Connect with us

Europe

NATO chief’s backing of Trump’s Iran war deepens rift with Europe

Published

on

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has stirred unease across European capitals after signalling support for Donald Trump’s confrontation with Iran and suggesting that European allies could ultimately join US naval operations in the Strait of Hormuz.

The intervention has sharpened strains within the transatlantic alliance at a moment when Europe is already grappling with an energy shock triggered by the conflict.

Rutte’s indication that European allies would, in time, “come together” to heed the US president’s call to deploy naval assets to the Strait of Hormuz has unsettled officials in several capitals. According to alliance diplomats, the episode has intensified internal tensions over how far NATO members should align themselves with the bloc’s largest power.

“This puts us in a very difficult and uncomfortable position,” an EU diplomat told the Financial Times. “We want to show goodwill, but the reality is that we are in no position to become involved [in the conflict] in any way.”

The discomfort felt in many European capitals stands in stark contrast to Rutte’s remarks about a war that has inflicted significant damage in the Middle East and driven oil and gas prices sharply higher. The NATO chief has repeatedly sought to placate and praise Trump in an effort to keep the US anchored within the military alliance.

On Sunday, Rutte said of Trump’s decision to bomb Iran: “He is doing this to make the world safer.” Referring to the US leader’s call for NATO allies to contribute to a naval force escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has obstructed, Rutte added: “It is entirely natural for European countries to take a few weeks to come together.”

Trump, however, rebuked NATO allies for failing to respond immediately, branding them “COWARDS” and warning that without the US the alliance would be a “PAPER TIGER.” Since returning to office last year, the US president has repeatedly tested transatlantic unity through disputes over trade, defence spending, and threats to seize Greenland.

EU countries, all but three of which are also NATO members, collectively rejected Trump’s Hormuz proposal last week. The bloc’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, stated: “This is not our war,” a position echoed by ministers from Germany, Italy and Spain.

Three European diplomats within NATO said they were concerned about the growing divergence between Rutte’s stance and that of most European capitals. While they saw no reason to directly criticise Trump, they also did not endorse the decision to enter the war.

German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said on Tuesday: “This war is, moreover… a political catastrophe for those involved. And what troubles me most is this: it is truly a preventable, unnecessary war.”

France’s Chief of the Defence Staff, Fabien Mandon, said on Tuesday that the US had become “increasingly unpredictable and does not even bother to inform us when it decides to launch military operations.”

“This affects our security. It affects our interests,” Mandon added.

A NATO official told the Financial Times: “NATO is not involved in the war in Iran, but is closely monitoring the situation to keep allies safe. The secretary-general remains in constant contact with allied leaders across the alliance.”

Some European capitals, led by Paris, have indicated they may be willing to conduct patrol operations in the Strait of Hormuz after the war ends, in order to safeguard roughly one-fifth of global oil and gas shipments that pass through the vital waterway connecting the Gulf to international markets.

At the same time, some European officials have privately pushed back against describing the conflict as “not our war,” citing its significant impact on energy prices and the resulting increase in costs for households and businesses across Europe.

“The consequences are ours, therefore the conflict is ours,” one official said, adding that multiple capitals remain in contact with Middle Eastern countries affected by the war in an effort to pursue a diplomatic resolution.

The tensions over how to respond to the conflict and to Trump’s approach became more visible as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio travelled to France on Friday to meet his G7 counterparts and discuss “shared security concerns and opportunities for co-operation.”

Europe

EIB to unveil 15 billion euro tech initiative to scale European startups

Published

on

The European Investment Bank (EIB) will announce a €15 billion initiative today, in collaboration with EU capitals and private investors, aimed at supporting the growth of European technology companies.

For decades, startups on the continent have struggled to raise the large-scale funding rounds necessary to scale on this side of the Atlantic, frequently turning to US investors or relocating abroad as they expand.

“We are catching up. Now we need to accelerate,” EIB President Nadia Calviño said.

Under the existing European Tech Champions Initiative, the EIB had already pooled resources with six EU governments to establish funds that invest in high-growth companies across the EU.

Calviño described the initiative as “very successful,” noting that it has supported 12 European “unicorn” companies valued at over $1 billion, including the German artificial intelligence translation firm DeepL.

The bank is now expanding the program with a new phase nearly four times the size of the original.

Twenty-five EU governments, alongside private investors such as Santander and Danske Bank, are expected to participate in the program.

This initial €15 billion aims to mobilize up to €80 billion in total investment. Calviño stated that this estimate is based on the multiplier effects achieved under previous programs.

As part of these efforts, the EIB also aims to attract European pension funds, which manage immense pools of capital but have historically allocated fewer resources to technology investments compared to their US counterparts.

In addition to the new funding, Calviño noted that the EIB will create a platform providing a single point of access for existing European scale-up initiatives, including the European Commission’s Scaleup Europe Fund, France’s Tibi initiative, and Germany’s Win initiative.

Continue Reading

Europe

Germany to purchase US Tomahawk missiles to build own long-range strike capability

Published

on

Germany will purchase Tomahawk cruise missiles from the United States and deploy them on German territory, Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Thursday.

The move marks a shift away from planned US deployments and toward Germany establishing its own long-range strike capability.

Merz told lawmakers that he finalized the agreement with the US government during the NATO summit in Ankara, adding that the talks held on Tuesday and Wednesday had exceeded his expectations.

“While we close a critical strategic gap in our defense, we are also working to develop our own European systems and deploy them in Europe,” the Chancellor said.

According to German government sources, Washington committed in a letter of intent signed on Tuesday to approve Germany’s acquisition of Tomahawk missiles and their land-based Typhon launchers in August.

The number of missiles and launchers Germany plans to purchase was not disclosed because the information is classified.

The planned acquisition appears aligned with US President Donald Trump’s pressure on European allies to cover their own security costs, such as by purchasing US weapons.

The fate of the Tomahawk procurement had become uncertain after Trump announced in May that he would reduce the US military presence in Germany.

That development was seen as a cancellation of a plan made under the previous administration to deploy a US battalion equipped with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany.

That original plan was designed as a temporary solution to serve as a strong deterrent against Russia while Europeans developed their own versions of such weapons.

Germany produces its own cruise missile, the Taurus, but its range of approximately 311 miles is three to five times shorter than that of the Tomahawk missiles.

Continue Reading

Europe

Apple loses EU court appeal over Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation

Published

on

The General Court of the European Union has rejected Apple’s challenges against its “gatekeeper” status designated under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

With this ruling, the company’s designated status for the App Store and iOS remains valid, while its applications regarding iMessage were also rejected.

Apple had argued that the five separate App Stores it operates for the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, and Apple TV should be evaluated as distinct, individual services.

The court rejected this argument, ruling that these stores serve a common purpose of connecting developers and users, regardless of the specific device.

The court also dismissed Apple’s defense that the DMA’s interoperability obligations violate its fundamental rights.

However, it did not conduct a substantive assessment on the legality of this obligation, stating that a direct legal link could not be established between the regulation in question and the determination of “gatekeeper” status.

Following the ruling, Apple argued that the obligations under the DMA “exceed the boundaries of legality and proportionality.” The company asserted that the new rules jeopardize the work it has carried out for years to ensure user privacy and security.

Apple retains the right to appeal the decision, though a company spokesperson did not comment on whether there are plans to do so.

Apple previously declared that DMA rules prevented the launch of the updated version of Siri in Europe, resulting in European users being unable to benefit from the service.

In force in the European Union since 2024, the DMA covers a total of 22 services and products belonging to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft.

The regulation obliges these companies to share certain data with competitors, provide access to user-generated data, and offer verification tools to advertising partners.

Additionally, it prohibits platforms from engaging in anti-competitive practices that favor their own products. Companies failing to comply with the rules face fines of up to 10% of their global turnover, which can rise to 20% in cases of repeated violations.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey