Asia
China releases white paper on US trade relations
The State Council Information Office of China yesterday released a comprehensive white paper titled “China’s Position on Certain Issues in China-US Economic and Trade Relations,” outlining its official position on ongoing trade disputes with Washington.
The white paper addresses the nature of economic relations between the two countries, the implementation of the Phase One Trade Agreement, compliance with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, and unilateral policies of the US.
In the introduction, Beijing stated that China and the US are the world’s largest developing and developed countries, respectively, emphasizing that economic and trade relations between the two are of great importance for both bilateral and global stability and development.
It noted that since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1979, bilateral trade volume has increased from $2.5 billion to approximately $688.3 billion in 2024.
The white paper stated that the foundation of China-US economic and trade relations lies in the understanding of “mutual benefit and win-win.”
It was noted that the two countries are important trading partners for each other, with rapidly increasing trade in goods and services.
China is the US’s largest goods export market and second-largest source of imports; the US is China’s third-largest export market and second-largest source of imports.
Beijing argued that it does not pursue a trade surplus, and that the trade balance is a result of structural problems in the US economy, the comparative advantages of the two countries, and the international division of labor.
It was reported that when local sales through trade in goods, trade in services, and investments are considered together, the economic benefits obtained by the two countries are roughly balanced.
Additionally, it was stated that China is taking active steps to increase imports through platforms such as the China International Import Expo (CIIE).
The white paper gave extensive coverage to the Phase One Trade Agreement signed on January 15, 2020.
It was argued that the Chinese side has meticulously fulfilled its obligations under the agreement, despite challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions, and global economic recession.
In this context, it was stated that intellectual property protection has been strengthened, market access has been increased in the agricultural and food products and financial services sectors, and forced technology transfer has been prohibited.
In contrast, it was pointed out that the US side has not fulfilled its obligations under the agreement.
According to the white paper, Washington, contrary to the spirit of the agreement, tightened export controls, increased sanctions against Chinese companies, and imposed investment restrictions.
In particular, regarding technology transfer, it was argued that the US, as in the case of TikTok, is forcing companies to sell and preventing investment cooperation under the pretext of “national security.”
In the field of agriculture, it was stated that the US has not recognized China’s avian influenza-free zone status and has not responded to requests for cooperation on pesticides.
It was also claimed that the US has engaged in restrictive and discriminatory practices in financial services and exchange rate issues.
In addition, Beijing emphasized that since joining the WTO in 2001, it has adhered to the principle of free trade and has strictly complied with WTO rules.
It was stated that in this process, more than 2,300 central laws, regulations, and rules, and more than 190,000 local regulations have been reviewed and revised.
It was stated that customs duty rates have been reduced in line with WTO commitments and have even been further reduced unilaterally in recent years.
It was argued that subsidies are provided within the framework of WTO rules and within reasonable limits, and that relevant notifications are made in a timely manner.
The white paper stated that accusations that China creates “overcapacity” and disrupts international markets with “non-market economic behaviors” such as subsidies are “irrational and untrue.”
It was emphasized that such claims are trade protectionism and will harm global supply chains.
On the other hand, it was noted that China is constantly improving its business environment, expanding market access for foreign investments, and treating all domestic and foreign businesses equally.
A significant part of the white paper was devoted to criticizing the US’s unilateral and protectionist policies. It was stated that Washington arbitrarily expanded the concept of “national security,” used export controls as a political weapon (especially in the fields of semiconductors and artificial intelligence), and applied Section 301 and Section 232 customs duties that clearly violate WTO rules.
It was pointed out that the WTO panel found Section 301 tariffs to be against the rules. It was noted that these tariffs did not solve the US trade deficit, but rather increased costs for US importers and consumers.
Similarly, it was stated that Section 232 tariffs applied to steel and aluminum products were used not for “national security” reasons, but to put pressure on other countries in negotiations.
It was warned that US attempts to remove China’s Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status violate WTO rules and would seriously damage bilateral relations.
It was stated that using the fentanyl issue as an excuse to increase customs duties is baseless and will not solve the problem.
Finally, it was pointed out that the “reciprocal customs duties” implemented by the US will harm both the US economy and global trade.
In the conclusion of the white paper, it was reiterated that China and the US are the world’s two largest economies and that cooperation between them is critical for global peace and development.
It was emphasized that it is natural for the two countries to have differences, but these should be resolved through equal dialogue and mutually beneficial cooperation rather than conflict.
Beijing, using the expressions “There are no winners in trade wars, and protectionism is a dead end,” called on the US side to move in the same direction as China, and to act in accordance with the principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation.
It was stated that the two countries can address their concerns through dialogue and jointly promote the healthy, stable, and sustainable development of bilateral economic and trade relations.
Asia
Chinese Politburo signals cautious confidence as Beijing pivots toward targeted tech support
The mid-year meeting of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Politburo has long served as a critical evaluation point for Beijing. The session provides the central government with an opportunity to review developments from the first half of the year and steer the country toward a more realistic economic course in the months ahead.
The latest statement from the top leadership signals cautious confidence. The release indicates that policymakers are favoring a stable, targeted approach over the broad-based stimulus measures that characterized previous years. As China manages its economic transition, the post-Covid era of aggressive spending has clearly drawn to a close. In its place, a strategic and structural approach has taken hold, prioritizing resilience and stability over short-term capital injections.
According to the outcomes of the Politburo meeting, the policy orientation will continue to target specific sectors. Financial support will be directed away from the property market and toward high-tech emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. In the real estate sector, the objective remains stabilizing market confidence and keeping debt risks under control.
Infrastructure investment is likewise being reshaped around the concept of “new infrastructure.” The focus is no longer solely on concrete and physical structures; smart power grids, information technology networks, and data infrastructure have taken precedence.
This approach signifies an investment in future competitiveness rather than simply pumping capital into the economy’s more stagnant sectors. Serving as a new driver of growth, digital infrastructure fulfills a dual purpose: supporting domestic demand in the short term while safeguarding technological competitiveness over the long term.
Finally, Beijing is signaling a more conciliatory posture in international trade. The Chinese leadership aims to establish a more balanced trade framework to mitigate concerns voiced by trade partners such as the European Union over what has been termed “China Shock 2.0.”
As the administration prepares for critical leadership changes next year, its primary focus will remain on stability across both economic and social spheres.
China continues to strike a balance between realistic growth targets and systemic restructuring, maintaining policy leeway to absorb potential external shocks. Beijing’s economic strategy reflects a pragmatic assessment of both domestic and international challenges.
Struggling with weak demand, the domestic economy is not yet in a position to anchor national growth independently. Expansion continues to rely heavily on a record trade surplus alongside the impressive export performance of high-tech and clean energy sectors. However, this reliance has drawn pushback from several trading partners.
To stimulate domestic economic activity and ease trade tensions, Beijing unveiled its first standalone five-year plan focused on consumption. Released in July by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce, the plan targets an increase in retail sales to 60 trillion yuan (approximately $8.9 trillion) by 2030. This represents an increase of roughly 20% compared to 2025 levels.
To improve profit margins for small businesses, regulatory authorities are tackling the issue of “involution”—described as excessive internal competition—by curbing platform monopolies and preventing destructive price wars. While these structural adjustments may take longer to yield results, they are viewed as a more sustainable and effective alternative to direct cash handouts.
Asia
Chinese chipmaker profits surge 2,500% on explosive AI computing demand
Major Chinese microchip manufacturers saw their profits surge by 2,579.5% in the first half of 2026, driven by unprecedented demand for artificial intelligence and computing capacity.
Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), underscored the industry’s sharp upward trajectory.
Yu Weining, senior statistician at China’s National Bureau of Statistics, explained that this surge is directly connected to the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors.
Yu noted that this process has increased the need for computing capacity. The demand for computational processes also lifted profits across the entire electronics industry by 97% year-on-year.
Profits of major Chinese industrial enterprises with an annual revenue exceeding 20 million yuan ($2.9 million) rose 18.7% in the first six months of the year, reaching 4 trillion yuan.
In the first half of 2025, before the global data center construction process had begun, industrial profits had dropped by 1.8% to 3.4 trillion yuan, while profit growth in the electronics sector remained at 3.5%.
The SCMP reported that the global AI boom has generated explosive demand for high-performance computing systems and memory chips, causing a structural pivot in China’s industrial landscape.
Data showed that integrated circuit production in the first half of the year grew by 23% year-on-year to reach approximately 280 billion units.
This figure means that the country produced an average of more than 1.5 billion chips per day.
The profit growth is also corroborated by forecasts from China’s leading chipmakers. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics, one of the largest memory module manufacturers, expects its profits to increase by more than 600-fold in the first half of the year.
Flash memory maker GigaDevice projects that its net profit will surge by approximately 1,099% year-on-year due to supply shortages and rising product prices.
Chinese companies in the AI chip segment are also demonstrating strong profit growth, albeit at a more moderate pace compared to the memory market.
Hygon Information Technology, which develops central processing units and computing units for artificial intelligence, projects that its profits will rise by up to 52.3%.
CXMT hits record high on Shanghai Stock Exchange
Shares of Chinese chipmaker CXMT gained more than 500% on their first day of trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, jumping from 8.66 yuan to 55 yuan.
As a result of this sharp surge in its shares, CXMT’s market valuation reached 3.65 trillion yuan ($539 billion), making the company China’s most valuable publicly traded firm.
At the peak of the rally—even though quoted prices underwent a slight correction toward the close of the trading day—CXMT surpassed Tencent, which was trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with a market capitalization of $514 billion.
Asia
Massive student movement over exam leaks forces resignation of India’s education minister
Indian public examination reform proposals follow education minister’s resignation after nationwide youth protests
India’s federal government introduced legislation in parliament on Monday to amend the law governing public examinations, days after the “Cockroach” movement forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan following nationwide youth protests.
The bill incorporates enhanced sanctions, including longer prison sentences and higher fines for those found responsible for exam leaks and irregularities.
The demonstrations are widely viewed as the most significant youth-led challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he took office in 2014.
What triggered the protests?
Nearly 2 million students took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an undergraduate medical entrance examination, in May. The federal National Testing Agency cancelled the exam on May 12 following allegations that question papers had been leaked. The examination was re-administered on June 21.
Young people took to the streets to protest against examination fraud, youth unemployment, and a perceived lack of future prospects.
According to a BBC report, the unemployment rate among university and college graduates aged 15 to 25 in the country stands at a critically high level of 40%. The addition of corruption in public examinations to existing economic strain broke the patience of the youth.
Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Public Party (CJP) movement, led the protests.
The movement derived its name from remarks made in May by Supreme Court Judge Surya Kant, who used the terms “cockroach” and “parasite” in a derogatory reference to unemployed youth and protesters. Young demonstrators adopted the insult as a symbol and named their movement after it.
How the movement unfolded
Young protesters organized street demonstrations demanding the resignation of Education Minister Pradhan. Dipke, who initiated the movement in New Delhi, subsequently organized protests in other parts of the country.
Sonam Wangchuk, one of the protesters, began a hunger strike at the demonstration site in support of the movement. As his physical condition deteriorated, authorities forcibly transferred him to a hospital.
The reaction to Wangchuk’s forcible removal from the protest site caused crowds at the venue to expand rapidly.
Tens of thousands of protesters faced tear gas and baton charges by police while attempting to march on parliament. Some demonstrators engaged in clashes with law enforcement officers.
CJP leaders held talks with ministers from the Modi government, who requested time to evaluate the protesters’ demands internally.
Modi called for unity among lawmakers in the ruling coalition to implement strict measures against exam paper leaks, punish those responsible, and establish a secure, leak-proof system.
Opposition representatives led by Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in at the entrance of Modi’s official residence demanding Pradhan’s resignation. They were briefly detained by police before being released.
Opposition lawmakers supporting the student protesters disrupted proceedings in parliament. Demonstrations expanded to other regions of the country, including the financial hub of Mumbai.
In his first direct statement regarding the protests, published in a post on X, Modi announced that special courts would be established to prosecute individuals involved in exam paper leaks. Protesters rejected the proposal.
Movement leaders held a second round of talks with the government after Wangchuk ended his 26-day hunger strike.
Following those discussions, the government requested time until the afternoon of the following day to respond to the demand for Pradhan’s resignation.
Education Minister Pradhan subsequently announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down in light of the situation at the protest site and across the country, as well as to prevent “external forces” from exploiting the environment.
On July 26, Modi announced the creation of a task force headed by technology entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani to overhaul the country’s examination system.
On Monday, July 27, the government presented a bill to parliament proposing amendments to the law governing public examinations. The legislation introduces stiffer penalties for offenders, including extended prison terms and increased monetary fines.
-
America2 weeks agoUS controls $13 billion in Venezuelan oil revenues with little transparency, raising congressional concerns
-
America2 weeks agoUS agricultural superpower status at risk as trade wars shift global markets to Brazil
-
Europe2 weeks agoUS secures multi-billion-dollar energy and AI deals at Three Seas summit in Dubrovnik
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoPalantir CEO Alex Karp says he would not vote for ‘pro-Russian’ AfD in Germany
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoWorld Bank warns US-Iran conflict could slash global growth to 1.3% as inflation looms
-
Middle East2 weeks agoPentagon faces severe budget crunch as Middle East operational costs drain key military funds
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany accelerates African energy diplomatic push to secure natural gas and green hydrogen
-
Middle East2 weeks agoOil passes $90 as tanker attacks halt Hormuz shipping
