Asia
Afghanistan infrastructure and agriculture
Over the course of the US occupation of Afghanistan, which began 20 years ago till August 2021, the US has invested billions of dollars in major infrastructure projects, schools, hospitals, water and energy facilities as well as construction of thousands of miles of roads.
Indeed now Afghanistan has miles of asphalt roads, but not across Afghanistan, Afghans in provinces and rural areas still travel on poor roads. The same applies in schools, the Afghans were lacking schools, even in Kabul the capital city and regards to hospitals, there were several reports that US forces targeted hospitals and killed patients. After the incident the US forces called it a mistaken operation. Several hospitals were built but there were no treatment facilities, and no beds. Regarding water and energy, the Afghans are still scrambling with the lack of potable water.
Water and electricity shortages
On 8 of September, the residents of Kabul city said they are facing shortages of drinking water. One of the residents, Ahmad said that he walks everyday for about 30 minutes to bring drinking water home. Taliban said they have a plan to bring water to Kabul from Panjshir province and the project costs between $120 to $150 million to annually transfer 120 million cubic meters of water to Kabul. And in regards to energy, Afghanistan is still facing a huge difficulty in terms of electricity. Afghanistan imports 78% of its electricity from abroad. Afghanistan’s state power company Da Afghanistan Breshna Sherkat (DABS) in October of 2021, appealed for $90 million to settle nearly three months of unpaid electricity bills. DABAS said that the neighboring states have the right to cut the power because they did not pay money to them but we convinced them that they pay them. Afghanistan usually pays $20-$25 million a month to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Iran for electricity.
US against hydroelectric dams in Afghanistan
Once there was a report that a top US official said that they don’t have a plan to build hydroelectric dams to produce energy, and told the Afghan officials to use imported electricity and generators to produce electricity. Afghanistan has several dams and the money that was spent on buying electricity from neighboring countries, was better spent on operationalizing these dams. Reportedly the US official was Robert Gates, the former US defense secretary who opposed the idea of building dams in Afghanistan.

Dahla Dam in southern Afghanistan
The US also did not help to improve the agriculture sector in Afghanistan as well, despite knowing the fact that Afghanistan is an agricultural land and over 40% of the population engaged in agricultural activities and 77% percent of Afghans in rural areas were engaged in farming. There was some work, but not a fundamental one. Irrigation system was also very poor and many farmers were complaining about the lack of water.
US spent $145 billion dollars in Afghanistan reconstruction
According to the SIGAR report, the US has spent 145 billion dollars in the reconstruction of Afghanistan over the past twenty years, which is considerably more than the Marshall Plan’s budget for the reconstruction of sixteen European nations. But the ground reality is speaking today of a fact that these money were either ended up in the pocket of corrupt US and Afghan officials or transformed back to US through various ghost projects.
Indeed, After September 11, 2001, Afghanistan’s economy did grow, but fundamental work in this sector was not done. The World Bank report shows Afghanistan’s GDP from 2002 to 2014; the graph increases and reaches from 4 billion to 20 billion dollars, but then it declines once again.
Afghanistan’s GDP per year according to the World Bank’s report
- 4 billion dollars in 2002
- 4.5 billion dollars in 2003
- 5.23 billion dollars in 2004
- 6.21 billion dollars in 2005
- 6.97 billion dollars in 2006
- 9.75 billion dollars in 2007
- 10.11 billion dollars in 2008
- 12.42 billion dollars in 2009
- 15.86 billion dollars in 2010
- 17.81 billion dollars in 2011
- 19.91 billion dollars in 2012
- 20.15 billion dollars in 2013
- 20.5 billion dollars in 2014
- 19.13 billion dollars in 2015
- 18.12 billion dollars in 2016
- 18.75 billion dollars in 2017
- 18.5 billion dollars in 2018
- 18.8 billion dollars in 2019
- 20.12 billion dollars in 2020
- 15 billion dollars in 2021
Afghans fragile economy
However, with the withdrawal of US forces and the collapse of the republic administration, Afghanistan’s economy was abruptly on the brink of collapse and especially after seizing $9b in Afghan assets by the US, several infrastructure projects that had been started with government funds were not finished. The US has never supported fundamental projects, even the work of large regional projects such as CASA-1000, TAP and TAPI started over six years ago, have not been completed so far.
The TAPI project, which was launched by the leaders of Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, and India in December 2015, was supposed to be operationalized by the end of 2019, but is yet to finish. Currently the practical work on this project has been halted and it is unclear when the gas pipeline will pass through Afghanistan to provide the country with gas, and also help Pakistan and India in transforming gas through a pipeline.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy1 week agoIran discloses 14-point draft US peace accord detailing sanctions relief, regional security measures
