Connect with us

Diplomacy

Xi Jinping rejects Brussels summit invitation

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping has reportedly declined an initial invitation to visit Brussels for a summit marking the 50th anniversary of relations with the European Union.

According to two individuals with knowledge of the matter who spoke to the Financial Times, Beijing has informed EU officials that China’s second-ranked leader, Premier Li Qiang, will meet with the presidents of the European Council and Commission in Brussels in Xi’s place for the summit.

EU-China summits traditionally alternate between Brussels and Beijing. While the premier typically attends the summit in Brussels, Xi usually hosts in Beijing. However, the EU believes that the significance of this meeting, which commemorates half a century of diplomatic relations, warrants the presence of the Chinese President.

Both parties have stated that discussions are ongoing, but Xi’s rejection of the invitation has raised questions among many in Brussels.

This year’s summit coincides with a particularly sensitive period in EU-China relations.

Tensions between Brussels and Beijing have escalated since Russia’s intervention in Ukraine in 2022, with the EU accusing China of supporting the Kremlin. The EU is also imposing tariffs on electric vehicles imported from China, citing that they are subsidized.

EU officials assert that China, which recorded a trade surplus of €304.5 billion with the bloc last year, has not made sufficient efforts to rebalance trade by reducing subsidies to its industries and lowering trade barriers for foreign companies operating in the world’s second-largest economy.

A senior EU diplomat told the Financial Times that “relations are icy.”

Lu Shaye, China’s former ambassador to France and currently Beijing’s special representative for European affairs, stated that China’s policy towards Europe has always “advocated peace, friendship, cooperation, and mutual benefit.”

“This has never changed. It is only the contrast with the US’s current policy towards Europe that makes China’s policy towards Europe appear even more visionary, fair, and reasonable. I hope this will be a wake-up call [for Europe],” he said.

The diplomat added, “China has even said that they expect Europe to have a seat at the negotiating table [in Ukraine peace talks].”

EU trade chief Maroš Šefčovič is scheduled to visit China later this month. Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares told the Financial Times last month that the EU should also see potential opportunities. Albares said, “If China can be a partner, let’s take advantage of that.”

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated in February that the EU would continue to “de-risk” by protecting its industry, while adding, “we may find agreements where we can further expand our trade and investment ties.”

Trump’s imposition of 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium forced the EU to retaliate, even as industry groups warned of the damage it would cause. However, a senior EU official said that a critical focus when it comes to China is defensive measures to keep out the “wave” of Chinese products diverted from the US market due to tariffs.

On Friday, the EU initiated an anti-dumping investigation into exports of adipic acid, used in the production of nylon and numerous other products, to China. This is the 11th such case since October, including those related to sweet corn, metal screws, and waxes.

An EU official stated, “Informal discussions are ongoing, both on the timing of this year’s EU-China summit and on the level of representation.”

The Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that they had “no information to provide” on the matter.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey