America
Genesis Mission: National security strategy or economic rescue for AI?
US President Donald Trump launched “Mission Genesis” via an executive order issued yesterday, directing the Department of Energy and all scientific institutions to accelerate the artificial intelligence (AI) race.
The executive order argues that since the founding of the US, scientific discoveries and technological innovations have “ensured America’s progress and prosperity.” It further states, “Today, America is in a race for global technological dominance in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) development, a key frontier of scientific discovery and economic growth.”
Citing the need for a “historic national effort comparable to the urgency and ambitious goals of the Manhattan Project,” Trump tasked the Department of Energy with leading an initiative that brings together “federal laboratories and industry partners.”
The order states:
“Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary shall identify federal computing, storage, and networking resources that can be used to support the mission. These resources include cloud-based high-performance computing systems located at DOE [Department of Energy] facilities and resources available through industry partners. The Secretary shall also identify additional partnerships or infrastructure upgrades that could support the Platform’s computing infrastructure.”
Some observers believe this order signifies a federal government “bailout” of AI investments and companies, which have become the driving force of the American economy.
For instance, the Moon of Alabama (MoA) blog highlights the shifting stance of Trump’s “AI and crypto czar,” David Sacks, over the span of just a few weeks. In early November, Sacks stated, “There will be no federal bailout for AI. There are at least 5 major frontier model companies in the US. If one fails, others will take its place.” However, two days ago, while sharing a pessimistic AI report from The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), he wrote, “According to today’s WSJ, AI-related investments account for half of GDP growth. A reversal of this brings recession risk. We cannot afford to go back.”
On the other hand, Sacks reverted on Tuesday to his thesis opposing any bailout package for companies in the artificial intelligence sector.
Referencing the WSJ article he shared, Sacks stated, “I understand the confusion of those who might interpret this post as supporting a bailout. I have already opposed this. Furthermore, I do not believe such a thing is needed.”
However, the relevant WSJ report draws attention to the risks accompanying the American economy’s dependence on artificial intelligence:
“Stock price-to-earnings ratios are near record levels. If high profit estimates prove incorrect, stock prices could fall, and investments could slow down. Although the S&P 500 recorded a 1% increase on Friday, it fell approximately 2% last week due to bubble concerns.
(…)
Falling stocks could create a reverse wealth effect: Americans consume less, which lowers sales, profits, and potentially employment.”
Moreover, another WSJ report published a few weeks ago suggested that American taxpayers might have already begun bailing out AI companies.
The report notes that while the market gives “moderate” signals, the White House is treating this sector as if it were “too big to fail.”
The Wall Street Journal emphasized that while players in the AI industry argue a “correction” akin to the 2008 crisis is not imminent, the federal government has “already started to save” the AI sector through regulatory changes and public funds designed to protect companies should the private sector withdraw.
A frank statement on this matter had already come from OpenAI’s Chief Financial Officer, Sarah Friar. At an event hosted by The Wall Street Journal, Friar stated that the company had approached governments to “backstop” loans for AI chip purchases with a “guarantee” that would attract private financing.
The Wall Street Journal wrote:
“By presenting US leadership in AI as a goal on which American national security and economic growth depend, Friar removed the main concern making investors hesitate: Is developing AI on such a large scale worth the financial risk?”
Although Friar later walked back her comments, the genie is out of the bottle. Performance pressure for these companies is becoming unprecedented, and evidence suggests they may not succeed. An MIT study conducted this summer revealed that 95% of approximately 300 organizations purchasing or developing their own generative AI (GenAI) tools obtained zero return on their investments.
According to Census Bureau surveys, AI adoption in large companies has decreased. Some observers have also drawn attention to a situation resembling “circular deal-making,” a characteristic feature of the collapse in the telecom sector.
Nvidia is investing $100 billion in OpenAI, which plans to purchase millions of Nvidia chips. This type of financing cycle can become dangerous when the market cools.
On the other hand, MoA underscores another dimension of the “bailout package” by highlighting the move to centralize AI activities within the executive order.
The executive order states that Genesis will “act as a bridge between government computing models and private sector models” and “allow Washington to influence which companies will be in the leading position and which capabilities will be prioritized.”
The order notes, “It will accelerate real scientific breakthroughs, but at the same time quietly determine the rules of the AI race, who will participate, who will provide access, and how the most powerful systems will be directed.” Consequently, the thesis of “private sector-led investment” appears to have taken a significant hit.
MoA argues that by allowing the bailout of overextended AI companies through massive federal spending, Trump is also attempting to prevent a stock market crash that could cause Republicans to lose their majority in the House of Representatives.
America
Trump administration targets 60 nations with new tariff draft under Section 301
The US administration is proposing new tariffs of at least 10% on imports from 60 trading partners, following an investigation into goods allegedly produced using forced labor.
According to a Bloomberg report citing sources within the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), the specific tariff rates will vary based on individual countries’ legislative frameworks regarding forced labor and their capacity to enforce those laws.
Under the drafted regulations, a 10% tariff rate will apply to imports from the European Union, Mexico, Canada, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, and several other nations. Conversely, goods arriving from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, and Brazil will be subject to a 12,5% tariff.
The USTR stated that the lower tariff rate will apply to products from nations that prohibit forced labor or have committed to doing so. The agency emphasized that states failing to establish such prohibitions or lacking the capacity to effectively enforce them will face the higher tariff rate.
Bloomberg reported that this step represents a continuation of President Donald Trump’s policy to reinstate across-the-board tariffs on all countries, which had previously been ruled unconstitutional.
The proposed tariffs are the result of investigations initiated under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Commenting on the development, Deborah Elms, Head of the Trade Policy Group at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, said, “This is highly significant because Section 301 is an extremely powerful tool and is highly unlikely to be overturned. This opens the door to a range of new tariff and non-tariff measures.”
The report noted that the tariffs are being introduced at what could be a turning point for the global economy.
Financial markets are already navigating a sensitive period due to rising gas and oil prices driven by conflict in Iran.
The new tariffs will not take effect immediately. Before implementation, a review and evaluation period will be conducted, which may lead to modifications in the draft proposal.
According to the timeline reported by Bloomberg, written comments on the tariffs must be submitted by July 6. Additionally, the Section 301 Committee is scheduled to hold a public hearing on July 7.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer argued that forced labor practices in partner nations force American workers to compete on an unequal playing field. “We will no longer tolerate this unfairness,” Greer said.
On the other hand, the USTR proposed certain tariff exemptions that could affect apparel and textile imports. While these goods could enter the US at reduced tariff rates, quotas would be determined based on the respective countries’ existing textile exports to the US.
Beef, tomatoes, bananas, coffee, orange juice, and several other food products will be entirely exempt from the tariffs. Furthermore, double taxation will not be imposed on metals, specific fuel types, and chemicals that are already subject to other duties.
In May, the US Court of International Trade ruled that the 10% tariff on foreign imports promoted by President Donald Trump was unlawful. Defending the White House’s objectives following the court ruling, Trump characterized the judges as “radical left-wing” and remarked, “Nothing surprises me. We always find different ways. We make a decision and act in another way.”
In February, the US Supreme Court also ruled that tariffs established by Trump were contrary to the law. The court concluded that the president had exceeded his authority in imposing those duties. Trump, however, claimed that the court was under foreign influence.
America
Google seeks approval to release 32 million mosquitoes in US disease-control project
Google is seeking federal approval to release nearly 32 million mosquitoes in California and Florida as part of a biological pest-control initiative known as the Debug project.
The little-known program aims to combat disease-carrying mosquitoes by releasing millions of sterile male mosquitoes into the environment, an approach designed to stop “bad bugs with good bugs.”
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mosquitoes are classified as the world’s deadliest animals. Of the more than 3,500 mosquito species that exist globally, only Aedes aegypti is responsible for transmitting dengue fever, Zika virus and chikungunya, diseases that sicken hundreds of millions of people each year.
In a statement published on the official website of the Debug project, Google described the issue as a difficult problem to solve, noting that many mosquito-borne diseases lack effective vaccines or treatments.
The statement argued that relying on pesticides is not a sustainable solution because such chemicals become less effective over time and can be toxic. It also said that eliminating standing water alone is insufficient because it is impossible to identify every breeding site used by mosquitoes.
For those reasons, Google said a new approach is required and that it found a solution in what it describes as “good” mosquitoes of the same species.
The project website explains the method as follows:
“Good bugs are the same mosquito species as the bad bugs that spread disease. Our good bugs are male mosquitoes carrying Wolbachia, a naturally occurring bacterium found in nature. This bacterium prevents them from producing offspring with wild female mosquitoes. Male mosquitoes do not bite and cannot spread disease, so the good bugs will stop the bad bugs from reproducing. Over time, fewer bad mosquitoes will remain.”
Scientists involved in the Debug project emphasized that the technique relies entirely on a naturally occurring bacterium, contains no chemicals or toxins, and does not involve genetic modification.
Researchers said similar approaches have been used safely for decades to control other pests. They added that the Debug team is combining scientific and engineering expertise with support from international partners in an effort to suppress disease-carrying mosquito populations.
Project scientists said their approach differs from previous eradication programs because it applies the Sterile Insect Technique on a larger scale through the use of data analytics, sensors and automation.
According to information published in the project’s frequently asked questions section, program officials are working closely with national and local governments, community leaders and research institutions.
Officials said they meet with residents in areas targeted for deployment before operations begin in order to better understand local concerns and priorities.
Google is therefore continuing to pursue federal authorization to implement the project in both California and Florida.
A notice published in the Federal Register shows that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reviewing Google’s applications for an Experimental Use Permit under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
According to details contained in the filing, nearly 16 million mosquitoes would be released in Florida during the first year of the project.
A further 16 million mosquitoes would be released in California during the second year.
Members of the public can obtain additional information and submit comments through the federal rulemaking portal by visiting regulations.gov and entering docket identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-3951.
America
US Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence
US Marine Corps personnel tested a new counter-drone defense system during military exercises held in the Philippines in April.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the system is designed to avoid the continuous use of expensive missiles and instead relies on a coordinated set of countermeasures.
The system consists of two armored vehicles known collectively as MADIS (Marine Air Defense Integrated System).
One vehicle is equipped with an advanced radar system, while the other carries the Stinger air defense missile system. Both vehicles are also fitted with a small cannon, a machine gun and electronic warfare equipment.
According to the report, MADIS is intended to provide military personnel with multiple options for engaging drones, including cannon fire, missiles and electronic warfare tools.
The objective is to reduce dependence on high-cost weapons when protecting military units and other strategic assets.
US Marine Corps officials told WSJ that one of the system’s most effective features is its ability to fire specially manufactured 30-millimeter ammunition equipped with precision fuzes that detonate as they approach a target.
Steven Sawyer, a former ammunition technician at the NATO Support and Procurement Agency, told the newspaper that 30-millimeter rounds are generally less accurate than missiles but are significantly cheaper to use.
Sawyer said that even if five such rounds were required to destroy a drone, the total cost would remain around $11,250.
By comparison, a single Stinger missile costs about $430,000, while Coyote interceptor missiles used in conflicts in the Middle East are priced between $100,000 and $125,000 each.
Sawyer added that 30-millimeter ammunition has proven effective against Shahed-family drones, which cannot be neutralized through electronic warfare methods.
At the same time, he stressed that US defense companies continue to face difficulties producing sufficient quantities of the ammunition. According to Sawyer, the precision fuzes are highly sophisticated electromechanical devices and only a limited number of manufacturers can produce them at scale.
WSJ noted that countering large numbers of inexpensive drones has become one of the most pressing challenges facing modern militaries.
The US military has encountered the problem directly during operations in the Middle East, where it has been forced to expend limited stocks of extremely costly precision-guided munitions.
Previously, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that Chinese scientists had developed a combat algorithm known as HG-STR based on a “kill them all” concept.
The algorithm was said to enable swarms of fixed-wing drones to autonomously scan the battlefield and destroy enemy targets even if communications are disrupted and lines of sight are obstructed.
In April, The New York Times, citing three sources within defense and intelligence agencies, reported that the Pentagon assessed Russia’s and China’s drone development programs to be more advanced than those of the United States.
The assessment regarding China’s drone capabilities was reportedly based on analysis of a military parade held in China in September 2025.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
