Asia
Will the ‘Camp David spirit’ continue after the US elections?
The course of regional crises and conflicts around the world will be determined by the United States presidential elections in November. While the Democrats’ desire to continue with Kamala Harris suggests continuity with the current policies of the Joe Biden era, the course of foreign policy in the event of a victory for the Republican candidate, Donald Trump, is a matter of debate.
Undoubtedly, the Asia-Pacific side of this policy is an important point for US security and foreign policy strategy.
To sum up the situation of the last five years, the US agenda of ‘Indo-Pacific strategy’ has brought the major power balances in the region closer, from an informal alliance against China and North Korea to partnerships with legitimised security agreements and action plans.
On Sunday 28 July, at a fast-track meeting in Tokyo, the US, Japan and South Korea signed agreements to secure gains in security cooperation and strengthen military alliances ahead of a new president in November.
South Korea felt the need to send its defence minister to Tokyo for the talks, his first official visit to the country in 15 years.
What has changed?
In March 2018, a group of senior officials from the South Korean democratic government of Moon Jae-in travelled to Pyongyang for a meeting hosted by North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. At the meeting, Kim announced that he was open to discussing the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula if the US was willing to provide security guarantees for North Korea’s border security and sovereignty. Following these positive steps, Moon met Kim in Panmunjom on 27 April 2018. Moon and Kim discussed the resumption of the US-China quadrilateral talks and the signing of a peace treaty to formally end the Korean War. They also signed a joint statement calling for ‘complete denuclearisation, a denuclearised Korean Peninsula’. These important diplomatic processes were supported by Trump, and on 12 June 2018, Trump and Kim Jong-un met in Singapore.
Diplomatic efforts with the North stalled in 2019, with high-level talks between Kim and Trump going nowhere. The South Korean opposition stepped up its election efforts, claiming that this approach trampled on national honour. South Korean public opinion was influenced by US Democratic politicians who said that peace on the peninsula was not the way forward. Having made no progress with Pyongyang, Washington decided to abandon its previous policy towards South Korea by demanding that Seoul more than quadruple its financial contribution to the cost of maintaining the US military presence in the country.
In fact, South Korean right-wing conservatives, who believed that peace on the peninsula was not the solution and that ‘Kim and his country must be destroyed’, welcomed the new president, Yoon Seok-yeol, to the White House, where Yoon performed the song ‘American Pie’ with great honour.
Fumio Kishida, who replaced Shinzo Abe, who was assassinated in Japan, reiterated his determination to carry on the ‘hoshu honryu’ traditions and declared that he would continue Abe’s remaining works. The most prominent of these policies was the continuation of steps to change the ‘pacifist defence strategy’, Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. While Kishida intensified joint agreements with the US Democrats, he also signed rapprochement agreements with the South Korean Yoon government, which is moving in the same direction, in order to satisfy the US.
What are the expectations?
While the race between Harris and Trump is in full swing, Yoon and Kishida appear to be polling poorly in their respective countries. This raises the question of whether a change of leadership in all three countries will continue the ‘Camp David spirit’.
Sources in the region say that the Japanese and South Korean governments have held or are planning dozens of high-level meetings with right-wing think tanks such as the America First Policy Institute, the Heritage Foundation and the Hudson Institute, which are known to be planning policies that Trump could implement in 2025.
When asked for assurances on the matter, Chris LaCivita, a senior adviser to the Trump campaign, said: ‘No one has the authority to make promises on behalf of Donald Trump about continuing a dialogue with another administration’.
Trump’s recent comments on China and North Korea are seen as a signal that he will pursue a more trade-oriented process in the Asia-Pacific. A consortium of conservative think tanks known as ‘Project 2025’, which is making detailed plans for Trump’s second presidency, describes South Korea and Japan as ‘critical allies’ in military, economic, diplomatic and technological terms in Trump scenarios. However, it is unclear how long public support for the South Korean conservatives and Japanese Liberal Democrats in power will last if the Democrats leave the US government.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
