Connect with us

Diplomacy

Wang Yi meets Kissinger – message to Washington

Published

on

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with former U.S. Secretary of State and Beijing-Washington diplomatic talks architect Henry Kissinger in New York. About the meeting, the Chinese press underlined that handling the Taiwan question was an ‘urgent task’ in bilateral relations.

Celebrating Kissinger’s upcoming 100th birthday, Wang Yi called him “an old and good friend of the Chinese people”, stressed that Kissinger has always been friendly.

Discussing China-U.S. relations and complaining about Washington’s failure to keep his promises, Wang Yi recalled Kissinger’s warning that China-U.S. relations were “on the brink of the Cold War” and stressed that such a war would be a disaster not only for China and the U.S., but also for the whole world.

Pointing out that the U.S. side should return to a “rational and practical Chinese policy”, Wang Yi noted that the most important priority at the moment is the proper management of the Taiwan question, otherwise it will have a subversive impact on China-U.S. relations.

The Taiwan question is at the center of relations

Kissinger recalled how he and Chinese leaders prepared Shanghai Communique in 1972 and emphasized that the Taiwan question is at the center of China-US relations.

Stressing that it is necessary to fully understand how important the Taiwan question is for China, Kissinger noted that “the U.S. and China should engage in dialogue rather than conflict and establish bilateral relations to live peacefully together”.

“One-China” principle is a prerequisite for normalization

Zhang Tengjun, deputy director of the Asia-Pacific Studies Department of the China Institute for International Studies, told the Global Times that Wang Yi’s meeting with Kissinger, a key figure behind the normalization of U.S.-China relations 50 years ago, was a clear message: “One-China principle is the basis for the normalization of bilateral relations.”

U.S. President Biden told CBS’s 60 Minutes program on Sunday that US troops would defend Taiwan in the event of a “Chinese invasion.”

The goal is to prevent the development of China

“US keeps hollowing out its one-China principle and its commitment over the Taiwan question so it can strangle China in the chip and semiconductor sector and amplify its democracy vs authoritarian narrative” Wang Yiwei, director of the Institute of International Affairs at the Renmin University of China, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

The Biden administration banned U.S. ‘advanced tech’ firms that receive federal funding from building facilities in China for 10 years. It was announced that the decision was made to reduce the dependence of the US on China in the production of semiconductors.

Wang Yi listed five conditions

This year marks the 50th anniversary of former U.S. President Richard Nixon’s visit to China and signing of the Shanghai Communique.

“An important year to take stock of the past and move on from a new starting point,” told Wang Yi at a meeting in New York with representatives of the U.S.-China National Relations Committee, the U.S.-China Business Council, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Wang Yi said there is a lot of uncertainty in current China-U.S. relations and listed China’s five “certainties”:

*China’s development prospects are certain, and this development will provide larger markets and opportunities for the U.S. and other countries.

*China’s resolve to further advance reform and opening-up is certain and will continue to advance economic globalization.

*China’s policy toward the U.S. is certain and what is most critical for the U.S. right now is to reinstate a reasonable and pragmatic policy towards China as soon as possible.

*China’s commitment to strengthen economic and trade cooperation is certain.

*China’s readiness to engage in multilateral coordination with the U.S. is certain. For this to happen, it is vital to maintain the political basis of China-U.S. relations and to support the one-China principle specially.

Shanghai Communique

In 1972, Richard Nixon became the first U.S. President to visit China. Nixon’s visit to China and the publication of the Shanghai Communique are considered a turning point in China-U.S. relations.

The communique acknowledged that the two countries have different forms of governance. China and the U.S. agreed on the normalization of bilateral relations based on peaceful coexistence, the expansion of contacts covering all areas, and the development of bilateral trade.

Most importantly, in the joint communique signed, the U.S. acknowledged that it had adopted one-China principle and that Taiwan was an integral part of China.

Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan

U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan ramped up tensions in relations between the two countries.

Pelosi insisted on visiting Taiwan despite China’s concerns and opposition.

Beijing described the visit as an intervention in its internal affairs, a violation of its sovereignty and territorial integrity and stressed that the visit was a violation of the one-China principle, undermining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey