Connect with us

America

Foreign investors rush to hedge dollar risk amid concerns over Trump’s agenda

Published

on

Foreign investors in US assets are rushing to hedge against the dollar, a sign of growing concern over the impact of Donald Trump’s agenda on the world’s reserve currency.

According to a Financial Times report on Deutsche Bank’s analysis, hedged investments in US bonds and stocks are outpacing unhedged investments for the first time in four years, following a sharp move since Trump’s election last November.

Deutsche Bank strategist George Saravelos said, “Foreigners may have returned to buying US assets, but they do not want the accompanying dollar risk,” adding that these investors are “eliminating dollar risk at an unprecedented rate.”

According to the Financial Times, this behavior helps explain an apparent paradox in US markets following the sharp sell-off triggered by Trump’s tariff announcements in April: how did Wall Street stocks stage a strong comeback without prompting a dollar recovery?

According to Deutsche Bank’s analysis, 80% of the nearly $7 billion that has flowed into US stock exchange-traded funds domiciled in foreign countries over the past three months has been on a hedged basis. This figure was approximately 20% at the start of the year.

This type of hedge means investors are exposed only to movements in an asset’s price, not to fluctuations between the dollar and their home currency, but they must pay a premium for this protection.

Analysts say the increase in hedging activity has contributed to the dollar’s depreciation of over 10% against other currencies, such as the euro and sterling, this year.

The dollar’s decline pushed the euro above $1.18 on Tuesday, its highest level in four years.

Fund managers report that clients are eager to invest in US stocks amid the artificial intelligence boom but are less willing to bear the associated dollar risk.

Arun Sai, a senior multi-asset strategist at Pictet Asset Management, said the Swiss fund company has increased the dollar hedging on its US stock portfolio, predicting that the dollar is in a “long-term bear market.”

“The dollar will continue to bear the brunt of the erosion of institutional credibility,” Sai added.

According to a September Bank of America survey of global fund managers, 38% of investors want to increase their hedging positions against a weakening dollar, while only 2% want to hedge against a strong one.

“This is not the time to ‘sell America’… It is the time to ‘hedge the dollar’,” said Meera Chandan, co-head of global foreign exchange strategy at JPMorgan.

Weak economic data causing the dollar to fall below its recent trading range could trigger a new wave of currency hedging.

“The flow of hedging will further exacerbate the dollar’s weakness,” Chandan said.

While bond investors often seek to hedge their currency risk to prevent return fluctuations in low-risk investments, the practice is less common among equity investors.

Some noted that the foreign capital flowing into US stocks in recent years contributed to the dollar’s strength, pointing to a virtuous cycle of stock prices and currency gains.

However, this relationship has broken down this year as concerns about the US economy and Trump’s policies have dragged the dollar down. The S&P 500 stock index has risen 12% in dollar terms this year but has fallen 2% in euro terms.

Charles-Henry Monchau, chief investment officer at the Swiss private bank SYZ Group, said he moved to a fully dollar-hedged position in US stocks in March of this year.

Referring to Trump’s statements against a strong dollar, he said, “It was a geopolitical decision. This year is different. This year, you need to be hedged.”

Pension funds in many countries, including Australia and Denmark, are increasingly hedging their dollar exposure.

According to analysis by BNP Paribas, Danish pension funds reduced their unhedged US dollar exposure by approximately $16 billion to $76 billion at the end of June, while Dutch pension funds increased their hedging ratios at the start of the year.

In a report published in June, the Bank for International Settlements stated that currency hedging by institutions outside the US made a “significant contribution” to the dollar’s weakness in April and May, suggesting that Asia-based investors played a key role.

A typical way to hedge against dollar weakness is through derivatives such as currency forwards, which lock in a future exchange rate. These contracts reflect differences in short-term interest rates, and falling US interest rates have made hedging cheaper.

Kamakshya Trivedi, chief foreign exchange strategist at Goldman Sachs, said the falling cost could encourage more hedging from investors in Asia, which in turn could cause the dollar to fall further.

America

Musk appointed co-director of Pentagon future warfare initiative

Published

on

The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has assumed the co-directorship of a Pentagon initiative focused on the future of warfare, known as “Project Meridian”.

Musk’s new role was announced by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.

Musk, who has long expressed his conviction that wars will ultimately be fought with autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles, will advise the project as co-director alongside Palmer Luckey, founder of defence start-up Anduril, and former Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich.

In a memorandum issued at the Pentagon, Hegseth stated that the group would “examine the battlefields of the future” and “determine which weapons and technologies warfighters must employ to achieve dominance in these environments.”

During his “State of the Force” address at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Hegseth said:

“The best predictors of future conflict do not reside exclusively within the Pentagon. Obvious biases and risks arise when we task ourselves with both framing the questions and answering them.”

Hegseth stated that this initiative would commence immediately and that, following his address, he would convene with Musk, Luckey, and Gingrich at a secure location.

Project Meridian will have 120 days to “ruthlessly map the trajectory of wars, domains, and technologies”, a process that will culminate in the public disclosure of its findings alongside a classified annex.

Hegseth outlined an expansive mandate extending “from beneath the surface of the Earth to beyond the Moon.”

Rather than formulating new military strategies or policies, the panel will seek to identify “the domains we must seize and the capabilities we must master”, focusing on the effort to “discover, develop, and field” the weapons and systems that next-generation American troops may require.

The group is expected to submit a report containing recommendations to him by the end of January.

In 2024, Musk remarked: “Future wars will be entirely about drones and hypersonic missiles.” This was merely one of several similar statements he has made in recent years.

For Musk, whose oversight role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) ended in turmoil and escalated into a dispute with President Donald Trump over Trump’s spending bill, this appointment marks his formal return to government in an official capacity.

Musk and Trump ultimately reconciled, and Musk attended a meeting on artificial intelligence safety at the White House this week alongside other technology leaders.

Meridian forms part of a broader push announced by Hegseth to restructure the military around autonomous warfare and rapidly advancing technologies.

Hegseth announced the establishment of the Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM), a new four-star combatant command endowed with what he termed “service-like authorities” to scale autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force.

The Department of War will also begin phasing in new occupational frameworks across all military branches to establish specialised career tracks for what Hegseth described as “the next generation of autonomous warfighters.”

“We should have conceived an Autonomous Warfare Command a decade ago,” Hegseth said, explaining that Meridian aims to gaze far enough ahead to enable the military to anticipate the next technological shift rather than lag behind.

Continue Reading

America

Pentagon breach exposes personal records of three million people

Published

on

A cyberattack targeting the US Department of War’s personnel database has resulted in the leak of personal information belonging to approximately 3 million people.

Speaking to ABC News, a Pentagon official stated that the system accessed by unauthorised individuals contained the records of 2,760,000 living persons and 294,000 deceased individuals.

The Military Times portal, which first broke the news, had reported the number of affected individuals as approximately 4 million based on two sources. The Pentagon official subsequently conveyed different figures to ABC News.

The leak encompasses Social Security numbers and duty information belonging to military personnel and civilian employees. According to an official notification examined by Military Times, the compromised records may also include names, dates of birth, contact information, sex, race, and military occupational specialties.

The unauthorised access to the information system of the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) lasted for approximately nine months, between October 2025 and 16 July 2026.

ABC News reported that the access in question was obtained by a small number of third-party users. The vulnerability was closed after it was identified.

The DMDC is considered one of the Pentagon’s primary personnel records centres. More than 60 million records belonging to active-duty personnel, reservists, civilian staff, contractors, retirees, veterans, and military family members are stored at the centre.

The Pentagon has not detected any evidence that the leaked data has been misused. Military Times reported that affected individuals were offered identity restoration and credit history monitoring services.

A similar data breach previously occurred on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) recruitment website, FBIJobs.gov. According to information obtained by ABC News from internal communications and sources, the FBI is considering the possibility that data belonging to its entire staff may have been stolen.

The New York Times (NYT) examined a portion of the stolen FBI records. Home addresses, telephone numbers, official email addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, hiring dates, and emergency contact details for relatives were identified within these documents.

The database also contained unit designations, duty roles, and information regarding the supervisors of personnel. Some records revealed assignments within counterintelligence and counternarcotics units, as well as departments examining threats originating from Russia, China, and Iran.

Ciaran Martin, the former head of the UK National Cyber Security Centre, noted that this type of breach could directly affect the FBI’s operational capabilities.

The hacker group known as ShinyHunters had announced that it had seized medical data and security clearance records alongside files belonging to tens of thousands of active and former FBI employees.

Experts evaluating the matter for the NYT warned that this information could be used to track agents, threaten their families, or compile dossiers by foreign intelligence services.

The ShinyHunters group initially threatened to release the data unless the bureau withdrew an advisory it had published concerning the group’s attack methods.

The group later asserted that it had never intended to leak the information and characterised its action as an advertising campaign.

In a report published in May, Reuters noted that the personal data of US military personnel had been used in surveillance and attack preparations.

According to the agency, Washington’s adversaries gained the ability to pinpoint areas where troops were concentrated by exploiting commercially available location data. US lawmakers at the time criticised the Pentagon for failing to adequately protect the personal data of military personnel.

Continue Reading

America

Canada diversifies oil and gas exports away from US

Published

on

US President Donald Trump’s trade policy and the Washington administration’s push to increase Venezuelan oil imports are prompting Canada to diversify its energy exports.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, recent developments are accelerating Canada’s development of new oil and natural gas projects.

Steps taken by the Ottawa administration, which aspires to become an energy superpower, are seen as potentially strengthening the country’s position in global markets.

In Canada, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer and fifth-largest natural gas producer, the energy sector accounts for approximately one-fifth of total exports.

Almost all of the country’s natural gas exports and approximately 90% of its oil exports go to the US.

The newspaper writes that the trade war with Washington and the atmosphere of confrontation entered into with Iran have heightened Canada’s desire to turn to alternative markets outside the US.

Officials plan to increase shipments of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European and Asian markets.

Accelerating infrastructure investments in line with this target, Canada is also shortening approval processes. The government is prioritising the construction of an oil pipeline extending specifically to the west coast.

According to the newspaper’s estimate, if major pipeline projects are implemented, Canada’s daily oil transport capacity could rise to 6.8 million barrels by 2034.

Routes heading to the west coast will make up approximately 30% of this capacity.

The Canadian administration is simultaneously advancing LNG export projects. According to the report, these investments could allow approximately 55% of Canadian natural gas exports to be directed to markets outside the US by the early or mid-2030s.

While the government expands tax incentives for the oil and natural gas sector, the province of Alberta also plans to overhaul its royalty system.

However, the newspaper notes that implementing the new projects requires heavy investment, and the process depends on the final decisions taken by producers as well as the completion of regulatory approval processes.

The expansion of pipeline and LNG infrastructure could gradually reduce Canada’s dependence on the US market while raising its share in the global energy market.

The Canadian Prime Minister’s demand to reduce reliance on the US market had also come to the fore in July.

According to Carney’s statement, the province of Alberta submitted a plan for a pipeline spanning more than 1,000 kilometres to the west coast of British Columbia.

Targeted for completion by September 2027, the line will reach the Pacific coast by following an existing corridor through the mountainous terrain.

This shift in energy comes at a time of strained relations with the US. Donald Trump said that if Canada obtains associate member status in the European Union, he could halt trade with Europe in certain sectors and impose high tariffs.

As reported by the Associated Press, Trump characterised such a rapprochement as a “potentially hostile act”.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had proposed opening the path for Canada to become the EU’s first associate member. The terms of this associate membership status, which is not defined in EU treaties, are not yet clear and require the approval of member states to enter into force.

Canada, which does not seek full membership, aims for maximum rapprochement with the EU.

Following Trump’s return to the White House, relations between Washington and Ottawa deteriorated. The Trump administration, which repeatedly called on Canada to become the “51st state” of the US, introduced additional tariffs.

In July, the US began imposing 50% tariffs on certain Canadian-origin goods.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey