Connect with us

Diplomacy

Trump and Japan discuss tariffs and military support costs

Published

on

US President Donald Trump expressed his satisfaction following a meeting with Japan’s trade envoy at the White House on Wednesday, noting progress in the discussions. However, the Japanese side requested that the President reconsider tariffs, stating that they would negatively impact Japanese companies’ efforts to invest in the US.

Trump posted on the Truth Social platform after trade talks with Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, Ryosei Akazawa: “Just met with the Japanese Delegation on Trade. Great Progress!”

Akazawa later told reporters that after a 50-minute meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, he attended a 75-minute meeting at the White House with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Akazawa said that Trump made it clear that discussions with Japan were a high priority for America and that he hoped the talks would progress well at the ministerial level.

Akazawa noted that during the cabinet-level discussions, he conveyed his regret regarding all newly implemented tariffs, including “reciprocal” tariffs, sector-specific tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminum, as well as across-the-board 10% tariffs. He added that he strongly urged the US to reconsider the measures.

The two sides agreed to hold another round of talks this month, aiming to reach an agreement that could be signed by Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba as soon as possible.

Akazawa declined to provide details about Wednesday’s discussions but clarified that currencies were not discussed.

A Japanese Foreign Ministry official told reporters that the parties would take away what they learned, analyze each other’s positions, and meet again within the month. It has not yet been decided whether the second meeting will be in person or virtual.

Earlier in the day, Trump signaled that discussions on lowering reciprocal tariffs imposed on Japan, currently set at 24%, would depend on Tokyo’s willingness to further share the burden of maintaining US military bases in the country.

“Japan is coming in today to talk Tariffs, the Cost of Military Support, & ‘TRADE JUSTICE.’ I will be meeting, along with the Secretary of the Treasury & Commerce. Hopefully, something that will be good (GREAT!) for both Japan and the US can be worked out!” he wrote on Truth Social.

In the trade negotiations, Japan was represented by Akazawa, a close ally of Ishiba. He was accompanied by senior officials from the finance, economy, trade and industry, and foreign affairs ministries.

Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, told reporters on Friday that Trump had made it clear he would be “deeply involved” in the discussions with his trade team.

“He wants to sign all of these deals himself,” Leavitt said.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who told reporters in Tokyo that there was still a “gulf” between Japan and the US, said Akazawa’s meeting was constructive. “The negotiations will not be easy,” the Prime Minister said, adding, “but President Trump said he would give priority to Japan. I think it was a meeting that will lead to the next steps.”

Akazawa, a former transportation bureaucrat, faces a long task. Japan wants the 24% “reciprocal” tariff to be lowered and to be exempted from the 25% tariff imposed on foreign automobiles. However, the Trump administration has signaled that the automobile tariffs are “Section 232” tariffs based on national security concerns and are not negotiable.

Possible concessions from the Japanese side include a guarantee to purchase liquefied natural gas from Alaska on a long-term basis, more rice imports, and a commitment to buy more American cars.

One of the most contentious issues would be a demand from the US side for action on the currency front—for example, measures that would lead to a higher yen and a lower dollar.

Concessions on agriculture would be a sensitive issue ahead of upper house elections in Japan this summer, where the ruling Liberal Democratic Party cannot afford to lose agricultural votes.

Last week, Trump said at a cabinet meeting that he did not believe the security alliance with Japan was fair.

“We defend them, but they don’t have to defend us. That doesn’t sound too good,” Trump told reporters.

He expressed frustration that Japan does not pay for the protection it receives: “We spend hundreds of billions of dollars defending them… We pay for the whole thing, and they don’t pay anything. But if we are attacked, they don’t have to do anything to help us.”

According to the Congressional Research Service, Japan pays about $2 billion per year to offset the cost of stationing US military personnel in Japan. In addition, Japan pays compensation to local governments that host US troops, rent for bases, and costs for new facilities.

It is unclear what role China will play in the discussions.

According to Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal, Bessent is asking trade partners to limit China’s interference in their economies in exchange for concessions on reciprocal tariffs. The plan, according to the newspaper, is to isolate China.

According to the newspaper, these measures include not allowing China to ship goods through their countries, preventing Chinese companies from locating in their territories to avoid US tariffs, and not incorporating cheap Chinese manufactured goods into their economies.

Cutting China off from the US economy with tariffs, and even potentially delisting Chinese stocks from US exchanges, are also being considered, according to the report.

Meanwhile, Ishiba has implied that he wants to work with other countries to deal with Trump’s tariffs, rather than just making an arrangement for Japan alone.

Ishiba told a parliamentary committee on Monday that he wanted to work with US allies such as Southeast Asian countries and Britain, which are currently facing tariff threats.

As of now, Trump’s reciprocal tariffs are under a 90-day pause to allow room for trade negotiations. A 10% across-the-board tariff and a 25% tariff on exports to the US of automobiles, auto parts, steel, and aluminum remain in effect.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey