Connect with us

Asia

Australia and UK to sign ‘historic’ 50-year submarine agreement

Published

on

Australia and the UK announced on Friday that they will sign a 50-year bilateral agreement to reinforce the existing AUKUS submarine deal with the US. This step was taken amid concerns that a potential Donald Trump administration might not remain committed to the agreement.

In a statement, the UK said, “The new 50-year AUKUS agreement will support the submarine programs of the UK and Australia, provide employment for tens of thousands of people in the UK and Australia, increase the industrial capacity of both countries, and deliver submarines that will ensure the security of the UK and our allies.”

In 2021, a multi-billion dollar trilateral agreement was signed under AUKUS, focusing on Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines. However, the future of the deal came into question after Elbridge Colby, former US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development, initiated a review in June that could jeopardize the 368 billion Australian dollar plan.

Details of the new bilateral agreement, to be signed on Saturday, emerged following talks between foreign and defense ministers in Sydney as part of the annual Australia-UK Ministerial (AUKMIN) consultations.

UK Shadow Secretary of State for Defence John Healey described the new deal as “historic” and a sign of the UK’s “AUKUS commitment for the next half-century.”

“This is an agreement to build the most powerful and advanced attack submarines our two navies have ever possessed,” Healey said at a joint press conference. “This agreement will outlive us politicians and will protect the security of our children and grandchildren,” he added.

Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Richard Marles also praised the agreement, stating, “This is the most significant agreement signed between our two countries since the federation.”

“The Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific are an indivisible whole”

Beyond the agreement, the consultations also covered strengthening economic resilience, fostering deeper cooperation on critical minerals, and enhancing cybersecurity capabilities.

Canberra and London also reaffirmed their full support for Ukraine.

Healey, making a veiled reference to North Korea and China, argued that the two countries “will stand by Ukraine for as long as it takes, because those who are helping Russia, providing drones, supplying technology, and sending soldiers to the front may be focused on Ukraine today, but they could turn their eyes to the Indo-Pacific tomorrow.”

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy stated, “The Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions are an indivisible whole.”

The visit by UK officials is being marked by the deployment of the UK Carrier Strike Group to Australia for the first time since 1997, as part of this year’s Talisman Sabre exercise. Talisman Sabre is a biennial military training exercise led by Australia and the US, this time involving an unprecedented 40,000 military personnel from 19 countries.

“The China threat”

This development comes at a time when both London and Canberra perceive China’s growing influence as a “threat.”

In its first in-depth review of relations with China, the British government alleged that Beijing poses “a full-spectrum threat,” including “espionage and cyber-attacks,” “dangerous and destabilizing activities in the South China Sea,” and “assaults on the rules-based order.”

In June, Lammy told the UK Parliament: “Together with our regional partners, we will continue to support freedom of navigation and condemn China’s violations. We will double down on our support for AUKUS.”

Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who led the country from 2018 to 2022 when bilateral relations with China were at their most tense, told a US congressional hearing on Wednesday that Beijing “continues to engage in intimidating behavior with its military against Australia when it suits its interests.”

Morrison suggested that AUKUS is an “example of resistance and resilience” against Chinese pressure.

US still reviewing

Under Pillar 1 of AUKUS, the first of eight nuclear-powered attack submarines will be built in the UK in the late 2020s and enter service in the early 2040s. The US will also sell three to five Virginia-class submarines to Australia starting in the early 2030s as an interim measure. A rotational deployment of US and UK submarines in Australia is also planned.

The US review process, which was extended in mid-July, aims to ensure that the sale of submarines to Australia does not weaken the US Navy’s own submarine capacity and that the program aligns with Trump’s “America First” agenda.

Both Canberra and London have sought to largely allay concerns about the Pentagon’s review. AUKUS Special Representative Stephen Lovegrove told the Australian Strategic Policy Institute think tank in July that it is “not only legitimate but probably advisable for new governments to come in and review these matters.”

The UK, under Keir Starmer’s leadership, also reviewed AUKUS after coming to power in 2024.

“They are very expensive,” Lovegrove said, referring to the submarines, adding: “They are very important, and they need to be sure that they are necessary for the national interest.”

However, Lovegrove stated unequivocally that “the US Navy is fully committed to Pillar 1 of AUKUS,” adding that it particularly supports the component that enables the rotational basing of its submarines, allowing it to project power into the Indian Ocean.

Canberra has also expressed confidence in the progress of the Pentagon’s review, making a second payment of 800 million dollars to the US following an initial payment of 800 million dollars in February.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defended the payment in an interview with national broadcaster ABC on Wednesday, saying, “This is not an extra payment. This is a payment in our plan.”

“We have an agreement with the United States, just as we do with the United Kingdom. This is about increasing their industrial capacity,” he added.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey