Connect with us

Europe

Britain boosts cooperation against EU

Published

on

On November 7, an interesting story was published in Politico. The headline was meaningful as well: ‘We were taken for fools’: MEPs fume at UK data protection snub. A European Parliament MP, French MEP Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield, described meetings with the U.K. government over their data protection reform plans as ‘appalling.’

The situation, the French official said, was truly dire: the UK Minister for Digital Affairs, Julia Lopez, quit the meeting halfway through, U.K. Home Office ministers did not deign to meet them, and instead of the chief of the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), they met the acting director. As if that were not enough, the ICO officials whom they could meet seemed to know nothing about data protection, giving one-sentence answers to all the questions. When Britain was reforming the data protection law inherited from the EU, it was only about growth and innovation, human rights wasn’t even considered: “I never heard them say, protecting data is a fundamental right. Even in Hungary they say this,” Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield said.

British-Swiss cooperation against EU

The tension between Brussels and London is not limited to data protection alone. The crisis due to the UK’s participation in the European Union’s massive budgeted scientific fund programme Horizon (95.5 billion euros by 2027) has led to a significant alliance.

According to the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which was signed after Britain’s exit from the EU (“Brexit”), the United Kingdom would be able to become a partial member of the Horizon. But the dispute broke out when the European Commission refused to set a binding deadline for partial membership. This is said to be due to a complication with the Northern Ireland Protocol. According to the Horizon scheme, researchers from third countries can participate in Horizon programs, but generally cannot manage projects or access funds.

So, Britain began to implement Plan B. London, which has set out to sign its own bilateral agreements outside the EU mechanism, has managed to build a surprising bilateral collaboration with a non-EU European country.

Switzerland, which has dozens of bilateral deals with the EU, wanted to join Horizon, but has been blocked from joining the programme since it rejected the scientific cooperation agreement for being ‘overarching.’ Switzerland says joining Horizon is still a ‘priority’, but it seems the die is cast.

Another sign showing that it’s too little too late is hidden between the lines of British Science Minister George Freeman’s response to criticism that the agreement with Switzerland is no match for Horizon: “This Anglo-Swiss agreement is the first of a number I am negotiating. I was recently in Israel, which will follow next [deal].” Mr. Freeman also said that deepening relationships with research and development economies such as Switzerland is critical to becoming a science superpower.

On the other hand, the amount of funds to be allocated to the Anglo-Swiss partnership is still a mystery. According to a claim, the science community is vexed by the rumors that the Treasury Department could cut the £15bn (€17.2bn) that was reserved for Horizon, BBC reported. 

Northern Ireland tensions continue

The Northern Ireland Protocol was signed between Brussels and London during the Brexit negotiations. As per the protocol, there would be no need to check the goods to be transported across the Irish land border. As is known, Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom, while the Republic of Ireland is an independent country and still a part of EU.

Before Brexit, there was no problem in the trade of goods because both sides were subject to EU rules. After the UK left the EU, special trading agreements were needed since Northern Ireland has a land border with the Republic of Ireland. The EU has strict control mechanisms over certain goods from non-EU countries.

The protocol provides for EU inspections to be carried out between Northern Ireland and Great Britain (England, Wales, and Scotland), not on the land border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. These inspections will take place at Northern Ireland ports and will continue to follow EU norms in Northern Ireland production standards.

So, the British government wants to change this protocol. According to London’s new plan, goods going from England, Wales and Scotland to Northern Ireland will be divided into two sectors. The first sector (“Green Lane”) will only cover goods going to Northern Ireland and there will be no checks here. This lane will be for ‘trusted traders.’ The second sector (“Red Lane”) will cover goods destined for the Republic of Ireland and the EU from England, Wales, and Scotland and these will undergo full checks.

In this case, taxation will have to change. Northern Ireland remains subject to EU rules on state aid and VAT, which include certain limitations. Britain also wants to remove these limitations. London also wants an independent body, not the European Court of Justice, to be responsible for resolving disputes over the protocol. The UK government is threatening to amend the protocol even if no agreement is reached with Brussels. The island country argues it could amend an international protocol, citing concerns it could undermine peace in Northern Ireland.

In June, the European Commission sought legal sanctions against the United Kingdom. The commission said it was not ready to renegotiate the protocol but has offered to work on its implementation. These include reducing customs and checks on goods, reducing the amount of paperwork, and relaxing regulations for chilled meats to be sent across the Irish Sea.

Since last October, technical negotiations on the Protocol have been conducted between the parties. London says it wants a negotiated solution but is also considering the option of taking a unilateral step if they fail to reach an agreement.

On the other hand, the United States made a statement that seems like a threat. According to The Telegraph, Washington piles pressure on Brussels to reach an agreement before Good Friday Agreement’s 25th anniversary. According to an EU diplomat, the U.S. has increased the pressure on the EU, but it also ‘encourages’ London. However, The Telegraph reported that Britain gets the lion’s share of the U.S. pressure. According to the paper, Joe Biden is not happy about Britain’s decision to amend the protocol on the grounds that it could undermine peace in Northern Ireland.

Britain-EU relations are at odds: We need WhatsApp diplomacy

But things don’t end here either. The UK Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick announced that Non-Irish EU citizens will have to present biometric data to enter the UK, including Northern Ireland.

Together with the law, which will enter into force next year, citizens of EU member states (excluding Irish) who are subject to Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) have to provide their fingerprints and facial biometrics.

London, on the other hand, appears to make fences with Paris, while looking daggers at Berlin. With the agreement on illegal migrant traffic in the English Channel, relations are accelerating. This is said to be influenced by the golden boys of the financial world being the heads of the two countries, as Rishi Sunak is the former executive of Goldman Sachs and Emmanuel Macron is the former executive of Rothschild. According to a French official speaking to the Financial Times, the two countries have now achieved a very positive dynamic. Lord Peter Ricketts, former British Ambassador to Paris, said relations have improved gradually since the summer.

From a Brussels’ point of view, the situation does not seem very promising. Another guest at the Financial Times was EU Ambassador to London João Vale de Almeida. Almeida’s complaint is hilarious as well as an indication of the extent to which relations with the UK have declined: “We’ve had more summits with China than we have had with the UK. There have been none. That’s not normal. These people need to share their WhatsApp numbers.”

Europe

China’s critical mineral restrictions challenge EU defence expansion plans

Published

on

The European Union’s plans to expand its defence capabilities are being hindered by China’s export controls and sales restrictions on critical raw materials.

In response, EU leaders are urging member states to accelerate efforts to diversify supply chains.

According to Nikkei Asia, the European Commission announced last week that it would propose new legislation requiring companies across the bloc to broaden their supplier base in an effort to address economic imbalances, although it did not explicitly name China.

The war in Ukraine and growing uncertainty over Washington’s security guarantees have pushed European governments to increase military spending and defence production.

At the same time, according to a report published in May by Joris Teer, a policy analyst at the European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), China accounts for at least 70% of global mining or refining activity in 17 of the 34 materials classified as critical by the EU. Eight of those 34 materials are currently subject to Chinese export controls.

“China is undermining Europe’s rearmament efforts,” Teer wrote. “Simply by activating this tool, China has already increased its leverage and demonstrated both the capability and willingness to restrict supply whenever it chooses.”

The Aerospace, Security and Defence Industries Association of Europe also warned that geopolitical developments and intensifying global competition for critical raw materials are further underscoring the need to strengthen European supply chains.

The organisation represents more than 4,000 companies, including Britain’s BAE Systems, France’s Thales and Germany’s Rheinmetall.

European defence manufacturers are pursuing a range of strategies, including vertical integration, recycling, diversification and stockpiling.

Rheinmetall told Nikkei Asia that it has “no dependencies” and is “well prepared” regarding critical minerals.

A company spokesperson said: “Rheinmetall has stockpiled key raw materials sufficient for several years. We have also implemented IT systems that allow us to centrally monitor and precisely manage raw material consumption across the entire group.”

Analysts, however, caution that stockpiling alone will not be sufficient. Maria Shagina, a researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said: “Stockpiling serves as an important buffer against sudden disruptions, but on its own it is unlikely to mitigate structural damage over the long term.”

Shagina added that replacing the volume and diversity of critical minerals controlled by Beijing with alternative sources would take years.

In 2024, the EU enacted the European Critical Raw Materials Act, aimed at rebuilding domestic supply chains for such minerals.

The legislation sets 2030 targets for domestic extraction, processing and recycling while limiting dependence on any single third-country supplier to 65%.

A €3 billion ($3.5 billion) fund was established last year to accelerate strategic projects.

Nevertheless, the European Court of Auditors has noted that the 2030 targets are not legally binding and that the EU remains far from achieving them.

Industry groups argue that policy inconsistencies could further slow progress.

The Cobalt Institute, which represents a sector vital to jet engines, advanced batteries and defence alloys, warned that proposed EU chemicals regulations risk undermining the industry.

“Europe has one foot in and one foot out,” said Michael Blakeney, head of government and public affairs at the London-based institute. “It says the right things, but its actions are inconsistent.”

Europe’s efforts are unfolding alongside a more aggressive US strategy to secure critical mineral supply chains.

Shagina said:

“The US is investing more capital to secure and expand capacity, taking greater financial risks and, in some cases, acquiring equity stakes. Europe, by contrast, is generally more cautious, which places it at a relative disadvantage in the competition for critical minerals.”

In April, the EU signed an agreement with the United States to coordinate supplies of critical minerals. Although some member states initially resisted over concerns that the deal could weaken the bloc’s strategic autonomy, they authorised the Commission in early June to join the US-led “Pax Silica” initiative, which coordinates investment and export-control policies.

Teer urged Europe to use ongoing US-EU-Japan negotiations as the nucleus of a broader coalition aimed at making critical mineral production outside China financially viable through state support, minimum-price mechanisms and supply rules.

“Particularly important are countries that either produce raw materials or possess significant mineral deposits, such as Malaysia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Brazil and Indonesia, as well as countries like India with large pools of skilled labour,” he said.

Teer also argued that the EU should activate its Anti-Coercion Instrument, which allows the bloc to impose tariffs and restrictions in response to economic pressure on countries outside the union, in order to deter China from introducing further restrictions.

A European Commission spokesperson said the bloc had “long been aware of the risks associated with the EU’s dependence on critical raw materials.”

“The objective is clear: to anticipate disruptions early and reduce the EU’s vulnerabilities while strengthening our industrial and defence capacities,” the spokesperson said.

Continue Reading

Europe

Four European countries move to make citizenship harder to obtain

Published

on

European countries are increasingly tightening their citizenship rules. Most recently, the Norwegian government has drafted legislation that would raise the minimum residency requirement for citizenship from three years to seven.

The proposed amendments to the citizenship law were presented by the Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion.

Under the draft legislation, stateless individuals born in Norway, as well as those who arrived in the country as children, would be required to reside in Norway for at least five years before becoming eligible for citizenship.

The government also plans to increase residency requirements for foreign nationals who are married to or cohabiting with Norwegian citizens.

Language requirements are set to become more demanding as well. The proposal would raise the required level of spoken Norwegian proficiency from A2 to B1. The new rules would apply to applicants aged between 18 and 67.

Commenting on the changes, Minister of Labour and Social Inclusion Kjersti Stenseng said: “Obtaining and holding Norwegian citizenship should be a privilege.”

The government argues that simplifying administrative procedures while simultaneously tightening eligibility criteria will help reduce the country’s large backlog of pending applications and shorten processing times.

Norway is the latest European country to announce revisions to its citizenship rules.

In Finland, the minimum residency requirement for citizenship was increased from five years to eight years on October 1, 2024.

The country also plans to introduce a mandatory citizenship test for applicants aged between 18 and 64 from the beginning of 2027.

Finnish Interior Minister Mari Rantanen said: “The introduction of a citizenship test is the final component of a comprehensive reform aimed at making citizenship requirements more stringent.”

Sweden has also approved a similar reform. Beginning in June 2026, the standard residency requirement for citizenship will increase from five years to eight years. Authorities are also introducing a financial self-sufficiency requirement for applicants and expanding the scope of security screenings.

Explaining the rationale behind the changes, Migration Minister Johan Forssell said: “It was possible to become a citizen after living in the country for five years without knowing a single word of Swedish, learning anything about Swedish society, or even having one’s own source of income.”

The most far-reaching changes have been implemented in Portugal. Portuguese President Antonio Jose Seguro has signed legislation raising the minimum residency requirement for citizenship from five years to 10 years.

For citizens of the European Union and the Community of Portuguese Language Countries, the requirement has been set at seven years.

The residency period will now be calculated from the date a residence permit is granted rather than from the date a citizenship application is submitted. The new rules will also affect the children of immigrants.

Previously, children could obtain citizenship one year after birth if their parents held residence permits. Under the new rules, at least one parent must have legally resided in the country for a minimum of five years.

The law also introduces a mandatory examination covering Portuguese history, culture, values and social structures.

Migration policies are tightening across the European Union as well. On June 17, the European Parliament approved legislation allowing irregular migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected but who cannot be returned to their countries of origin to be deported to third countries.

The new EU rules permit the establishment of migrant detention centres outside the bloc’s borders. African countries are reportedly among the options being discussed for such facilities.

Continue Reading

Europe

SpaceX warns EU satellite spectrum plan could disrupt connectivity in Ukraine

Published

on

SpaceX has sharply criticised a European Union plan to restrict access to satellite spectrum, arguing that the proposal risks degrading connectivity in Ukraine and disrupting emergency communications services.

In a document shared with European officials and reviewed by the Financial Times, SpaceX warned:

“This proposal significantly increases the likelihood that Europeans will be deprived of direct-to-device satellite services, or that new European operations will create global interference issues, including for emergency services such as those operating in Ukraine.”

In a proposal unveiled in May, the EU recommended reserving part of the spectrum band used for direct satellite-to-smartphone connectivity for European operators, thereby limiting the frequencies available to US and Chinese providers.

The 2 GHz frequency band in question is currently used by two US companies, Viasat and EchoStar.

SpaceX argued that the EU plan prioritises “an operator’s country of establishment over economic, technical and regulatory realities.”

When the proposal was announced, EU technology chief Henna Virkkunen defended the move, saying the bloc wanted to “increase European capacity in this sector.” She added that other parts of the frequency band would remain open to international operators, arguing that prioritising European providers was justified.

Other participants involved in discussions over the proposal said some EU officials were specifically seeking to limit Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite network.

Europe’s initiative follows a warning from Washington. In March, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) cautioned that it could take retaliatory measures if the EU chose to favour European satellite operators over alternatives such as Starlink.

At the time, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr told the Financial Times: “Some of the discussions in Europe regarding satellite sovereignty concern us. If Europe decides to move down that path, then, as you know, we will have to consider reciprocal measures.”

The European Commission’s proposal has not yet entered formal negotiations with EU member states or the European Parliament.

A source close to SpaceX said the company remained hopeful of influencing the outcome of the process, given concerns raised by both businesses and several European governments.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey