Diplomacy
Eastern Ukraine and Kyiv face total blackout risk amid Russian energy attacks
The eastern regions of Ukraine and the capital, Kyiv, are facing the risk of a complete blackout due to intensified Russian attacks targeting energy infrastructure.
Officials state that the Russian army aims to sever the energy connection between the east and west and leave Kyiv powerless by deliberately destroying the country’s power generation and transmission systems.
In Ukraine, where each wartime winter is more difficult than the last, even the capital is experiencing regular 16-hour power outages due to the scale and intensity of the attacks.
Kyiv is one step away from a complete blackout
An energy expert speaking to The Washington Post said, “We are one step away from a complete blackout in Kyiv.”
A senior European diplomat also confirmed the situation, stating, “Even if we are not on the brink of a complete blackout in the east of the country, we are very close.”
Russia’s attacks peaked last month
Ukrainian Deputy Energy Minister Mykola Kolesnyk announced that Russia launched approximately 5,000 drones and missiles in November, compared to around 2,000 per month at the beginning of the year.
Kolesnyk noted that the majority of the attacks targeted power plants, transmission lines, and natural gas infrastructure.
Sources providing information to The Washington Post stated that these attacks threaten to effectively split the country in two by disabling the transmission systems that run from the west, where most of the electricity is generated, to the east.
Valeriy Osadchuk, public relations director for the grid operator Ukrenergo, also confirmed that one of the targets of the regular attacks is the transmission and distribution infrastructure.
Moscow’s goal is to create energy islands
The European diplomat stated that in addition to dividing Ukraine’s power grid, Moscow is pursuing a “strategy of creating energy islands.”
The diplomat said the goal is “to deprive specific regions of all production capacity and electricity supply.”
Kolesnyk added that the most affected areas are the border regions, stating, “The Russians are trying to attack all energy facilities, from small to large, throughout the day.”
Repair efforts in the capital are falling short
Attempts to disconnect eastern Ukraine from the western grid began in October. Since then, Kyiv, as well as the Sumy, Chernihiv, and Kharkiv oblasts, have been subjected to intense bombardment.
A Ukrainian government source speaking to The Economist said, “They primarily want to leave the eastern wing without electricity, not the entire country.”
According to the report, attacks have become more frequent since then, leaving less time for repair crews to work.
Although outages in Kyiv were reduced to 2.5 hours a day at the beginning of December, an intense bombardment on the night of December 5 caused significant damage to the grid again, and Kyiv’s electricity supply dropped considerably.
The corporate sector in the capital is reportedly already operating largely on generators.
Maksym Tymchenko, CEO of DTEK, Ukraine’s largest private energy company, described their difficult situation:
“We are responding as quickly as we can, but it is becoming increasingly difficult. We have lost a significant portion of our capacity. Our current priority is to find spare parts in various European countries that can be delivered quickly to Ukraine. Transformers and gas compressors are the most critical.”
Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
