Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

G20 in the shadow of global crises

Published

on

Indonesia Island Bali is busy hosting the most strained edition of the G20, or Group 20 countries on 15 and 16 November. The annual summit will host for two days with including G20 members – Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union. The G20 was created after the Asian financial crisis in 1999, and the members consider themselves something of a superpowers club that manages future crises.

Beside political issues such as US-China tensions and Russian-Ukraine war, there are plenty of other issues on the discussion block. Soaring inflation, the ever-looming threat of a global recession, nuclear threats and perhaps most alarming of all, a rapidly warming earth are key agenda of discussions.

Amid all this ambiguity, the host and Indonesian President Joko Widodo is trying to play chief dealmaker, however, the success of the summit is in limbo.

No peace without dialogue

Of course, the host leader, Widodo will try level best to make this summit a success. He already insisted on co-existence and peace, and believes that there would be no peace in the world sans dialogue.

In fact, Widodo seemed sanguine about what has been described as the most diplomatically delicate and stressful G20 ever, but the first face-to-face meeting between US President Joe Biden and China’s leader Xi Jinping at the sidelines of the summit, have reported positive. Both sides made their best efforts to refrain from “cold war” which shows the first success of the summit.

Mr. Widodo has good relations with both Washington and Beijing as they remained as top trade partners, but in recent years China has consistently ranked as one of its top foreign investors.

Mr. Widodo is hosting the G20 summit as he is in the final stretch of his presidency as he has to stand down after two terms in the presidential palace.

Will the G20 make progress on many crippling issues?

Undoubtedly, there are plenty of issues to deal with. The COVID-19 pandemic has wrecked the global economy as it affected the supply chains. It has also slowed down global trade where even many developing countries pushed into the verge of bankruptcy.

The second headache is war in Ukraine that has created a global energy crisis and runaway inflation, prompting central banks to drastically raise interest rates.

All this is adding up to what the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is predicting will be a bad 2023 for the global economy. The 2023 slowdown will be broad-based, with countries accounting for about one-third of the global economy poised to contract this year or next, according to the IMF. It is feared that the global economy continues to face steep challenges as the IMF said that the worst is yet to come and, for many people, 2023 will feel like a recession.

This time G20 summit comes aimed political wrangling

It would not be wise to think that all the issues will be resolved in the summit. This time the world leaders are much divided on several fronts, starting from the Russia-Ukraine war to US and Middle Eastern issues and from Turkey to EU substance and so on. In such a context, it would be a difficult task on how to address these problems. The best Mr. Widodo can do in this summit is to open a window for discussions between the leaders which itself is a big development and pave the ground for face-to-face talks.

Much of G20’s work happens behind the close doors

It’s unlikely all the issues will be resolved in Bali in just two days of meetings. It has several dimensions, and needs more practical steps once promised by the world leaders to overcome it. Though there is high hope at the summit, but, in fact much of the G20’s work happens quietly behind the scenes, with leaders and high-ranking officials meeting throughout the year under a rotating presidency to address global economic challenges.

Rising tensions and deepening economic crisis have highlighted the need that these leaders should share the outcome of the summit in order to provide some relief to the anxiety of the people who are scrambling with delicate economic conditions and worried over the trend of daily inflation.

However, this year’s summit would take place in the backdrop of food and fuel prices spiking worldwide, and the renewed threat of nuclear war. There will also be one conspicuous absence around the table, Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia is represented at the summit by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

DIPLOMACY

Argentina and the IMF: Negotiations begin for a new $44bn agreement

Published

on

Argentina is pursuing a new agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to replace its current $44 billion arrangement. The effort signals a significant shift in the country’s financial strategy under President Javier Milei’s administration.

IMF Chief Spokesperson Julie Kozack confirmed on Thursday that the Milei government is prioritizing the establishment of a new programme over completing the final reviews of the existing deal inherited from the previous administration. According to a Bloomberg report, Kozack stated, “The authorities have formally expressed their desire to move to a new programme, and negotiations are now underway.”

The discussions intensified following a visit earlier this month by officials from Economy Minister Luis Caputo’s office and the central bank to Washington, where they engaged with IMF representatives.

The central question in the negotiations revolves around whether the IMF will extend additional financing beyond the $44 billion already allocated to Argentina. Milei had previously suggested an additional $15 billion, although he has not reiterated this figure recently. However, Caputo indicated this week that new funding could be included as part of the prospective programme.

If the parties reach an agreement, it would mark Argentina’s 23rd programme with the IMF since 1958 and its third since 2018. Historically, the IMF’s interventions in Argentina have faced criticism, as many past agreements failed to stabilize the economy. Successive governments often violated programme objectives, raising doubts about the effectiveness of IMF support in the country.

President Milei and his chief negotiator, Caputo, have a history of strained relations with the IMF. Earlier this year, Milei publicly criticized Rodrigo Valdes, one of the IMF’s senior officials, leading to Valdes stepping back from negotiations. Similarly, Caputo clashed with the IMF during his tenure as finance minister in 2018, particularly over exchange rate policies, which eventually prompted his resignation after a short stint as central bank governor.

Despite these tensions, the IMF has commended the Milei administration for implementing measures to cut spending, reduce inflation, and narrow gaps between the country’s various exchange rates.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Trump threatens tariffs on the EU over energy purchases

Published

on

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has issued a warning to the European Union (EU), stating that the bloc may face tariffs if it does not increase its purchases of U.S. oil and gas on a “large scale.”

“I told the European Union that they must close the enormous gap with the United States by buying our oil and gas on a large scale. Otherwise, TARIFFS!!! in every way!!!” Trump declared in a post on the Truth Social platform on Friday.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen previously suggested that the EU could explore the possibility of importing more liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the U.S. “We still buy a lot of LNG from Russia, and why not replace it with American LNG, which is cheaper for us and lowers our energy prices?” von der Leyen remarked to reporters in November.

An EU official, speaking to the Financial Times (FT), noted the peculiarity of Trump’s threat, given von der Leyen’s earlier openness to the idea of increasing LNG imports from the U.S.

Currently, the United States is Europe’s largest supplier of LNG, though Russia remains the EU’s second-largest source. The possibility of replacing Russian LNG with U.S. imports aligns with the EU’s efforts to diversify its energy sources.

Trump has also floated the possibility of a general tariff of up to 20% on all non-Chinese imports, which could have significant implications for EU-U.S. trade relations.

In November, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde urged European leaders to engage with the U.S. on trade matters, including tariffs, and to consider purchasing more U.S.-manufactured goods. This call for cooperation echoes measures taken during Trump’s first term, when then-European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker pledged to buy more U.S. gas to avert the risk of a trade war.

Global oil prices have shown sensitivity to these developments. On Friday, international oil benchmark Brent crude prices dropped 0.4% to $72.61 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures also fell 0.4%, trading at $69.14 per barrel.

The U.S., currently the world’s largest producer of crude oil and exporter of LNG, has been strengthening its energy trade partnerships. Buyers, including the EU and Vietnam, are reportedly considering increased fuel purchases from the U.S., partly to mitigate the risk of potential tariffs.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

London pushes for continued U.S. support to Ukraine amid leadership transition

Published

on

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer urged Donald Trump on Wednesday to ensure that Western allies “stand together” in supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.

During a phone call with the U.S. president-elect, their second conversation since Trump’s electoral victory in November, Starmer emphasized the importance of unified support for Ukraine, stating that “allies must stand with Ukraine… and ensure that Ukraine is in the strongest possible position.”

A spokesperson for the British Prime Minister’s Office described the discussion as highlighting a “shared desire to strengthen the close and historic relationship between the United Kingdom and the United States.”

Starmer began the call by congratulating Trump on his recent team appointments. Trump responded by “warmly recounting” his recent meeting with Prince William, Prince of Wales, in Paris earlier this month, according to the Prime Minister’s Office.

As Trump prepares to take office next month, he has expressed intentions to seek a deal to end the war in Ukraine, though he has also publicly criticized certain Western policies, including the approval of missile supplies to Ukraine for use on Russian soil.

In an interview with The Sun on Tuesday, Starmer expressed hope to revive trade talks with the incoming U.S. administration. These negotiations had stalled two years ago under President Joe Biden. The leaders also expressed mutual anticipation of meeting in person “at the first opportunity.” According to the i newspaper, Starmer may visit the U.S. in early February.

Meanwhile, The Telegraph reported that Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, conducted private meetings with senior members of Trump’s team earlier this month. McSweeney traveled to Florida to meet Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff-designate, who played a pivotal role in managing his re-election campaign. He also held discussions in Washington with Congressman Mike Waltz, Trump’s incoming National Security Adviser.

A senior source in the Prime Minister’s Office described the interactions as “very warm,” adding that “President Trump has a warm approach to the UK. As the year draws to a close, the Starmer team is confident that the UK is well-placed for a strong bilateral relationship with the new president.”

Starmer’s delegation to the U.S., which began on December 2, included Jonathan Powell, former chief of staff to Tony Blair and now Starmer’s national security adviser. Together with McSweeney, Powell engaged in policy discussions on Ukraine, China, and the Middle East, identifying areas of alignment and divergence between the two leaders.

According to The Telegraph, those close to Starmer believe Trump is currently in “listening mode” on Ukraine, carefully evaluating strategies to fulfill his campaign promise of resolving the conflict “on day one” of his presidency.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey