Diplomacy
Iran-US World Cup clash

Tensions are set to rise between the US and Iran, the two contention countries in the West and in the Middle East, not only in the political realm but now even in sports. There are several disputation controversies between them, but this time they brought sports to politics. The US and Iran have been bitter ideological foes for more than 40 years, cutting diplomatic relations in the wake of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Political antagonism further degenerated when the US Soccer Federation briefly displayed Iran’s national flag on social media without the emblem of the Islamic Republic, terming the move in support of protests in Iran ahead of the two nations’ World Cup match on late Tuesday.
In the posts, the Iranian flag icon was missing its Islamic Republic emblem and only showed its red, white and green stripes. The US Soccer Federation said it had changed the flag for 24 hours to show support for the women in Iran fighting for basic human rights. There have been nationwide protests in Iran since the death of Mahsa Amini, a 22 years old woman in custody on September 16. She was detained for allegedly not wearing a proper headscarf and since then Iranian people took to the streets, demanding more freedom for women.
However, the Federation said they intended to change the flag back, but it immediately earned reactions.
Iran reacted swiftly on the use of an incorrect flag
Iran has strongly condemned the decision to use an incorrect flag, which it said violated the statutes of the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), world football’s global governing body. The Iranian Football Federation also lodged a protest with the (FIFA), demanding sanctions against the United States team. It also called for the US to be disqualified from the World Cup for its action.

A US soccer federation screenshot displaying Iran’s national flag on social media without the emblem of the Islamic Republic. (AP)
“By posting a distorted image of the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran on its official account, the US football team breached the FIFA charter, for which a 10-game suspension is the appropriate penalty. Team USA should be kicked out of the World Cup 2022,”semi-official state news agency in Iran (Tasnim) tweeted.
Safia Allah Faghanpour, a legal adviser to Iran’s soccer federation also said that respecting a nation’s flag is an accepted international practice that all other nations must emulate.
Fagahanpour also said that measures taken regarding the “Islamic Republic of Iran flag are against the law” of FIFA competitions and the US must be held responsible.
US coach apologizes for depicting a modified version of Iran’s flag
The United States coach Gregg Berhalter apologized for the furor triggered by a social media post depicting a modified version of Iran’s flag and said they were not part of this as they are focusing more on today’s (Tuesday) match.

USA’s coach Gregg Berhalter gives a press conference at the Qatar National Convention Center (QNCC) in Doha (AFP)
The US players and coaching staff had been unaware about social posts regarding the flag change. “We’re not focused on those outside things and all we can do is apologizing on behalf of the players and the staff, but it’s not something that we were a part of,” Berhalter told newsmen.
“We had no idea what US Soccer put out. The staff, the players, we had no idea. For us our focus is on this match and I don’t want to sound aloof, or we’re not caring by saying that.”
To ease tension, the US State Department said it had no involvement in the US Soccer Federation’s decision to remove the “Islamic Republic” emblem from the Iranian flag in its social posts.
“We look forward to a peaceful and competitive match on the field. The United States continues to find ways to support the Iranian people in the face of state-sponsored violence against women and a brutal crackdown against peaceful protestors,” a State Department spokesperson told CNBC in an emailed statement.
Flag row and crucial football game
The US and Iran are set to meet in a crucial game that already has drawn political undertones. The loser, if there is any, most likely will be eliminated from the tournament. It is in the knockout stages. There were three matches and the last one between Iran-US was in the World Cup in 1998, with the Iranians securing a 2-1 victory. But in the 2022 World Cup, the Iranian side started off their campaign poorly after the 6-2 thrashing by England, only to put on a redeeming, dominant display against Wales, winning 2-0.
Meanwhile, the flag has also become a point of contention among the Iranian football fans as well. The pro-government supporters waved the flag and went on shouting against those demonstrating over Amin’s death. While other Iranian fans waved Iran’s lion and sun flag, an emblem of its former ruler, the late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in support of ongoing protests in Iran.
A female Iranian fan was also removed from a match for holding Amin’s T-shirt and some others were arrested by the Qatari police for showing support to the protests in Iran. The arrest was made in the line with the FIFA’s officials fan’s guideline which bans “promoting any political, offensive and/or discriminatory messages.”
Difficult to separate sports from politics
Indeed, fans don’t want politics brought into any sports, especially in football, a favorite sport to millions of people. Every country must refrain from introducing politics into sports because the lovers want sporting prowess to be pure no matter in football or cricket, or basketball, or gymnastics, or etc… It is rational to say that sports are, at a baseline, the ultimate meritocracy. In sports we also have a loser and a winner, but the outcome should never be politicalized.
Throughout history, the sport has generally been viewed as a form of entertainment, separate from serious matters of politics. Sport is often considered as a phenomenon that is not related to politics, and many see sports as a way of escaping politics.
But in this tournament “World Cup 2022” the football has been intrinsically-linked with the political games, where even players and fans are now engaged in political activities on the ground. The Iranian football players did not sing the national anthem and fans are separated between pro-and-anti-protests. This itself is a political move, and an indication that politics is difficult to separate from sports. Today’s match between US and Iran is especially significant for both sides, not only to qualify for the final 16 of the World Cup, but because of the rivalry between Washington and Tehran.
Many people also watched Saudi Arabia and Morocco’s victories over Argentina and Belgium, respectively, as political wins. We must learn to watch sports with no eye toward politics. There is need to remember that politics have appeared in the Olympic Games many times in the past several years, but yet the stated goal of the Olympic Movement was to keep sports and politics separate. This is what FIFA also needs to do, and the fans must also learn ethics in sports.
Diplomacy
BRICS internal trade volume hits the $1 trillion mark

Kirill Dmitriev, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation and CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), announced that the internal trade volume among BRICS countries has reached $1 trillion.
In a statement on his Telegram channel, Dmitriev noted that surpassing this significant milestone confirms the strengthening of economic ties between member states and the bloc’s growing role in shaping the new global economic architecture.
He also emphasized that Russia continues to strengthen trade relations, particularly through the BRICS Business Council, in line with the directives of President Vladimir Putin.
BRICS’ share will continue to grow, Putin says
During a plenary session at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on June 20, Russian President Vladimir Putin recalled that at the beginning of the 21st century, BRICS countries accounted for only one-fifth of the global economy, whereas today this figure has reached 40%.
The Russian leader stated that this share will continue to grow, describing it as a “medical fact.” According to Putin, this growth will primarily be driven by the countries of the Global South.
In April, Maxim Oreshkin, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Presidential Administration of Russia, also said that the BRICS countries, operating on principles of consensus, have become a key force in the world economy.
BRICS expansion agenda
Initially composed of five countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—BRICS expanded in 2024 with the inclusion of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran, Ethiopia, and Egypt.
In January of this year, Indonesia became the bloc’s tenth full member.
Diplomacy
Xi Jinping to miss BRICS summit in Rio for the first time

Chinese President Xi Jinping will not attend the upcoming BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro next week.
According to multiple sources cited by the South China Morning Post on Tuesday, this marks the first time Xi will miss the gathering of leaders from major emerging economies.
Officials familiar with the matter stated that Beijing informed the Brazilian government of a scheduling conflict. Premier Li Qiang is expected to lead the Chinese delegation in Xi’s place, a similar arrangement to the 2023 G20 summit in India.
Chinese officials involved in the preparations suggested Xi’s absence is due to his two meetings with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva within the past year. The first occurred during the G20 summit and a state visit to Brasília last November, while the second took place at the China-CELAC forum in Beijing this May.
Xi has never before missed a BRICS summit. In 2023, he was scheduled to deliver a speech at the meeting in South Africa but, at the last minute, sent Commerce Minister Wang Wentao instead. Beijing provided no official explanation for the change.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Xi participated in BRICS meetings virtually, with Russia hosting in 2020 and China in 2021.
On Tuesday, the Brazilian Foreign Ministry told the Post it “would not comment on the internal deliberations of foreign delegations.” The Chinese embassy in Brazil did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
However, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun told the Brazilian newspaper Folha de S.Paulo, “information regarding participation in the summit will be shared at the appropriate time.” Guo added that China supports Brazil’s BRICS presidency and aims to “promote deeper cooperation” among member nations. “In a volatile and turbulent world, the BRICS countries are maintaining their strategic resolve and working together for global peace, stability, and development,” he said.
In Brasília, officials have not concealed their disappointment regarding Xi’s absence. A source informed the Post that Lula had traveled to Beijing in May as a “show of goodwill” and had hoped “the Chinese president would reciprocate the gesture by attending the Rio summit.”
There was also speculation that Lula’s invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a state dinner after the BRICS summit may have influenced Beijing’s decision, as Xi might have been “perceived as a supporting actor” at the event.
Lula’s special adviser for international relations, Celso Amorim, met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing, where he clearly expressed Brazil’s desire to host Xi. “I told them, ‘BRICS without China is not BRICS,'” Amorim stated, recalling that then-President Hu Jintao attended the first BRICS summit in Brazil despite a major earthquake in China at the time. “He only stayed for one day, but he came.”
Amorim emphasized the particular importance of Xi’s attendance in the current global context, citing the “US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization” as a “violation of international rules.”
Premier Li is expected to arrive in Brazil next weekend for the summit, which is scheduled for July 6 and 7 in Rio.
Diplomacy
German arms industry expands presence in India amidst geopolitical shifts

German arms manufacturers Rheinmetall and Diehl Defence have signed agreements with India’s Reliance Defence for the production of precision-guided munitions, explosives, and propellants in India. This move is driven not only by a desire to diversify supply chains but also by Berlin’s efforts to encourage New Delhi to reduce its arms cooperation with Moscow.
Germany has recently increased military collaboration with India, including joint naval and air force maneuvers. However, German companies still lag significantly behind their Western rivals in the US and France, who are supplying or planning to supply fighter jets for large-scale arms purchases in India.
The recent military conflict between India and Pakistan has intensified competition in the growing Indian defense market, with India shifting its focus toward advanced high-tech weaponry, including combat aircraft.
Reliance Defence, the partner of Rheinmetall, continues to lead the list of Indian companies securing international defense contracts. The company has faced accusations of receiving preferential treatment from Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Diehl and Reliance partner for 155mm precision-guided munitions
On June 10, Diehl Defence and India’s Reliance Defence announced a strategic cooperation agreement for the production of Vulcano 155mm precision-guided munitions in India. These munitions, equipped with GPS technology and laser-guided targeting, are expected to enhance the Indian army’s precision weapon capabilities.
Reports suggest that Reliance Defence anticipates sales of up to $1 billion. This agreement between Diehl and Reliance was announced just days after another strategic partnership was revealed on May 22 between Rheinmetall AG and Reliance Defence. Under this latter agreement, Reliance will take over the production of explosives and propellants for medium and large-caliber ammunition, supplying them to Rheinmetall.
This strategic partnership provides Rheinmetall with access to critical raw materials and ensures the security of its supply chains, with plans for further expansion of the collaboration. The timeframe and total value of the agreement have not yet been disclosed.
South Asia’s largest manufacturing facility to bolster Indian defense production
To support its collaborations with Diehl Defence and Rheinmetall, Reliance will establish its own manufacturing facility at Dhirubhai Ambani Defence City in India’s Maharashtra state. This facility, projected to be one of the largest in South Asia, will produce precision-guided munitions and boast an annual production capacity of 200,000 artillery shells, 10,000 tons of explosives, and 2,000 tons of propellants, which will be supplied to Rheinmetall.
These two contracts increase Reliance’s international defense partnerships to four, following existing collaborations with France’s Dassault Aviation and Thales. The agreements reflect the newly established Reliance Defence’s plans to become a leading company in India’s rapidly expanding defense sector.
Meanwhile, both Diehl and Rheinmetall aim to capitalize on the Indian government’s plan to achieve $5 billion in arms exports by 2029.
Germany’s move to reduce India’s reliance on Russian military imports
The agreements between Rheinmetall, Diehl, and Reliance Defence are part of intensified German efforts, ramped up in 2022, to reduce India’s high dependence on Russian arms imports. In February 2023, during a visit to India, then-Chancellor Olaf Scholz urged New Delhi for greater support in Western efforts to isolate Russia, including an increase in arms purchases from Germany.
In June 2023, then-Defense Minister Boris Pistorius stated during his visit to India, “It is not in Germany’s interest for India to remain dependent on Russia’s arms deliveries in the long term.” Pistorius’s discussions resulted in the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the two countries for the joint construction of six non-nuclear submarines in India, to be carried out by Germany’s ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems (TKMS) and India’s Mazagon companies.
The “Focus on India” document, adopted by the German government in October 2024, explicitly linked the intention to “more strongly direct India toward German arms companies” with the goal of “reducing India’s arms policy orientation toward Russia.” Simultaneously, both countries have expanded practical military cooperation, including joint air and naval maneuvers in and around the Indian Ocean.
India-Pakistan tensions and the Sino-Western military technology rivalry
The recent military conflict between India and Pakistan, also viewed as a test case for the clash between Western and Chinese military technology, has further intensified competition for India’s large defense market. The armed conflict lasted four days, with both sides employing their most advanced weapons, including modern fighter jets. Reports indicate that the Pakistan Air Force, with the assistance of Chinese-made J-10C fighter jets, managed to shoot down one or more Indian Air Force Rafale fighter jets; both aircraft are classified as 4.5 generation.
Since then, the US has increased its efforts to expand arms sales to India, including the potential sale of fifth-generation F-35 fighter jets. Shortly before the conflict, India signed a billion-dollar deal with France to acquire 26 Rafale fighter jets to replace its Russian MiG-29K fighter jets.
In response, Russia offered to sell India the Su-57, another fifth-generation fighter jet, and unlike the US, Russia proposed manufacturing the jets in India, including technology transfer. This would enable India to equip the aircraft with indigenous radar and weapon systems. Compared to France and the US, Germany has not recently secured significant arms contracts from India, the world’s largest military equipment importer, apart from the submarine agreement.
Controversial Indian giant: Reliance
Reliance Defence is a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure, which is part of the Reliance Group. The Reliance Group is one of India’s leading conglomerates, with total assets of approximately $47 billion and a broad base of about eight million shareholders. The group also includes other affiliated companies such as Reliance Communications, Reliance Capital, Reliance Power, Reliance Defence and Engineering Limited, and Reliance Defence Technologies Private Limited.
However, the group has a controversial history. The Reliance Group is owned by Anil Ambani, who was once listed as the world’s sixth richest person in 2008. By 2019, however, he had accumulated $2 billion in debt to various investors. In 2020, Anil Ambani was forced to declare bankruptcy in a British court after being sued by three Chinese banks for unpaid loans totaling $700 million.
Another significant setback came from Swedish telecommunications company Ericsson, which sued one of his companies over unpaid bills. Anil Ambani was saved from a jail sentence in this case only by the intervention of his elder brother, Mukesh Ambani, India’s richest man, who paid the debt.
Allegations of Modi’s support for reliance defence
The crisis-ridden Reliance Group reportedly received a lifeline from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the form of an excessively expensive arms deal with French company Dassault Aviation to purchase 36 Rafale fighter jets worth a total of $8.8 billion. As part of the contract signed in April 2015, Reliance Group was designated as an offset partner: Dassault was to reinvest a very large portion of the revenues into Reliance to purchase more defense equipment and strengthen indigenous production capabilities.
This was done despite Reliance Group having no prior experience in the defense sector. In fact, Reliance Group established its subsidiary, Reliance Defence Limited, only thirteen days before the deal with Dassault was announced. A few days after the agreement was signed, Reliance Group formed Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited, which would become Dassault’s most important offset partner. The indebted Ambani Group, with no experience in the aviation sector, suddenly became the guarantor of a multi-billion dollar aviation business.
-
Middle East6 days ago
US to launch major bombing campaign against Iran this weekend, Hersh reports
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Former diplomat warns forcing Iran out of the NPT is the greatest danger
-
Middle East1 week ago
Iran targets Mossad and Unit 8200 in missile attack on Tel Aviv
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Former CIA analyst says Israel used ceasefire talks as a trap
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Netanyahu’s government survives no-confidence vote as Haredi crisis is delayed
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Iranian missile attack causes heavy damage across Israel
-
Middle East1 week ago
Iran signals NPT withdrawal amid rising tensions with Israel
-
Russia1 week ago
Russia alleges UK-Ukraine plot for false flag attack on US Navy in Baltic Sea