Connect with us

Diplomacy

Pakistan offers to host second round of US-Iran talks following Islamabad impasse

Published

on

Pakistan has formally offered to host a second round of negotiations between Iran and the US, maintaining its diplomatic momentum following an initial set of contacts in Islamabad on April 13 that concluded without a definitive breakthrough.

Despite the current lack of common ground between the two adversaries, Pakistani officials are signaling that the stalled dialogue could be revived.

Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif stated that a resumption of talks remains a viable possibility. “It is still possible for negotiations between the US and Iran to restart,” Asif said, noting that the process is ongoing and suggesting a new round of discussions could commence in the near future.

Two Pakistani officials, speaking to the Associated Press (AP) on condition of anonymity, confirmed that Islamabad has extended an offer to host the second round. The proposed timing would see the meeting take place in the days preceding the expiration of the current ceasefire.

The officials noted that the implementation of this proposal depends on whether the parties involved seek an alternative venue for the negotiations.

One official emphasized that while the first round did not produce an agreement, it should not be viewed as an isolated attempt. Rather, it constitutes a component of a broader, sustained diplomatic process.

The weekend meetings in Islamabad were recorded as the highest-level direct talks between the two nations in decades. However, deep-seated disagreements over critical issues—specifically transit rights in the Strait of Hormuz and nuclear warheads—prevented significant progress.

US Vice President JD Vance underscored Washington’s expectations, stating, “What we fundamentally need is a clear commitment from them that they will not pursue nuclear weapons.”

Vance characterized the American position on the nuclear issue as a “final and best offer,” adding, “We will see if the Iranians will accept it.”

Following the conclusion of the talks, US President Donald Trump confirmed that partial progress had been achieved but noted that the core dispute remains unresolved.

“The meeting went well, and agreements were reached on many issues, but the only issue that really matters—the nuclear issue—was not resolved,” Trump said. Immediately following this statement, Trump announced that the US Navy would begin “a blockade of all ships” attempting to enter or exit the Strait of Hormuz.

Tehran: Washington’s demands are maximalist

Iranian officials placed the blame for the diplomatic impasse directly on what they described as “maximalist demands” from Washington.

Tehran indicated that serious divergences persist on at least two or three primary fronts, including nuclear activities and protocols for access to the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi asserted that Tehran approached the negotiating table in “good faith” but was met with “maximalism, constantly changing conditions, and the threat of a blockade” from its counterparts.

“Good faith begets good faith. Hostility, however, produces hostility,” Araghchi said. Similarly, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, emphasized that while Tehran proposed “forward-looking initiatives,” the leadership remains distrustful of the opposing side.

Although the US naval blockade of Iranian ports effectively commenced following the inconclusive talks, signals continue to emerge from both capitals regarding a potential return to the table.

Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar affirmed that Islamabad will continue its role in facilitating communication between the two parties.

Analyst Ishtiaq Ahmed told Al Jazeera that the process in Islamabad did not suffer a total collapse, but rather concluded without a formal consensus.

“The talks did not collapse; they ended without an agreement, but a defined US offer remains on the table,” Ahmed said. He highlighted Pakistan’s success in keeping the communication channel open, arguing that the ability to bring the parties face-to-face was a significant diplomatic achievement and that the potential for diplomacy is not yet exhausted.

Nevertheless, military activity on the ground is placing immense pressure on diplomatic efforts as the ceasefire deadline approaches. The US naval blockade of Iranian ports and continued Israeli strikes in Lebanon are jeopardizing the limited momentum gained during the talks.

Journalist Sehar Baloch warned that the existing ceasefire is at risk of becoming merely symbolic rather than a functional arrangement. Baloch cautioned that escalating tensions could either halt the negotiations entirely or force the parties back to the table under significantly more arduous conditions.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey