America
Federal courts weigh religious freedom against ICE enforcement tactics
Numerous religious congregations have filed lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s decision to rescind a 30-year policy restricting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations at or near houses of worship. The organizations contend that the policy change effectively bars clergy from providing “pastoral care” to individuals held in temporary detention facilities.
Religious groups, representing thousands of congregations across various faiths, have initiated legal action in response to these policy shifts, securing favorable rulings from several federal judges.
As reported by Politico, Ingrid Rasmussen, head pastor of the Holy Trinity Lutheran Church in Minneapolis, referenced President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address, stating: “The President said religious freedom is important to him. But I cannot help but wonder if this administration believes that only certain people should have the right to practice their faith and accept visits from religious leaders they trust.”
Some federal judges have found that the administration’s drive for mass deportations impedes the religious rights of not only the immigrants but also the congregations that welcome them.
The legal battles center on the constitutional right to free exercise of religion and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which requires the government to utilize the “least restrictive means” in instances where official action hinders religious observance.
Earlier this month, US District Judge Robert Gettleman determined that the restrictions imposed by ICE at a detention center in the Chicago area “significantly burdened” the rights of clergy serving immigrants. Judge Gettleman ordered ICE to grant these individuals limited access to the facility to provide “ashes and communion” on Ash Wednesday.
In Minnesota, US District Judge Jerry Blackwell scheduled a hearing for March 13 regarding a similar lawsuit brought by religious organizations and clergy seeking access to the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minnesota.
These disputes are part of a broader conflict regarding the administration’s “Day 1” policy change, which rescinded decades-old restrictions on ICE operations at “sensitive locations,” including churches, hospitals, and schools. This change eliminated “hard rules” for operations at these sites, replacing them with guidance for local ICE officials to exercise “common sense.”
Religious organizations representing thousands of congregations have filed lawsuits, arguing that this policy shift has led to a measurable decline in attendance at houses of worship that welcome immigrants. The threat of enforcement actions has chilled public expression, altered decisions regarding the appointment of immigrants to leadership positions, and compelled congregations to consider new security measures to protect their members.
The Trump administration maintains that these concerns are exaggerated. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin stated: “The Freedom of Worship clause does not permit unlawful conduct. Those who are here legally and have not broken other laws have nothing to fear. Elected officials and clergy who choose to spread fear by distorting the truth are doing our country a great disservice… We are protecting our schools and houses of worship by preventing criminal aliens and gang members from exploiting these places and finding sanctuary.”
In court, the administration’s argument is straightforward: ICE has conducted very few enforcement operations at churches, and therefore, fears of frequent future operations cannot be legally challenged.
However, a panel of the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., appeared skeptical of this position during arguments this month in a case brought by Christian and Jewish congregations, who are demanding that ICE obtain judicial warrants before conducting operations near houses of worship.
During the proceedings, Judge Robert Wilkins remarked: “We are going to lift the barriers to enforcement at houses of worship, but the court is supposed to assume that, even though we are enforcing everywhere else, we will not enforce at houses of worship? Make that make sense.”
Judge Florence Pan added that requiring ICE to obtain warrants for operations at churches would effectively render houses of worship “safer than your own home.”
Quaker, Baptist, and Sikh congregations secured a smaller-scale preliminary injunction last year, mere weeks after the administration rescinded the former restrictions.
Irina Vaynerman, CEO of Groundwork Legal and lead attorney for the clergy seeking access to the Whipple building in Minnesota, stated that the crux of this struggle is the fundamental need to show human dignity to individuals facing dire circumstances in detention.
“Denying them the ability to connect with a religious leader who could otherwise provide emotional or spiritual support is the next iteration of the inhumane treatment that has permeated the handling of individuals,” Vaynerman said.
America
Unauthorised AI agents access customer accounts at major US banks
Incidents have been detected at the largest US banks in which unauthorised artificial intelligence agents gained access to customer accounts.
According to a report by Axios based on sources, some of these AI agents attempted to take actions that were not included in user instructions.
Institutions facing risks arising from such agents include leading lenders such as Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, and Citi.
In some cases, AI software entered customer accounts using usernames and passwords directly with user consent.
In contrast, security rules at most banks require users to log in to their accounts personally.
According to Axios, in other instances, AI agents designed to carry out tasks on behalf of customers contacted bank call centres directly or tried to take independent steps without receiving any instruction from the user.
Bank executives worry that such software with access to credentials could make unauthorized purchases or transfer funds.
Following these risks, banks are moving to restrict third-party AI agents from accessing their platforms. While Morgan Stanley has begun blocking such software, JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Citi are also introducing similar restrictions.
Banks are also considering offering a financial access model that gives AI agents read-only permissions while completely cutting off transaction capabilities.
Sources speaking to Axios point out that it is extremely difficult for banks to determine whether an agent is acting on user instructions or accessing the account entirely on its own initiative.
Regulators hold emergency meeting with systemically risky banks
According to reports by Bloomberg and the Financial Times citing sources, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell held an extraordinary meeting in April with top executives of the country’s largest banks over concerns about cyber threats that could be posed by a new AI model developed by Anthropic.
Sources providing details on the talks stated that US officials wanted to gauge bank awareness regarding risks tied to the Claude Mythos model and inspect the measures they have taken to protect their systems.
Senior executives from Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Morgan Stanley attended the meeting.
Organised at short notice, the summit indicated that regulatory authorities view this new breed of cyber attack as one of the greatest threats to the financial sector.
All of the banks represented at the table are classified as systemically important institutions within the global financial architecture.
Axios reported that leading AI firms, including Anthropic and OpenAI, harbour concerns that an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could take place over the next 6 to 12 months.
America
US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land
Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.
For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.
Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:
“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”
The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.
Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.
Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.
Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.
Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.
Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.
Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market
The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.
Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.
The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.
Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.
Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.
Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.
William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.
Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.
America
US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies
An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.
Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.
Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.
Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.
Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.
When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.
The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.
Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.
Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war
In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.
Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.
Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.
American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.
Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.
Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.
Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise
The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.
Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.
Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.
Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.
Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.
Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSWP urges backing for Gulf trade routes bypassing Strait of Hormuz
-
America2 weeks agoThiel targets Pope and Obama over AI in new ‘Antichrist’ lectures
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoEU and China reach preliminary deal to curb hybrid car imports
-
Europe2 weeks agoLSE study finds post-bailout Greece turned into a cafe economy
-
America2 weeks agoEnergy firms enlist ex-US officials to tap Venezuelan oil
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia relaxes diesel export curbs after talks with Trump
