Middle East
Israel’s security cabinet approves plan to control Gaza, not occupy it
The Israeli Security Cabinet has approved the plan to occupy Gaza. A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office announced that the Security Cabinet had approved the Prime Minister’s proposal to occupy Gaza City.
According to local sources, the Israeli army is preparing to occupy the entirety of “Gaza City” in the Gaza Strip.
According to the US-based news site Axios, an Israeli official stated that the attack the army is preparing for will only cover Gaza City and will not extend to refugee camps or other areas.
According to the official, the goal is to forcibly displace all civilians from Gaza City by October 7, directing them to refugee camps in the central parts and surrounding areas. Subsequently, a ground offensive will be launched against the remaining Hamas members in the city, and the city will be placed under a complete siege.
The term “control” was preferred over “occupation”
As reported by one of Israel’s leading newspapers, Yediot Aharonot, the word “occupation” was deliberately avoided in the Security Cabinet meeting due to legal responsibilities. Instead, the term “control” was preferred.
A senior Israeli official, also speaking to Yediot Aharonot, said, “Our intention is to occupy Gaza, but we use the term ‘control’ in official documents and statements for legal reasons.”
According to the newspaper, this choice was made to avoid the direct responsibilities towards civilians in occupied territories under international law.
The Israeli Security Cabinet, which discussed the occupation of the entire Gaza Strip, held a meeting yesterday evening.
Israel will not assume civil administration
As reported by The Times of Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated before the cabinet meeting that Israel aims to establish military control over the entire Gaza Strip but does not want to hold the territory. Netanyahu indicated that after the elimination of Hamas, Gaza would be handed over to Arab forces outside the Palestinian Authority.
Speaking to Fox News, Netanyahu said that Israel wants to take control of the entire 26-mile Gaza Strip, stating, “We have to do this to ensure our security, to eliminate Hamas, and to allow the people to live freely. But we do not want to hold Gaza. We want to establish a security perimeter, but we do not want to govern.”
Netanyahu stated that a detailed plan for the post-Hamas era would be prepared and that Israel would not assume civil administration. He also said that the Palestinian Authority would not play any role in this process.
“A temporary Arab force will take over”
Speaking to CNN-News18, Netanyahu said, “We have no plan to occupy or annex Gaza. Our goal is to destroy Hamas, rescue our hostages, and then hand Gaza over to a temporary government.” He emphasized that they want the region to be managed by Arab forces during this transition period, but this administration must not pose a threat to Israel.
Netanyahu also stated that Gaza would be left neither to the Palestinian Authority nor to Hamas: “We will have overall security. We will provide the security perimeter.”
Stating that they want the war in Gaza to end as soon as possible, Netanyahu said, “If Hamas lays down its arms and releases the hostages, the war will end tomorrow. Even the Palestinians in Gaza are fighting against Hamas.”
Israel currently controls about 75% of the Gaza Strip but is staying away from areas where hostages are believed to be held. Although civilians in the areas where the ground operation is being conducted have been called to evacuate, a civil administration has not yet been established.
“The day after” agreement with the US
In his interview on Fox News, Netanyahu did not give a clear answer to the question of whether US President Donald Trump had given explicit approval for Israel to completely control Gaza: “He just says, ‘Israel will do what is necessary.'”
Stating that there is no detailed plan for the post-war period in Gaza but that they have agreed on some principles with the US, Netanyahu listed these principles as follows:
— The disarmament of Hamas
— The demilitarization of Gaza
— The release of hostages
— Israel’s security responsibility
— A civil administration that wants to live in peace, outside of Israeli control
Netanyahu also stated that safe zones would be created for the people of Gaza, and aid for food, water, electricity, health, and infrastructure would be delivered.
Harsh reaction from Hamas: “A coup attempt”
Hamas reacted harshly to Netanyahu’s statements, saying that this plan is “an open coup against the negotiation process” and that the hostages have been written off. Hamas stated that they would consider any administration formed in line with Netanyahu’s proposal as an “occupying force.”
Jordan: The decision must be made by the Palestinians
Speaking to Reuters following Netanyahu’s statements, a Jordanian official emphasized that “only the Palestinians can decide on the future of Gaza,” adding that Arab countries would not accept Netanyahu’s plans and “will not clean up the mess he has created.”
Israeli opposition: Hostages and soldiers are in danger
Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid sharply criticized Netanyahu’s plan, saying, “This plan leads to a new war, the death of more hostages, more martyred soldiers, and public damages worth billions of shekels.”
Yisrael Beiteinu party leader and former Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman said, “The prime minister of October 7 is once again sacrificing the security of Israeli citizens for his own seat.”
Democrats party leader Yair Golan described Netanyahu as a prime minister who is “weak, easily influenced, devoid of decision-making ability, and incapable of bridging the gap between the professional staff and the messianic group that controls the government.”
Golan stated that the decision is a “disaster that will last for generations” and added: “Our sons and grandsons will continue to patrol the streets of Gaza. We will pay hundreds of billions over the years. All of this is being done just for political survival and messianic dreams. How does the government plan to disarm Gaza? Will we be crawling through tunnels, collecting the last Kalashnikovs?”
The plan must be stopped immediately, says UN
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk stated that Israel’s plan must be stopped urgently. Emphasizing that the occupation plan violates the decisions of the International Court of Justice, Türk warned that it would lead to more death, destruction, and forced displacement. Noting that the war in Gaza must end immediately, Türk said that Israel must clear the way for humanitarian aid and protect the lives of civilians. He also called for the unconditional release of both the hostages in Gaza and the Palestinians arbitrarily detained by Israel.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe5 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy5 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
