Asia
South Korean parliamentary elections will also determine Yoon’s programme
South Korean voters go to the polls tomorrow to elect members of the country’s National Assembly. The outcome could have a lasting impact on the remaining three years of President Yoon Suk-yeol’s five-year term.
Yoon’s conservative People’s Power Party (PPP) is aiming to win a majority against the liberal bloc led by the Democratic Party (DP) in the elections, which will see all 300 seats in the National Assembly, the country’s parliament, contested.
The polls, which opened at 6am, will close at 6pm and voters will elect members of the National Assembly who will serve for four years. While 254 of the 300 seats will be decided by direct district elections, under the country’s partial proportional representation system, voters will also choose a political party and decide the distribution of the remaining 46 seats.
But given Yoon’s relatively weak support – currently hovering in the mid-30s – the PPP will face an uphill battle to wrest a parliamentary majority from the progressive bloc amid the country’s deepening political polarisation.
Instead, observers say the most likely scenario to emerge from the elections is something closer to the status quo, with both sides forced to continue to seek compromise or face the prospect of gridlock on key agenda items.
The PPP has been gaining momentum in the run-up to the elections, with a Gallup Korea poll released late last month showing 37 percent of respondents backing Yoon’s party, 29 percent the DP and 12 percent the third most popular party, the National Innovation Party, which has ties to the DP.
Analysts say the election will closely resemble the 2022 presidential race, in which Yoon narrowly defeated his arch-rival, current DP leader Lee Jae-myung, by just 0.73%, the smallest margin in South Korean presidential history.
Still, experts say voters unhappy with Yoon and the PPP’s performance could punish him and the party at the ballot box by giving the liberal bloc a 200-seat majority to override presidential vetoes and even push through measures to impeach the president.
Tokyo and Washington watching closely
Yoon’s performance in the election will be closely watched in Tokyo and Washington.
With strong encouragement from Washington, the South Korean leader has taken ambitious and politically delicate steps to rebuild Seoul’s once frayed bilateral relations with Japan, while strengthening trilateral ties with the United States, the two countries’ common ally in the face of North Korea’s growing nuclear and missile threat.
Yoon has also worked closely with the administration of US President Joe Biden, who has sought to revitalise Washington’s alliances in Asia in the face of China’s assertive foreign policy.
It is unclear exactly how the elections will affect Seoul’s foreign policy orientation, but no significant change is expected no matter who wins. Observers say that South Korea’s president wields too much power in agenda-setting and policy implementation, and that the National Assembly has little room to take on the president’s foreign policy agenda.
“I don’t think the election will have any impact on South Korea’s foreign policy,” said Ramon Pacheco Pardo, a professor at King’s College London and an expert on the two Koreas, noting that despite the DP’s current power in the National Assembly, “Yoon has been able to establish close ties with the US and much closer ties with Japan”.
“Whatever the outcome of the election, I hope Yoon will be able to continue his current foreign policy without facing major obstacles from the National Assembly,” Ramon told The Japan Times.
Still, Seoul’s alliance with Washington remains overwhelmingly popular in South Korea, while an opposition victory could raise doubts about the continuity of trilateral cooperation with Japan, which ruled the Korean peninsula as a colony from 1910 to 1945.
While public support for the move has increased under Yoon’s impetus, the issue remains controversial, and Seoul’s ties with Tokyo – and the many historical issues that have dogged relations since normalisation in 1965 – have traditionally been used as a powerful political weapon against conservatives.
Tokyo and Washington may therefore be concerned about the election results, which could have implications for the future of their staunch ally Yoon.
If he fails to secure a parliamentary majority, he may find it difficult to push through his agenda
Indeed, bogged down and forced to devote resources to defending its policies, the Yoon administration may find it difficult to advance the president’s agenda, especially as it grapples with scandals and gaffes that have stagnated approval ratings.
The president’s gaffe during a supermarket visit last month, when he described the price of green onions, a common ingredient in South Korean cuisine, as “reasonable”, sparked a huge wave of criticism amid voter concerns about inflation.
Corruption also remains a top issue for many voters.
The Dior bag scandal, in which ambassador and first lady Kim Keon-hee, who resigned last month amid controversy over her appointment amid a corruption probe, allegedly accepted a gift of a 3 million won ($2,250) luxury bag, has put Yoon and the PPP on the defensive.
Experts say the public’s perception of Yoon as indifferent to their concerns could have repercussions, especially if his party suffers an electoral setback.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
