Connect with us

Asia

Media freedom situation in Afghanistan

Published

on

The Media Freedom Coalition (MFC) has announced that it has removed Afghanistan’s membership in the coalition, citing the deterioration in the country’s media freedom situation as a core reason behind it.

Canada and Netherlands, which jointly chair the global MFC, said that the situation of Afghan media is no longer in accordance with the country’s obligations and they have annulled its membership.

Afghanistan joined the coalition in January 2020 after fulfilling the Global Pledge, and committed to fulfill its global obligations towards freedom of expression. However, the MFC said the decision to remove Afghanistan from the coalition was made after consultation with the members of the coalition and in accordance with the membership conditions of this association.

MFC said that “for the coalition, it is clear that unfortunately the situation of media freedom in Afghanistan is no longer in accordance with the global commitment (of this country) and the current situation (of media freedom) is one of the serious concerns of (the coalition).”

The coalition also lamented the rapid loss of freedom of media in Afghanistan since last year due to persistent harassment, assaults, detentions, and exclusion of women from the media, putting journalists’ lives in danger every day. But the MFC will continue to keep a careful eye on the state of media freedom in Afghanistan.

A quick change on Afghanistan’s freedom of expression

There has been a quick change in the landscape of freedom of media in Afghanistan after regaining power by the Taliban in 2021. Hundreds of journalists and media workers left the country, and hundreds more became jobless within a night. Several news agencies, including some popular tv channels and newspapers closed due to political and economic pressures.

But it is not the end of the road, because still there are many media outlets active in Afghanistan and are making all out efforts to report impartially with all journalism ethics codes. But at the same time they are scrambling to get first hand news as access to information has been limited. There are also reports coming out over censorship that have made the free flow of information into serious challenges.

Reports of violence against journalists have also hit the peak and as per the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) report, there have been over 200 cases of journalist human rights violations recorded in the past over one year.

Over 245 cases of violence against journalists recorded during Taliban’s first year rule

Afghanistan Journalist Center said it acknowledges the concern of the MFC about the situation of freedom of expression in Afghanistan as it had recorded at least 245 incidents of violence against journalists and media workers during the one year of the Taliban rule from 15 August 2021 to 15 August 2022.

The center also recorded at least 130 cases of temporary detention with violence and threats from one to several hours or several days during the span of time. Among the detained journalists, Khalid Qadri, former presenter of Nowruz Radio in Herat province, has been sentenced to one year in prison for publishing his critical views on the Taliban government on social media.

The Taliban has urged to comply with its commitment regarding the applicability of the law of mass media and related laws and regulations (approved by the republican system) and while respecting the free media, it should immediately remove the restrictions imposed on the media outlets and journalists.

Taliban regretted expulsion of Afghanistan from MFC

Reacting to the expulsion of Afghanistan from MFC, the Taliban top official regretted the decision and said that the government is fully committed to support free media in Afghanistan.

Taliban advisor to the Ministry of Information and Culture, Abdul Matin Qani said that the ministry is committed to freedom of expression and fully supports media outlets and access to information in accordance with Islamic and national values.

The Taliban condemns the unilateral decision of the MFC to remove Afghanistan from the global coalition, according to Qani, blaming the MFC for not fully aware of the realities in Afghanistan. “The international community should understand the realities on the ground in Afghanistan and surely they are aware of the fact that Afghan media are operating freely and freedom of expression is there in Afghanistan,” the official said.

While calling the MFC’s decision regrettable, Qani said that the ministry will continue to support the freedom of expression and the media in Afghanistan. The MFC was asked to reconsider its decision.

However, the Taliban has apparently ordered the media not to publish news, reports, and analytical materials in opposition to and against the Taliban regime, ideology, and method of governance. Taliban had already banned broadcasting of foreign movies, TV series, and commercial advertisements that contain images of women. Female journalist’s appearances on the screen had already been restricted and they must wear a hijab during any news bulletin or interviews.

219 media outlets in Afghanistan stopped operations

219 media outlets in Afghanistan have stopped operations in the past one year. Out of 547 active media outlets in Afghanistan till 2021, only 328 media outlets have continued to operate after the Taliban seized power. Other media protecting agencies also said that the activities of 318 media outlets were stopped and nearly three thousand journalists lost their jobs during the past one year.

Indeed, the growth of an independent media in Afghanistan since 2001 was one of the greatest successes and most of these outlets were privately owned. Most of the government’s performance and activities are observed and covered by media and are criticized by media when required and it was effective somehow. But it was not like everything was perfect, and the media sector does not have challenges. Nearly 50 journalists were killed and hundreds of violations against the media have been recorded at that time. Several cases of journalist’s assassination remained uninvestigated, and in most of these incidents the previous government was blamed for.

However, the Taliban, the current ruler of Afghanistan, must let the media workers and journalists carry their jobs because journalism is not a crime but rather it plays a role of bridge connecting people to the government. In fact, the media has been considered as the fourth pillar of the state because it informs the government of situation on the ground.

Asia

Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says

Published

on

The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.

According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.

The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.

The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.

The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.

The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.

According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.

Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House

The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.

In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.

In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.

According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.

Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.

Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.

Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.

Continue Reading

Asia

Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices

Published

on

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.

Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.

The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.

According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”

Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).

Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.

During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.

Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.

Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.

The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.

“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.

Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.

Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers

Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.

In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.

Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.

The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.

Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.

Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks

Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.

A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”

The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.

At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.

According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.

Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.

A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.

Continue Reading

Asia

South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants

Published

on

South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.

The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.

Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.

Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”

“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.

Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.

The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.

Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.

Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.

According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.

South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.

South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.

The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.

Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.

After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey