Connect with us

Diplomacy

BRICS ministers champion multilateralism amid Trump trade war

Published

on

The foreign ministers of the expanded BRICS group of countries, initially formed by Brazil, Russia, India, and China, pledged to strengthen multilateralism and promote peace amid intensifying global conflicts and increasing economic turbulence stemming from US trade policies.

At the opening of the meeting held in Rio de Janeiro on Monday, Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira stated the bloc should serve as “a force for good” in an increasingly fragmented world.

“The path to peace is neither easy nor straight,” Vieira said. “BRICS must lead by example, reaffirming our belief in a multipolar world where security is everyone’s right, not a minority’s privilege,” he added.

Vieira emphasized the expanded role of the group, which has reached 11 full members with its recent expansion, representing approximately half of the world’s population and about 40% of global GDP.

“With its geographical and cultural diversity, BRICS is uniquely positioned to promote dialogue, development, and stability,” he remarked.

The summit took place at a time when trust in international institutions has decreased and armed conflicts have become widespread due to aggressive trade measures implemented under the leadership of US President Donald Trump.

BRICS ministers were negotiating a joint statement that criticized “unilateral measures” related to trade and reaffirmed the central role of multilateral negotiations, which the bloc of leading developing markets has long advocated.

Although China was reportedly pushing for stronger language in response to US tariffs on Chinese goods, which recently reached up to 145%, a source told the South China Morning Post that the final statement would criticize this move but “would not use confrontational language.”

Meanwhile, according to Reuters, Brazilian officials are expected to shelve plans for a single currency and focus on promoting trade in local currencies to reduce dependence on the US dollar.

Ahead of the summit, the Chinese Foreign Ministry described BRICS as a new “cooperation backbone” for the Global South.

On Wednesday in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated China would work with BRICS members to build a “more comprehensive” partnership, promote multilateralism, and support “justice and equality” in the global order.

Guo said, “The BRICS cooperation mechanism emerged during the collective rise of the Global South and meets the international community’s expectations to preserve world peace, promote common development, and improve global governance.”

At Monday’s meeting, Vieira condemned the violence in Gaza, calling Israel’s military operations “devastating” and demanding the full withdrawal of Israeli forces, the release of hostages, and the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid.

Regarding Ukraine, Brazil’s top diplomat called for “a diplomatic solution based on the principles of the UN Charter.”

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov met during the summit, pledging to strengthen cooperation through BRICS to accelerate the reshaping of the global order.

Wang praised the “unity and cooperation” of BRICS members and said the group would contribute to building “a more just and rational global governance system.”

Lavrov agreed, stating that China, Russia, other BRICS members, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization “are active participants in this transformation and are at the forefront of the movement for justice and equality.”

Additionally, climate finance was one of the focal points of Monday’s discussions. Brazil rejected attempts to shift financial obligations to developing countries, emphasizing that wealthy nations should fulfill their responsibility to finance climate adaptation and mitigation efforts.

The day began with officials arriving at Brazil’s historic foreign ministry building, Itamaraty Palace, in Rio.

While Russia and China sent their top diplomats, one person’s absence was notable: Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar did not attend the meeting.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is assessing how to respond to an armed terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 that killed more than 25 people.

India blamed Pakistan for the incident and announced it would give “an appropriate response.” Jaishankar was represented by New Delhi’s BRICS sherpa Dammu Ravi.

China, a close ally of Pakistan and a founding member of BRICS, called for a neutral investigation and urged South Asian countries to de-escalate tensions.

Farwa Aamer from the Asia Society, a US-based non-profit organization, suggested that Jaishankar’s absence from the BRICS meeting could have both practical and strategic reasons.

While staying in place after the Kashmir attack could be a factor, Aamer said, “part of it could be to convey the seriousness of the issue from India’s perspective to other BRICS members and the international community, especially China, which recently supported Pakistan.”

Tensions between India and China have long complicated BRICS dynamics, and there are concerns that bilateral issues could spill over into the bloc’s agenda.

Nevertheless, Aamer said there is “an interest in the group moving as cohesively as possible,” and this will largely depend on the 17th BRICS leaders’ summit in Rio in July.

BRICS ministers will continue bilateral consultations until Tuesday, and the outcomes are expected to shape the discussions in July.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey