Asia
South Korean lawmakers mobilise to impeach leader
South Korea’s main opposition party on Wednesday called on President Yoon Suk Yeol to resign immediately, saying he had committed the ‘crime of sedition’ by briefly declaring martial law a day earlier, which it said had spread to advisers in the leader’s inner circle.
South Korea’s main opposition Democratic Party said Yoon’s declaration of martial law was a ‘gross violation of the constitution’.
“This is a clear act of treason and an excellent reason for Yoon’s dismissal,” the party said in a statement.
In a statement on behalf of floor leader Park Chan-dae, the party said Yoon, who was forced to resign as the country’s leader by a National Assembly resolution hours after he declared martial law on Tuesday night, should step down.
“It has become clear to the entire nation that President Yoon can no longer conduct state affairs normally,” the statement said.
Some 190 lawmakers from six opposition parties submitted an impeachment motion, which will be debated in parliament on Thursday before a vote on Friday or Saturday.
The attempt to remove Yoon foreshadows further political turmoil in the country of 52 million, Asia’s fourth-largest economy and a key ally of the United States.

Resignations from presidential office
Senior presidential aides, including Yoon’s chief of staff, submitted their resignations on Wednesday, the presidential office said. The statement did not say whether Yoon would accept the offers. The president has not spoken publicly since his televised message on Tuesday night.
In a brief televised address the night before, Yoon unexpectedly declared martial law, citing the need to protect South Korean democracy from ‘anti-state forces’ linked to North Korea.
Kim Min-ki, secretary general of the National Assembly, the country’s legislature, held a press conference on Wednesday to give a detailed account of the previous night’s state of emergency. He began his remarks by condemning what he described as the ‘unconstitutional and unlawful’ seizure of the legislative body on Yoon’s orders.
Kim said that at 10.50pm on Tuesday, shortly after Yoon declared martial law, police tried to prevent lawmakers from entering the National Assembly grounds. Kim said that the Ministry of National Defence then brought about 230 soldiers by helicopter to the National Assembly building. They were followed by about 50 more soldiers who scaled the perimeter walls and entered the area.
Video from the scene showed members of the public scuffling with police and soldiers at the entrance to the National Assembly, but no injuries were reported. On Wednesday, the Kyunghyang Shinmun newspaper published footage from the scene showing soldiers armed with machine guns, gas masks and night vision goggles.
In Seoul’s Jongno district, a major business center, vehicular and pedestrian traffic was as busy as ever as citizens went about their daily routines a day after the shocking footage of soldiers entering the National Assembly. A rally was held in the vast Gwanghwamun Square, attended by hundreds of people carrying banners calling on Yoon to resign.
Korean Confederation of Trade Unions declares general strike
Yoon has been plagued by scandal in recent months, with his wife accused of influence peddling and himself facing political backlash after using his presidential veto to halt an investigation into his wife’s case.
The declaration of martial law immediately sparked strong opposition, including from within Yoon’s own party. Han Dong-hoon, leader of the ruling People’s Power Party, immediately issued a statement saying he would oppose Yoon’s declaration, while opposition lawmakers gathered late at night in Seoul’s parliament to vote on martial law. Outside the building, an enthusiastic protest took place, with people chanting slogans calling for Yoon’s dismissal and arrest.
The Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU), a major umbrella group, announced an indefinite strike and a morning rally in Seoul’s Gwanghwamun Square until Yoon was removed from office.
The KCTU issued a statement calling the declaration of martial law ‘absurd and anti-democratic’.
The statement read The Yoon Suk Yeol government has declared the end of its rule. After this martial law, the KCTU and all the people of this country will declare the end of Yoon Suk Yeol.
Samsung Electronics shares fall
Yoon’s proposal to impose martial law, the country’s first since the restoration of democracy in the 1980s, came after months of tension with the opposition over his loss of a parliamentary majority.
After a night of turmoil, South Korea’s financial authorities pledged to support markets with ‘unlimited’ liquidity. The Bank of Korea said, after an emergency meeting on Wednesday that it would ‘keep all options open until markets stabilize’.
The won, which weakened sharply against the dollar following Yoon’s declaration of martial law, recovered.
The benchmark Kospi index fell nearly 2 per cent. Shares in Samsung Electronics, the country’s largest company, fell 1.1 per cent.
Is impeachment possible?
For Yoon to be removed, two-thirds of the 300-member National Assembly must vote in favor. Opposition parties have a total of 192 seats, so a bill could pass with the support of more than eight members of Yoon’s own party.
If impeached, Yoon would be immediately suspended as president pending a final ruling by South Korea’s Constitutional Court.
A new election must be held within 60 days of the president’s impeachment or resignation. The prime minister will take over as acting president.
Choi Jin-bong, a professor of journalism and broadcasting at Sungkonghoe University, said “there could be more demonstrations if lawmakers do not vote for impeachment. Public protests are likely to increase, forcing them to vote for impeachment again.”
‘We are watching closely’
Yoon’s decision to abandon his attempt to impose martial law was welcomed by the United States, South Korea’s most important ally.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the U.S. was ‘closely monitoring developments over the past 24 hours’.
“We welcome President Yoon’s announcement that he will rescind the emergency martial law order,” Blinken said in a statement. “We continue to expect that political disputes will be resolved peacefully and in accordance with the rule of law”
Earlier, Yoon’s own conservative People’s Power Party called on the president to sack Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun, who it said recommended the martial law declaration. Party leaders are discussing whether Yoon should leave the party, according to the state-run Yonhap news agency.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
