Connect with us

Asia

Is there any possibility of sharing power?

Published

on

Pakistan is one of the countries that has played a major role in the production of extremism, fundamentalism and terrorism. By investing in religious schools and using these schools to preserve its interests in the region, this country has deepened its role in regional and global relations.

Fundamentalism and terrorism have become a major source of income for Pakistan. Therefore, with the invasion of the Soviet Red Army in Afghanistan, the US had given financial aid to Pakistan to support the groups against the government of that time and especially the Red Armies.

This was at a time when Islamic extremism was sprouting in Afghan society, especially among young people who had studied at Al-Azhar University in Egypt. The Islamic youth movement was one of the prominent examples of this spectrum, which was in front of the leftist ideas, but after some time, the space for these young people’s activities was limited and they fled to Pakistan.

Of course, this was not an accident. Pakistan was constantly monitoring the situation and trying to find an opportunity to implement its pre-planned program and succeeded in this direction. Pakistan recruited emotional young Muslims in Afghanistan under the name of Jihad (Holy War).

This support continued until the Jihadi groups came to power, and after that, another group was created under the name of the Taliban to challenge the Mujahideen.

Mujahideen and Taliban, both the children of the plans of the great powers and soldiers to the bottom of Pakistan’s interests in Afghanistan. Now that the Taliban have once again come to power with the direct support of Pakistan and the signing of the Doha Agreement with the United States, will they negotiate with the Mujahideen leaders on power sharing?

Power sharing and negotiations between the Taliban and jihadi leaders will not be possible for several reasons:

First: The Taliban group emerged in order to destroy the Mujahideen’s regime that caused the civil war, and the Taliban also called them “evil and corrupt people.” When the Mujahideen were engaged in civil wars among themselves over power and insecurity and disorder spread throughout the country, the Taliban defeated them in the shortest possible time.

The Taliban, who have gone to the Mujahideen war with the motive of right against wrong, it is difficult to explain to their forces how to make sharing of power with the wrong party.

Second: The Mujahideen have become burnt beads for their supporters, especially Pakistan. Mujahideen leaders, who gained huge wealth during the republic and made many investments in different countries, have adapted to modern life. They think more about their interests than the interests of their supporters. Pakistan no longer sees Mujahideen in its favor, but in order to put pressure on the Taliban, Pakistani officials sometimes meet with the Mujahideen leaders outside Afghanistan.

Third: By holding the Bonn International Conference on Afghanistan, the Mujahideen leaders not only ignored the side of the Taliban, but also cooperated with NATO forces in suppressing this group. Power and wealth were so embedded in the minds of Mujahideen leaders that they considered it impossible to share it with the Taliban.

Fourth: Mujahideen and Taliban, two groups created by Pakistan, are for two purposes. The first was created against the Soviet forces and the second against the former and then the NATO forces. The sensitivity of Mujahideen has been lost in the current situation and their leaders have become retired veterans and have lost their popularity among their supporters.

On the other hand, the children of Mujahideen leaders, most of whom studied and lived in Western countries, are unable to challenge any group in Afghanistan.

Fifth: Meanwhile, the Taliban have achieved the key to their success, loyalty to America. As long as the Taliban do not cross the line with American interests, they will remain in power and do not see the need to share power with others. Power sharing will be possible when the Taliban become weak.

Sixth: Discussing differences among the Taliban is a common thing. Regional powers try to support people within the Taliban to secure their interests. The recent tensions among the Taliban are also caused by the support of regional powers, but the big powers have emphasized on the internal stability and leadership of the Taliban unit. This is because the division within the group threatens the interests of the powers in the region and beyond.

There may be changes in the leadership level, but not the fragmentation that others expect. Some of the Taliban leaders, who seem dissatisfied with the leadership of this group and have given a green light to the jihadi leaders, have done this just to exert pressure and score points.

Once again, the Taliban do not want to share power with the Mujahideen leaders. By signing the Doha agreement, they considered themselves victorious in both (war and battle) fronts and now considered themselves as undisputed rulers of Afghanistan. Besides this, there is no case such as actual pressure or threat to challenge the rule of the Taliban, so that the Taliban is not satisfied to share the power with its opponents.

Asia

Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says

Published

on

The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.

According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.

The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.

The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.

The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.

The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.

According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.

Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House

The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.

In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.

In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.

According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.

Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.

Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.

Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.

Continue Reading

Asia

Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices

Published

on

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.

Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.

The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.

According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”

Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).

Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.

During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.

Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.

Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.

The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.

“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.

Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.

Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers

Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.

In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.

Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.

The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.

Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.

Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks

Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.

A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”

The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.

At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.

According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.

Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.

A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.

Continue Reading

Asia

South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants

Published

on

South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.

The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.

Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.

Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”

“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.

Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.

The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.

Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.

Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.

According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.

South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.

South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.

The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.

Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.

After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey