Europe
AfD imposes strict new travel rules amid internal crisis over Russia ties
The AfD is now grappling with a Russia crisis. The relationships of AfD members of parliament with Russia and their visits abroad, especially to Russia, will lead to the party leadership implementing stricter controls.
Tension erupted at the end of an AfD parliamentary group executive board meeting when party co-leader Alice Weidel invited Susanne Fürst, a foreign policy expert from the sister party, the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), to the podium.
During the executive board meeting, members were particularly interested in the FPÖ’s stance on “travel to Russia.” Fürst explained that no FPÖ member of parliament has traveled to the country since the beginning of the war in Ukraine.
According to a report in tagesschau, this statement surprised some members of the executive board. Not everyone is convinced that this approach would be feasible in the AfD, and a planned visit to Sochi by two members of the Federal Parliament (Bundestag) has further complicated matters.
Rainer Rothfuß, a Bavarian member of parliament representing the Oberallgäu constituency, appears to have drawn the ire of the party leadership for this reason.
Due to its dissatisfaction with Rothfuß’s behavior, the AfD leadership discussed at the meeting whether to cancel all his future trips abroad.
The parliamentary group even discussed Rothfuß’s expulsion. The AfD deputy had submitted a travel request to the parliamentary group’s foreign affairs working group, which was approved. However, what he failed to inform the party was that he also intended to meet with former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
In a press statement, Alice Weidel criticized the foreign affairs working group in unusually blunt terms. According to Weidel, the travel request should have been examined in more detail beforehand.
“Frankly, I cannot understand the purpose of this. I would not have done it this way, but the decision was made by the Foreign Affairs Working Group. Mr. Rothfuß will remain here,” the AfD leader added.
Tagesschau noted that very few people have been publicly reprimanded in this manner by the party leadership recently. What makes this particularly significant is that the criticism was directed at the foreign policy spokesperson and, in fact, one of Weidel’s closest confidants, Markus Frohnmaier.
According to the report, Weidel has recently seemed somewhat annoyed by Frohnmaier’s growing desire for recognition, especially his social media activities during a trip to the US; she did not find these and other MPs’ appearances to be professional.
On the other hand, Weidel’s office, in a statement sent to tagesschau following the report, said, “Markus Frohnmaier manages the foreign affairs working group impeccably. I greatly appreciate his efforts to maintain a balanced approach, and I have no doubt that he will continue the professionalization of the working group in the future.”
What is more decisive, however, is that the AfD is facing intense pressure from the CDU/CSU. Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently identified the AfD as his main rival, and since then, leading CDU/CSU politicians have been particularly critical of its relations with Russia.
Last Thursday, the CDU/CSU and SPD even held a debate on this topic. The title of the debate was: “The impact of the AfD’s relations with Russia on Germany’s security interests – Not patriotism, but a potential threat to our security.”
The trips made by AfD members of parliament were also criticized during the debate.
All other parliamentary groups have repeatedly accused the AfD of allowing itself to be used as a “Trojan horse” for the Kremlin’s interests and of posing a real threat to democracy.
Another factor is that the debate about the party’s foreign policy orientation is in full swing. The AfD is generally seen as close to the Kremlin, and its MPs have repeatedly made headlines for their close ties to Russia.
However, Alice Weidel appears to be trying to change the party’s course. Following incidents in NATO airspace, the AfD leader openly criticized Russia and called for de-escalation, stating that “Trump’s patience should not be tested.”
It seems Weidel wants to distance her party somewhat from Russia and Putin. But the foreign policy working group handled the matter differently and opposed Weidel, unanimously approving Rainer Rothfuß’s planned trip.
In the future, the parliamentary group leadership plans to handle approvals differently. According to a draft from the parliamentary group’s executive committee obtained by ARD, trips by members or staff of the parliamentary group to “politically risky countries” or for meetings with “particularly risky individuals” will require prior approval from the parliamentary group’s executive committee.
Currently, the working groups and their leaders are responsible for this. The parliamentary group’s executive committee wants to be able to intervene at an earlier stage. This refers to countries where sanction regulations are in place, such as Russia, or where there is a “reputational risk.”
In the future, travel requests will be submitted at least ten working days before departure. The reason and purpose of the trip, as well as a list of individuals to be met, must be included, and the source of funding for the trip must also be specified.
Trips made without the approval of the executive board are considered “not supported by the parliamentary group” and are therefore not recognized as official AfD trips. If MPs violate this rule, there could be other consequences.
The current trip to Sochi will proceed in any case, even without Rainer Rothfuß. Among others, MP Steffen Kotré will also be traveling to Russia in the coming days.
The parliamentary group leadership has given him several rules to follow: no social media activity, no photos with Russian politicians, and no interviews with Russian television channels.
The AfD’s internal travel memorandum, obtained by ARD, lists the planned travel destinations of Bundestag members. These include trips to Turkey, Kyrgyzstan, and repeatedly to the US, as well as two trips to Russia, specifically to Sochi.
On November 13-16 and November 17, Bundestag members Steffen Kotré and Rainer Rothfuß will attend the “International Symposium in the BRICS-Europe format.” Rothfuß is also scheduled to give a lecture here.
According to the internal document, budgets of €4,050 and €2,000 have been allocated for the travel, with these costs to be covered by the parliamentary group.
Europe
EIB to unveil 15 billion euro tech initiative to scale European startups
The European Investment Bank (EIB) will announce a €15 billion initiative today, in collaboration with EU capitals and private investors, aimed at supporting the growth of European technology companies.
For decades, startups on the continent have struggled to raise the large-scale funding rounds necessary to scale on this side of the Atlantic, frequently turning to US investors or relocating abroad as they expand.
“We are catching up. Now we need to accelerate,” EIB President Nadia Calviño said.
Under the existing European Tech Champions Initiative, the EIB had already pooled resources with six EU governments to establish funds that invest in high-growth companies across the EU.
Calviño described the initiative as “very successful,” noting that it has supported 12 European “unicorn” companies valued at over $1 billion, including the German artificial intelligence translation firm DeepL.
The bank is now expanding the program with a new phase nearly four times the size of the original.
Twenty-five EU governments, alongside private investors such as Santander and Danske Bank, are expected to participate in the program.
This initial €15 billion aims to mobilize up to €80 billion in total investment. Calviño stated that this estimate is based on the multiplier effects achieved under previous programs.
As part of these efforts, the EIB also aims to attract European pension funds, which manage immense pools of capital but have historically allocated fewer resources to technology investments compared to their US counterparts.
In addition to the new funding, Calviño noted that the EIB will create a platform providing a single point of access for existing European scale-up initiatives, including the European Commission’s Scaleup Europe Fund, France’s Tibi initiative, and Germany’s Win initiative.
Europe
Germany to purchase US Tomahawk missiles to build own long-range strike capability
Germany will purchase Tomahawk cruise missiles from the United States and deploy them on German territory, Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Thursday.
The move marks a shift away from planned US deployments and toward Germany establishing its own long-range strike capability.
Merz told lawmakers that he finalized the agreement with the US government during the NATO summit in Ankara, adding that the talks held on Tuesday and Wednesday had exceeded his expectations.
“While we close a critical strategic gap in our defense, we are also working to develop our own European systems and deploy them in Europe,” the Chancellor said.
According to German government sources, Washington committed in a letter of intent signed on Tuesday to approve Germany’s acquisition of Tomahawk missiles and their land-based Typhon launchers in August.
The number of missiles and launchers Germany plans to purchase was not disclosed because the information is classified.
The planned acquisition appears aligned with US President Donald Trump’s pressure on European allies to cover their own security costs, such as by purchasing US weapons.
The fate of the Tomahawk procurement had become uncertain after Trump announced in May that he would reduce the US military presence in Germany.
That development was seen as a cancellation of a plan made under the previous administration to deploy a US battalion equipped with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany.
That original plan was designed as a temporary solution to serve as a strong deterrent against Russia while Europeans developed their own versions of such weapons.
Germany produces its own cruise missile, the Taurus, but its range of approximately 311 miles is three to five times shorter than that of the Tomahawk missiles.
Europe
Apple loses EU court appeal over Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation
The General Court of the European Union has rejected Apple’s challenges against its “gatekeeper” status designated under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).
With this ruling, the company’s designated status for the App Store and iOS remains valid, while its applications regarding iMessage were also rejected.
Apple had argued that the five separate App Stores it operates for the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, and Apple TV should be evaluated as distinct, individual services.
The court rejected this argument, ruling that these stores serve a common purpose of connecting developers and users, regardless of the specific device.
The court also dismissed Apple’s defense that the DMA’s interoperability obligations violate its fundamental rights.
However, it did not conduct a substantive assessment on the legality of this obligation, stating that a direct legal link could not be established between the regulation in question and the determination of “gatekeeper” status.
Following the ruling, Apple argued that the obligations under the DMA “exceed the boundaries of legality and proportionality.” The company asserted that the new rules jeopardize the work it has carried out for years to ensure user privacy and security.
Apple retains the right to appeal the decision, though a company spokesperson did not comment on whether there are plans to do so.
Apple previously declared that DMA rules prevented the launch of the updated version of Siri in Europe, resulting in European users being unable to benefit from the service.
In force in the European Union since 2024, the DMA covers a total of 22 services and products belonging to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft.
The regulation obliges these companies to share certain data with competitors, provide access to user-generated data, and offer verification tools to advertising partners.
Additionally, it prohibits platforms from engaging in anti-competitive practices that favor their own products. Companies failing to comply with the rules face fines of up to 10% of their global turnover, which can rise to 20% in cases of repeated violations.
-
Middle East2 weeks agoQatar and Saudi Arabia acquire hundreds of millions of dollars in Israeli defense technology, report says
-
Europe2 weeks agoBuckingham Palace updates King’s official role to focus on securing faith in multi-faith Britain
-
Interview2 weeks ago“Capitalism does not require a free social order”
-
Asia2 weeks agoSouth Korea unveils $518 billion plan for new southwestern semiconductor cluster
-
Europe2 weeks agoBillionaire Peter Thiel deepens ties with German and Austrian right-wing political elite
-
America2 weeks agoAnthropic withdraws covert China user tracking feature after online backlash
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany’s BSW proposes cooperation with AfD to break political ‘firewall’
-
Europe2 weeks agoEurope faces 15-year low in winter gas reserves as June storage targets fall short
