Europe
European nations seek alternatives to Palantir amid growing digital sovereignty concerns
European Union member states, led by Germany and France, are stepping up efforts to develop native alternatives to software from US data-analytics giant Palantir Technologies Inc., as concerns grow over deep-seated public sector reliance on the company’s platform.
According to a report by Politico, when German and French security officials unveiled plans last month to build a “European sovereign digital infrastructure,” technology and defense sector experts on both sides of the Atlantic widely viewed the initiative as a direct move against Palantir.
Across Europe, an increasing number of government officials are seeking substitutes for the Denver-based firm, which has embedded its software into some of the continent’s most sensitive operational domains, ranging from local policing and global intelligence to national defense and public health networks.
However, severing ties with Palantir to achieve greater digital autonomy presents severe operational hurdles. The company’s tools have become deeply integrated into everyday administrative workflows, backed by a level of data-processing expertise that few domestic competitors can match.
Philippe Latombe, a French advocate for digital sovereignty, compared the stickiness of Palantir’s platform to “sugar in Coca-Cola,” noting that the firm’s entrenched position makes disengagement exceptionally difficult.
“Palantir is capable of processing massive amounts of data with great precision, and thanks to its experience, it has had the opportunity to refine its algorithms and adapt them to various use cases with numerous clients,” Latombe said.
Despite these entanglements, efforts to break away from Palantir are gaining traction across the continent. In Madrid, the government of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has instructed state-backed companies to exclude Palantir from future public procurement contracts. In Paris, France’s domestic intelligence agency, the Direction générale de la sécurité intérieure (DGSI), opted for French firm ChapsVision over the US provider.
In the UK, the next major test of this policy shift is expected in February 2027, when the Labour government will face a decision on whether to terminate a £330 million contract with Palantir for the National Health Service (NHS) Federated Data Platform.
Rivals exploit European pushback
The decision by French and German intelligence structures last month to select ChapsVision dealt a dual setback to Palantir’s leadership.
Chief Executive Officer Alex Karp reacted sharply to the sudden turn away from his company’s products, while insisting he was unconcerned by European competitors.
“There is an example of what doesn’t work. Its name is Europe,” Karp said.
Olivier Dellenbach, CEO of ChapsVision, told Politico that his firm was benefiting from what he described as a “visceral rejection of Palantir” in parts of Europe.
However, Dellenbach emphasized that he did not want ChapsVision to be viewed merely as an “anti-Palantir” substitute, arguing that digital sovereignty will remain an empty slogan unless European governments back it up with industrial policy.
“We need more public procurement,” Dellenbach said.
Meanwhile, other European defense contractors are seeing increased interest in their proprietary platforms. According to Patrick Moreau, one of the architects of a data solution developed by French aerospace and defense group Thales SA, military authorities in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, Romania, the Netherlands, and Canada have expressed interest in the French Army’s Artemis AI system.
“They all want to be able to choose a sovereign solution compatible with NATO standards, as opposed to Palantir’s black box,” Moreau said.
Yet even officials advocating for domestic substitutes concede that the European market remains fragmented, with local vendors still lacking the scale and operational track record of their American counterpart.
Military entrenchment and political friction
The challenge of replacing Palantir is particularly acute in the defense sector. Admiral Pierre Vandier, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, told Politico in recent months that the alliance possesses no viable operational alternative to Palantir’s battlefield artificial intelligence technology.
A NATO official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive capabilities, said Palantir’s platform has unmatched capacity to process vast arrays of satellite imagery to identify targets, recommend strike weaponry, calculate required ammunition quantities, and automatically generate replenishment orders.
“To my knowledge, Palantir has no real competitor today,” Vandier said in May.
This deep integration has fueled sharp political pushback from critics concerned about the company’s leadership and ideological stance. Aurélien Saintoul, a French lawmaker who authored a parliamentary report on foreign military dependencies, criticized the influence of Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel.
“Peter Thiel explains that the defense of freedom does not necessarily require democracy. He clearly puts technical tools at the service of his own political project, and here we are talking about technofascists,” Saintoul told Politico.
A spokesperson for Palantir, speaking on condition of anonymity, dismissed such characterizations as “absurd,” noting that similar accusations had recently been leveled against the firm by the Russian Foreign Ministry.
Pointing to the company’s ongoing operational support for the Ukrainian armed forces, the spokesperson said: “We know which side we are on and who we stand with. Since our founding, the protection of privacy and civil liberties has been the foundation of how we conduct our work in both public and private sector institutions. Western politicians should think deeply about who the real enemy is and not become puppets of the Kremlin.”
Many of the company’s European critics maintain that the pushback is driven primarily by technological sovereignty rather than political ideology.
They argue that displacing Palantir from the continent’s security architecture is a necessary test case for broader technological independence. If European governments fail to replace a software provider, critics say, hopes of reducing reliance on US tech giants for underlying cloud infrastructure and hardware will prove unrealistic.
From crisis management to long-term contracts
Palantir established its presence in Europe long before the current boom in artificial intelligence, pursuing a growth strategy centered on deploying its software during national emergencies to demonstrate immediate value to governments.
In France, Palantir entered the market following the November 2015 terror attacks in Paris, as security services faced intense scrutiny over intelligence failures. The DGSI signed its initial contract with the data analytics firm in 2016.
A similar pattern unfolded in Germany, where Palantir’s first major deployment occurred in Frankfurt, the financial hub of the state of Hesse. In 2017, state police acquired Palantir’s Gotham platform, deploying it under the name hessenDATA as a core tool for connecting disparate data points in criminal investigations.
Germany remains deeply divided over the technology. Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has pushed to expand Palantir’s footprint, introducing draft legislation intended to create a framework for broader federal use. However, the initiative has encountered resistance from coalition Social Democrats and senior security officials.
The same “crisis-to-contract” model was deployed in the UK during the Covid-19 pandemic. According to Louis Mosley, head of Palantir’s UK operations, the firm’s relationship with the NHS began during the health crisis, when it offered data aggregation services for a nominal fee of £1.
By contrast, Europol, the EU’s law enforcement agency, phased out Palantir’s Gotham platform after using it from 2016 to 2021.
A Europol official stated that the agency’s decision was driven by practical considerations rather than ideology, noting that the platform was expensive, raised sovereignty concerns, and left the institution reliant on Palantir for technical updates.
The official questioned whether every public body requires a platform as comprehensive as Palantir’s: “[Palantir] is really good when you have massive amounts of data and want to connect everything. But that is not the case for us. In most cases, alternatives are close enough. If we used it, I am not sure our efficiency would increase significantly.”
Expanding footprint across defense and corporate sectors
Part of Palantir’s operational strategy in Europe has involved recruiting former officials from target government departments. Investigative outlet OpenDemocracy reported that Palantir hired four former UK Ministry of Defence officials prior to securing a £240 million contract with the department.
The company is currently expanding its defense footprint across the region. On July 1, Palantir’s Maven Smart System—originally developed for the US Department of Defense—achieved full operational status within NATO, securing authorization to run on the alliance’s classified networks to link command and control systems.
“I think this is a very important turning point for European defense,” Mosley said.
Palantir’s reach extends beyond government agencies into major European commercial enterprises. In 2015, aircraft manufacturer Airbus SE integrated Palantir’s Foundry platform as the foundation of its aviation data infrastructure. Automaker BMW AG, energy giant BP PLC, and German media group Axel Springer SE also utilize Foundry to manage operational data.
Even if European entities succeed in reducing their reliance on Palantir, the company’s deployment model—which pairs software with embedded technical personnel—is being widely replicated by major US technology firms competing in artificial intelligence.
On June 30, Amazon Web Services announced a $1 billion investment to establish a “Forward Deployed Engineering” division designed to embed engineering teams directly within client organizations. Days later, Microsoft Corp. unveiled a $2.5 billion plan to deploy 6,000 engineers and domain experts to customer sites. Both initiatives mirror the operational model pioneered by Palantir.
Whether European institutions can transition away from Palantir is now viewed as a benchmark for the continent’s broader digital policy.
Hannah Neumann, a German Green Party member of the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Defence, emphasized the political stakes of the debate.
“European public institutions cannot become dependent on software developed by a small circle of US tech billionaires with an uncertain political worldview,” Neumann said. “That would be like outsourcing part of the democratic state to a private intelligence service that is accountable neither to voters nor to parliament.”
Europe
Israel nears completion of vast trench dividing Gaza Strip
The Israeli military is nearing completion of a vast trench and earthen barrier project designed to divide the Gaza Strip effectively in two. According to a report by the Israel-based newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, fortification works are concentrated in the eastern sector of the Yellow Line, which separates Israeli-occupied zones from areas under Hamas control.
Alongside the deep trench excavated to block vehicular passage, an elevated earthen berm is being erected using excavated soil. Israeli units are also conducting ground drilling at regular intervals along the route to detect cross-border tunnels extending into Israeli territory.
Controlling approximately 70% of Gaza’s territory, Israeli forces are consolidating their occupation area through this fortification line.
Excavations exceed designated boundary line
The plan to partition Gaza was first detected via satellite imagery in July of this year, revealing that construction extended hundreds of metres beyond the Yellow Line.
According to data cited by the Haaretz newspaper, the trench advances more than one kilometre beyond that designated line at certain critical points in southern Gaza.
Exceeding the line by roughly 400 metres in the Khan Younis area, the line extends along Salah al-Din Road, the primary transit artery between northern and southern Gaza.
In the Rafah sector, excavations reportedly reach approximately 1,300 metres beyond the Yellow Line. Through these works, which have continued without interruption for months, the Israeli military is expanding its de facto presence on the ground.
Permanent military bases built beyond ceasefire boundary
The Yellow Line was defined under the ceasefire agreement signed last year as the withdrawal boundary to which Israeli troops would pull back in the initial phase.
However, despite the plan announced by the US in October 2025 and the ceasefire process, Israeli forces advanced beyond the boundary and constructed permanent military positions along the line.
The Israeli administration conditions subsequent withdrawal phases on the disarmament of Hamas. Palestinian factions, conversely, stress that they will not surrender weapons unless an independent Palestinian state is established.
Yedioth Ahronoth pointed out that, despite the war, Hamas maintains administrative control across certain sectors of Gaza. The newspaper carried the headline: “Three years after October 7, Hamas still governs Gaza.”
Israeli officials speaking to the newspaper noted that they would continue targeting Hamas members, stating: “We will act against them and kill them one by one.” The officials claimed they were awaiting suitable operational conditions to limit civilian casualties.
The Gaza Ministry of Health stated that more than 1,450 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli strikes since the October 2025 ceasefire plan.
While the flow of humanitarian aid into the besieged enclave remains restricted to low levels, the transit of emergency medical equipment, such as wheelchairs, is being curtailed.
According to data from the Gaza Civil Defence, three people, including a woman and a child, were injured on Monday, 5 October, in an attack on a tent encampment near Khan Younis.
In an Israeli military strike on a vehicle in Deir al-Balah on 4 October, a Palestinian director of a Turkish aid organisation was killed.
Europe
Ex-BND chief August Hanning detained in German espionage inquiry
Investigators in Germany have detained the former president of the Federal Intelligence Service (BND), August Hanning.
According to reporting by WDR, NDR, and Süddeutsche Zeitung, an informant allegedly provided him with classified BND documents. Authorities are investigating whether this information reached foreign actors.
The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office is investigating the former BND chief on suspicion of espionage against the state, disclosing state secrets, attempted high treason, and acting as an intelligence agent.
Another long-serving employee of the agency faces allegations of aiding and abetting attempted high treason as well as aiding and abetting espionage against the state.
According to findings by WDR, NDR, and SZ, investigators from the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) detained Hanning early in the morning at his home in Nordwalde, near Münster.
In Bavaria, authorities also detained another former senior BND employee: Manfred D., who was reportedly Hanning’s former head of office and worked at the BND until spring 2026.
D. allegedly supplied Hanning with top-secret information from the agency in exchange for money until at least 2022.
Investigators are examining suspicions that the 80-year-old former BND chief used this information in at least one instance to draft a security analysis for a foreign intelligence service.
According to information obtained by WDR, NDR, and SZ, however, this case does not involve Russia.
In another instance, Hanning allegedly used information obtained from internal BND documents in correspondence with a foreign agent.
According to sources in security circles, Hanning came under investigation following searches conducted at his home and offices in September last year.
At that time, the Hamburg State Criminal Police Office (LKA) was seeking evidence linked to the Block abduction case.
The Hamburg Public Prosecutor’s Office accuses steakhouse heiress Christina Block of ordering the abduction of her two youngest children in late 2023 amid a custody dispute.
According to investigators, August Hanning allegedly played a role in an earlier attempt to abduct the children, an accusation he denies.
According to reports by WDR, NDR, and SZ, LKA officers reviewing material seized from Hanning last year came across an electronic storage device containing critical information.
These reports indicate that the former official had access to top-secret BND documents of recent origin that he should not have been permitted to possess under any circumstances.
Hanning’s tenure at the BND ended in November 2005.
In total, approximately 2,000 documents were allegedly transferred from D. to Hanning. According to the investigation, most of these were briefing materials prepared for the “ND Situation” meeting at the Chancellery, where heads of security agencies exchange information on a weekly basis.
According to the reporting, the documents in question contained highly sensitive material, including reports on the Iranian nuclear programme and the Russian military.
Sources in security circles state that the records also included intelligence received from allied foreign intelligence services.
The leak of such material is considered a worst-case scenario among intelligence services.
Allied intelligence services could lose confidence in the BND and withhold vital intelligence from the agency.
Following an examination of the records, the Hamburg State Criminal Police Office (LKA) handed the seized documents over to federal authorities.
In May 2026, the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office ultimately launched a classified investigation into Hanning and his alleged informant inside the BND.
The exact period over which classified internal documents were allegedly supplied to Hanning remains unclear. Security sources report that the latest documents found were dated June 2022.
It also remains unclear how the suspected mole inside the BND smuggled this material out of the secure agency. An urgent statement was requested from the BND regarding the matter.
Lawyers representing August Hanning have not responded to a late inquiry concerning the allegations.
For the BND, this marks the second severe incident in only a few years. A former BND department head is currently on trial before the Berlin Court of Appeal, alongside another defendant, on charges of spying for Russia in 2022.
That case involved top-secret information concerning the BND’s cyber operations that had been leaked from the agency.
If the suspicions against Hanning and the second suspect are substantiated, it would represent an intelligence scandal of historic proportions.
Never before in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany has an allegation of high treason involved an official of such seniority.
Throughout his career, August Hanning occupied key positions within Germany’s security architecture for decades.
Prior to serving as BND president, Hanning worked as a security officer at West Germany’s diplomatic mission in East Germany.
Following several postings in the Federal Chancellery, including as coordinator of the federal intelligence services, Hanning, who holds a doctorate in law, assumed leadership of the BND in 1998.
Following his tenure at the intelligence service, Hanning was appointed state secretary at the Federal Ministry of the Interior in late 2005. Four years later, he entered temporary retirement.
In subsequent years, Hanning established himself as an entrepreneur and security consultant.
Until last May, he served on the management team of a controversial security company based in Switzerland.
The firm’s German subsidiary had been temporarily retained in the custody dispute between Christina Block and her former husband.
During this period, Hanning and a business partner, a former LKA officer, apparently resorted to questionable methods: according to the public prosecutor’s office, the two allegedly planned in 2023 to discredit Block’s former husband through unfounded allegations of paedophilia.
Hanning and his alleged accomplice reportedly attempted to plant a hard drive containing images and videos of child sexual abuse material on the father of Block’s children.
The investigation remains ongoing. Hanning had previously denied all allegations in the Block case.
Europe
German domestic intelligence to probe Left Party and candidate Eralp
Germany’s Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) plans to examine the ties of the Left Party (Die Linke) and Elif Eralp to “extremist” groups.
The party’s lead candidate in Berlin, Elif Eralp, stands accused of “meeting with members of a PKK front organisation” while the election campaign was ongoing.
According to a report in WELT, Eralp has come under scrutiny by the BfV. During a Bundestag hearing with the heads of Germany’s security agencies, BfV Vice-President Sinan Selen also addressed the Left Party in the capital and its links to “extremist and terrorist” groups.
“We need to examine certain local situations very closely,” Selen said.
The domestic intelligence agency plans to investigate the extent to which Eralp and other Left Party politicians, such as Bundestag member Ferat Kocak, have established connections with “terrorist groups” and other organisations.
On election night, for instance, clan figurehead Issa Remmo, who is alleged to have ties to organised crime, and Ibrahim Ibrahim, alleged to be a supporter of the PFLP, attended the Left Party’s celebration.
Most recently, Eralp also faced criticism over her past membership in the left-wing organisation “Rote Hilfe” (Red Aid).
It is highlighted that this organisation, among other activities, collected donations for Daniela Klette, who is on trial over allegations of being a member of the RAF.
According to reporting by Bild newspaper, Eralp met during the election campaign with a delegation comprising several Kurdish organisations. Members of NAV Berlin were also present at the meeting.
Security agencies consider this group to be a front organisation for the PKK, which is banned in Germany.
During the election campaign, Eralp said that she wanted to abolish the Berlin State Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
When questioned by Bild, Eralp refrained from commenting on her stance regarding the PKK.
The domestic intelligence agency, meanwhile, issued the following statement:
“The PKK continues to be the organisation with the largest membership and the greatest influence in the field of foreign-linked extremism and terrorism in Germany.”
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Europe2 weeks agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Europe2 weeks agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Middle East2 weeks agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America2 weeks agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Europe1 week agoRome protests AfD poster depicting South Tyrol as independent state
