Connect with us

Asia

Iran and Pakistan missile firings: Tit-for-tat or diplomacy failure

Published

on

Pakistan did not remain silent over Iran’s brazen missile attack on an alleged militant group inside the country’s Balochistan region as it fired back against what it had claimed as rebel-held sites in Iranian territory. The exchange of fires between the two neighbors marked an explosive new development in growing unrest in the Middle East since the outbreak of deadly war in Gaza, the new wave of clashes in Yemen and now toward South Asia.

It was Iran which fired first on Tuesday and Pakistan responded on Thursday and Islamabad called it a clear violation of its national territory. Both sides claimed that they had targeted hideouts of the separatist Baloch militants but the reports speak otherwise and the civilians were the victims on both sides. Iranian state media reported the death toll from Pakistan’s missile attack in southeastern Sistan-Baluchistan region has reached to ten, including three women and four children. Three civilians, including two children were also killed in Iran’s attack on Pakistani soil.

The attack, of course, further deteriorated the ties between the two nuclear weapons neighbors which indeed is not in their interest at all. Both Iran and Pakistan apparently have a clear interest in finding a ceiling for this conflict and pathway toward de-escalation. At the same time, it is not simply possible as Iran is angrier now because the diplomacy approach failed to convince Islamabad not to retaliate.

China works to ease tensions between Iran and Pakistan

However, the mediation process has been scrambled, especially by China which has a very good tie with both the countries.

China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ming expressed her country’s willingness to play a constructive role in easing tensions between Iran and Pakistan

“China has always advocated that relations between countries should be handled in accordance with the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter and international law, and that the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of all countries should be effectively respected and maintained,” Mao stated.

She furthered: “Iran and Pakistan are close neighbors, friendly countries to China, and countries with important influence. China sincerely hopes that both sides can maintain calm and restraint and avoid escalating tensions. If needed, we are also willing to play a constructive role in alleviating the situation.”

Meanwhile, Afghanistan, the closest neighbor to both Iran and Pakistan had deemed the recent violence between Iran and Pakistan alarming, and called on the two neighboring countries to exercise restraint.

“In light of the region’s newfound peace and stability after protracted imposed wars and instability, both sides should direct efforts towards further strengthening regional stability and resolving disputes through diplomatic channels and dialogue,” Taliban Foreign Ministry Spokesman Abdul Qahar Balkhi said.

Iran’s enemy has spoken of course negatively

However, US President Joe Biden said that the recent clashes between Iran and Pakistan indicate Iran’s lack of popularity in the region.

Youth activists of Muslim Talba Mahaz (MTM) holding a banner shout slogans during a protest against Iranian air strike, in Islamabad on January 18, 2024. AFP

“As you can see, Iran is not particularly well-liked in the region, and where that goes, we’re working on now. I don’t know where that goes,” Biden said.

But US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller urged restraint among all parties amid escalating tensions between Iran and Pakistan, and lauded Pakistan’s emphasis on cooperative relations with its neighbors.

Attacking Pakistan was a mistake – diplomacy wins

An Iranian war expert said that Pakistan has been under attack for several years, and there was a wave of attacks on bordering sides against Pakistani soldiers, but Islamabad didn’t attack directly any country like Iran did. “I am not blaming Iran, but carrying out a missile attack inside Pakistan was not a right decision,” he told Harici.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said that Iran is already alone in the region, attacking Pakistan is making Iran more peril to terrorist attacks by different names and agenda. “We are already at war with Israel, Syria, Iraq, and now with Pakistan. We also fought with the Taliban in bordering areas. So, these are not good signs. We need friends not more enemies,” he added.

We need to think twice before taking any action, he said, adding that Iran should not lose its way with recent attacks in Kerman. “Iran should understand that the extremist groups like Islamic State (IS), who claimed responsibility for Kerman twin bombings, and Baloch militant groups, have no specific hideouts as they are just brain-made by the intelligence agencies of countries,” he added.

He said that Pakistan claimed it targeted militant sides, but the casualties all were civilians, including children and similarly to Iran’s claim attacking Pakistan. “My advice to the government of Iran is that do not retaliate again and the diplomacy channel must work to resolve the issue,” he added.

Pakistan convenes emergency security meeting  

Following a deadly airstrike exchanged between Islamabad and Tehran, the government of Pakistan has decided to hold an emergency meeting with military and intelligence chiefs on Friday. As of now, the meeting has not been held, however the national security committee meeting comes as both sides are apparently trying to reduce the tension. It has been reported that the Pakistani Chief of Army Staff and the head of Intelligence services are expected to attend the meeting.

Meanwhile, Pakistan foreign ministry in a statement described Iran as a brotherly country, stating that the people of Pakistan have great respect and affection for the Iranian people. “We have always emphasized dialogue and cooperation in confronting common challenges, including the menace of terrorism, and will continue to endeavor to find joint solutions,” the statement reads.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey