Connect with us

Asia

South Korea considers arming Ukraine amid North Korean troop deployment

Published

on

South Korea’s conservative president, Yoon Suk Yeol, is considering direct arms supplies to Ukraine in response to North Korea’s deployment of troops on Russia’s front line.

Seoul has so far resisted calls from its Western allies to use its substantial stockpile of military hardware, preferring to provide only non-lethal aid to Kyiv. However, analysts and diplomats suggest that North Korea’s deployment of troops in the Kursk region of western Russia, reportedly as many as 8,000 according to U.S. officials on Thursday, is shifting South Korea’s stance.

Yoon and other senior officials in Seoul describe Pyongyang’s involvement in the conflict as a threat to South Korea’s security, noting the “valuable experience” North Korean troops could gain on the battlefield. They also worry that Moscow may share advanced military technology with Pyongyang in return for its support.

In response to the deployment, Yoon vowed not to “sit idly by.” His office confirmed this week that Seoul intends to send a delegation to Ukraine to monitor North Korean forces, following a phone call between Yoon and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday.

However, the prospect of arming Ukraine faces strong opposition from South Korea’s left-wing opposition, which holds a parliamentary majority. The opposition argues that Yoon’s hardline stance toward North Korea has pushed Pyongyang closer to Moscow.

“Arming Ukraine is an extremely dangerous idea that treats people’s lives like pawns in a chess game,” said Democratic Party leader Park Chan-dae at a recent rally organized by her party. She argued that South Korea has no direct stake in the outcome of the war. Park added that Yoon “should not involve South Korea in a proxy war with North Korea in a distant country,” warning that increased involvement could “risk triggering a military confrontation on the Korean Peninsula.”

“The South Korean government is caught between foreign partners urging it to do more and an opposition calling for restraint,” said Jeongmin Kim, a senior analyst at Seoul-based information service Korea Pro.

South Korea’s decades of preparation for potential conflict with North Korea, along with its formidable defense industry, have resulted in a vast stockpile of weapons, including artillery shells, tanks, howitzers, and surface-to-surface missiles. As a close ally of the United States, South Korea frequently attends NATO summits and supplies many NATO members. Analysts note that South Korea’s weaponry would be largely compatible with equipment already used by Ukraine’s armed forces.

“South Korea’s support for Ukraine could change the course of the entire conflict,” said Henry Haggard, a senior adviser at WestExec Advisors and former counselor for political affairs at the U.S. embassy in Seoul from 2021 to 2023. “Not only do Korean companies produce world-class weapons tailored for Ukraine’s needs, but they also have the manufacturing capacity to deliver essential arms at a pace that could make a difference when needed most,” he told the Financial Times.

South Korea has indirectly supported Ukraine by replenishing U.S. stocks of 155mm artillery shells. According to Ramon Pacheco Pardo, a Korea expert at King’s College London, South Korea is providing more shells to Ukraine, albeit through third countries, than all European countries combined.

Zelensky stated on Thursday that he had sent a representative to Seoul to make “detailed” requests for artillery and air defense systems in response to North Korea’s deployment to Russia.

However, Seoul has thus far refused to provide direct lethal assistance, citing the country’s Foreign Trade Act, which restricts arms exports “other than for peaceful purposes.”

An implicit understanding exists between Seoul and Moscow that South Korea will avoid sending lethal aid to Ukraine, while Russia will limit support to North Korea. But Pacheco Pardo noted that this understanding “has now come to an end.” He added, “I think the Yoon administration will provide lethal assistance to Ukraine if it has evidence that Russia is increasing support for North Korea, especially with technologies that could enhance Pyongyang’s missile, satellite, and other high-tech programs.”

On Wednesday, South Korean Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, during a meeting in Washington with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, remarked that it was “highly likely” North Korea was seeking Russian defense technology in exchange for troop deployments.

A European diplomat based in Seoul remarked that the South Korean government’s stance on arms procurement has “shifted” since the North Korean deployment, though it remains “very, very cautious.” The diplomat suggested that Seoul might wait for the U.S. presidential election’s outcome before making further decisions.

Jeongmin Kim noted that the Yoon administration may argue that providing lethal aid does not require parliamentary approval and would not violate the Foreign Trade Act, asserting that arming Ukraine would contribute to international peace by hastening the end of the war.

Such a decision, however, may face public opposition. According to a Gallup Korea poll conducted shortly after North Korean troops were reported in Russia, only 13% of South Koreans surveyed supported military assistance to Ukraine, while 66% favored limiting aid to non-military and humanitarian support.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey