Connect with us

AMERICA

The ‘third candidate’ in the U.S. elections: Jill Stein

Published

on

Although the U.S. political landscape is dominated by two major parties, “third candidates” or independent candidates have, at times, played significant roles in American politics.

Among the most notable of these “third candidates” was Eugene V. Debs, who began his career as a Democrat, later joined the trade union movement, and organized the historic Pullman Strike. This strike, which drew in hundreds of thousands across numerous states, incited such anxiety among the elite that then-President Grover Cleveland deployed the military to suppress it, leading to Debs’ imprisonment.

Debs ultimately ran as the Socialist Party of America’s presidential candidate in five elections, earning 6% of the vote in 1912. Notably, Debs received a 10-year prison sentence in 1918 due to his anti-war stance opposing U.S. involvement in World War I.

Presidential candidate for the third time

In the 2024 election, Green Party candidate Jill Stein continues the “third candidate” tradition by running for president a third time. First entering the race in 2012, Stein secured 0.4% of the vote, and in 2016, she improved to 1.6%. In current polling, Stein’s support ranges between 1.5% and 2%, with particular backing from Arab-Muslim voters due to her anti-war stance on Gaza.

According to recent updates, Stein, a physician from Massachusetts, will appear on ballots in Arizona, California, Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, Montana, Utah, Nevada, Alaska, Arkansas, Wisconsin, Tennessee, Maine, Maryland, and Missouri. The Green Party will be listed on the ballot in Mississippi, South Carolina, and Hawaii.

Ballot access in each state varies; Stein’s campaign manager Jason Call explained to Newsweek that in some states, petitioning was required to gain access, either as the Green Party candidate or as an independent.

The campaign anticipates ballot access in 40 states and Washington D.C. by the end of the process, although Stein will not be on the ballot in Nevada, Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Indiana.

Stein and the Green Party platform

Stein describes the Green Party as advocating for peace, environmental action, and the New Green Deal. In a recent CBS Pittsburgh interview, Stein expressed concern about the detrimental effects of fracking on air quality, especially in cities like Pittsburgh. She criticizes both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump for what she calls their alignment with “the endless war machine” and their support of Bibi Netanyahu’s military actions in Gaza.

Stein asserts that her environmental and anti-war positions distinguish her from Trump and Harris, positioning her as a genuine alternative. She pledges to end all new fracking operations immediately and phase out fracking over the next decade.

Calling for an end to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza

On Ukraine and Palestine, Stein argues for an immediate end to both conflicts. She accuses the U.S. of provoking Russia by placing NATO nuclear weapons on its border. Stein proposes negotiation and diplomacy as alternatives, alleging that the U.S. missed opportunities for peaceful resolutions.

Stein has also stated that she is the only presidential candidate advocating for an immediate ceasefire in Israel’s conflict with Gaza. She pledges to pressure Bibi Netanyahu for a ceasefire, emphasizing that most Americans support an end to what she describes as the genocidal assault on Gaza. “If you don’t comply with international law, we will cut off all U.S. aid until you do,” she insists.

Democrats accuse Stein of ‘splitting the vote’

Some Democrats contend that Stein could act as a “spoiler” by drawing votes from Kamala Harris and aiding Donald Trump in critical states like Pennsylvania. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democratic Congresswoman from New York, criticized the Green Party’s electoral approach, stating on Instagram, “You show up every four years to stoke anger, but that’s not serious.”

Stein, however, disputes this view. “The anti-genocide vote isn’t going to Harris,” she argues.

European Greens against U.S. Greens

Notably, the European Green Parties have called on Stein to withdraw and support Kamala Harris, asserting that Harris is the only viable candidate to prevent Trump’s return to the White House. The U.S. Green Party has responded, accusing the European Greens of parroting Democratic Party rhetoric and stressing that many Americans seek an option outside of the two main parties.

“We invite the European Greens to engage with us directly, understand our positions, and support our call for Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) to eliminate the so-called vote-splitting factor,” the Green Party stated.

AMERICA

Fed cuts interest rates, dollar surges to two-year high

Published

on

The U.S. Federal Reserve reduced interest rates by a quarter percentage point but signaled a slower pace of easing next year. This move drove the U.S. dollar to its highest level in two years and triggered a sell-off in both domestic and international stock markets.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted on Wednesday to lower the benchmark interest rate to 4.25–4.5%, marking the third consecutive cut. The lone dissenting vote came from Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, who favored maintaining the current rates.

Officials highlighted concerns about persistent inflation, projecting fewer rate cuts for 2025 than previously expected. Reflecting these worries, policymakers also raised their inflation forecasts for the coming year. Following the announcement, Fed Chair Jay Powell remarked that the current policy settings were “significantly less restrictive,” indicating the Fed’s inclination to adopt a more cautious approach to further easing.

“This decision was a ‘closer call’ than prior meetings,” Powell noted, emphasizing that inflation trends remain “sideways” while risks to the labor market are “diminishing.”

Aditya Bhave, senior U.S. economist at Bank of America, described the Fed’s message as “unabashedly hawkish.” He pointed to the shift in officials’ 2025 forecasts, which now anticipate just two quarter-point rate cuts instead of three, calling it a “wholesale shift.”

JPMorgan Chase, a key player in U.S. bond markets, noted that money markets are pricing in only a 0.31 percentage point rate cut in 2025. This outlook, significantly tighter than the bank’s earlier 0.75-point forecast, underscores the magnitude of the Fed’s policy shift.

The decision triggered a sharp sell-off on Wall Street, with the S&P 500 falling 3% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropping 3.6%. High-profile winners of the 2024 rally were hit hard, including: Tesla, down 8.3%; Meta (Facebook’s parent company), down 3.6%; Amazon, down 4.6%.

Smaller companies, often seen as more sensitive to US economic fluctuations, also suffered. The Russell 2000 index declined 4.4%.

In Asia, stocks fell in early Thursday trading. Benchmarks in South Korea and Taiwan dropped 1.8% and 1.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, U.S. government bond prices fell, driving the yield on two-year Treasuries—sensitive to Fed policy—up by 0.11 percentage points to 4.35%.

The U.S. dollar surged 1.2% against a basket of six major currencies, reaching its strongest level since November 2022. According to Wells Fargo senior economist Mike Pugliese, the currency had already been rising on expectations of inflationary pressures following Donald Trump’s election victory last month. However, Wednesday’s Fed decision “poured more petrol on the fire.”

The South Korean won dropped to a 15-year low against the dollar, while the Japanese yen weakened 0.5%.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Amazon pledges $1 billion to Trump inauguration fund

Published

on

Amazon confirmed on Thursday that it will contribute $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund, a move mirroring similar actions by other major tech companies, including Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. Amazon also plans to broadcast Trump’s inauguration via its Prime Video service.

This announcement comes as major tech executives seek to establish ties with the incoming U.S. president, despite Trump’s longstanding criticisms of Big Tech. Trump has frequently accused technology companies of censorship and bias against conservative media.

Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s founder and CEO, is reportedly planning to meet Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort next week, according to The Wall Street Journal, which first reported Amazon’s donation. Similarly, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple CEO Tim Cook have expressed their congratulations to Trump since his election victory in November.

Trump’s relationship with Amazon has been fraught with challenges. During his first term, he accused the company of undercutting competition and criticized its tax policies. In 2018, Trump ordered a review of U.S. Postal Service package pricing, claiming the agency acted as Amazon’s “courier.”

Apple, meanwhile, faces potential risks from Trump’s proposed tariff policies, which could disrupt critical supply chains in China. However, during Trump’s first term, Cook secured exemptions for certain Apple products.

Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, and other tech leaders have also engaged with Trump. According to The Information, Zuckerberg dined with Trump after the election. Pichai is also expected to meet Trump this week.

While Trump scrutinized Big Tech during his presidency, Amazon now faces mounting regulatory pressure under President Joe Biden. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), led by Lina Khan, has been investigating Amazon for alleged monopoly practices, with several states filing lawsuits last year. The FTC is also examining major cloud service providers, including Amazon, over partnerships in artificial intelligence.

Despite earlier conflicts, Bezos recently praised Trump for his “tremendous grace and courage under real fire” in a post on X (formerly Twitter) following an assassination attempt. Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, reportedly prevented the newspaper from endorsing Trump’s Democratic opponent Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.

Speculation about a tacit agreement between Bezos and Trump has surfaced, allegedly tied to Blue Origin, Bezos’s rocket company competing with Elon Musk’s SpaceX.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Investors poured $140 billion into U.S. equities following Trump’s victory

Published

on

Nearly $140 billion has flowed into U.S. equity funds since last month’s election, as investors anticipate Donald Trump’s administration will implement sweeping tax cuts and regulatory reforms.

According to the Financial Times (FT), which cites data from EPFR, U.S. equity funds have seen inflows totaling $139.5 billion since Trump’s victory on November 5. This surge in investment made November the busiest month for equity inflows since records began in 2000.

The massive influx of funds has driven major U.S. stock indexes to a series of record highs, as investors appeared to shrug off concerns about potential economic risks, including inflation and its implications for the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy.

“The growth agenda that Trump has put on the table is being fully embraced,” said Dec Mullarkey, Chief Executive of SLC Management. He added that Trump’s picks for top administration posts have been seen as “very market friendly.”

Trump has promised to fill his administration with financial experts, including Scott Bessent as Treasury Secretary, and Paul Atkins, a cryptocurrency advocate, as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The president-elect has outlined a pro-growth agenda, emphasizing reduced taxes, deregulation, and economic expansion. These proposals have spurred optimism among investors, fueling a rally in the market.

The S&P 500, Wall Street’s primary stock market indicator, has risen 5.3% since Election Day, bringing its total gains for the year to 28%. Smaller companies, which are often seen as more responsive to changes in the U.S. economy, have outperformed larger firms during this period. The Russell 2000 index recently hit a record high for the first time in three years.

While U.S. equity funds have enjoyed record inflows, other global markets have experienced outflows emerging market funds have seen net withdrawals of $8 billion, with China-focused funds accounting for $4 billion; funds investing in Western Europe have lost $14 billion; and Japan-focused funds have seen outflows of approximately $6 billion.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey