Connect with us

ASIA

‘Conservatives try to form government with army and US support’

Published

on

Sabbaha Ali Khan Colince, a member of the central committee of the Workers Party of Bangladesh, gave Harici an assessment of developments in the country and the current situation: “Anti-freedom, far-right parties dominated the protests. The radical conservative Jamaat-e-Islami and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party are trying to form a new government in cooperation with the military and with the support of the United States. The majority of young people taking part in the protests are unhappy with this situation”.

Bangladesh, the South Asian country that declared independence from Pakistan in 1971, has been rocked by events that some call a ‘people’s movement’ and others a ‘coup’. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, 76, who has ruled the country since 2009 after her first term from 1996-2001, fled the country as a result of the events and sought refuge in neighbouring India.

Before her resignation this week, Hasina was one of the world’s longest-serving female leaders and a symbol of ‘secularism and democracy’ in the country, leading the Awami League, the party of her father, Mujiburrahman, who was deposed and killed in a 1975 coup. But despite being returned to power in recent elections, Hasina’s government has frequently been rocked by social movements and protests. With allegations of corruption on top of inflation and livelihood problems, Hasina’s government has suffered a serious loss of confidence.

The government’s introduction of preferential quotas for relatives of veterans of the country’s 1971 war of independence against Pakistan, which provided many jobs in the public sector, caused a huge backlash among young people, especially students, who are struggling with unemployment. Bangladesh is one of the most densely populated countries in the world and more than 30 million young people are unemployed.

The student-led protests were joined by opposition parties, including the radical conservative Jamaat-e-Islami and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), and local sources say the opposition parties have taken control of the streets.

While Hasina did not back down in the face of the growing protests, more than 200 people were killed in the protests, which were met with a heavy-handed police response. Withdrawing the quota request was no longer enough to save Hasina.

Following Hasina’s resignation on Monday, military chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman announced in a televised address to the nation that he had taken temporary control of the country and that troops were trying to quell the growing unrest. General Zaman also said Hasina was in talks with leaders of leading political parties other than the long-ruling Awami League to discuss the way forward.

Bangladeshi President Muhammad Shahabuddin dissolved parliament on Tuesday, meeting one of the main demands of protesters following the resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, and announced that 84-year-old Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus would head the interim government.

Yunus, a banker popular in the West, won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for his work in microfinance, which he said would help reduce poverty in Bangladesh.

In 1983, he founded the Grameen Bank with the aim of alleviating poverty through microcredit. The bank has grown rapidly, with branches and similar models now operating around the world. Yunus and the Grameen Bank were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 after lending a total of around $6 billion in housing, student and micro-enterprise loans.

However, critics have viewed Yunus and the Grameen Bank with scepticism. The banker Yunus has been criticised on the grounds that high interest rates impoverish borrowers and that lenders make large profits on small loans. Yunus claimed that his aim was ‘not to make money, but to help the poor’.

Hasina, who resigned, had repeatedly criticised Yunus for ‘sucking the blood of the poor’ during her tenure. Yunus has been charged with ‘tax irregularities’ and most recently in June with embezzlement.

While it is notable that Muhammad Yunus, who is seen as close to the West and educated in the US, has come to the fore as a result of the protests, there are widespread assessments that the protests against Hasina were instigated by the US and other Western countries.

The US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs, Donald Lu, who visited the country in 2023, said that Bangladesh was ‘rapidly sliding into authoritarianism’ and held separate meetings with opposition leaders and ‘rights groups’.

In the run-up to the January elections, the US banged the ‘democracy’ drum and issued harsh criticisms and warnings to the Hasina government. After the elections, although Hasina’s Awami League party won 223 of the 300 seats in parliament, both the US and the UK criticised the elections as ‘not free and fair’.

In May, the US government imposed sanctions on retired Bangladeshi army chief Aziz Ahmed and his close family over corruption allegations. The move was seen as an attempt by Washington to influence the Bangladeshi government.

India, on the other hand, criticised the US’s tough stance against the Hasina government and warned that it could push Bangladesh closer to China. Indeed, the Hasina government has been trying to strike a balance between its historic friend and neighbour India and China, which is preparing to make major investments in the country.

Following the recent events, the European Union called for ‘an orderly and peaceful transition to a democratically elected government with full respect for human rights and democratic principles’, while the US called for an interim government. “The people of Bangladesh deserve a government that listens to their voices, respects their will and upholds the honour of their nation,” US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Cardin said in a statement.

We spoke with Sabbaha Ali Khan Colince, a member of the central committee of the Bangladesh Workers’ Party, about these debates and the current situation in the country. A former president of the Students Unity of Bangladesh, Colince was one of the student leaders who led the youth movements in the country.

Speaking from the capital Dhaka, Colince said that the student protests began with socio-economic demands and that the quota system had created a huge backlash among young people struggling with unemployment. Colince explained that the quota system places certain people in certain positions within the state, adding that it excludes other qualified candidates and creates an unfair competitive environment. However, he also said that although this situation had triggered the protests, it was not the only reason. According to Colince, increasing corruption and mismanagement within the government had become apparent. Colince said that in a country struggling with high inflation, rising unemployment and dwindling foreign exchange reserves, the government was focusing on protecting the interests of a small number of business interests and businessmen within the party instead of protecting the interests of the people. He added that Hasina had resorted to repression and police violence rather than reforms to address public discontent.

Colince said that despite this, the protests were gradually moving away from economic demands and reactionary, anti-freedom and anti-democratic political parties were dominating the protests. The left parties failed to organise the response adequately and the radical Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami and the  Bangladesh Nationalist Party took the lead in the protests, Colince said, stressing that army chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman only met and consulted with these parties after taking over. We had reported that General Zaman had announced that he had met with representatives of all parties except the Awami League, but Colince said the army chief had met only with Jamaat-e-Islami and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, ignoring other leftist parties. “The army’s attempt to form a government with anti-freedom, reactionary parties like the Jamaat-e-Islami and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party is against all the values that the youth of Bangladesh stand for. It is against the spirit and principles of Bangladesh’s progressive war of liberation and independence” said. He stressed that the majority of the protesting youth were uncomfortable with this ‘army-conservative-nationalist’ combination trying to dominate the country.

Commenting on discussions about possible US involvement in the protests, Colince said that the US had instigated the protests through Jamaat-e-Islami and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. Noting that the US had supported these parties before the elections, Colince said, “It is now very clear that the US has a hand in these events. “Unfortunately, I foresee a reactionary, anti-freedom, US-backed government for Bangladesh in the near future,” Colince said, adding that banker Mohammad Yunus, who has been appointed to head the interim government, is also known as an ‘Americanist’.

Sabbaha Ali Khan Colince, leader of the Bangladesh Workers’ Party, said he had not lost hope in the long term and that he had faith in the country’s labour and youth movement and its tradition, which was modelled on Bangladesh’s libertarian, democratic and progressive struggle for independence in 1971 and its principles.

Photos of the Workers Party Bangladesh’ demonstrations against Israel.

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey