Connect with us

Asia

Pakistan’s spy chief calls on Tajik President aimed rising tensions with Taliban

Published

on

President of Tajikistan Emomali Rahmon met with the Director General of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Service (ISI) Muhammad Asim Malik, where both sides discussed regional and bilateral issues.

Both sides discussed the current state and prospects of political relations between Tajikistan and Pakistan, according to the press service of the head of the Republic of Tajikistan.

They also emphasized taking practical action in the direction of ensuring regional peace, stability and security, as well as ways to resolve other pressing issues of bilateral cooperation.

Emomali Rahmon, expressing satisfaction with the fruitful process of political relations between the parties, highly praised the level of mutual trust between the two states.

They stressed the need to further strengthen cooperation in the areas of combating terrorism, extremism, radicalism, drug trafficking, transnational crime and other issues of mutual interest.

The meeting between Rahmon and Malik in Dushanbe takes place while tensions between the Afghan Taliban and Islamabad have intensified over the issue of Pakistani Taliban (TTP).

From another point of view, this meeting is highly diplomatic and important because Tajikistan is the only neighboring country of Afghanistan that does not have very warm and favorable relations with the Taliban, and on the contrary, it hosts members of the National Resistance Front, one of the opposing groups of the Taliban.

Therefore, the meeting of the head of ISI with the highest official of Tajikistan can be a warning for the Taliban – a new military-political front may be forming with the support of two neighboring countries of Afghanistan against the Taliban rule based in Kabul.

Is there any other military front on the wing to deal with the Taliban government in Kabul.

This military-political front, unlike the Taliban, which is a mono-ethnic movement, is formed from all the ethnic groups in Afghanistan and has the full support of Pakistan and Tajikistan, it can pose a very serious challenge to the Taliban. But are all the conditions and facilities ready for the formation of such a front? We will try to answer this question below.

The political opponents of the Taliban are in a very chaotic and scattered situation, and after more than three years have passed since this group came to power, they have not yet been able to overcome their differences and create a large and coherent military-political front against the Kabul-based government.

However, at the local and limited level, efforts have been made in both military and political directions, and in some places, these efforts have caused trouble for the Taliban. Among them, scattered and limited military attacks of the National Resistance Front and the Freedom Front have to some extent challenged the Taliban’s claim of providing security throughout the country.

This group has repeatedly denied the existence of any resistance against itself and has even claimed that ISIS does not have a physical presence in Afghanistan. But ISIS has shown how false and baseless the Taliban’s claim is every time by carrying out deadly suicide attacks. Azadi Front and National Resistance Front also assassinate Taliban members every now and then in cities, which again exposes the lie of maintaining security by the Taliban.

Major global and regional players are preferring to interact with the Taliban rather than standing opposite

Of course, these attacks are not convincing for anyone, even the leaders of the two fronts, and the Taliban mostly do not take them seriously, because they have not been able to target large and decisive targets.

At the global and regional level, the situation is not as good as the Taliban opponents want. Major countries, as well as the majority of Afghanistan’s neighbors, prefer to interact with the Taliban rather than stand by those who, most of them, once took their test in Afghanistan’s political field and got a failing grade.

However, the primitive performance and political stubbornness that the Taliban have displayed in the past three years have caused the world to act cautiously in dealing with them. No country in the world has yet come forward to recognize the regime based in Kabul. Even regional allies of the Taliban see the expediency in informal interaction with this group rather than accepting the high risk of recognizing it and this is a source of encouragement for Taliban opponents.

In such a situation, if Pakistan and Tajikistan agree on opening a new front against the Taliban, it can increase the political weight of scattered movements against the Taliban. If the opposition has a significant brilliance in the military field, it is not even unlikely that more countries will join the military-political front desired by the Taliban opposition.

We must admit that Pakistan plays a very important and decisive role in the chronic and wide-ranging crisis in Afghanistan. Historical experience tells us that when governments based in Kabul fail to establish good relations with Pakistan, sooner or later they are doomed to collapse.

The Pakistani army manages the terror industry – one of the deadliest industries – and this country has an exceptional and unique position in the country’s politics due to having the longest border – which is very vulnerable and uncontrollable – with Afghanistan. The higher the level of conflict and tension with Islamabad, the greater the vulnerability of Afghanistan, which is never in the country’s favor.

Tajik president’s meeting with the head of Pakistan’s spy agency could be taken as the first step to form a large militarily-political front.

On the other hand, although Tajikistan is a weak country in regional political games and the resistance front and the rest of the armed opposition of the Taliban have not yet achieved significant military achievements in the battlefield with the Taliban after more than three years, Imam Ali Rahman’s meeting with the head of the ISI can be the first step to form a large military-political front.

With this description, the conditions for planning such a front are both favorable and unfavorable. This is because the regime based in Kabul has not yet been recognized and the Taliban’s ultra-reactionary dealings with citizens, especially women, will cause the world to distance itself from them or maintain its relationship at the current level.

But because the actors opposing the Taliban suffer from many weaknesses and confusion and have not succeeded in creating a big challenge for this group, there is a possibility that the opportunities that have arisen will be wasted, and finally countries like Tajikistan and Pakistan will also depend on their security and political interests. Like other countries, take the path of compromise with the Taliban. This means, favorable conditions for the formation of a large military-political front against the Taliban can soon turn into its opposite.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey