Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Is international free trade coming to an end?

Published

on

Where in the world is “free trade” really free? The European Union, and maybe China… The number of countries that feel bound to the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, especially considering the last “protective” measures of the USA, does not go beyond the fingers of one hand.

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), signed by Joe Biden, seems to be a continuation of Donald Trump’s “America First” policy to many. The law provides government support for the transition from seemingly innocent fossil fuels to green energy. It is no secret that the role of states in the transition to renewable energy should increase. It does not seem possible to make progress in such a large infrastructure transformation without public intervention.

In the IRA, the issue that bothers EU in particular is government incentives for electric cars. In addition to financial support to automotive companies producing in the United States, tax breaks are also foreseen for consumers. The summary is that an electric Ford, GM or Tesla may cost $7,500 less under this law than an electric Volkswagen or Hyundai, depending on where and how it is produced. Let’s also say that in the IRA, Canada and Mexico are granted exemptions.

South Korea and Japan are also concerned

Of course, this is not just about the EU. Japan and South Korea also have world-renowned automotive companies that produce electric vehicles. These countries also think that the US’s new industrial policy is a violation of international trade rules.

The Japanese government said in a note to the US Treasury Department in early November that the IRA would challenge the competitiveness of Japanese automotive companies in the North American market. Tokyo warned its interlocutor that the new law could deter Japanese manufacturers from making new investments in the United States, which could lead to unemployment in the United States.

The CEO of the Japanese huge company Nissan said the IRA must be given some time before its entry into force. Nissan has a factory in Canton, Mississippi, but according to the CEO, the number of these factories could increase with the IRA. Nissan expects its electric models to account for 40 percent of US sales by 2030.

The South Korean government also said that the implementation of the IRA should be given a minimum of three years. Seoul has also reported that the IRA may violate the free trade agreement signed between the United States and South Korea. Companies like South Korean Hyundai and Kia are expected to increase their investment in the US.

Speaking to Axios, a South Korean official said that the issue almost led to a diplomatic crisis. The United States and South Korea have discussed the issue twice at the presidential level, but it seems unlikely that the Biden administration will make any changes to the law.

South Korea thinks that they cannot meet every request from the USA, for example, they cannot unite against China. Some officials think that US-Japan-South Korea-Taiwan co-operation on the semiconductors issue would have been easier to move forward without the IRA.

Along with the IRA, it is stated that Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Subaru Solterra and Toyota bZ4X models are not impossible to compete in the USA market. Rivian Automotive, Hyundai Motor and Kia Corp recently suggested to the US that the pressure on them could be reduced by arranging “commercial clean cars” regulation for the IRA.

US barrier to chip trade angers Netherlands

Yet another trade that the Biden administration is trying to block with IRA is the chip trade.

The US has recently imposed tight barriers to the sale of advanced chip and chip-making equipment. Dutch and Japanese companies are among the leading companies in this regard.

The United States has not yet reached an agreement with these countries on banning the sale of chips. But it is reported that Dutch chip makers will resist moving out of the Chinese market.

The Netherlands-based ASML is one of the largest suppliers to the global semiconductor industry. A Dutch official told Bloomberg last month that they would protect their own economic interests when it comes to selling chip equipment to China.

Dutch officials have emphasized that the United States should not expect its own countries to unquestionably comply with Washington’s restrictions on China.

Despite this, the Netherlands refuses to sell extremely ultraviolet lithography machines to China under US’ pressure. But ASML continues to sell less advanced chip-making systems to China.

US pressure on ASML and Japanese firm Tokyo Electron continues. ASML told its staff in the US to stop doing business with Chinese customers as a result of a new regulation that came into force in the US in October.

Dutch Foreign Trade and Development Co-operation Minister Liesje Schreinemacher insisted last week that his government’s “national security interests are really important”.

Dutch Economy Minister Micky Adriaansens told the Financial Times last week that his country was “very positive” about relations with China and emphasized that Europe and the Netherlands “should have their own strategies” for controlling exports to China.

Macron’s visit and concern in Europe

“Joe Biden wants to strengthen the American economy – to the detriment of Europe,” wrote the German newspaper Die Zeit, while the French economic newspaper Les Echos cited “America First, Europe Last.”

The fact that French President Emmanuel Macron was greeted like a king in Washington last week does not seem to have solved the problem. US President Joe Biden admitted there may be flaws in the IRA, but then mentioned the negotiations of the US-EU trade delegations.

Describing the IRA as “super aggressive” during a closed-door meeting with US senators, Macron invited the EU to adopt its own “Europe First” law before heading to the US. French Economy and Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire also suggested that the United States was pursuing a Chinese-style industrial policy.

In a statement with Mr Biden, Macron said it was now time for Europe to “synchronise” itself with US’ steps. This word is thought to refer to the EU’s own state incentives.

French authorities are concerned that European companies, whose operational costs have already risen due to inflation, will start to migrate investment to North America. But Stefano Sannino, secretary-general of the EU’s Foreign Relations Service, who was in Washington for the visit, argued that a scenario in which the United States on one side, and the EU on the other, started to provide incentives would not be “rational”.

At the same time, Denis Redonnet, the EU’s trade chief, said they could report the IRA to the WTO. European Commissioner for the Internal Market Thierry Breton also announced that he will not attend the EU-US Trade and Technology Council meetings later this week. Breton argued that the meetings were insufficient to address the concerns of Europe’s industry and labour ministers, noting instead that Europe would focus on the urgent need to protect the competitiveness of its industrial infrastructure.

EU officials are considering negotiating a free trade agreement between the EU and the United States as another option. However, the fact that this process takes too long and the bureaucratic procedures reduce the possibility of this option.

Meanwhile, Italian automotive companies are more concerned about the entry of Chinese electric cars into the European market than the IRA, according to the Italian newspaper La Stampa. The Germans fear the IRA more than the Chinese.

Czech Trade Minister Jozef Síkela reminded in November that the People’s Republic of China would be the winner of the EU-US trade wars.

Giga factory investments multiply in the US

We can say that the fears of Germans and the French are coming true. While Europeans are worried about the US “sucking up” investment in Europe, alarm bells are ringing in battery production.

Until recently, Europe’s production of lithium-ion batteries was a league ahead of the United States. But with the rise in energy prices and the IRA, the picture seems to have changed.

Since the day the IRA was announced, there has been a 35 percent increase in capacity in the United States. That’s 17 percent in Europe. Despite all this, Europe is still far ahead of the United States in terms of capacity. In 2031, Europe’s annual production capacity is estimated to be 1,186.2GWh, and the US 957.6GWh.

The Turkish company Kontrolmatik announced that it is considering increasing the size of the giga factory in the United States, while Norway-based FREYR announced that it will accelerate its plans in the United States. In Europe, there are reports that such plans have been delayed.

Towards a European protectionism

“The new ambitious industrial policy from our competitors requires a structural response,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, delivering the message that the EU will start playing by the rules: “Europe will always do what is right for Europe.”

According to Estonian Entrepreneurship Minister Kristjan Järvan, the EU has always supported free trade, and this was a good thing, but “non-democratic forces” were now using free trade against the EU.

Trying to balance the trade wars between the US and China for a long time, Brussels may now start to change its attitude towards friendly fire as Joe Biden jumps on the “protectionist” train. Von der Leyen’s speech Sunday also suggested that the EU should reconsider its own state subsidies.

“There is a risk that the IRA will lead to unfair competition, close markets, and dismantle the same critical supply chains that have already been challenged by COVID-19,” Leyen said, bringing up the possibility that manufacturers will move from Europe to the US.

The fear of subsidies in the EU’s ultra-liberal and pro-free trade departments is at a heightened level. European Commissioner for Trade Valdis Dombrovskis, among them, argued that the subsidy race would be “expensive and inefficient”. EU competition chief Margrethe Vestager said no one wants a subsidy war.

However, the genie has definitely came out of the bottle. If EU takes a step towards government incentive, it will be the last nail to be put in the coffin of international free trade, which hasn’t been really practiced for a long time.

DIPLOMACY

US proposes controversial ‘colonial’-style agreement to Ukraine

Published

on

The US is pushing to control all future major infrastructure and mining investments in Ukraine, veto the role of Kyiv’s other allies, and undermine its goal of European Union membership.

According to a draft document obtained by Bloomberg, the Donald Trump administration is demanding the “right of first refusal” on investments in all infrastructure and natural resource projects under a revised partnership agreement with Ukraine.

If accepted, the partnership agreement would give the US enormous power to control investments in projects in Ukraine such as highways and railways, ports, mines, oil and natural gas, and the extraction of critical minerals.

The agreement would give the US first claim on profits transferred to a special reconstruction investment fund controlled by Washington.

The most crucial point of the document is that the US considers the “material and financial benefits” it has provided to Ukraine since the beginning of the war as a contribution to this fund.

In effect, this means the Trump administration would force Ukraine to pay the cost of all US military and economic support provided since the start of the war before Kyiv receives any income from the partnership fund.

According to the draft document, the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) will control the investment fund by nominating three of the five board members and holding a “golden share” giving it special voting rights to block certain decisions. Ukraine will appoint the other two members and will be prevented from interfering in the fund’s daily management.

The Kyiv government will be required to deposit 50% of the earnings from all new natural resource and infrastructure projects into the fund. The draft states that the US will be entitled to all profits until its investment is recouped, plus a 4% annual return.

Ukraine will be obliged to submit all projects to the fund for review “at the earliest possible time,” and the DFC will gain board membership or oversight rights in all funded programs.

Kyiv will also be prohibited from offering rejected projects to other parties on “materially better” terms for at least one year.

Furthermore, according to the draft, the US government will have the right to purchase Ukraine’s metals, minerals, and oil and gas on commercial terms before other parties, regardless of whether the fund finances the project.

The agreement, which has no time limit, also prohibits Kyiv from selling critical minerals to countries that are “strategic rivals” of the US.

The US presented a revised agreement to officials in Kyiv last weekend after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s plans to sign an earlier deal fell through following a tense discussion with Trump in the Oval Office last month.

The White House said last week that the administration has moved beyond the previously negotiated agreement covering critical minerals in Ukraine.

Negotiations between the two sides are ongoing, and the final draft may include revisions to the terms. A person familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that Ukraine would respond to the US document with its own changes this week.

Speaking to reporters in Paris on Thursday, where he traveled to attend a summit with European leaders, Zelenskyy said the full agreement proposed by the US requires “detailed study” and that the terms are constantly changing during negotiations.

While it is too early to say an agreement has been reached, he said, “We support cooperation with the US, we do not want to send a single signal that could cause the US to stop helping Ukraine.”

In response to a request for comment, a US Treasury Department spokesperson stated that the US remains committed to the swift finalization of the agreement and securing a lasting peace for Ukraine.

National Security Council spokesperson James Hewitt said, “The minerals agreement offers Ukraine the opportunity to establish a lasting economic relationship with the US, which is the foundation for long-term security and peace. This agreement will strengthen relations between the two countries and benefit both sides.”

Ukraine gained EU candidate status in 2022 and is set to begin accession talks for full membership, which could take years to complete. This situation is likely to become more complicated if the US gains effective control over investment decisions covering large areas of the Ukrainian economy.

Ukraine had previously stated that an agreement with the US should not conflict with its association agreement with the EU. It had also previously rejected the US demand that Washington’s past support for Ukraine be included as a contribution to the joint fund.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

EU to continue funding Türkiye despite İmamoğlu concerns, Politico reports

Published

on

Protests following the detention and arrest of Istanbul Metropolitan Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu seem to have put Europe in a difficult position.

In an assessment published in Politico titled “EU faces a billion-euro dilemma in Türkiye crisis,” politicians and officials cited say that regardless of what happens on the streets of Istanbul, Ankara is too important an ally to alienate.

The report states, “The European Union will continue to transfer billions of euros to Türkiye despite President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s extensive crackdowns on political opponents.”

Recalling that European officials warned their southern neighbor to “uphold democratic values” following Ekrem İmamoğlu’s arrest, Politico writes, “But Türkiye’s strategic importance means the bloc will likely look the other way. Erdoğan knows this too.”

Dimitar Bechev, a lecturer at Oxford University, says, “Whatever the Turkish leader does, the EU will have to follow suit.”

Two European officials, speaking to Politico on condition of anonymity, said that Türkiye’s EU candidate status requires it to protect democratic values and that Brussels would respond to violations. Although one of them stated, “We are following the developing situation in Türkiye with great concern” and “Recent developments contradict the logic of EU membership,” they also acknowledge that given Türkiye’s importance in migration, trade, energy, and defense matters, any reaction from the EU is unlikely to disrupt relations between Brussels and Ankara.

Pointing out that although Türkiye’s EU membership negotiations have stalled over the past decade, the country still receives billions of euros in accession funds, Politico notes, “Ankara has also received about 9 billion euros in aid to host refugees from the Middle East and is in line to receive large sums to support European defense industries.”

Highlighting that Türkiye, which has become a major hub for oil and gas exports, has a trade flow with the EU exceeding 200 billion euros annually, the publication writes, “Türkiye has also played a key role in controlling access to the Black Sea and enforcing sanctions against Moscow since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Recently, its potential significant contribution to a possible peacekeeping mission in Ukraine has been discussed.”

Bechev says, “The status quo before İmamoğlu’s arrest was comfortable for the EU because there was enough democracy,” and suggests that recent developments are not dire enough to change this.

According to the “Readiness 2030” plan presented by EU leaders last week, Türkiye, as an EU candidate country, has the potential to access 800 billion euros worth of joint procurements from funds designed to increase the bloc’s defense spending.

However, Greece and Cyprus, both long in conflict with Türkiye, are pushing for restrictions. Diplomats speaking to Politico said they intend to enact a clause requiring the defense move to occur “without prejudice to the specific character of the security and defense policy of certain Member States.”

Arguing that Athens and Nicosia, which were in the process of normalizing relations with Ankara before the recent crisis, now have to perform a “delicate balancing act,” Politico quotes a senior Greek official admitting that “even Athens cannot go too far.”

The Greek official involved says, “Of course, we will support a firm stance condemning the current developments in Türkiye, but without being provocative. The defense industry remains a major gap for Europe, which paves the way for this policy of trade-offs that we see happening.”

Even Cypriot MEP Michalis Hadjipantela, calling for “targeted sanctions” by stating “Effective pressure from the EU is essential,” also said that “sanctions should be targeted and linked to progress on the above issues to prevent further alienation of the country.”

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Fidan and Rubio discuss Syria, Gaza, and defense in US meeting

Published

on

Minister of Foreign Affairs Hakan Fidan and his accompanying delegation began a two-day visit to the US.

During the visit, Fidan met with US Senator Marco Rubio. According to a statement attributed to US State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce, the two discussed cooperation on key issues in security and trade.

Rubio requested Turkey’s support for peace in Ukraine and the South Caucasus, while appreciating Ankara’s leadership in the “Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS.”

According to the spokesperson, the American senator reiterated the need for close cooperation to support a “stable, unified, and peaceful Syria,” stating they do not want Syria to be “either a base for international terrorism or a pathway for Iran’s destabilizing activities.”

Rubio also highlighted recent progress in bilateral trade and encouraged an even greater economic partnership moving forward.

Finally, the Senator expressed concerns regarding the recent arrest of Ekrem Imamoglu in Turkey and the subsequent protests.

Turkey has not made an official statement: AA reported based on ‘foreign ministry sources’

According to Turkish Foreign Ministry sources cited by AA, Fidan and Rubio emphasized the “importance of engaging with the Syrian government” during their meeting on Tuesday.

The sources stated, “Both sides emphasized the importance of engaging with the Syrian government and expressed their determination regarding the stabilization of Syria and the fight against terrorism.”

According to the sources speaking to AA, Fidan and Rubio discussed a range of regional and bilateral issues, including the need for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, deemed essential for “regional peace.”

The sources also mentioned that the issues discussed in the phone call between President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and US President Donald Trump on March 16 were followed up on during the meeting.

The two sides also discussed preparations for upcoming presidential-level visits and expressed their determination to remove obstacles to defense cooperation.

The report added, “Both sides clearly expressed their political will to remove obstacles to cooperation in the defense industry. Technical meetings will be held to resolve existing issues.”

The two sides also discussed efforts to achieve a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, with Turkey expressing support for recent US efforts in this direction.

The talks also covered the ongoing peace process between Azerbaijan and Armenia and the importance of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s stability for the entire Balkan region.

Is Hamas on the table?

Meanwhile, Trump, during a White House meeting with a group of US Ambassadors confirmed by the Senate, referred to Turkey and Erdogan as a “good country, a good leader.”

The new US Ambassador to Ankara, Thomas Barack, was also present at the meeting. Barack, known as a close friend of Trump and a real estate magnate, thanked the President for appointing him to Turkey, “one of the ancient civilizations.”

In an article penned by Murat Yetkin in Yetkin Report, it is alleged that Trump might engage in bargaining over Hamas and Gaza in exchange for steps such as lifting CAATSA sanctions against Turkey.

Yetkin relays that CHP leader Ozgur Ozel, in a statement on March 18, referred to the Trump-Erdogan phone call, criticizing the lack of mention of Gaza and Israel, and accused Erdogan of “selling out the Palestinian cause for Trump.”

Recalling that Trump’s special representative Steve Witkoff told Tucker Carlson in an interview that they expect “good news” from Turkey, Yetkin underscores that Witkoff also stated elsewhere in the interview, “A terrorist organization cannot run Gaza; this is unacceptable for Israel. But their disarmament is possible. Then they can stay for a while longer and even get involved in politics.”

Yetkin asks, “Is Trump supporting Erdogan because of a plan to disarm the PKK and Hamas together?” while also noting that the Secretary of the PLO Executive Committee, Hussein al-Sheikh, met with Foreign Minister Fidan in Ankara on March 19, before Fidan flew to the US.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey