Connect with us

MIDDLE EAST

China is wary on opening new road with Afghanistan

Published

on

After the Taliban announced that they have completed its first road link between Afghanistan and China, Beijing has been cautioned about giving its neighbor full access to its land border due to security issues.

It has been feared that terrorists and separatist militants could use this road which is located in Badakhshan province to penetrate inside Chinese territory. Meanwhile, China so far also has no intention to bring custom facilities where Afghanistan meets the autonomous Xinjiang. Chinese media reported that Beijing has no intention to add a formal crossing point in this area. The Chinese border guards are patrolling in Wakhjir Pass at the eastern end of the Wakhan Corridor where the road is located and connects Afghanistan and China by land.

The construction of the road even started before the return of the Taliban in power. The construction began in May 2021, and the Taliban seized power on 15 August the same year following the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan after 20 years of presence, the longest in the history of the US. The project worth 5.07 million US dollars conceived by the former US-backed government in order to attack Chinese investment in Afghanistan’s untapped mining resources. However, the Taliban has completed the construction of the 50Km Little Pamir Road in Badakhshan, and the Taliban are eager to inaugurate the road.

Afghanistan hopes to boost commerce and cross-border transit with China

Mohammad Ayub Khalid, the Taliban governor for Badakhshan province said that this road has been completed with a hope to improve and boost commerce, imports and exports and cross-border transit between the two neighbors.

Mirza Mohammad Shakib, head of provincial office of the Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development said that construction of 40 km road has been completed and work on the remaining 10 km has been underway. He said that this road will connect Afghanistan with China and considered it as a big achievement in areas of improving the economy.

Meanwhile, an Afghan military expert said that the Taliban has failed to eradicate terrorist groups in Afghanistan and that’s why China is warrying on reopening the land border with Afghanistan.

Taliban says connecting with China via land border is priority

Mohammad Radmanesh, an expert on military affairs, said China doesn’t not want to spend money on projects which are of no use and blamed Taliban for Beijing’s rejection to embrace the road.

The exact location of Afghanistan’s Little Pamir Road has not been disclosed, but it is understood to reach the Chinese border via the narrow and barely accessible strip of land called the Wakhan Corridor. AFP

“The current situation has changed based on the negative performance of the Taliban, and many projects have been suspended due to the existence of anti-Taliban movements and this is not a good sign for the Taliban,” he added.

“The Chinese want to see the implementation of this project because this will connect the two countries by land and China is not weak that it should be afraid of tiny groups like Daesh or other terrorist groups which are not so active in Afghanistan,” an official said.

“China has a strong army and Beijing knows that terrorist groups in Afghanistan no longer exist,” the official told Harici on condition of anonymity. He said that in the last several months no major security incident had happened and also assured that the Taliban security officials were working day and night to further improve the security.

He said that one of the priorities of the Taliban government is to have a land border with China and at the same time working on security issues.

Besides security issues that China has apparently restricted full access to its land border with Afghanistan, experts believe that this road is not too useful in terms of improving the economy.

Expert says Wakhan Corridor is largely unusable and has no economic viability

Chinese Professor at Lanzhou University, Zhu Yongbiao said that the Wakhan Corridor is largely unusable and has no economic viability due to its challenging mountainous terrain.

He said that the road itself is largely devoid of practical access and doubts that Afghanistan could build highways in the high-altitude Wakhan Corridor.

“China must have its security considerations. This road is not economically worthwhile, but it must have security risks,” Zhu quoted by South China Morning Post, as saying.

China has been considering Wakhjir Pass as a major counterterrorism front line between Afghanistan and Xinjiang militants and that’s why it exercises extreme caution for having a land border.

At the same time China is trying to have balance in its relation with Afghanistan since the withdrawal of foreign troops and also didn’t recognize the Taliban government like the rest of the world.

Though the Taliban are willing to have a strong tie with China, especially in economic areas, but Beijing is deeply worried about terrorism spilling into Xinjiang from Afghanistan.

MIDDLE EAST

Israel’s reserve crisis deepens amid Gaza plans

Published

on

As the Israeli army prepares to intensify its attacks in Gaza, the crisis within its reserve forces, considered the “backbone of the army,” is growing.

According to a report in Haaretz, tens of thousands of reserve soldiers are expected to be recalled to duty as Israel prepares to escalate its operations in Gaza. However, army officials report that motivation is declining, and an increasing number of reservists are stating they will not report for duty. Officials indicate that the reasons for this drop in motivation include war fatigue, the lack of clear objectives for the ongoing conflict, and anger towards government policies.

A senior reserve commander informed Haaretz that brigade and battalion commanders are handling numerous cases involving reserve soldiers refusing to report for duty. The most frequently cited reason is the perception that the government is making insufficient efforts to rescue the hostages. This is followed by anger over the proposed law exempting ultra-Orthodox Jews from military service and discontent regarding judicial reform plans.

Another reserve officer reported that soldiers and commanders suffer from severe burnout after serving hundreds of days over the past year. He expressed that they struggle to commit to new missions not only for political reasons but also due to physical and psychological fatigue.

Among those refusing service is combat pilot Alon Gur, who publicly announced his resignation last week after 16 years of service. Declaring his departure from the Air Force, Gur stated on social media, “The line has been crossed,” accusing the government of “prioritizing politics over human life.” After Gur was relieved of duty, other reserve soldiers began taking similar actions, causing significant concern within the army command.

According to Israeli army data, as of February, the reserve participation rate stood at 85%. At the start of the war, however, almost all called-up reservists reported for duty, marking the highest reserve mobilization in Israeli history.

Israel, with its relatively small population, relies on its reserve forces system to sustain the army during prolonged conflicts. This system, which involves recalling individuals who have returned to civilian life after compulsory military service back to active duty when needed, is considered one of the cornerstones of Israel’s security doctrine. This system allows tens of thousands of experienced soldiers to be rapidly deployed to the front lines during times of war or crisis.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Hamas retains guerrilla capacity and political role in Gaza, says US intelligence

Published

on

According to the 2025 Threat Assessment Report from the US Intelligence Community, the umbrella organization for 18 separate intelligence agencies, Hamas retains the capacity to sustain low-intensity guerrilla warfare and remains a primary political actor in Gaza. In Lebanon, Hezbollah, noted as weakened post-war, is still described as posing a threat to Israel and the US.

According to a report in Haaretz, the assessment predicted that “tension will persist regarding the situation in Gaza, as well as in the Israel-Hezbollah and Israel-Iran dynamics” and stated that Hamas “will continue to pose a threat to Israel’s security even in its weakened state.”

The report also noted that Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel disrupted the diplomatic progress achieved through the Abraham Accords and the trend toward stability in the Middle East.

Pointing out that Hamas has preserved thousands of its fighters and a significant portion of its underground infrastructure, the report warned that the organization “likely used the ceasefire to bolster its military capacity and replenish ammunition stocks.”

The report stated, “Hamas retains the capacity to reignite low-intensity guerrilla resistance and will remain the dominant political actor in Gaza for the foreseeable future. The low expectations among the parties for a permanent ceasefire and the absence of a post-war political and reconstruction plan point towards instability that could last for years.”

Noting that support for Hamas among Palestinians in the West Bank is higher compared to the Palestinian Authority, the report assessed that “the long-term trajectory of Israeli-Palestinian relations will depend on developments in the increasingly unstable West Bank.”

The report also highlighted that the Palestinian Authority’s capacity to provide security and public services in the West Bank is progressively weakening, emphasizing that Israeli operations in the West Bank, attacks by Jewish settlers, and the activities of Palestinian armed groups, including Hamas, could further deepen the governance crisis.

It added, “A potential leadership change within the Palestinian Authority could exacerbate governance challenges. Furthermore, how Israel will govern post-war Gaza and whether its operations in the West Bank will undermine the Palestinian Authority will also be crucial factors.”

The report also drew attention to the fragile dynamics between Israel and Lebanon, warning that a resumption of large-scale Israeli operations in Lebanon could heighten sectarian tensions, weaken Lebanese security forces, and worsen the humanitarian crisis.

The report concluded, “Despite being weakened, Hezbollah retains the capacity to target Americans and US interests regionally and globally, and even, to a limited extent, on US soil.”

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

US presents conditions to HTS for potential sanctions relief

Published

on

According to six sources speaking to Reuters, the US has presented Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which seized power in Syria, with a list of conditions to fulfill in exchange for partial sanctions relief. These conditions reportedly include ensuring foreigners do not hold senior management roles.

Two individuals, an American official and a Syrian source knowledgeable about the matter, told the news agency that US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Levant and Syria Natasha Franceschi conveyed the list of demands during a face-to-face meeting with Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaybani. The meeting took place at the Syria donors conference in Brussels on March 18.

The sources indicated that the conditions put forward by the US include Syria “destroying its remaining chemical weapons stockpiles” and “cooperating in the fight against terrorism.”

Additionally, American officials and one source in Washington stated that another demand involves ensuring foreign militants are not appointed to senior government positions within Syria’s administrative structure. Criticism had previously arisen over Syria’s appointment of thousands of foreign militants—including Uyghurs, Jordanians, Chechens, and individuals of other nationalities—to the defense ministry.

According to two sources, Washington also requested that Syria appoint a liaison officer to assist in efforts to locate US journalist Austin Tice, who disappeared in Syria more than a decade ago.

The source also indicated that the US wants Syria to issue a statement supporting its own territorial integrity.

Washington reportedly did not provide a specific timeline for the fulfillment of these conditions.

While the HTS administration has not commented on the matter, the US State Department stated, “We do not discuss our private diplomatic conversations publicly.”

Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce mentioned last week that Washington is monitoring the actions of the interim administrators.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey