Connect with us

Diplomacy

EU leaders push for deregulation to boost competitiveness and appease the US

Published

on

Reducing bureaucracy is one of the few policy areas where there is broad consensus among EU countries.

According to draft conclusions obtained by POLITICO, European leaders meeting in Brussels this week will instruct the European Commission to accelerate its work on “all files with a simplification and competitiveness dimension as a matter of the highest priority.”

To emphasize this message, 19 EU leaders, including Germany’s Friedrich Merz, France’s Emmanuel Macron, Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, and Poland’s Donald Tusk, called for a “systematic review of all EU regulations to identify unnecessary, excessive, or unbalanced rules” ahead of the summit.

In a letter obtained by POLITICO, they urged Brussels to repeal old rules, demanded a “continuous flow” of simplification measures, and called for restraint on new legislation.

Nevertheless, the simplification effort is being presented as a way to address Washington’s concerns that Brussels is over-regulating.

“Since Trump is ready to swallow a number of jokes… if we can tell him, ‘Donald, thank you very much, thanks to you we’ve tidied things up a bit,’ why not?” asked Pascal Lamy, former EU trade commissioner and head of the World Trade Organization.

To pull the struggling European industry back from the brink, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has made deregulation (or “simplification”) a central goal of her second term.

In less than 12 months, the Commission has drafted plans to dismantle many of the bureaucratic hurdles created during her first term, covering nearly all areas of EU law, from defense and agriculture to digital rules and the environment.

Initially, the logic was simple: fewer rules would be good for European companies trying to maintain their competitiveness against US and Chinese rivals.

Now, the simplification effort is seen as a diplomatic gesture to smooth relations with Washington, after Trump made it clear that US companies should not have to adhere to European rules he claims are discriminatory.

Under the trade deal von der Leyen signed at Trump’s Scottish golf resort in July, the Commission had pledged that its green rules would “not impose excessive restrictions on transatlantic trade.”

The list agreed upon by the two sides included Europe’s rules on supply chain due diligence, sustainability reporting, its carbon border tax, and rules to prevent the import of goods produced on deforested land.

All of these have been targeted by the simplification measures initiated by the Commission.

In an interview with POLITICO, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen compared this strategy to a “Kinder Surprise Egg,” the Italian-made children’s confection with a chocolate exterior and a toy inside.

Rasmussen, whose country holds the presidency of the Council, the bloc’s intergovernmental arm, stressed that reducing bureaucracy serves Europe’s “own interests” but also serves the interests of others.

Others say the situation is not so clear. “We cannot say on the one hand that we are ready to pay for America’s strategic protection in terms of tariffs, and on the other hand that we will not change our regulations for it. Not on data, not on the DMA, not on the DSA, nor on anything else that the Americans see as over-regulation,” said Lamy.

The Commission stated that although Washington and Brussels have decided to look for ways to reduce bureaucracy, “This will not lead to a lowering of EU standards or legislation.”

“The EU is determined to defend our fundamental principle; our legislative framework and regulatory autonomy are not up for negotiation,” added Commission spokesperson for trade, Olof Gill.

The letter from the 19 EU leaders intensifies the pressure from the bloc’s leading economies, particularly Macron and Merz, on the EU executive to pursue deregulation.

With the backing of their largest companies, the two leaders have joined the US call for the EU to abandon its supply chain due diligence directive.

But the debate in Europe seems to have convinced the new US ambassador to Brussels, Andrew Puzder, that the EU’s effort to reduce bureaucracy is in its own best interest.

“Germany’s Friedrich Merz and President Macron have said this directive should be repealed… not because it is in America’s interest. They are saying it is in the interest of Germany and France,” Puzder said at an event in Brussels, referring to the supply chain rules.

National calls for a significant reduction in EU rules have also drawn criticism from EU decision-makers who do not want trade negotiations or corporate interests to derail the bloc’s green agenda.

“Let no one be mistaken, we will not lower these standards because there is no competitiveness in a race to the bottom,” said Teresa Ribera, Spain’s Minister for the Ecological Transition.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey