “This is the most significant agreement signed between our two countries since the federation.”

“The Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific are an indivisible whole”

Beyond the agreement, the consultations also covered strengthening economic resilience, fostering deeper cooperation on critical minerals, and enhancing cybersecurity capabilities.

Canberra and London also reaffirmed their full support for Ukraine.

Healey, making a veiled reference to North Korea and China, argued that the two countries “will stand by Ukraine for as long as it takes, because those who are helping Russia, providing drones, supplying technology, and sending soldiers to the front may be focused on Ukraine today, but they could turn their eyes to the Indo-Pacific tomorrow.”

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy stated, “The Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions are an indivisible whole.”

The visit by UK officials is being marked by the deployment of the UK Carrier Strike Group to Australia for the first time since 1997, as part of this year’s Talisman Sabre exercise. Talisman Sabre is a biennial military training exercise led by Australia and the US, this time involving an unprecedented 40,000 military personnel from 19 countries.

“The China threat”

This development comes at a time when both London and Canberra perceive China’s growing influence as a “threat.”

In its first in-depth review of relations with China, the British government alleged that Beijing poses “a full-spectrum threat,” including “espionage and cyber-attacks,” “dangerous and destabilizing activities in the South China Sea,” and “assaults on the rules-based order.”

In June, Lammy told the UK Parliament: “Together with our regional partners, we will continue to support freedom of navigation and condemn China’s violations. We will double down on our support for AUKUS.”

Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who led the country from 2018 to 2022 when bilateral relations with China were at their most tense, told a US congressional hearing on Wednesday that Beijing “continues to engage in intimidating behavior with its military against Australia when it suits its interests.”

Morrison suggested that AUKUS is an “example of resistance and resilience” against Chinese pressure.

US still reviewing

Under Pillar 1 of AUKUS, the first of eight nuclear-powered attack submarines will be built in the UK in the late 2020s and enter service in the early 2040s. The US will also sell three to five Virginia-class submarines to Australia starting in the early 2030s as an interim measure. A rotational deployment of US and UK submarines in Australia is also planned.

The US review process, which was extended in mid-July, aims to ensure that the sale of submarines to Australia does not weaken the US Navy’s own submarine capacity and that the program aligns with Trump’s “America First” agenda.

Both Canberra and London have sought to largely allay concerns about the Pentagon’s review. AUKUS Special Representative Stephen Lovegrove told the Australian Strategic Policy Institute think tank in July that it is “not only legitimate but probably advisable for new governments to come in and review these matters.”

The UK, under Keir Starmer’s leadership, also reviewed AUKUS after coming to power in 2024.

“They are very expensive,” Lovegrove said, referring to the submarines, adding: “They are very important, and they need to be sure that they are necessary for the national interest.”

However, Lovegrove stated unequivocally that “the US Navy is fully committed to Pillar 1 of AUKUS,” adding that it particularly supports the component that enables the rotational basing of its submarines, allowing it to project power into the Indian Ocean.

Canberra has also expressed confidence in the progress of the Pentagon’s review, making a second payment of 800 million dollars to the US following an initial payment of 800 million dollars in February.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defended the payment in an interview with national broadcaster ABC on Wednesday, saying, “This is not an extra payment. This is a payment in our plan.”

“We have an agreement with the United States, just as we do with the United Kingdom. This is about increasing their industrial capacity,” he added.

Asia

Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says

Published

on

The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.

According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.

The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.

The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.

The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.

The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.

According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.

Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House

The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.

In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.

In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.

According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.

Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.

Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.

Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.

Continue Reading

Asia

Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices

Published

on

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.

Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.

The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.

According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”

Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).

Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.

During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.

Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.

Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.

The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.

“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.

Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.

Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers

Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.

In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.

Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.

The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.

Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.

Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks

Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.

A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”

The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.

At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.

According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.

Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.

A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.

Continue Reading

Asia

South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants

Published

on

South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.

The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.

Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.

Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”

“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.

Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.

The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.

Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.

Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.

According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.

South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.

South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.

The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.

Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.

After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey