Diplomacy
African Union joins Caribbean nations in demanding colonial reparations from Britain
The African Union has joined the campaign demanding reparations from Britain for its “historical crimes.”
The African Union is demanding “meaningful reparations” from former colonial powers that exploited the continent’s people, lands, and resources.
The Union also linked the ongoing “systemic injustice” on the continent to 19th-century imperialism.
At a summit of African and Caribbean leaders in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, this week, the chairperson of the African Union Commission called for “reparatory justice and true freedom.”
Mahamoud Ali Youssouf, the Djiboutian politician responsible, announced that Africa and the Caribbean would work together to “honor our ancestors, uplift our descendants, and reclaim our common destiny in freedom, justice, and unity.”
The African Union will prepare its own reparation demands, while Caribbean nations are seeking trillions of dollars in compensation for slavery.
Britain, which controlled a quarter of the continent at the height of its empire, could face reparation claims not only related to the slave trade, in which African kingdoms also participated, but more broadly for “colonialism” and ongoing “structural and systemic injustice.”
Reparations could include the reform of global economic practices, the return of cultural artifacts, and compensation for the effects of climate change.
The demands will be directed at the former colonial powers in Africa, consisting of Britain, France, Portugal, Spain, Germany, and Belgium in the late 19th century.
The 15 member states of the Caribbean Community (Caricom) have been demanding reparations for slavery for more than a decade, presenting a “10-point plan” to former colonial powers.
This plan includes not only financial compensation but also a full formal apology, debt cancellation, and requests for assistance with economic development and education.
The Telegraph previously revealed that when these demands were first drafted in 2013, Attorney General Lord Hermer worked with Caricom, advising on a potential case that could be brought against Britain.
The African Union is trying to catch up with the Caribbean’s cause, and The Telegraph has learned that a branch of the organization has been tasked with developing policies to pursue reparation claims.
This work has been ongoing for about eight months as part of the year the African Union declared the “Year of Reparations,” but progress is understood to be slow, and a definitive policy has not been established.
This follows a series of meetings between Caricom and the African Union dating back to 2023, when the idea of forming a united front against former colonizers was first raised.
Various injustices requiring reparations have been put forward, including “economic inequalities between Africa and the Global North,” which are said to be perpetuated through the “exploitative practices” of multinational corporations.
Furthermore, in the context of climate change, it has been argued that “industrialized nations in the Global North bear historical responsibility for environmental degradation.”
Experts working on the African Union policy also emphasize that “the return of stolen artifacts to their rightful owners in African countries is a step towards cultural restoration and healing.”
Museums in the United Kingdom have moved to return artifacts, including the Benin Bronzes, Ashanti gold, and objects sacred to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, on a temporary or permanent basis.
While the African Union is trying to model its approach on the Caribbean reparations infrastructure, which consists of special national and multinational committees, Caricom’s approach has so far yielded no results.
Demands for reparations have been repeatedly rejected by successive prime ministers, including Keir Starmer, who has opposed the Commonwealth’s efforts to secure commitments on reparation payments.
There were hopes that the Labour Party would be more open to paying reparations, and inside sources indicated that David Lammy would host a “Caricom forum” to listen to reparation demands during his time as foreign secretary.
However, this was postponed due to the conflict between Israel and Iran.
France and other former slave-trading powers have rejected the demands, and some Caribbean island nations have changed tactics, seeking reparations from institutions rather than unresponsive governments.
In June, leaders in Jamaica announced plans to call on King Charles, who as head of state under the Jamaican constitution is the conduit for legal petitions, to address the issue of reparations.
Grenada has demanded reparations from the Bank of England for its direct involvement in the slave trade, which included owning a plantation on the island.
Former BBC reporter Laura Trevelyan has offered personal reparations to the island nation, where her ancestors had stakes in several slave plantations.
In a 2023 interview with The Telegraph in Grenada, she called on others to do the same, revealing that more than 100 descendants of wealthy slave owners had signed up for a reparations group.
Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
