Connect with us

Diplomacy

Britain, US near trade deal to ease Trump tariffs

Published

on

According to officials in London and Washington, Britain and the US are on the verge of signing a trade agreement that would mitigate the impact of Donald Trump’s “day of liberation” tariffs.

The agreement, according to the Financial Times, would grant British car and steel exports lower tariff quotas. The deal, expected to be signed this week, would exempt some British exports from a portion of the additional 25% tariffs that Trump imposed on steel and automobile imports in February and March.

UK trade negotiators traveled to Washington this week for the final stages of talks. A senior British official stated that negotiations were proceeding “rapidly” but noted that disagreements over pharmaceuticals persisted.

In addition to offering quotas for its own exports, Britain hopes to secure reductions in the sector-specific 25% tariffs that Trump applied to cars and steel.

London will compromise but doesn’t want to undermine rapprochement with the EU

Among London’s “offers” are concessions to Washington on the digital services tax applied to international technology companies, reductions in tariffs on US car exports, and reductions in tariffs on American agricultural products.

However, the British government has stated it will not accept US food production standards, such as chlorinated chicken and hormone-treated beef. These standards could make it impossible to sign a veterinary agreement, which is a crucial part of Britain’s upcoming “reset” process with the EU.

The anticipated Britain-US agreement is one of 17 deals that the Trump administration aims to sign with major trading partners as part of a process to roll back comprehensive tariffs applied to countries worldwide on April 2.

To follow the Britain-India agreement

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated in Congress on Tuesday that some of these agreements could be announced “perhaps later this week,” noting that several countries had made “good offers” but did not elaborate.

White House officials are also holding talks with Canada, Mexico, Japan, Vietnam, and India, as well as the EU. Some foreign officials have privately expressed frustration with the administration’s lack of clarity regarding how much tariff reduction it will offer trading partners.

If an agreement is reached, the US-Britain deal would follow the full-scope free trade agreement between Britain and India, which was announced on Tuesday.

Pressure is mounting on UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to sign a deal with the US after warnings from the British car and steel industries that Trump’s tariffs would have “devastating” effects on their sectors.

British automotive sector dependent on exports to the US

Mike Hawes, CEO of the trade organization Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), warned that the new US tariffs were having a “serious, significant, and immediate” impact on the sector’s upper segment.

Luxury brands such as Bentley, Jaguar Land Rover, and Aston Martin are heavily reliant on exports to the US. According to the SMMT, the US is the UK’s second-largest car export market after the EU, exporting over 100,000 vehicles last year, valued at over £7.5 billion.

A senior executive in the automotive sector welcomed the possibility of reduced tariffs for Britain’s vehicle exports but stated that the primary goal should be the removal of the 25% tariff.

The executive said, “Applying quotas is complicated and hinders trade. The most important thing is the removal of the 25% tariff, because tariffs above 10% are not sustainable.”

Under an agreement with then-US President Joe Biden, London was permitted to export 500,000 tons of steel to the US annually tariff-free. This agreement was terminated this year when Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports into the US.

The trade association UK Steel warned that Trump’s tariffs would halt the sector’s exports, which were already under pressure due to a global metal surplus. In 2023, the US accounted for approximately 165,000 tons of British steel exports. This was valued at around £400 million, representing approximately 8% of the total value.

Since 2017, when Trump first imposed tariffs, the UK’s exports to the US have almost halved.

Two people familiar with the negotiations said the agreement had been delayed due to disagreements related to the pharmaceutical sector. Last month, the Trump administration initiated national security investigations into pharmaceutical and microchip products, which could pave the way for tariffs on pharmaceuticals, an area where the UK exported £6.6 billion worth of goods to the US in 2024.

British officials described the quotas offered by the US as “generous,” stating that Britain was trying to avoid the worst effects of future tariffs. A second British official was more cautious, describing the expected agreement as “limited.”

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey