Asia
Sadiq Khan’s prompt trip to Kabul; Pakistan is really sidelined on Afghan front
Pakistan’s special envoy to Afghanistan Muhammad Sadiq Khan’s prompt or in “hurry” trip to Kabul could be seen as an act for “immediate” response to US acts ignoring Pakistan in recent developments of establishing direct links with Taliban governing Kabul for the second term since August 15 2021. Prior to Sadiq Khan’s comprehensive trip to Kabul, high powered US officials have made the first ever formal trip to Kabul and held detailed talks with Afghanistan’s foreign minister.
Ironically, both the developments took place soon after high power discussion on National Security issues in parliament, whereas apparently Prime Minister Shehaz Sharif was the most important figure but internally the whole session was dominated by Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Gen. Asim Muneer. First with help from its most trustworthy Qatar, a US team headed by Ambassador Adam Boehlar visited Kabul and got the release and air lifting of George Glezmann, an American airline mechanic to the United States via Qatar Doha. And on the next day, Sadiq Khan, considered most effective and popular in Afghanistan, landed in Kabul for a three day visit.
Though no further details of Sadiq Khan’s engagements in to Kabul is ascertained but a brief statement, is appearing in Rawalpindi-Islamabad controlled media which states, “Pakistan and Afghanistan on Saturday vowed to sustain their diplomatic engagement to address ongoing bilateral challenges, including trade, security and the status of Afghan refugees in Pakistan.” Through such statements, Pakistani officials confirmed only Ambassador Muhammad Sadiq’s meeting with Afghanistan’s Acting Foreign Minister, Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi.
Is there any discussion over the prolonged controversial issue of Durand Line
No one can deny the fact that since the return of Taliban into power in mid of August 2021, Pakistan is a head with a stock of confusions. On one hand like of Mullah Muhammad Omar Akhund, his successor Mullah Haibatullah is reluctant to change mind on prolonged controversial issue of Durand Line and on the other the policy makers in Rawalpindi-Islamabad corridors are going towards isolation as the major global players like US, China, Russian Federation and even European Community succeeded in establishing direct links with Kabul. Pakistan is no longer dependent on the global community in handling issues and matters with Kabul.
Soon after his first ever trip to Kabul after August 15th 2021, former US special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad who was part of Ambassador Adam Boehlar has criticized the Pakistan Army. Through this latest statement, Khalilzad cautioned Pakistan’s government and military, emphasizing that time is running out to prevent further turmoil. It is his second criticism against Pakistan after May 9th 2023 whereas he had backed the deposed Prime Minister. Now the situation is very clear as Zalmay Khalilzad’s status in US society especially in the ruling Republic is very clear. Almost all Afghans, especially his (Khalilzad) long time friends and familiars are now very clear about his next assignments or agenda.
Another stressful issue is the Torkham crossing for trade in Central and South Asian countries
Besides soon after US team’s trip to Kabul, Pakistan has not only ordered reopening of Torkham border, considered most important corridor between the two neighbouring countries but Sadiq Khan in Kabul and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi in Peshawar received joint delegations of traders involved in bilateral trade. A report from Kabul revealed, “officials of the Chamber of Commerce and Investment have met with Pakistan’s Special Envoy for Afghanistan Muhammad Sadiq and Obaidur Rahman Nizamani, the head of the Embassy of the country in Kabul and discussed bilateral trade relations and the problems in this area. According to the Chamber of Commerce and Investment Newsletter, Muhammad Younis Momand, Deputy Chief of the Chamber, stressed the importance of the Torkham route for trade in Central and South Asia, which route can connect with other countries in the region like Afghanistan and Pakistan. They have created an increase in grants and by the way, the lockdown can also cause a big loss to the economy of both countries.”
On certain issues, especially Afghans maltreatment, frequent closure of Torkham, imposition of taxes on transit and bilateral trade. Controversial Durand Line and others, Islamabad and Kabul are at loggerhead with each other.
Though nothing in detail regarding Pakistan’s stance on the issue of terror during his talks with Foreign Minister Mutaqqi appeared in media but Governor Faisal Karim Kundi in his chat with traders repeated, “terrorists are incurring from Afghanistan into Pakistan.
Afghanistan not only explored alternate trade routes but its sitting rulers made more friends and sympathizers like the US, China and Russian
Compared to other civil-military officials, Sadiq Khan has long had a realistic approach towards issues with Afghanistan. He believes in talks and dialogues. Unfortunately, high ups occupying important offices in the Rawalpindi-Islamabad corridor are stuck to British colonial rulers’ inherited expansionism based policies towards Afghanistan. Unless and until honouring the importance of talks and consultations and remaining neutral in intra Afghan issues, it could be hard to earn the hearts of Afghans which is a must for tackling the situation that erupted with direct jumping of US and others in the region.
Compared to the past, the regional situation is different. Earlier Pakistan was dealing matters with Afghanistan like a landlocked and under developed country wholly solely depending on Karachi sea port. But now Afghanistan has not only explored alternate trade routes but its sitting rulers made more friends and sympathizers like the US, China and Russian Federation. After the empowerment of Donald Trump, now Washington is making ways and means for converting long time hostilities in friendship with Russia. Similarly growing influence of terror, especially presence of IS-Daesh militants in certain parts of the country, especially along the Pak Afghan border is also much more harmful to the very interests of Pakistan. Instead of remaining hostile to its failed “STRATEGIC Depth” policies inherited by successive military generals, Pakistan must follow the realist politico-diplomatic approaches towards Afghanistan and other neighboring countries.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
