Middle East
US State Department watchdog probes defunct Gaza aid group over $30 million grant
The US State Department’s internal watchdog has launched a comprehensive investigation into how the now-defunct “Gaza Humanitarian Fund” (GHF) managed a multi-million-dollar emergency aid budget, according to reports.
The investigation, conducted by the State Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG), is focusing on the details of a $30 million grant decision and the subsequent expenditure of those funds. The GHF was established last June specifically to distribute humanitarian aid in Gaza, the Financial Times reported, citing three sources familiar with the matter.
The foundation was created last year with the support of the Donald Trump administration and the Israeli government to serve as an alternative to United Nations (UN) humanitarian operations in Gaza. While the United States (US) was the only country to publicly declare its funding of the GHF, UN officials characterized the entity as a “front” utilized to further Israeli wartime objectives. International humanitarian organizations had largely refused to cooperate with the foundation.
One source stated that the OIG is investigating “exactly what the money was spent on and how,” as well as which budget line provided the funds and how they were distributed. Another source indicated that investigators are also scrutinizing the pricing mechanisms for aid supplies and logistical services purchased by the GHF using department funds.
The Office of Inspector General stated that it does not comment on ongoing investigations and would neither confirm nor deny the allegations. However, the office noted that it had initiated a general audit in February regarding the department’s “efforts to provide food assistance to the West Bank and Gaza.”Two sources with knowledge of GHF operations said the State Department transferred funds to the foundation, which then used contractors to purchase food and logistics. One source emphasized that the GHF paid “exorbitant” amounts for food supplies, significantly exceeding the prices previously paid by the US in the region.
A GHF spokesperson, speaking on condition of anonymity, claimed the foundation was unaware of the OIG investigation and defended the procurement, asserting that food supplies were largely sourced from the local market at reasonable prices. However, the spokesperson admitted that an internal assessment by the foundation found shipping costs to be exceptionally high due to the inherent risks of operating in an active war zone.
The spokesperson further noted that while the GHF was developing a plan to reduce transportation costs, the Israeli government requested the suspension of its activities in October following a US-brokered ceasefire. The spokesperson declined to provide further details regarding the foundation’s financial statements.
While US government internal audit mechanisms do not have the authority to impose direct criminal sanctions, they can recommend legal action to relevant agencies or refer cases directly to the US Department of Justice if they find reasonable suspicion that federal laws have been violated.
Established in May 2025, the GHF faced intense scrutiny from its first day of operations due to its opaque organizational structure, mysterious funding sources, and the reported use of mercenaries at aid distribution points. During a period of escalating international condemnation regarding Israel’s blockade of Gaza and its severe humanitarian toll, the foundation’s founding executive director and deputy resigned before operations had even fully commenced.
Health officials in the Hamas-controlled territory reported that approximately 1,000 Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire while attempting to reach GHF distribution centers. During the period when Israel restricted access for most international organizations except the GHF, UN agencies warned of an impending famine in the besieged enclave.
The GHF commenced operations during a period when the Trump administration was moving to dissolve the US Agency for International Development (USAID). State Department officials and contractors claim this move led to total chaos in aid distribution.
A US official stated that the department drew the $30 million grant from humanitarian aid funds and that the administration encouraged other nations to contribute to the structure. However, officials in Washington admitted they struggled to understand the exact mechanics of how the GHF operated.
Reports indicate the government exempted the GHF from the standard oversight and legal regulations typically applied to taxpayer-funded groups. Conversely, congressional staff overseeing the department’s budget were reportedly given no information regarding which security measures remained in place or how the funds were being spent.
In July, a group of Democratic senators wrote to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, questioning “what procurement mechanism was used in the execution of the $30 million appropriation,” which rules were bypassed, and what other funding sources supported the GHF. The senators stated in the letter that “not a single dollar of American taxpayers should be complicit in this questionable scheme.”
The GHF completely ceased its Gaza operations in October 2025. A US official who was forced to defend the project during its active period commented on its status, stating, “The funding was always in the dark. There were major question marks within the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs because there were no answers.” Diplomats reportedly felt significant unease being tasked with advocating for what they described as a half-baked and poorly executed project.
By late 2025, the GHF, which was initially registered in both the US and Switzerland, announced it had run out of funds. While the foundation claimed to have distributed more than 187 million free meals to Gazans during its months of operation, even some Israeli officials have viewed that figure with skepticism.
Middle East
Pentagon faces severe budget crunch as Middle East operational costs drain key military funds
The US Department of Defense is facing a severe budgetary shortfall driven by the escalation of the war with Iran, according to current and former American officials cited by The Washington Post.
Officials noted that funding for several critical areas could be completely exhausted in the coming weeks. Budgets allocated for this year’s operations of the Navy and Air Force, which have deployed warships and aviation assets to the Middle East, are projected to run out by the end of July.
To cover the funding deficit expected before the start of fiscal year 2027 on October 1, the Pentagon is internally redirecting its budgetary resources. Under this approach, military exercises and training sessions designed to maintain troop combat readiness are being scaled back or canceled. Additionally, funds originally allocated for the maintenance and repair of military equipment and facilities are being transferred to operational expenses.
In recent weeks, the Department of Defense requested permission from Congress to shift $4.3 billion—initially allocated for personnel training and weapons procurement—to cover emergency requirements. However, no decision has yet been made regarding this request.
The White House has also requested that Congress allocate $67 billion in emergency supplemental funding to cover military expenditures. Despite this, the House of Representatives plans to begin a one-month recess on Thursday, which will delay any decision on the funding for at least several weeks.
“Everyone needs to look at this situation and shake off the complacency,” said Representative Pat Harrigan, a Republican from North Carolina, commenting on the development.
Pentagon Spokesperson Sean Parnell emphasized the critical importance of defense funding, stating that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will do everything necessary to maintain the combat readiness of the armed forces.
Secretary Hegseth and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, are scheduled to present the justification for the funding allocation at an upcoming hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee. Russell Vought, the Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, is also among those scheduled to testify before the committee.
Vought stated last month that the cost of the war had reached approximately $30 billion. However, this White House calculation did not include the cost of rebuilding and repairing US bases damaged as a result of Iranian attacks in the Middle East.
Current and former officials warn that if Congress fails to act, military leadership will soon be forced to make even deeper compromises.
In closed-door discussions, Pentagon officials are expressing more profound anxieties. They emphasize that supplemental funding is urgently required to replenish munitions stockpiles, which are vital for deterring adversaries such as Russia and China.
The US defense budget for this year stands at approximately $1 trillion. This figure includes $150 billion in one-time funding approved by Congress last year for various priority goals, ranging from designing advanced weapons systems to stimulating the domestic defense industry. Meanwhile, the Donald Trump administration has requested a $1.5 trillion defense budget for 2027.
Internal Pentagon assessments indicate that when accounting for base repairs, the replacement of destroyed aircraft, and the replenishment of munitions stockpiles, the total cost of the Iran war could rise to between $80 billion and $100 billion, according to reporting by NBC. Sources state that the repair costs for US military facilities in Bahrain alone could reach $1 billion.
Senators are expected to question Hegseth on the collapse of the ceasefire, rising war costs, and the American service members who lost their lives in Jordan, Bloomberg reported.
Middle East
Yemen’s Houthis declare naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, escalating global energy risks
Yemen’s Houthi movement announced on Monday that it will impose a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, a move that raises the prospect of a new front opening in the US-led war with Iran and poses fresh threats to global energy supplies and trade stretching far beyond the Gulf.
The escalation followed one of the bloodiest periods of the war for American personnel. On Monday, the Pentagon released the identities of two US service members killed in an Iranian attack on a US base in Jordan on Friday. Officials also reported that unidentified remains had been recovered, which are believed to belong to a third service member previously listed as missing in the clash. In a separate incident, a fourth American soldier was killed in northern Iraq during the “controlled demolition” of unexploded ordnance left by a downed Iranian one-way attack drone.
Following the Houthi blockade declaration, the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen announced in a statement that it would respond to the move with force. The coalition also stated that it has begun implementing measures to protect its vessels transiting the Bab al-Mandab Strait, which has become a critical export route for Saudi crude after the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
The Houthis made their announcement after mutually hostile strikes rendered a fragile temporary agreement, signed last month between Tehran and Washington, non-functional. Nevertheless, both sides also signaled an openness to negotiations. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicated that diplomatic contacts are continuing, noting that mediators had presented certain “proposals” to Tehran, though it did not share specific details.
Oil prices rose briefly following the Houthi announcement but subsequently fell back as investors maintained hope for a diplomatic solution. However, insurance costs for transporting goods through the Red Sea increased due to the heightened risks facing commercial shipping.
Iran had previously requested that the Houthis close the Bab al-Mandab Strait, which opens into the Red Sea, should the US continue its attacks on Iran’s energy infrastructure.
A complete closure of the strait could reduce global oil supplies by 7%, as the bulk of Saudi Arabia’s oil exports would be blocked from leaving the region. This disruption would add to the major supply contractions caused by the Gulf war, which have already disrupted shipments equivalent to 10% of global supply.
In statements issued by their armed forces, the Houthis declared that they were imposing “a naval embargo against the criminal Saudi enemy, effective immediately on an eye-for-an-eye basis,” in response to what they termed the “unjust and cruel siege” imposed on Yemen by Saudi Arabia.
Diplomatic initiatives to restore the ceasefire
A senior Iranian official told Reuters on Monday that Tehran had received a proposal from mediators for a 10-day ceasefire. The initiative is reportedly aimed at saving the temporary agreement, which was intended to pave the way for a deal that would permanently end the war that began on February 28 with US and Israeli strikes against Iran.
Neither the Iranian Foreign Ministry nor the official who spoke to Reuters provided details regarding the reported ceasefire talks under discussion.
Meanwhile, two sources in the Pakistani government said that Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni had requested that Pakistan resume its role as a mediator in the conflict. Momeni subsequently traveled to Islamabad for new talks.
The diplomatic maneuvers came after a fresh overnight round of US strikes on Iranian cities and subsequent attacks by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targeting American military assets in the region. US Central Command announced that it had launched a new wave of strikes against Iran on Monday afternoon, US time.
Facing mounting domestic political pressure due to rising gasoline prices—which have climbed steadily since the outbreak of the war and Iran’s de facto closure of the vital Strait of Hormuz—US President Donald Trump defended the latest strikes against Iran as retaliation for the American soldiers killed in recent Iranian attacks.
“Whenever Iran kills an American soldier, they will pay the price many times over! This instruction has been conveyed to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Daniel Caine, and all commanders in the military,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social account on Monday.
Iran: Tankers exploded
The IRGC announced that two oil tankers exploded while attempting to transit the strait via an “unsafe” route. On Sunday, the Revolutionary Guards had reported that two vessels were involved in an “accident” in the same area. It remains unclear whether the two incidents are connected.
Reuters was unable to independently verify the incident. The IRGC statement did not provide details regarding the identities of the vessels or any casualties.
Separately, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) agency reported that a vessel was struck by an unidentified object off the coast of Oman, overlooking the Strait of Hormuz.
In Iran, explosions were reported in Tabriz, Chabahar, Konarek, Bandar Mahshahr, and Bandar Imam Khomeini. According to the state news agency IRNA, one person was killed and several others were injured southwest of Tabriz.
The Revolutionary Guards announced that they had targeted American aircraft at Jordan’s Aqaba Airport with ballistic missiles. The statement added that military assets at Camp Adiri and Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, as well as several positions in Syria, were also struck.
Sirens sounded across Bahrain throughout Monday, while the Kuwaiti military announced early Tuesday morning that its air defense systems had once again intercepted Iranian drones.
Middle East
Oil passes $90 as tanker attacks halt Hormuz shipping
Oil prices have risen above $90 a barrel for the first time in more than a month after the United States launched a new wave of strikes against Iran and the American military death toll from the conflict increased.
Brent crude, the international benchmark, rose by 2.5% to $90.30 a barrel in early Asian trading on Monday. Prices have advanced by more than 23% this month, putting oil on track for its largest monthly increase since March, when hostilities were at their peak.
Oil last traded above $90 a barrel on 11 June.
The surge in prices follows an escalation in retaliatory strikes between the US and Iran. Washington confirmed over the weekend that it had suffered further military casualties, whilst Tehran targeted critical energy and water infrastructure in the region. At least three US service members have been killed in attacks since Friday, with officials stating that remains recovered in Jordan may belong to a fourth soldier.
In an assessment published on Monday, commodity analysts at ANZ noted that tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz had “collapsed” due to heightened security anxieties. The analysts added that rising production in the US has been insufficient to offset shipping disruptions in the Gulf, whilst Washington’s blockade of Iranian ports has further disrupted global energy supplies.
The US has launched strikes against Iran for a ninth consecutive night. Washington stated that the operations targeted various military facilities, coastal surveillance stations, and communications networks in an effort to degrade Tehran’s capability to attack commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) reported late on Sunday that two oil tankers attempting to navigate the “unsafe” southern route of the strait had been “blown up and halted.” In a statement published on social media, the Revolutionary Guards emphasised that the US had “provoked” the attack.
“This is our territory,” the statement said, declaring that there was no “legal” basis for the intervention of the US military, which had travelled thousands of kilometres. The IRGC added that no oil, natural gas, or fertiliser would be permitted to pass through the strait as long as hostile US activities in the region continued.
In a separate statement, the Revolutionary Guards announced that they had targeted US military C-17 transport aircraft and P-8 reconnaissance aircraft at Aqaba Airport, acting on “intelligence” provided by Jordanian citizens.
British maritime authorities reported on Monday that a fire had broken out on board a vessel north of Oman. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) stated that “the cause of the fire cannot be confirmed at this stage,” advising vessels in the area to navigate with caution.
Markets outside of the oil sector remained relatively stable. The dollar was flat against a basket of currencies of its major trading partners, whilst the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note was unchanged at 4.55%. S&P 500 and Stoxx Europe 600 futures also traded flat, while Asian equity markets presented a mixed picture.
US officials maintained that the primary objective of the current military strikes is to secure the safe passage of energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz.
-
Asia2 weeks agoEnding Western reliance on China requires $23.6 trillion in investment by 2050, study shows
-
America2 weeks agoPentagon and Justice Department form joint task force to combat media leaks
-
Asia2 weeks agoChina and Russia deploy submarines together in “Joint Sea-2026” drills
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO leadership sees no evidence of Russian preparations for attack on Baltics by 2030
-
Middle East2 weeks agoSaudi-UAE economic rivalry sparks contingency planning at Wall Street giants
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoZelenskyy announces sweeping Ukrainian cabinet shakeup as Prime Minister Sviridenko resigns
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoIran rejects Turkish foreign minister’s comparison of regional policy to Israel
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoUK demands FIFA investigation after Argentina players display Falklands banner at World Cup
