Connect with us

Europe

Price cap on Russian gas creates trouble in Europe

Published

on

Spanish Energy Minister Teresa Ribera lashed at Brussels last week. Describing the European Union’s (EU) price cap plan for natural gas as “ridiculous” and “damaging”, Ribera also urged Brussels bureaucrats to take the issue seriously.

Polish Climate Minister Anna Moskwa has also joined the long list of people who are unsatisfied with the matter. “[The gas cap proposal] is a joke,” he said, saying the EU’s offer for a price cap does not satisfy a single country.

EU officials, reluctant to give their names to CNBC, said the price cap negotiations had been challenging. Another official told that the negotiations were heated and at some point things even got “really ugly”.

No one is satisfied

The European Commission’s proposed natural gas price cap is 275 euros per hour and the price of natural gas will have to remain above 275 euros for two weeks for the law to be implemented. According to European Energy Commissioner Kadri Simson, the price cap is not a silver bullet that will lower energy prices, but a powerful tool that can be used when needed.

While EU energy ministers had not yet met and the Commission’s proposal had just emerged, a division had begun, involving France and Italy on one side, and Germany and the Netherlands on the other. The group, led by France and Italy, argued that it was necessary to set a price cap on wholesale gas prices in order to protect consumers and industry. The group led by Germany and the Netherlands thought that this would jeopardize supplies. This group includes Austria, Denmark and Hungary.

Similar objections came from members of the European Commission. Setting a price cap for natural gas would cause supplies to shift outside of Europe, causing fuel shortages and making it difficult to supply gas to countries in need within the union.

The electricity commodity exchange Europex also issued a statement, saying they were deeply concerned about the “market adjustment mechanism”, with the risk that the price cap would drive buyers to buy and sell directly. What is meant by direct trading is the purchases made through brokers and companies that are not listed on the stock exchange.

Objection by Poland, Spain and Greece

Countries that support the price cap think the bill is unrealistic. For example, the Spanish’s own Iberian price cap mechanism, which will expire in 2023, has set 40 euros as the limit. Therefore, it makes little sense for Spain to adjust to the price cap of 275 euros.

Poland’s problem seems to be different. Together with the Baltic countries, Warsaw argues that the price cap for natural gas and oil is too high, that it will never be put into practice and therefore will not harm Russia. For example, a price cap in 65-70 dollars range is being considered for Russian oil, but Poland’s proposal is 30 dollars.

Greek Environment and Energy Minister Costas Skrekas says a price cap of 275 euros is not actually a price cap though. The energy crisis for businesses and households is “shocking”, Skrekas said, claiming that Athens’ price cap proposal is 150-200 euros.

The meeting failed to reach any consensus

The emergency meeting of EU energy ministers last week also resulted with uncertainty and disagreement. “The debate was very heated and you all know that there are very different views,” Czech Industry Minister Jozef Síkela, who chaired the meeting, told the press.

Dutch Energy Minister Rob Jetten, who was skeptical about the price cap, said there were still huge. On Friday, while the price of gas in Europe was 123 euros per megawatt hour, Jetten said they want to prepare for the following year.

The Associated Press estimates that there are 15 countries that want a lower price cap. Germany and the Netherlands worry that gas suppliers who find better prices elsewhere in the world will bypass Europe.

With no results from last week’s meeting, a new meeting was scheduled for December 13th. On 5 December, new EU oil sanctions against Russia will begin.

Russia’s reaction

The first statement from the opposite front came from Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s permanent representative in Vienna-based international organisations. “Totalitarianism is being expanded into economics by the West,” Ulyanov said, arguing that the West is the biggest enemy of the market economy. Ulyanov also reminded that Moscow will not sell oil and natural gas under the price cap conditions.

In a phone conversation with the Iraqi Prime Minister, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that the price cap that is to be implemented on Russian oil and natural gas would create “serious consequences” in the global energy market.

Estimates show that oil production in Russia ranges from 20 to 50 dollars per barrel. According to Bloomberg, that’s an average of 52 dollars. If the EU implements the price cap, Russia has the opportunity to cut production and turn the world’s energy markets upside down.

Attitude of US is different from EU

Other EU member states, including those with large maritime industries such as Greece, Malta and Cyprus, want to keep the price high in order to maintain the flow of Russian oil trade, the Financial Times wrote. The interesting thing is that the US probably supports this position. Washington is concerned that EU sanctions and the price cap will drive oil prices up.

The Biden government hopes that if a price cap is set, countries such as China, India and Turkey will be able to negotiate lower-priced deals, taking advantage of the price cap.

Europe

NATO unveils 32-nation defence strategy to counter adversaries

Published

on

NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) Alexus Grynkewich has unveiled a new defence strategy aimed at rendering any attack against an alliance member entirely futile.

Speaking at the Warsaw Security Forum, Grynkewich said the concept, titled the “Theory of War”, is designed to prevent hostile elements from infiltrating NATO territory and waging conflict there.

Arguing that they aim to reassure the one billion people living within the alliance’s borders, Grynkewich maintained that they also wish to send a message to adversaries such as Russia that NATO is prepared for a potential invasion.

“If we are attacked, we are ready to fight even tonight,” Grynkewich said.

Three-stage defence plan enters into force

Approved by all 32 alliance members, the plan combines land forces and conventional weapons systems with advanced technologies such as unmanned aerial vehicles, counter-drone systems, and artificial intelligence.

Lessons drawn from ground and air combat in Ukraine, as well as current conflicts in the Middle East, play a decisive role in shaping the strategy.

According to Grynkewich, the new defence doctrine rests on three fundamental phases that form the core of NATO’s approach:

The first pillar of the plan, the “block” phase, focuses on preventing hostile forces from seizing allied territory.

In this context, NATO ground components will engage directly with attacking units, restrict their manoeuvrability, and neutralise forces attempting to breach alliance borders.

Should the assault continue, the second phase (“blunt”) will come into play, deploying autonomous systems requiring minimal human intervention alongside advanced sensor networks to slow the momentum of the attack and wear down advancing forces.

These systems will detect threats in real time, combining capabilities across different operational domains to halt the adversary’s advance.

The final stage, the “break” phase, will target not the attacking units directly, but the operational warfighting system that sustains them.

Command centres, supply chains, and logistics routes will be struck using long-range precision strike systems and sensor networks, eliminating the adversary’s ability to sustain military operations.

“Enemy commanders will not be able to direct their troops, their supply lines will be severed, and their logistics vehicles will be destroyed,” Grynkewich said.

Strategy aims to defend borders rather than gain territory

Noting that NATO has no intention of acquiring territory and that the strategy is entirely defence-oriented, Grynkewich said, “We have no plan, intention, or ambition beyond protecting our citizens and our territory.”

Stating that he considers the likelihood of a direct attack on alliance territory to be low, the commander nevertheless stated that they would respond without hesitation to any attempt targeting allies.

Addressing questions regarding US commitment to the alliance, Grynkewich recalled that Washington reaffirmed its adherence to Article 5 at the NATO summit in July.

Article 5, which forms the cornerstone of NATO’s collective defence principle, stipulates that an armed attack against one ally is considered an attack against all members.

Continue Reading

Europe

Germany detains two Turkish suspects over Polish Starlink arson

Published

on

Polish authorities have announced that German police detained two Turkish citizens suspected of setting fire to a Starlink station near Warsaw last month.

Tomasz Siemoniak, Poland’s minister coordinating the special services, told a news conference in Warsaw on Monday that Poland has requested the suspects’ extradition and has “no doubt” that Russian secret services were behind the arson attack.

“It should also be noted that Russian intelligence agencies are increasingly turning to people linked to the criminal underworld,” Siemoniak said at the press conference.

In a post on X, Prime Minister Donald Tusk described the incident as another “act of hybrid warfare” and said those responsible for the sabotage would be brought to justice in Poland.

Interior Minister Marcin Kierwinski said the two Turkish citizens would be charged in Poland with carrying out an act of sabotage on the orders of a foreign intelligence agency.

Power supply equipment at a Starlink ground station serving Eastern Europe, including Poland and Ukraine, caught fire on the night of 23 September.

The incident did not cause a major disruption to internet service. The blaze, however, completely destroyed the station’s electrical system and backup generator.

Poland, a key transit route for Western aid to Ukraine, has faced a series of suspicious incidents recently.

Numerous cyberattacks have targeted public utilities, including water and energy infrastructure as well as hospitals.

In addition, damage to a railway line between Warsaw and the Ukrainian border was attributed by officials to Russian sabotage.

In late July, a Russian missile also landed in Poland.

Continue Reading

Europe

LSE study finds post-bailout Greece turned into a cafe economy

Published

on

A new study prepared by the Hellenic Observatory at the London School of Economics (LSE) has examined the structural transformation of the Greek economy following the bailout era.

According to reporting by the Greek Reporter, the study titled “The Café Economy”, authored by Michalis Nikiforos, Vlassis Missos, Christos Perros, and Nikolaos Rodousakis, revealed that the country has become excessively dependent on Accommodation and Food Service Activities (AFSA), a sector encompassing all tourism-related fields including restaurants, bars, hotels, entertainment, and short-term rentals.

The researchers pointed to a fundamental issue that is often overlooked behind the “café economy” characterisation. According to the study, despite promises of a new “development model”, Greece has over the last 15 years remained trapped in a growth cycle built on an exceptionally fragile foundation.

Labour productivity declined as tourism expanded

The study reported that following austerity policies and structural reforms that liberalised labour and product markets, tourism-linked activities expanded disproportionately compared to other sectors. This unbalanced growth became one of the primary drivers of the economy’s broader loss of productivity.

Contrary to the productivity gains promised by bailout reforms, an opposite trend took hold across the Greek economy. While labour productivity suffered a steep decline, employment shifted toward low-productivity sectors, led by accommodation and food services.

The researchers identified the contraction in aggregate demand and the sharp erosion of real wages as the main causes of this productivity collapse. Between 2009 and 2024, labour productivity fell by 16% and remained below pre-crisis levels.

The slide in real wages was even more pronounced. Across the country, real wages dropped by between 26% and 35%, while losses in the tourism sector reached as high as 60%. The authors described this outcome as a severe process of income redistribution operating against labour.

The shift of employment toward the AFSA sector accounted for approximately one-third of the total decline in labour productivity. The loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs in productive sectors such as manufacturing, alongside the scarcity of employment in high-technology and innovation fields, deepened this decline.

Greece enters regression under a dual model

According to the study, Greece’s development model is displaying a historical regression by evolving into a “dual” structure typically observed in underdeveloped or transition economies. In this model, economic growth relies on deploying labour, cheapened through wage suppression, into low-productivity sectors.

Noting that the three bailout programmes implemented between 2010 and 2018 triggered a deep recession instead of boosting competitiveness, the researchers stated that the Greek economy has never fully emerged from this slump.

The study also recalled that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had in the past apologised for underestimating the negative impacts of severe fiscal contraction.

Educated young population works in low-wage jobs

Data published by the LSE showed that the workforce in the AFSA sector underwent a fundamental transformation between 2009 and 2023:

Employment in the sector surged by 87%. Gross Value Added recorded 11% growth. AFSA became the largest employer in the Greek economy.

On the other hand, the sector is characterised by low wages, precarious working conditions, and an increase in part-time work. Although the educational attainment of tourism employees has risen, workers are increasingly employed below their qualifications.

Eurostat figures confirm that Greece, behind Spain, has one of the highest rates in Europe of young graduates who are overqualified yet employed in unskilled jobs.

More than 86% of young university graduates working in the tourism and hospitality sector are employed below their qualification levels.

Structural risks deepen while external balance improves

The report titled “The Café Economy” listed the advantages along with the severe vulnerabilities generated by this development path:

The positive effect emerged in the external balance. The tourism sector provided a significant contribution to correcting the current account balance. The trade surplus in travel services rose by five percentage points between 2009 and 2023, covering approximately half of the total current account deficit contraction over the same period.

Conversely, overreliance on tourism and a low-productivity, low-wage, labour-intensive services economy brought heavy structural weaknesses:

Social and environmental degradation: The disproportionate growth of the sector lays the ground for environmental and cultural deterioration, frequently described through the concept of “overtourism”.

Housing crisis: The proliferation of short-term rentals and foreign property acquisitions drives up rents, making housing costs unaffordable for local workers.

External dependence: As the café economy expands at the expense of other sectors, reliance on external demand and seasonal fluctuations multiplies; entire regions remain exposed to shifts in tourist flows.

The researchers warned that low-wage policies erode economic competitiveness over the long term by weakening incentives for technological innovation and progress.

Noting that the thesis claiming market liberalisation automatically delivers productivity has been undermined by the Greek experience, the study stated that dependence on low-productivity sectors such as AFSA creates an economic dilemma. Even if these activities support demand and foreign currency inflows, they damage long-term productivity and social sustainability.

The report noted: “A successful way out for Greece requires policies that do not merely stimulate demand, but also strategically promote high-productivity sectors, support technological upgrading, and ensure inclusive growth. Without such a change of course, the ‘café economy’ risks becoming not a temporary adjustment process, but a long-term stagnation equilibrium.”

The study concluded with a call to re-evaluate structural reforms in light of real economic and institutional conditions, and to prioritise development focused on high productivity.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey