Connect with us

Asia

New Russia-China payment network cuts trade costs

Published

on

According to a report from the Reuters news agency, based on four sources familiar with payment processes, sanctioned Russian banks and companies are actively using netting systems to carry out export and import payments in trade with China.

These systems have significantly reduced costs for Russian businesses while also accelerating cash flow.

Sources stated that in early 2024, payment agent commissions reached up to 12% of the invoice amount, but currently, the average agent commission has dropped to 2% to 3%.

This decrease became possible after large Russian banks and exporters established closed netting systems to simplify financial logistics with China.

Financial logistics had suffered two heavy blows: the mass exclusion of Russian banks from SWIFT in 2022 and the near halt of direct payments with Russia by major Chinese banks in 2024 under the threat of secondary sanctions.

A source from the payment market said, “At that time, everyone faced the need to structure financial flows through friendly countries to protect these payments from blockages, but people have now learned to work with this, different payment solutions are developing.”

The same source and others said that the cheapest way to make payments with China is currently through mutual offsetting via “netting.”

The same source added, “In addition to payment agent services as sub-suppliers, mutual offsetting, sessions… We even do swap transactions so that money does not cross the border. Many companies, especially large importers, are investing in developing their own foreign structure networks and not depending on third parties.”

Elvira Nabiullina, Governor of the Bank of Russia, stated in a recent speech in parliament that Western sanctions have made cross-border payments difficult for Russian companies, but alternative payment channels are emerging.

Another source from banking circles said, “The most effective tool is goods netting. Essentially, this is a solution that involves property exchange and the use of payment agents who serve the counter-flows of exporters and importers within their own circles and service banks, offsetting these flows.”

The source said that this service was established by large Russian banks within their own circles and that thanks to their participation, this system has not yet seen significant defaults.

They noted that large companies are interested in having a bank as a guarantor for payments and that banks offer tools that protect them from the risk of payment agent default.

Bankers explaining the payment system with China through payment agents said that payments go directly to any Chinese bank without delay, provided the goods are not sanctioned and the counterparty is registered in one of China’s 11 provinces (Anhui, Heilongjiang, Shandong, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Xinjiang, Jilin, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Fujian, and Hebei).

The 11-province scheme, also called the “China path,” is primarily aimed at large companies, and its disadvantage is the requirement for each payment to be confirmed.

Furthermore, according to the source, the supplier does not always accept this scheme, as they generally cannot reclaim export VAT.

Another banker described the advantages of the service: “The scheme allows direct work with 11 Chinese provinces that are fundamental for the production of goods exported to Russia. The cost is calculated according to the Central Bank rate, there is no spread on it.”

The cost of agent services starts from 1% of the invoice amount for imports and 0.5% for export transactions.

Banks stated that they assist with VAT refunds through this scheme by consulting with Chinese counterparties.

A banker said, “According to statistics, we currently have 100% money transfer success, meaning there hasn’t been a single return. Money is delivered within two days. Currently, there is one clearing session per week, on Thursdays.”

They added that they plan to start two clearing sessions from the end of April, on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Zhang Hanhui, China’s Ambassador to Moscow, confirmed that clearing allows for the regulation of mutual payments between the two countries.

Zhang told reporters, “We can turn international mutual offsetting into domestic offsetting. Then we compare the accounts, and that’s it; the balance.”

The diplomat said, “There is a need for a new channel instead of SWIFT between our banks. This issue is currently being discussed.”

Osman Kabaloyev, Deputy Director of the Financial Policy Department at the Russian Ministry of Finance, stated that the authorities support the creation of alternative payment mechanisms to create a full “payment menu” consisting of different options for businesses and banks.

A source from banking circles said, “Thanks to the wide range of solutions, the prices for alternative payments in the banking system have recently decreased… Every large exporter or importer, competing with banks, tries to get involved in payments using the capabilities of their related companies outside Russia.”

The source added that the average range of delivery tariffs, including currency commissions, for large corporate clients is 2% to 3% of the payment amount, which applies to both fiat and crypto payments, and noted that tariffs for small and medium-sized businesses do not exceed 4%.

The source said that the price conditions on the “China path” are the most favorable, but there are restrictions regarding provinces and goods names, and clearing sessions are infrequent.

Global trade wars have reinforced the assumption among Russian businesses that China will now approach US threats more easily.

Aleksandr Shokhin, President of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RSPP), said, “There is a high probability of active penetration of Chinese imports into the Russian market. It is not excluded that the Chinese will stop being afraid of secondary sanctions.”

China’s Ambassador said, “Russia-China relations are only changing for the better, from victory to victory… We will overcome American sanctions sooner or later.”

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey