ASIA
China seeks $10b investment in lithium reserves in Afghanistan

Afghanistan has been under occupation for the last 20 years, until the complete withdrawal on August 15, 2021. The US forces presence in Afghanistan marked the longest presence ever. There was no other country where the US had military presence for two decades. During the course of 20 years, and with the full engagement of the international community, nothing substantially changed in Afghanistan. There is quite evidence how it ended in war, but in the economic landscape it was also a failure.
The Afghans become poorer despite showering billions of dollars. It was expected there would be no poor community, or at least it would be at a lower point. However, this money did not really help; maybe this is because the US did not want that.
There were several indications that the US internally stopped running infrastructure projects. It has been said that former President Hamid Karzai told the US officials that they are working in five water dams to generate electricity. However, the appeal was rejected by the US side, and forced him to buy electricity from Central Asian states.
Afghanistan paid more money to transform electricity rather than investing in electricity dams, a permanent solution to the shortages of electricity.
This is just one example and there are many more of such. Meanwhile, the US was also not happy with investments made by other countries, especially from China and Russia. Despite that, China did not stop from investing in Afghanistan as well as providing scholarships for the Afghan students.
China investing $10b in Afghanistan
Afghanistan Ministry of Mines and Petroleum had said that Chinese Company “Gochin” is ready to invest $10 billion in Afghanistan’s lithium deposits, and the Taliban Acting Minister for Mine and Petroleum, Shahabuddin Delawar also met with the Chinese company representatives in Kabul, where they explored the project.
The Afghan ministry had expressed hope on the project, saying that the investment would create 120,000 direct jobs and indirectly to another million of Afghans.
The ministry also hinted that two Chinese companies are interested in repairing the Salang Pass within seven months. The companies also promised to carve another tunnel to make travel to the Afghans.
The company said that the lithium deposits will be getting done inside Afghanistan, and in order to go with the project, they also built a hydroelectric dam. Kumar and Laghman Road will also be asphalted to make the transportation easy.
At the start of the year, Afghanistan and China signed the extraction contract for the Amu oil field. The Chinese company named “China Petroleum Economics and Information Research Center (CPEIC) inked the agreement in which Afghanistan’s share is 20 percent at the moment.
This shows that China is more interested and already has increased its efforts to help Afghans via economic ties and it has been a great achievement if the Chinese company invests on estimated worth over $1 trillion lithium deposits.
Beefing up security
Reportedly, what has stopped the Chinese company from more investing in Afghanistan is the fragile security situation. With the return of the Taliban to power, it was hoped that there would be no security incidents; however, security incidents have been frequently the case.
Undoubtedly, China wants to invest more if the Taliban guarantee security for their workers and their assets. The Taliban had time and again assured to maintain security and firmly fight against terrorists. The Taliban spokesman had earlier said that China wants to invest in some sectors and currently they are in talk. Another project, “Mes Aynak” the country’s largest copper mine was also used to extract by the Chinese companies but due to security issues, the project did not end well. It has been reported that several elements in the past government had received money from foreigners to insecure the place of Aynak.
However, the current ruler of Afghanistan, Taliban, said they are fully ready to maintain security of the Chinese companies and workers.
Daesh is not a major threat
On the issue of Islamic State (IS), aka Daesh, the Taliban spokesman said that Daesh is not a major problem and they will not let the group gain more ground. He also said that Daesh has no significant presence in the country and they need to hide themselves as the Taliban security forces are chasing them.
However, still the Daesh managed to carry out some activities like blast in Kabul, and some provinces, including direct attacks on Taliban meetings. The group had also taken responsibility for attacks on a hotel in Kabul, famous for Chinese guests. Daesh also attacked Russian and Pakistan embassies in Kabul.
In return, the Taliban have intensified attacks on the Daesh hideouts, and killed key Daesh members. Daesh members were also arrested and their family members were shifted to the safe place.
Particular, Daesh had actively targeted Chinese sites, a neighboring country that has been involved in construction and reconstruction of Afghanistan.
ASIA
Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.
Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.
Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”
The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.
The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.
China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.
Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.
Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.
ASIA
Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”
This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”
Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.
Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.
Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.
According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.
“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.
South Korea in a similar situation
South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.
Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”
South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.
Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.
Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.
At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.
Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.
Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.
If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.
Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”
Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”
Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.
The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.
Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.
Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”
ASIA
South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.
Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.
Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”
The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.
Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.
Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.
Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.
The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.
Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.
Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?
-
EUROPE4 days ago
F-35 debate intensifies across Germany and Europe
-
EUROPE1 week ago
Europe plans for US absence in NATO with 5-10 year strategy
-
ASIA2 weeks ago
China’s AsiaInfo expands with DeepSeek-powered AI
-
EUROPE1 week ago
French defense industry gears up for war amid EU strategic autonomy push
-
AMERICA1 week ago
Trump’s tariffs drive Nvidia to invest heavily in US manufacturing
-
DIPLOMACY6 days ago
Trump’s proposed fees on Chinese ships threaten US maritime industry
-
DIPLOMACY2 weeks ago
US, Britain, and Türkiye excluded from EU armament fund
-
ASIA1 week ago
India shelves $23 billion plan to rival China’s factories