Diplomacy
EU-funded transport project in Senegal faces potential takeover by Chinese state firm
A major European corporation is at risk of losing a 320 million euro transportation contract in Senegal, funded by the European Union, to a Chinese competitor.
According to a report by Euractiv, the Chinese firm CRRC has emerged as the frontrunner in a tender for a public transport project in the capital, Dakar. CRRC submitted a bid less than half the price of its competitors, reportedly outmaneuvering the Swedish manufacturer Scania and another Chinese producer, King Long.
The contract is financed by a consortium of European institutions, including the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Commission, the French Development Agency (AFD), and the German state-owned investment bank KfW. The project involves the procurement of 380 compressed natural gas (CNG) buses.
Indignation is mounting in Brussels over criticisms that EU public funds, specifically earmarked to support development in Africa, may ultimately benefit state-subsidized Chinese enterprises.
Danish conservative Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Kristoffer Storm told Euractiv that the situation is “completely mad,” adding that he intends to demand answers from the European Commission.
Sandro Gozi, a liberal MEP and close ally of French President Emmanuel Macron, also asserted that the EU must not remain a bystander regarding the utilization of its funds. “If Europe is serious about its strategic autonomy, it cannot remain neutral when its own money is at stake,” Gozi stated. “EU-backed financing should come with a clear European preference.”
According to documents related to the tender, CRRC is the clear leader for the contract, having ranked first in both technical and financial evaluations. While Senegalese authorities were expected to select a winner in the coming weeks, the decision has recently been postponed until later this year, likely due to the backlash from Europe.
Scania remains the sole European bidder. The Swedish company employs more than 50,000 people and maintains operations in over 100 countries.
Frank Kehlenbach, director of the European International Contractors (EIC) association, expressed frustration with the procurement process. “We wish that ‘Team Europe’ financiers would act with a bit more patriotism,” Kehlenbach said.
The controversy is particularly sensitive given the EU’s objective to position its Global Gateway initiative—launched to stimulate economic growth in developing nations—as a value-based alternative to China’s Belt and Road strategy.
This debate recalls a previous case in Senegal. In 2019, an EU-funded Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project awarded a significant contract to another Chinese state-owned enterprise, the China Road and Bridge Corporation. That company subsequently drew attention following reports of substantial cost overruns.
Although the EU has since tightened regulations regarding abnormally low bids and foreign subsidies, the current case raises questions about the practical efficacy of these measures.
In June last year, during a visit by the Senegalese government to China, the two nations reached an agreement to construct a bus assembly plant within the West African country.
Meanwhile, a delegation from the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs is visiting Dakar this week for “bilateral meetings with Senegalese and other counterparts.” The ministry declined to answer questions regarding whether the tender and Scania’s bid would be part of those discussions.
A spokesperson for the European Commission did not comment on this specific case but noted that, in principle, G20 countries outside the EU are “not eligible” for EU-managed tenders. However, the spokesperson added: “Many EU projects are implemented indirectly through partners such as the EIB and other development finance institutions, which apply their own procurement frameworks.”
Nonetheless, the Commission is aware of the gravity of the situation and hopes to rectify it in the EU’s next long-term budget, the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). A senior Commission official stated: “We need to create the right tools and conditions for the next MFF to ensure a European preference—which is what we are doing.”
The European Investment Bank told Euractiv it could not comment on the ongoing tender but stated it would “confirm the regularity of the process.” This is part of a continuing procurement strategy aimed at ensuring EU bidders compete on a level playing field. However, the EIB also noted that it “cannot ask its clients to subject bidders to discrimination based on their nationality.”
The bank added that while its investments follow the EU’s Global Gateway strategy, “EU values and standards do not mean that we only support projects executed by Europeans.”
Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
