Middle East
Hatred politics could destroy Pakistan
Former Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife were sentenced to 14 years jail after being found guilty of corruption. Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi have been accused of retaining and selling state gifts when he was in power, but many see this as a political move by the military establishment of Pakistan to further isolate Khan.
In addition to his prison term, Khan was also disqualified from holding any public office for 10 years, yet another blow to Khan, the famous cricketer-cum-politician and its political carrier and team.
The verdict was announced days before political moments attempted a return to power as preparations have been underway for the country’s parliamentary elections.
Meanwhile, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) summoned the country’s national security officials to discuss measures and steps to be taken to protect the polling stations ahead of the February 8 elections across the country. The commission also issued a notification announcing a public holiday on election day. The ECP put reason behind the public holiday as to enable voters to vote freely and easily.
At the same time, the election body has a serious concern over the security situation in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces and asked the security officials to stay alert all the time to protect the sites. Militant groups are more active in these two provinces and witnessed a series of attacks. The election body preserves all rights of concern as only yesterday (Tuesday) a parliamentary candidate was killed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa while another political leader was shot dead in the electoral office of his party in Balochistan.
Sentencing Khan and his wife badly affecting image of Pakistan at global stage
Whatever might be claims or strategies of military establishment but court verdicts against former Prime Minister Imran Khan and spouse badly affecting the image of Pakistan at global level, said a Pakistani political export.

Workers of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) gather in front of the offices of the Election Commission of Pakistan in Karachi to protest against its decision to disqualify party chairman Imran Khan. AFP
Speaking to Harici, the veteran pundit Shamim Shaid said that all these decisions are not only made in hurry but are lacking the right of defense. “No doubt to mention that on the issue of Imran Khan state organs are divided. Powerful military establishment is bent upon elimination of Imran Khan whereas he has support within the judiciary. Only Supreme Court of Pakistan chief Justice Faez Essa making attempts to settle scores with the judiciary,” he added.
At the moment Imran Khan and his PTI kept away from the election process but PTI affiliated independent candidates becoming a serious problem for the military establishment. “It is also a fact that Imran Khan still enjoys support within Jewish lobby and on such grounds the international community is also pressurizing the military establishment to behave with Imran Khan. However, the situation is very critical for Pakistan as its internal and external problems are being complicated,” he added.
Khan and his ex-FM Qureshi accused of damaging Pak-US relations
The Special Court established under the Special Secret Act also sentenced Khan’s former foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi to 10 years behind bars and issued a verdict in the cipher case which accused both Khan and Qureshi for violating their oaths during their time of office as Prime Minister and Foreign Minister and caused damage to the Pakistan and US relations.
In a 77-page verdict, Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain also held that both Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi attempted to garner sympathy for personal gains, according to Pakistan observer.
The judge also accepted the prosecution stance, Azam Khan, that both the Khan and Qureshi had also damaged Pakistan ties with the US, stating that both had violated their oaths and damaged the country at the global stage.
They have failed to prove themselves innocent
According to the witnesses, Shah Mahmood Qureshi incited the people in a public gathering on the matter of cipher, and both Imran and Qureshi failed to prove themselves innocent, Pakistan Observer reported.

A special court of Pakistan handed both former premier Imran Khan and ex-foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi 10=14 years in jail in the cipher case.
But Khan’s lawyer, Babar Awan had dismissed the conviction as a violation of Khan’s basic rights and accused the judge of being so hasty to announce a jail sentence in such a hurry that even not waited for the legal team of Khan to arrive in the court.
Khan was removed from power in a no-confidence vote in April 2022, and he immediately accused the US and the country’s military establishment behind this decision. However, he now has over 150 legal cases of different charges, including corruption.
It is worth mentioning that Khan and his political party Tehreek-e-Insaf still remain intensely popular and his supporters have all time stood besides him and once they attacked military installations after Khan was arrested last year. But since then, the Pakistan army and the police had imposed a crackdown on his supporters and his team, where many of the party’s candidates have been disqualified from running in the upcoming elections.
Hatred politics would leave Pakistan nowhere
Chairman Pakistan People’s Party, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that Pakistan would achieve nothing if the politicians remained engaged in hatred politics and personal hostilities.
Zardari warned against engaging in revenge politics, stating that PML-N Supremo Nawaz Sharif’s revenge and hatred politics would leave the country nowhere, and called on the politicians to restrain themselves from settling personal scores rather than work for the betterment of the country.
In a move to exhibit political maturity, Zardari disapproved the celebrations over Khan’s jail sentence, but said that Khan has been going because of his own political approach and accused him too of prompting revenge politics against his opponents.
He also accused Nawaz Sharif of always resorting to revenge politics and warned that potential continuation of such practices will leave the country nowhere.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe4 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy4 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
