Connect with us

Asia

A challenging environment for media activities

Published

on

The Office of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has published a report on the state of the media after the rule of the Taliban, saying that this group has created a challenging environment for the activities of the media and journalists are facing increasing challenges.

Over the past three years, UNAMA has documented the human rights violations of 336 journalists and media workers, including 256 cases of arrest and detention, 130 cases of torture and ill-treatment, and 75 cases of threats.

UNAMA has said in a statement that in this report it has documented the increasing challenges that the media and journalists are facing. Journalists and media workers operate under censorship and severe restrictions on access to information, according to the report.

According to UNAMA, female journalists and media workers in particular face more restrictions and discriminatory practices. Roza Isakovna Otunbayeva, the special representative of the UN Secretary General in Afghanistan, said: “For every country, having a free media is not only a choice, but a necessity. Journalists and media workers in Afghanistan work in difficult conditions. They often face unclear rules about what they can and cannot report, and risk intimidation and arbitrary detention for being perceived as critical.”

She asked the Taliban to guarantee the safety and security of all journalists and media workers and to recognize the importance of women’s presence in the media sector. Volker Turk, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, called the findings of the UNAMA report very worrying and asked the governing authorities to coordinate their actions with Afghanistan’s obligations under international law, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Suspension of media activities in Afghanistan

According to UNAMA, the media sector in Afghanistan had grown significantly during the republic, but after August 15, 2021, a large number of media outlets have stopped their activities.

According to the UNAMA report, before the Taliban took over, there were 543 media outlets with 10,790 employees, but in November 2021, about 43pc of these media outlets ceased to operate and the number of media employees decreased to 4,360.

Meanwhile, 84pc of female media workers have lost their jobs. Currently, it is said that there are no female journalists working in some provinces. The economic problems caused by the cut off of foreign aid and income, the mass migration of journalists and the restrictions of the Taliban are considered to be the factors that stop the activities of the media.

UNAMA has noted that the Taliban have created a challenging environment for the media to operate, including censorship and lack of access to information. In addition, according to the report, journalists under Taliban rule are subjected to intimidation and threats, arbitrary arrest and detention, ill-treatment, prosecution and imprisonment for performing their duties.

Taliban restrictions on the media outlets

UNAMA has said that media activities in Afghanistan are subject to a series of restrictions – among these restrictions is the ban on the publication of music and films in which there is music and women are shown. According to this report, in media offices, men and women should work in separate offices, and male and female presenters should not appear in the same program. Also, female employees must cover their faces. Likewise, in some provinces, women are not allowed to call radio programs, unless the program is about health and religious issues for women.

UNAMA said in its report that media outlets that failed to comply with these restrictions were suspended or forced to cease operations. According to UNAMA, the law of the Taliban has intensified the restrictions on the media. The new restrictions include banning the publication of live photos and videos in the media.

With the implementation of the law of the Taliban, media video broadcasts have been stopped in some provinces, and journalists are not allowed to take pictures of living creatures. The Taliban say that they are implementing this law gradually.

Intervening in the affairs of active media outlets in exile

The UNAMA report states that after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, some media have moved their activities abroad. According to UNAMA, these media are operating in violation of the Taliban’s regulations and cannot obtain a license to operate in Afghanistan. These media are permanently exposed to Taliban intervention and suspension.

According to the UNAMA report, journalists who work for active media in exile are working in secret and are more likely to be caught and arrested arbitrarily. The UNAMA report states that the Taliban also intervened in the affairs of foreign journalists working for international media and asked them to first share their subject for review and approval. It has been said that the Taliban have told foreign journalists that the issuance of visas is subject to compliance with the guidelines of the media and respect for the “red lines”.

According to the UNAMA report, the Taliban consider reports focused on restrictions on women and girls, IS attacks, and the presence of armed groups such as al-Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban to be inappropriate.

The challenge of accessing information

Referring to the challenge of access to information, the UNAMA report states that the limited work environment of the media and the difficulties in accessing information have affected the accuracy of media reports and provided space for the increase of false information.

According to a survey conducted by the National Union of Afghan Journalists in September 2023, only one percent of the total of 433 journalists surveyed rated “good” access to information in Afghanistan. According to UNAMA, access to information is challenging, especially on issues considered sensitive to the Taliban, such as security incidents, protests or access to education and human rights issues.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey