Connect with us

Asia

Is there any possibility of sharing power?

Published

on

Pakistan is one of the countries that has played a major role in the production of extremism, fundamentalism and terrorism. By investing in religious schools and using these schools to preserve its interests in the region, this country has deepened its role in regional and global relations.

Fundamentalism and terrorism have become a major source of income for Pakistan. Therefore, with the invasion of the Soviet Red Army in Afghanistan, the US had given financial aid to Pakistan to support the groups against the government of that time and especially the Red Armies.

This was at a time when Islamic extremism was sprouting in Afghan society, especially among young people who had studied at Al-Azhar University in Egypt. The Islamic youth movement was one of the prominent examples of this spectrum, which was in front of the leftist ideas, but after some time, the space for these young people’s activities was limited and they fled to Pakistan.

Of course, this was not an accident. Pakistan was constantly monitoring the situation and trying to find an opportunity to implement its pre-planned program and succeeded in this direction. Pakistan recruited emotional young Muslims in Afghanistan under the name of Jihad (Holy War).

This support continued until the Jihadi groups came to power, and after that, another group was created under the name of the Taliban to challenge the Mujahideen.

Mujahideen and Taliban, both the children of the plans of the great powers and soldiers to the bottom of Pakistan’s interests in Afghanistan. Now that the Taliban have once again come to power with the direct support of Pakistan and the signing of the Doha Agreement with the United States, will they negotiate with the Mujahideen leaders on power sharing?

Power sharing and negotiations between the Taliban and jihadi leaders will not be possible for several reasons:

First: The Taliban group emerged in order to destroy the Mujahideen’s regime that caused the civil war, and the Taliban also called them “evil and corrupt people.” When the Mujahideen were engaged in civil wars among themselves over power and insecurity and disorder spread throughout the country, the Taliban defeated them in the shortest possible time.

The Taliban, who have gone to the Mujahideen war with the motive of right against wrong, it is difficult to explain to their forces how to make sharing of power with the wrong party.

Second: The Mujahideen have become burnt beads for their supporters, especially Pakistan. Mujahideen leaders, who gained huge wealth during the republic and made many investments in different countries, have adapted to modern life. They think more about their interests than the interests of their supporters. Pakistan no longer sees Mujahideen in its favor, but in order to put pressure on the Taliban, Pakistani officials sometimes meet with the Mujahideen leaders outside Afghanistan.

Third: By holding the Bonn International Conference on Afghanistan, the Mujahideen leaders not only ignored the side of the Taliban, but also cooperated with NATO forces in suppressing this group. Power and wealth were so embedded in the minds of Mujahideen leaders that they considered it impossible to share it with the Taliban.

Fourth: Mujahideen and Taliban, two groups created by Pakistan, are for two purposes. The first was created against the Soviet forces and the second against the former and then the NATO forces. The sensitivity of Mujahideen has been lost in the current situation and their leaders have become retired veterans and have lost their popularity among their supporters.

On the other hand, the children of Mujahideen leaders, most of whom studied and lived in Western countries, are unable to challenge any group in Afghanistan.

Fifth: Meanwhile, the Taliban have achieved the key to their success, loyalty to America. As long as the Taliban do not cross the line with American interests, they will remain in power and do not see the need to share power with others. Power sharing will be possible when the Taliban become weak.

Sixth: Discussing differences among the Taliban is a common thing. Regional powers try to support people within the Taliban to secure their interests. The recent tensions among the Taliban are also caused by the support of regional powers, but the big powers have emphasized on the internal stability and leadership of the Taliban unit. This is because the division within the group threatens the interests of the powers in the region and beyond.

There may be changes in the leadership level, but not the fragmentation that others expect. Some of the Taliban leaders, who seem dissatisfied with the leadership of this group and have given a green light to the jihadi leaders, have done this just to exert pressure and score points.

Once again, the Taliban do not want to share power with the Mujahideen leaders. By signing the Doha agreement, they considered themselves victorious in both (war and battle) fronts and now considered themselves as undisputed rulers of Afghanistan. Besides this, there is no case such as actual pressure or threat to challenge the rule of the Taliban, so that the Taliban is not satisfied to share the power with its opponents.

Asia

Chinese Politburo signals cautious confidence as Beijing pivots toward targeted tech support

Published

on

The mid-year meeting of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Politburo has long served as a critical evaluation point for Beijing. The session provides the central government with an opportunity to review developments from the first half of the year and steer the country toward a more realistic economic course in the months ahead.

The latest statement from the top leadership signals cautious confidence. The release indicates that policymakers are favoring a stable, targeted approach over the broad-based stimulus measures that characterized previous years. As China manages its economic transition, the post-Covid era of aggressive spending has clearly drawn to a close. In its place, a strategic and structural approach has taken hold, prioritizing resilience and stability over short-term capital injections.

According to the outcomes of the Politburo meeting, the policy orientation will continue to target specific sectors. Financial support will be directed away from the property market and toward high-tech emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. In the real estate sector, the objective remains stabilizing market confidence and keeping debt risks under control.

Infrastructure investment is likewise being reshaped around the concept of “new infrastructure.” The focus is no longer solely on concrete and physical structures; smart power grids, information technology networks, and data infrastructure have taken precedence.

This approach signifies an investment in future competitiveness rather than simply pumping capital into the economy’s more stagnant sectors. Serving as a new driver of growth, digital infrastructure fulfills a dual purpose: supporting domestic demand in the short term while safeguarding technological competitiveness over the long term.

Finally, Beijing is signaling a more conciliatory posture in international trade. The Chinese leadership aims to establish a more balanced trade framework to mitigate concerns voiced by trade partners such as the European Union over what has been termed “China Shock 2.0.”

As the administration prepares for critical leadership changes next year, its primary focus will remain on stability across both economic and social spheres.

China continues to strike a balance between realistic growth targets and systemic restructuring, maintaining policy leeway to absorb potential external shocks. Beijing’s economic strategy reflects a pragmatic assessment of both domestic and international challenges.

Struggling with weak demand, the domestic economy is not yet in a position to anchor national growth independently. Expansion continues to rely heavily on a record trade surplus alongside the impressive export performance of high-tech and clean energy sectors. However, this reliance has drawn pushback from several trading partners.

To stimulate domestic economic activity and ease trade tensions, Beijing unveiled its first standalone five-year plan focused on consumption. Released in July by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce, the plan targets an increase in retail sales to 60 trillion yuan (approximately $8.9 trillion) by 2030. This represents an increase of roughly 20% compared to 2025 levels.

To improve profit margins for small businesses, regulatory authorities are tackling the issue of “involution”—described as excessive internal competition—by curbing platform monopolies and preventing destructive price wars. While these structural adjustments may take longer to yield results, they are viewed as a more sustainable and effective alternative to direct cash handouts.

Continue Reading

Asia

Chinese chipmaker profits surge 2,500% on explosive AI computing demand

Published

on

Major Chinese microchip manufacturers saw their profits surge by 2,579.5% in the first half of 2026, driven by unprecedented demand for artificial intelligence and computing capacity.

Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), underscored the industry’s sharp upward trajectory.

Yu Weining, senior statistician at China’s National Bureau of Statistics, explained that this surge is directly connected to the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors.

Yu noted that this process has increased the need for computing capacity. The demand for computational processes also lifted profits across the entire electronics industry by 97% year-on-year.

Profits of major Chinese industrial enterprises with an annual revenue exceeding 20 million yuan ($2.9 million) rose 18.7% in the first six months of the year, reaching 4 trillion yuan.

In the first half of 2025, before the global data center construction process had begun, industrial profits had dropped by 1.8% to 3.4 trillion yuan, while profit growth in the electronics sector remained at 3.5%.

The SCMP reported that the global AI boom has generated explosive demand for high-performance computing systems and memory chips, causing a structural pivot in China’s industrial landscape.

Data showed that integrated circuit production in the first half of the year grew by 23% year-on-year to reach approximately 280 billion units.

This figure means that the country produced an average of more than 1.5 billion chips per day.

The profit growth is also corroborated by forecasts from China’s leading chipmakers. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics, one of the largest memory module manufacturers, expects its profits to increase by more than 600-fold in the first half of the year.

Flash memory maker GigaDevice projects that its net profit will surge by approximately 1,099% year-on-year due to supply shortages and rising product prices.

Chinese companies in the AI chip segment are also demonstrating strong profit growth, albeit at a more moderate pace compared to the memory market.

Hygon Information Technology, which develops central processing units and computing units for artificial intelligence, projects that its profits will rise by up to 52.3%.

CXMT hits record high on Shanghai Stock Exchange

Shares of Chinese chipmaker CXMT gained more than 500% on their first day of trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, jumping from 8.66 yuan to 55 yuan.

As a result of this sharp surge in its shares, CXMT’s market valuation reached 3.65 trillion yuan ($539 billion), making the company China’s most valuable publicly traded firm.

At the peak of the rally—even though quoted prices underwent a slight correction toward the close of the trading day—CXMT surpassed Tencent, which was trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with a market capitalization of $514 billion.

Continue Reading

Asia

Massive student movement over exam leaks forces resignation of India’s education minister

Published

on

Indian public examination reform proposals follow education minister’s resignation after nationwide youth protests

India’s federal government introduced legislation in parliament on Monday to amend the law governing public examinations, days after the “Cockroach” movement forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan following nationwide youth protests.

The bill incorporates enhanced sanctions, including longer prison sentences and higher fines for those found responsible for exam leaks and irregularities.

The demonstrations are widely viewed as the most significant youth-led challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he took office in 2014.

What triggered the protests?

Nearly 2 million students took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an undergraduate medical entrance examination, in May. The federal National Testing Agency cancelled the exam on May 12 following allegations that question papers had been leaked. The examination was re-administered on June 21.

Young people took to the streets to protest against examination fraud, youth unemployment, and a perceived lack of future prospects.

According to a BBC report, the unemployment rate among university and college graduates aged 15 to 25 in the country stands at a critically high level of 40%. The addition of corruption in public examinations to existing economic strain broke the patience of the youth.

Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Public Party (CJP) movement, led the protests.

The movement derived its name from remarks made in May by Supreme Court Judge Surya Kant, who used the terms “cockroach” and “parasite” in a derogatory reference to unemployed youth and protesters. Young demonstrators adopted the insult as a symbol and named their movement after it.

How the movement unfolded

Young protesters organized street demonstrations demanding the resignation of Education Minister Pradhan. Dipke, who initiated the movement in New Delhi, subsequently organized protests in other parts of the country.

Sonam Wangchuk, one of the protesters, began a hunger strike at the demonstration site in support of the movement. As his physical condition deteriorated, authorities forcibly transferred him to a hospital.

The reaction to Wangchuk’s forcible removal from the protest site caused crowds at the venue to expand rapidly.

Tens of thousands of protesters faced tear gas and baton charges by police while attempting to march on parliament. Some demonstrators engaged in clashes with law enforcement officers.

CJP leaders held talks with ministers from the Modi government, who requested time to evaluate the protesters’ demands internally.

Modi called for unity among lawmakers in the ruling coalition to implement strict measures against exam paper leaks, punish those responsible, and establish a secure, leak-proof system.

Opposition representatives led by Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in at the entrance of Modi’s official residence demanding Pradhan’s resignation. They were briefly detained by police before being released.

Opposition lawmakers supporting the student protesters disrupted proceedings in parliament. Demonstrations expanded to other regions of the country, including the financial hub of Mumbai.

In his first direct statement regarding the protests, published in a post on X, Modi announced that special courts would be established to prosecute individuals involved in exam paper leaks. Protesters rejected the proposal.

Movement leaders held a second round of talks with the government after Wangchuk ended his 26-day hunger strike.

Following those discussions, the government requested time until the afternoon of the following day to respond to the demand for Pradhan’s resignation.

Education Minister Pradhan subsequently announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down in light of the situation at the protest site and across the country, as well as to prevent “external forces” from exploiting the environment.

On July 26, Modi announced the creation of a task force headed by technology entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani to overhaul the country’s examination system.

On Monday, July 27, the government presented a bill to parliament proposing amendments to the law governing public examinations. The legislation introduces stiffer penalties for offenders, including extended prison terms and increased monetary fines.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey