Middle East
US depleted half of THAAD missile stockpile to defend Israel, officials say
The Washington Post, citing US officials, reported that the United States has depleted approximately half of its stockpiles of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile system to protect Israel during the period of active conflict with Iran.
Unnamed US officials stated that Washington expended more of its own resources for defense than Israel did from its own capabilities.
In total, US forces fired more than 200 THAAD interceptors. In addition, more than 100 Standard Missile 3 and Standard Missile 6 missiles were launched from naval platforms in the Eastern Mediterranean.
During the same period, Israel launched fewer than 100 Arrow interceptors and approximately 90 David’s Sling missiles from its own stockpiles.
Highlighting the strategic risks, Kelly Grieco, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center, emphasized that the data is striking.
Grieco stated that by assuming the bulk of the defensive responsibilities, the US enabled Israel to preserve its own ammunition stockpiles.
From the perspective of operational requirements, it was noted that the US has approximately 200 THAAD interceptors remaining, and the current production line is struggling to meet demand.
This ammunition deficit has caused concern among US allies in Asia, namely Japan and South Korea. Both countries rely on US deterrence against potential threats from North Korea and China.
Although US and Israeli authorities regularly speak of strong defensive cooperation, Pentagon data paints a more one-sided picture.
A US administration representative disclosed that the US used approximately 120 more interceptor missiles than Israel and neutralized twice as many Iranian missiles.
Israel’s decision to decommission some of its air defense systems for maintenance suggests that the ammunition burden on the US could increase further if hostilities resume.
An unnamed official predicted that the existing imbalance would deepen in the event of a recurrence of conflict. However, Shawn Parnell, the spokesperson for the US Deputy Secretary of Defense, argued that both sides “shared the defensive burden equally.”
US officials reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu played a key role in convincing US President Donald Trump to initiate the war by promising to organize a strike that would eliminate Iran’s capacity to develop nuclear weapons.
Although President Trump claimed that Iran’s military capability was “largely destroyed,” US intelligence data indicates that Tehran retains approximately 70% of its pre-war missile stockpiles.
Furthermore, US officials stated that the Israeli military is “exhausted” due to operations in Yemen and Lebanon. Grieco expressed that Israeli commanders may have overlooked their capacity to sustain the operational tempo.
It was reported that prior to the conflict, the parties had agreed on a defensive framework in which the vast majority of Iranian missiles would be destroyed by high-tech systems such as THAAD and naval missiles.
Justin Logan, director of defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, said these dynamics contradict Trump’s “America First” slogan.
Logan stated that Israel’s stance has become clear since Trump returned to office, making the prioritization of resources a subject of debate.
Benjamin Netanyahu, in a statement on May 11, said he supported the gradual phasing out of military aid received from the US over the next decade.
According to information reported by The New York Times on May 16, the US and Israel are preparing a new operational plan that includes more aggressive bombardment of military and critical infrastructure facilities in Iran.
It was noted that the plan in question would be put into effect if Trump decides to break the deadlock in negotiations with Iran through a new wave of attacks.
Middle East
US conducts covert ship-to-ship oil transfers in Strait of Hormuz, sources say
The United States is conducting a covert operation in the Strait of Hormuz to ensure the uninterrupted flow of oil shipments from the Persian Gulf, according to reports.
The US Armed Forces are secretly escorting tankers and conducting ship-to-ship oil transfers using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned surface vessels, and helicopters, Reuters reported, citing sources and satellite imagery.
At least 92 cargo vessels have participated in the process since the launch of the operation, the report said.
Sources stated that the plan is executed entirely and continuously under the control of the US military. According to the disclosed details, tankers arrive at a designated assembly point before reaching the Strait of Hormuz.
From there, they depart at staggered times, maintaining a distance of approximately 3 to 4 kilometers from one another. During the transit, the tankers switch off their transponders and extinguish their lights.
The US Armed Forces track the progress of the tankers via pre-determined routing points.
Once the tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz and arrive just outside the zone that Iran has declared under its own control, they pull alongside receiving vessels to begin the oil transfer.
This transfer process reportedly lasts between 24 and 40 hours, after which the emptied tankers return back through the strait. Reuters noted that this method resembles the scheme used by Iran to bypass sanctions.
Oil transfers conducted in two distinct areas
Sources familiar with the process reported that the ship-to-ship oil transfers began in the early days of May and are being carried out in two distinct locations.
One of these points is located off the coast of Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), while the other is near the Port of Sohar in Oman.
Reuters reported that satellite imagery dated June 11 detected 17 pairs of vessels simultaneously conducting oil transfers across both areas.
Sources claimed that a US Air Force Apache-type helicopter, which was shot down by Iran on the evening of June 8 and triggered retaliatory strikes by Washington, was also involved in this covert mission.
Satellite imagery captured on the day of the incident showed six pairs of tankers positioned side-by-side off the coast of Sohar. When asked for comment on the matter, the US Department of Defense (Pentagon) maintained that assets of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) are in no way involved in activities providing protection to ship-to-ship oil transfer operations on the high seas.
According to shipping documents reviewed by Reuters, a significant portion of the oil transported in the operation consists of exports originating from the UAE.
Sources added that the Kuwait Oil Tanker Company, a firm owned by the Kuwaiti state, is also actively participating in these transfers.
The UAE government, the UAE state oil company ADNOC, and the Kuwait Oil Tanker Company have not yet made any statements regarding the matter.
In a report published on June 3, Bloomberg also wrote that after Washington suspended its initiative dubbed “Project Freedom,” which envisioned escorting vessels through the Strait of Hormuz, the US Navy continued to quietly assist the transit of ships through the strait while trying not to publicize these activities.
The Iran-based Mehr news agency announced on June 10 that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had shot down a US MQ-9 Reaper-type unmanned aerial vehicle in the skies over the Iranian city of Jam.
On the evening of the same day, US President Donald Trump announced that he was preparing to resume bombardments against Iran due to insufficient progress in negotiations and the downing of the Apache helicopter off the coast of Oman on the evening of June 8.
CENTCOM announced on June 11 that the US military, acting on the instructions of President Donald Trump, had begun conducting “additional self-defense strikes” against certain targets in Iran.
Washington later desisted from launching new strikes, and Trump announced on June 15 that a peace agreement had been signed between the US and Iran.
Trump declared that the Strait of Hormuz was already partially open to maritime traffic and would be fully opened on June 19.
Middle East
Mine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
Clearing mines from the Strait of Hormuz to restore safe transit could delay the return of normal maritime traffic by several weeks, even after an agreement is reached to reopen the strategic waterway.
Security risks in the region persist, according to a report by the Reuters news agency, which cited shipping and maritime security sources.
Estimates from five Western sources operating in maritime security suggest that the clearance operation, which will utilize traditional minesweepers and underwater drones, could take 40 to 50 days to complete. Sources stated that this process must be concluded before insurance, shipping, and oil companies will be willing to risk transiting the strait.
The projected delay could impact global markets at a time when oil inventories in the world’s largest economies have fallen to their lowest levels since 2003. Based on pre-war shipment volumes, estimates suggest that tens of millions of additional barrels of oil could remain trapped in the strait, adding to the Persian Gulf shipments that have been blocked since February 28.
Jakob Larsen, the head of maritime safety and security at the shipping association BIMCO, called for caution regarding the situation:
“At this stage, we believe it is still too risky to begin transits. The mine hazard in the region remains a problem both now and for the future; therefore, safe, de-mined routes must be established.”
The report noted that the exact number of mines laid by Iran remains unknown in the strait, which accounted for 20% of global daily oil and natural gas shipments before the war. A June 11 briefing note from the German Navy, citing data from US and British naval forces, stated that the mines were located in four areas around the strait, though Germany noted it could not independently verify these locations.
The mere possibility of mines is highlighted as enough to keep shipping companies away from the region. Because a supertanker carrying crude oil can be valued at approximately $300 million, war-risk insurers, oil companies, and tanker operators are expected to demand guarantees of safe passage.
Rene Kofod-Olsen, CEO of V.Group—one of the world’s largest technical ship and crew management companies, which has 13 vessels stranded in the Persian Gulf—evaluated the situation:
“Even a single naval mine is enough to cause loss of life. This is clearly a massive problem for the global shipping industry.”
Arsenio Dominguez, Secretary-General of the UN’s International Maritime Organization, welcomed the agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, calling it “an important step toward restoring security in this vital corridor for seafarers and ships.” However, Dominguez added that “implementation will take time to ensure all necessary security and safety guarantees are met.”
Earlier, US President Donald Trump announced that an agreement had been signed with Iran, that the Strait of Hormuz was partially opened to maritime traffic, and that it would be fully opened as of June 19.
Trump claimed that, at the current stage, “a search is being conducted for a few mines.”
Middle East
Iran discloses 14-point draft US agreement featuring sanctions relief and troop withdrawals
Iran has disclosed the details of a 14-point draft memorandum of understanding (MoU) prepared as part of ongoing negotiations with the United States.
According to the draft text published by the Mehr news agency, citing sources, the document includes critical provisions such as an immediate end to the war, the withdrawal of US forces from the region, and the provision of financial assistance to Tehran.
Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs officials stated that the text has not yet taken its final shape and must be reviewed and processed by relevant domestic institutions.
The draft memorandum of understanding published by the Mehr agency consists of the following points:
- An immediate and complete cessation of war on all fronts, including Lebanon;
- US non-interference in the internal affairs of Iran and respect for its sovereignty;
- The complete lifting of the maritime blockade within 30 days;
- The withdrawal of American military personnel from areas close to Iran;
- The restoration of normal maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days;
- The suspension of sanctions and the provision of full access to Iran’s frozen assets;
- The provision of $300 billion in financial assistance to Tehran by the US and its allies;
- The initiation of a 60-day negotiation period for a final agreement regarding nuclear issues, the complete lifting of US sanctions, and the revocation of UN Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolutions;
- Iran’s reaffirmation of its commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT);
- A US commitment not to increase its troop levels in the region and to refrain from imposing new sanctions;
- The release of $24 billion of Iran’s frozen financial assets by the US during the 60-day negotiation process, with half of this amount transferred to Tehran before negotiations begin;
- The establishment of a monitoring mechanism to oversee the implementation of the agreement;
- The endorsement of the final agreement via a UN Security Council resolution;
- The requirement that half of the Iranian funds be released, oil sanctions suspended, and the maritime blockade lifted for second-phase negotiations to begin; with the final agreement strictly limited to the status of enriched uranium, the lifting of sanctions, and the economic recovery program, while explicitly excluding the missile program and support for resistance groups from the agenda.
Meanwhile, the news outlet Axios, citing its own sources, reported that Washington and Tehran have agreed on the text of the memorandum of understanding, though the document still awaits final approval.
The report noted that the document in question contains all the details regarding nuclear issues and satisfies US demands.
Bloomberg reported that instead of establishing direct contact, the parties have been exchanging messages through indirect diplomatic channels, utilizing Pakistani mediators and private couriers.
US President Donald Trump announced on June 11 that the parties had reached an agreement to end the war, stating that only the signatures remained to be finalized.
Trump indicated that the preparation of the documents had reached the final stage, adding that the signing ceremony could take place as early as this weekend.
According to information reported by Axios correspondent Barak Ravid, US Air Force aircraft and necessary equipment departed for Geneva, Switzerland, on the evening of June 11 to prepare for the signing ceremony.
Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei also announced that work on the main articles of the peace agreement text with the US is nearly complete.
Despite these positive statements pointing toward an agreement, military tensions between the two sides had continued until very recently.
A few days ago, the parties carried out reciprocal military strikes, after which Trump stated that Washington was prepared to launch new attacks against Iran, seize Kharg Island, and take control of the country’s oil and gas markets, drawing a parallel to Venezuela.
Trump later announced that he had canceled these attack plans, while the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs argued that the American attacks had rendered the ceasefire process dysfunctional.
-
Europe2 weeks agoHungary’s new PM Magyar vows absolute ban on illegal migration, challenging Brussels over fines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike ignites St. Petersburg oil terminal as major economic forum opens
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia and US to sign agreement on Bering Strait tunnel design at St. Petersburg forum
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEU authorizes Mediterranean naval mission to intercept suspected Russian shadow fleet tankers
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia signs trillions of rubles in industrial and infrastructure deals at St. Petersburg forum
-
Middle East2 weeks agoQatar and UAE LNG tankers go dark in Strait of Hormuz to evade security risks
-
Diplomacy1 week agoTrump administration weighs purchasing Chagos Islands from Mauritius to secure Diego Garcia base
-
Diplomacy1 week agoArmenia election: Pashinyan claims victory with near-majority as opposition alleges power usurpation
