Connect with us

Asia

Is there any possibility of sharing power?

Published

on

Pakistan is one of the countries that has played a major role in the production of extremism, fundamentalism and terrorism. By investing in religious schools and using these schools to preserve its interests in the region, this country has deepened its role in regional and global relations.

Fundamentalism and terrorism have become a major source of income for Pakistan. Therefore, with the invasion of the Soviet Red Army in Afghanistan, the US had given financial aid to Pakistan to support the groups against the government of that time and especially the Red Armies.

This was at a time when Islamic extremism was sprouting in Afghan society, especially among young people who had studied at Al-Azhar University in Egypt. The Islamic youth movement was one of the prominent examples of this spectrum, which was in front of the leftist ideas, but after some time, the space for these young people’s activities was limited and they fled to Pakistan.

Of course, this was not an accident. Pakistan was constantly monitoring the situation and trying to find an opportunity to implement its pre-planned program and succeeded in this direction. Pakistan recruited emotional young Muslims in Afghanistan under the name of Jihad (Holy War).

This support continued until the Jihadi groups came to power, and after that, another group was created under the name of the Taliban to challenge the Mujahideen.

Mujahideen and Taliban, both the children of the plans of the great powers and soldiers to the bottom of Pakistan’s interests in Afghanistan. Now that the Taliban have once again come to power with the direct support of Pakistan and the signing of the Doha Agreement with the United States, will they negotiate with the Mujahideen leaders on power sharing?

Power sharing and negotiations between the Taliban and jihadi leaders will not be possible for several reasons:

First: The Taliban group emerged in order to destroy the Mujahideen’s regime that caused the civil war, and the Taliban also called them “evil and corrupt people.” When the Mujahideen were engaged in civil wars among themselves over power and insecurity and disorder spread throughout the country, the Taliban defeated them in the shortest possible time.

The Taliban, who have gone to the Mujahideen war with the motive of right against wrong, it is difficult to explain to their forces how to make sharing of power with the wrong party.

Second: The Mujahideen have become burnt beads for their supporters, especially Pakistan. Mujahideen leaders, who gained huge wealth during the republic and made many investments in different countries, have adapted to modern life. They think more about their interests than the interests of their supporters. Pakistan no longer sees Mujahideen in its favor, but in order to put pressure on the Taliban, Pakistani officials sometimes meet with the Mujahideen leaders outside Afghanistan.

Third: By holding the Bonn International Conference on Afghanistan, the Mujahideen leaders not only ignored the side of the Taliban, but also cooperated with NATO forces in suppressing this group. Power and wealth were so embedded in the minds of Mujahideen leaders that they considered it impossible to share it with the Taliban.

Fourth: Mujahideen and Taliban, two groups created by Pakistan, are for two purposes. The first was created against the Soviet forces and the second against the former and then the NATO forces. The sensitivity of Mujahideen has been lost in the current situation and their leaders have become retired veterans and have lost their popularity among their supporters.

On the other hand, the children of Mujahideen leaders, most of whom studied and lived in Western countries, are unable to challenge any group in Afghanistan.

Fifth: Meanwhile, the Taliban have achieved the key to their success, loyalty to America. As long as the Taliban do not cross the line with American interests, they will remain in power and do not see the need to share power with others. Power sharing will be possible when the Taliban become weak.

Sixth: Discussing differences among the Taliban is a common thing. Regional powers try to support people within the Taliban to secure their interests. The recent tensions among the Taliban are also caused by the support of regional powers, but the big powers have emphasized on the internal stability and leadership of the Taliban unit. This is because the division within the group threatens the interests of the powers in the region and beyond.

There may be changes in the leadership level, but not the fragmentation that others expect. Some of the Taliban leaders, who seem dissatisfied with the leadership of this group and have given a green light to the jihadi leaders, have done this just to exert pressure and score points.

Once again, the Taliban do not want to share power with the Mujahideen leaders. By signing the Doha agreement, they considered themselves victorious in both (war and battle) fronts and now considered themselves as undisputed rulers of Afghanistan. Besides this, there is no case such as actual pressure or threat to challenge the rule of the Taliban, so that the Taliban is not satisfied to share the power with its opponents.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey