Connect with us

Diplomacy

Germany and Brazil expand strategic ties with new frigate deal and raw material pact

Published

on

Germany and Brazil are significantly expanding their strategic cooperation, with a primary focus on the raw materials sector and the defense industry as both nations move to launch a series of new joint projects.

During high-level talks held on Monday, April 20, in Hannover between German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Brazilian President Luis Inácio Lula da Silva, the Brazilian Navy reached an agreement to purchase four additional frigates. These vessels will be supplied by the German shipbuilder TKMS, which is already fulfilling an existing order for four frigates for the Brazilian fleet.

The negotiations took place on the sidelines of the Hannover Messe, where Brazil is this year’s partner country, and occurred within the framework of the third Germany-Brazil intergovernmental consultations.

A primary driver behind this intensifying cooperation is the significant pressure exerted on Brazil by US President Donald Trump. Washington is currently demanding exclusive access to Brazil’s rare earth element reserves while simultaneously attempting to exert direct influence over the Brazilian presidential elections scheduled for October.

Seeking support against US interventionism, Lula has emerged as a vocal advocate for multilateralism. “Trump was not elected emperor of the world,” the Brazilian leader stated in response to the pressure from Washington.

Lula’s visit to Berlin took place against a highly sensitive political backdrop. The Trump administration has begun a process of fracturing existing regional organizations in Latin America—specifically the Organization of American States (OAS) and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC). In their place, Washington has moved to establish a new organization composed exclusively of right-wing and far-right governments: the Shield of the Americas alliance.

To date, twelve states have joined this alliance. Alongside the US, members include Argentina under Javier Milei, El Salvador under Nayib Bukele, and Ecuador under President Daniel Noboa, the heir to a vast banana industry dynasty.

Officially, the Shield of the Americas is intended to combat drug cartels. To this end, its primary focus is on military operations, mirroring recent US actions in the Caribbean. In that theater, the US military has so far conducted 52 missile strikes against vessels alleged or confirmed to be carrying narcotics, resulting in at least 180 fatalities.

Observers suspect that, in the long term, this far-right alliance is also intended to bolster Washington’s efforts to counter Chinese influence across the continent. Currently, the three most populous nations in the region—Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia—are led by left-wing or social-democratic administrations and remain outside the alliance.

This regional dynamic may be subject to change as Brazil approaches its presidential elections in October. While Lula’s candidacy has not yet been officially confirmed, his opponent is expected to be Flávio Bolsonaro, the eldest son of former President Jair Bolsonaro. The elder Bolsonaro remains in detention following an attempted coup in early 2023, while his son Eduardo, initially viewed as his political successor, resides in exile in the US amid accusations of obstructing justice.

For an extended period, Lula maintained a significant lead in the polls. However, Flávio Bolsonaro began to close the gap in late 2025, and a victory for Lula is no longer considered certain.

Trump has explicitly endorsed Flávio Bolsonaro, with whom he shares a close political affinity, as he does with the entire Bolsonaro family. Several weeks ago, Darren Beattie, an influential State Department official, attempted to visit the imprisoned Jair Bolsonaro for public relations purposes while also seeking a meeting with Flávio. The Lula administration blocked these efforts, denying Beattie entry into the country and citing blatant interference in domestic affairs.

Previously, Trump attempted to force a suspension of the criminal proceedings against Jair Bolsonaro by imposing punitive tariffs, though this effort ultimately failed.

Parallel to the escalating friction with Washington, Lula issued several sharp critiques of the Trump administration’s policies ahead of the third Germany-Brazil intergovernmental consultations, which commenced yesterday.

In an interview with Der Spiegel last week, he stated: “Trump was not elected emperor of the world. He cannot constantly threaten other countries with war.”

Lula further argued in an op-ed for the Tagesspiegel newspaper that the world is being transformed into a “single theater of war” and urgently requires “bringing under order.” He added, “I am convinced that there is no alternative to multilateralism.”

Consequently, Brazil intends to partner with Germany to inject new momentum into multilateral policy. At the opening of the Hannover Messe on Sunday, Lula described the war conducted by the US and Israel against Iran as “madness.” He noted that it is unacceptable for the world to spend approximately $2.7 trillion annually on wars while countless people continue to live in poverty or suffer from hunger.

In the spirit of a multilateral order, and to counterbalance the growing US influence over Brazil’s vital raw materials sector, Lula proposed closer cooperation with Friedrich Merz regarding mineral resources.

Brazil possesses vast quantities of raw materials, including highly sought-after rare earth elements and niobium, which is essential for the production of solar cells.

Fierce competition has erupted specifically over rare earth elements. Until now, these elements were extracted by the Brazilian company Serra Verde, which processed them in China. However, following a significant loan from the US, the company was recently forced to agree to supply rare earth elements exclusively to the US or, at most, its allies.

The implications of this agreement remain unclear, as the rights to allocate raw materials in Brazil belong to the government. The Lula administration is pushing for the establishment of rare earth processing facilities within Brazil to ensure the country controls a larger portion of the value chain. In this context, Lula suggested that German companies, alongside American and Chinese firms, participate in this process.

In addition to resource cooperation, Germany and Brazil are expanding their military and defense ties. According to the German Ministry of Defense, Minister Boris Pistorius and Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in Hannover on Monday.

The MoU stipulates that Berlin and Brasília will “intensify cooperation in various sea, land, and air-based procurement projects.” This collaboration is intended to cover the “entire process” of procurement, ranging from “contract negotiations and training to the integration and operation of systems.”

Furthermore, both parties agreed on the delivery of four additional frigates to the Brazilian Navy. Germany has not traditionally been among the most prominent arms suppliers to the South American nation, as Brazil has historically sourced defense equipment from France, Italy, and the US.

However, in 2019, TKMS successfully secured a contract to deliver four MEKO A-100 class frigates to Brazil. These vessels are being constructed domestically in Brazil at Itajaí, located several hundred kilometers south of São Paulo, by the Águas Azuis consortium—a joint venture between TKMS and the Brazilian company Embraer. The Águas Azuis consortium is now preparing to build the four additional frigates, signaling a broader expansion of bilateral defense cooperation.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey