Connect with us

Diplomacy

Starmer faces Cabinet rift over US-Iran military operations

Published

on

Internal discord has fractured the British government regarding the US-led military operations against Iran and the authorization for American forces to utilize British military bases.

According to reports from The Telegraph, during a meeting held the Friday preceding the strikes, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves, and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper expressed vehement opposition to the UK supporting what they characterized as an illegal, preemptive military campaign.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer initially supported his ministers, resisting pressure from Donald Trump to permit US bombers to launch strikes against Iran from Royal Air Force (RAF) bases in Gloucestershire and the Chagos Islands.

Less than 48 hours later, however, the Prime Minister pivoted. US B-2 stealth bombers are now scheduled to arrive in the coming days at Diego Garcia, a military installation on the Chagos Islands, to conduct what have been described as “limited, defensive” missions.

President Trump indicated that large-scale US strikes remain pending, contingent upon Iran’s continued aggression toward Western allies in the Gulf and the Middle East.

Furthermore, the US has reportedly destroyed an Iranian warship with a submarine near Sri Lanka. This action marks the first such naval engagement involving a submarine since the sinking of the General Belgrano by the UK during the Falklands War.

During the National Security Council meeting on Friday, Energy Secretary Miliband voiced fierce opposition to the imminent US airstrikes, focusing on the potential repercussions for the UK’s energy security.

The meeting followed more than two weeks of contentious deliberations with President Trump and his administration.

Miliband leads opposition to Iran war

These deliberations included a heated exchange between the UK’s Deputy National Security Adviser, Matt Collins, and Elbridge Colby, the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development.

Reportedly relying on the legal counsel of Attorney General Lord Hermer, Miliband articulated what was described as a “grumpy, pacifist, legalistic, and highly political” argument against both the airstrikes and British participation.

“He [Miliband] fundamentally dislikes Trump and dislikes this Iran business,” a source remarked to The Spectator.

Miliband’s position was supported by the Chancellor and the Foreign Secretary, who advocated for Starmer to maintain a firm stance against Washington’s pressure to join the conflict.

Conversely, Defence Secretary John Healey reportedly favored granting permission for the use of British bases to protect allies from Iranian retaliation.

The Prime Minister’s initial refusal to authorize the use of Diego Garcia drew sharp criticism from President Trump.

On Monday, Trump told The Telegraph that the Prime Minister had “greatly disappointed” him; by Tuesday, he had further remarked that Starmer was “no Winston Churchill” and was “ruining the relationship.”

According to Western officials, preparations are underway at Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire for the arrival of US combat aircraft this week.

The Telegraph also reported that the Type 45 destroyer HMS Dragon, which Starmer stated on Tuesday would be deployed to defend the British base in Cyprus, will not arrive for another two weeks as it was not slated to depart Portsmouth until next week.

The vessel had been undergoing maintenance prior to the announcement of its deployment to the Eastern Mediterranean; however, the HMS Duncan remains available for immediate deployment.

Starmer: US Aircraft Operating from UK Bases

During parliamentary proceedings on Wednesday, Conservative MP Gareth Bacon questioned the Prime Minister: “The US is our most important international strategic partner. Does the Prime Minister believe that his hesitant and ambiguous response to the events in the Middle East this week has strengthened or weakened this relationship?”

Starmer defended his position, stating that the British military had been in contact with the US for several weeks and that British forces were actively engaged in operations to protect American lives.

In the House of Commons, Starmer justified his initial decision to withhold base access, asserting that there was no legal basis or “viable, well-thought-out plan” at the time.

Starmer stated:

“US aircraft are operating from UK bases. That is how the special relationship works. British jets are intercepting drones and missiles to protect American lives in the Middle East from our shared bases. That is how the special relationship works. We share intelligence daily to ensure the safety of our people. That is how the special relationship works. Obsessing over President Trump’s recent remarks is not the special relationship.”

Military assets deployed by the UK include radar systems, ground-based air defense, counter-drone capabilities, and combat aircraft.

“Since Saturday morning, a significant number of F-35s and Typhoons have been on patrol, not just in the Middle East but across the entirety of Cyprus. Further missions were conducted throughout the night. Typhoons have been specifically tasked with the defense of Qatar, while F-35s have supported other regional partners,” the Prime Minister added.

A spokesperson for the Prime Minister subsequently stated:

“The Prime Minister has been exceptionally clear that he will only take decisions that align with the UK’s national interest and ensure the safety of the British people.”

US withheld operational details from UK

According to The Guardian, the US did not share specific operational details or the precise timing of the joint US-Israeli strikes against Iran with the UK beforehand.

The US decision to exclude the UK from the official notification loop regarding the airstrikes coincided with Keir Starmer’s initial refusal to allow US access to British military bases.

Government sources indicated that while the UK usually aligns with the US on military matters, it is difficult to determine whether the lack of formal notification was unprecedented.

A source from Whitehall confirmed that the UK was aware an operation was imminent through the buildup of equipment and intelligence via “normal channels,” but was not informed of the exact timing or operational specifics.

The UK decided to evacuate its embassy in Tehran on Friday, signaling an awareness of the impending strikes, though details regarding the timing over the weekend remained undisclosed.

RAF Akrotiri houses 4,000 personnel and is home to F-35 and Eurofighter jets. Beyond RAF Akrotiri, the UK’s largest permanent overseas airbase, the country maintains three other permanent installations in the region.

These include a naval support facility in Bahrain, a joint logistical support base in Duqm, Oman, and the Donnelly Lines facility at Al-Minhad Air Base in the UAE.

British forces also possess access to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

Additionally, Diego Garcia, located in the Indian Ocean, remains within striking range for long-range US bombers targeting Iran.

Regional allies frustrated: ‘You did not protect us’

Other British allies have expressed dissatisfaction with Starmer’s response to the conflict.

Kyriakos Kouros, the High Commissioner of the Republic of Cyprus to the UK, told The Times that Cyprus expected at least a robust defense from Britain, given that the UK maintains two sovereign base areas on the island.

“The French are coming; we expect the British to be there as well, because as I said, we are not just defending the Cypriots on the island,” Kouros said.

The Times further reported that Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates have expressed concerns regarding the UK’s tepid reaction to the Middle East conflict.

The UK operates a naval support facility in Bahrain with approximately 300 personnel. This facility is located near the site where Iran launched a successful missile attack against the US Fifth Fleet headquarters.

Defence Secretary John Healey noted that the missile impacted less than 200 meters from British forces.

Gulf nations, including the UAE, have been reportedly incensed by the delay in granting permission to use joint bases, including Diego Garcia, to conduct “defensive” airstrikes against Iranian missile sites.

Public criticism reflects deep-seated frustration among Britain’s regional allies regarding the perceived slow response to Iranian retaliation.

A source familiar with the concerns of the UAE remarked: “There was a sense that the Prime Minister had to be dragged there. This clearly leaves a poor impression in the eyes of the Gulf Cooperation Council.”

Royal Navy Wildcat helicopters, equipped with Martlet missiles capable of neutralizing aerial threats, are scheduled to arrive in Cyprus in the coming days.

Kouros noted that while the deployment of the HMS Dragon was “welcomed,” the vessel’s arrival remains more than a week away.

Diplomacy

Anthropic uncovers Claude use by Iranian, Houthi, and Russian units

Published

on

Artificial intelligence company Anthropic has disclosed attempted “abuses” of its Claude AI model ranging from conventional weapons to biological research by state-linked entities, foreign intelligence services, and cybercrime networks, publishing the findings in a detailed threat intelligence report.

A significant portion of the report comprised the development of guided missile software by the Houthis in northern Yemen and the conversion of the model into a military reconnaissance tool by Iran-linked actors seeking to target US naval assets in the Middle East.

Covering the period between December 2025 and August 2026, the report shared details of activities detected across seven primary areas: cyberattacks, influence operations, mass surveillance, conventional weapons development, biological risks, and unauthorised model distillation.

The company announced that it had terminated all accounts violating its rules and shared the resulting data with relevant international counterparts.

According to findings by Anthropic’s Threat Intelligence unit, a weapons cell based in northern Yemen, where the Houthis operate, substituted human software engineers with the Claude Code system across three distinct missile development programmes.

These efforts comprised a tactical rocket equipped with a terminal guidance system powered by a commercial smartphone processor, a multi-stage ballistic missile with a target range exceeding 2,000 kilometres, and missile designs carrying a hypersonic glide vehicle.

The cell utilised the artificial intelligence to adapt open-source autopilot software to the smartphone processor, optimize flight control algorithms, and compile firmware.

Structuring their Claude accounts like a virtual engineering team, the Houthis assigned one account to write code, another to conduct research, and a third to review and audit the written code.

The report noted that the group conducted an actual test launch with a guided rocket in the Yemeni theatre.

Immediately following the failure of the live-fire test, the actors were documented returning to the Claude platform within hours to upload telemetry data and diagnose the cause of the malfunction.

The cell was observed successfully compiling offline simulation tools capable of operating independently even if access to Claude were severed.

Iran tracked US warships and personnel

Another military case detailed in the report involved attempts by Iran-linked cyber actors to target US naval forces in the Middle East.

These actors were found to have scraped open-source military data to draft operational targeting manuals directed against American warships and personnel.

Iran extracted name rosters of American military personnel from the captions of publicly accessible military photographs, monitored vessel and aircraft transponder data, authored code to scan commercial satellite imagery, and mapped vulnerabilities in maritime satellite communication terminals.

Other networks linked to the Tehran government were determined to have developed domestic and regional surveillance systems. A Qom-based unit produced a malicious web browser extension disguised as a prayer-time application to harvest credentials from social network users, funneling the data into a central case management system designated “Arman”.

Additionally, official Iranian institutions reportedly cloned authors’ voices using AI and operated multilingual disinformation networks to lay the groundwork for the supreme leadership succession.

Russia also used it for an autonomous kamikaze drone swarm

The report stated that an independent Russia-based software team developed fully autonomous kamikaze uncrewed aerial vehicle swarm software dubbed “DronDoc” or “Serafim”.

Affiliated with a university connected to the Russian Academy of Sciences, the team was said to have trained the artificial intelligence to distinguish between friendly and hostile elements using footage retrieved from the Ukrainian battlefield.

The developed system was designed with the capability to select targets, execute live human classification, and issue detonation commands without requiring human intervention, with simulations run directly against coordinates in the Donetsk region.

Meanwhile, the Russian-origin “Midnight Blizzard” group targeted the Ukrainian drone supply chain and staged attacks aimed at foreign officials and drone engineers by compromising hotel Wi-Fi networks.

A procurement manager stationed at a design bureau in Moscow was also discovered drafting plans via Claude to circumvent European sanctions. The individual was recorded assembling fraudulent tender and logistics correspondence to transport German-made magnetometers, space-grade photovoltaic sheets, and military aviation oxygen systems into Russia through intermediary firms based in China and Hong Kong.

Biological threats and pathogen engineering

The report disclosed five concrete cases regarding the deployment of artificial intelligence in hazardous biological research. Virologists attached to a military research institute were documented using AI for gain-of-function research aimed at enhancing the transmissibility and immune-evasion capabilities of the mosquito-borne Chikungunya virus.

Similarly, experimental designs were prepared to adapt the H5 avian influenza variant, which carries a 50% mortality rate in humans, to mammals and confer airborne transmission capabilities, while immune-evasion mechanisms of pathogens from the smallpox virus family were modelled.

The identities of paralytic neurotoxins subject to export control lists and haemorrhagic fever virus proteins featured on the World Health Organization’s priority epidemic list were deliberately masked and submitted to the AI for analysis.

In addition, a consultant working on behalf of the Malian State Intelligence Service designed a mass surveillance platform designated “Lakana 360” with the assistance of Claude.

The system was designed to monitor approximately 25 million SIM cards registered across three mobile operators in the country without requiring court orders, intercept audio recordings, and cross-reference records with biometric databases.

Separately, leading Chinese artificial intelligence firms including Alibaba, Moonshot, DeepSeek, Zhipu, and Xiaomi were alleged to have initiated hundreds of millions of unauthorised sessions to extract the logical reasoning chains of Claude models. Moonshot and DeepSeek platforms reportedly routed their own users’ queries secretly through Claude, in the process exposing Chinese police surveillance feeds from hundreds of cameras covering military facilities in Chengdu, internal credentials of Chinese state-owned enterprises, and live database access codes connected to the Russian Defence Ministry to third parties.

Türkiye detail in the report

The report also detailed cases involving the abuse of the Claude AI model, incorporating findings concerning an Istanbul-based technology firm.

In case GTG-84005 of the intelligence report, an operation aimed at commercial election manipulation targeting voters in Malaysia was intercepted.

According to the findings, the operation operated under the guise of a startup providing cyber intelligence and counter-disinformation tools. Anthropic determined that Istanbul-based BBS Bilisim Teknolojileri was behind the infrastructure.

According to documents, the company marketed the architecture as a paid influence operation service styled as a “military-grade, AI-powered, real-time political operations ecosystem”.

Managing roughly 1,000 synthetic X accounts, the system processed demographic and electoral data across 222 parliamentary constituencies in Malaysia, calibrating targeting around sensitive social fault lines including ethnicity, religion, and the monarchy.

The network also circulated content from Russian and Chinese state media masquerading as independent Malaysian news via an artificial media outlet designated “Malaysia Pulse”, while manufacturing fraudulent intelligence dossiers targeting an opposition politician and civil society organisations.

Anthropic reported that the network received a request to generate 1 million artificial impressions in support of the Malaysian Prime Minister and sought to secure a contract with the country’s national communications regulatory authority.

While no evidence emerged that the undertaking succeeded, the associated user accounts were closed and operational digital indicators were shared.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

EU pursues closer ties with Israel on space and air defence

Published

on

The EU is turning to Israel to bolster its new initiatives in high-tech air defence and space capabilities.

Shimrit Maman, head of the Israel Space Agency, travelled to Brussels this week and met on Tuesday with European Commissioner for Startups, Research and Innovation Ekaterina Zaharieva to discuss key sectors, including artificial intelligence and robotics.

The visit took place ahead of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s first major speech on space, scheduled for Thursday at a summit in Paris.

In the speech, Von der Leyen is expected to warn against mounting hostilities and emphasise the necessity of strengthening Europe’s presence in space.

“It’s very hard to do everything by yourself,” Maman told Politico, adding that the militarization of space is “already happening, it’s just we are not aware of the extent,” and noting that allies are showing growing interest in “dual-use” technologies intended for both civilian and defence purposes:

“One thing we’re working on is early-warning systems. For example, during the last wave [of missile attacks] with Iran, we saw this very clearly. How we were getting the alerts to all the civilians in Israel, and that made the casualties so low. This is part of the system. We’re working on a very holistic view, where you can alert in advance, the system alerts the citizens.”

Following several years of effective disengagement caused by political tensions surrounding the invasion of Gaza, the EU has recently begun forging closer military and technological ties with Israel through a series of agreements.

Competition from Washington and strategic rivalry with Moscow and Beijing have nevertheless underlined the requirement for allies possessing sophisticated industrial capacity.

In 2024, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen backed calls by Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis to create an EU-funded air defence shield.

Three senior officials involved in the discussions said, however, that the plans stalled after officials in the Commission and several national capitals concluded that the project would require reliance on Israeli air defence technology, which was considered too sensitive one year into the Gaza conflict.

Yet Israel’s Rafael, which is expanding its European operations significantly, has now confirmed that it will open a factory to manufacture the Iron Dome air defence system at a former Volkswagen plant in Germany.

One week ago, Greece signed a 3 billion euro agreement with the Israel Ministry of Defense.

The deal provides for the establishment of a new multi-layered air defence network designed to shoot down drones, hostile jets, and rockets.

“We see everything integrating into this multi-layer defence approach,” Maman said, highlighting satellite imagery and artificial intelligence modelling as primary focal points for joint development efforts:

“I’m not only seeing defence as ballistic missiles from Iran… think about a fire, a flash flood or even a long drought… we have a proven track record, and we’re getting really good results.”

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

UK reassures US that new Israeli settlement sanctions are symbolic

Published

on

The UK has reportedly engaged in behind-the-scenes talks to avoid a backlash from the US over anti-Israel sanctions scheduled for announcement today.

According to a report by Bloomberg, Andy Burnham’s government is expected to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank today.

Burnham is seeking to pursue a firmer stance on an issue of high importance to the governing Labour Party, though one that risks angering US President Donald Trump.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband will unveil a new sanctions regime targeting Israel but limited to Jewish settlements in the West Bank, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Burnham and Trump spoke by telephone on Monday, the Prime Minister’s Office said. A statement noted that the two leaders discussed a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinian territories.

The discussion suggests that Burnham used the call to notify Trump that sanctions against Israel were imminent.

The proposals under review included a new sanctions regime with measures to block the exchange of goods and services with Israeli settlements.

Miliband also evaluated expanding existing human rights sanctions to encompass the blocking of aid, which has drawn criticism for exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The Foreign Secretary further considered explicitly endorsing the International Court of Justice’s non-binding 2024 opinion that declared Israel’s occupation of territory currently recognised by the UK as the State of Palestine to be unlawful.

Even so, UK officials fear the announcement could cause an early setback in Burnham’s relationship with Trump.

To defuse a backlash from the Trump administration, British diplomats privately informed the US that the sanctions are largely symbolic and will have no tangible impact on the UK’s broader trade or security ties with Israel, according to sources familiar with the discussions.

The proposals were drawn up after Israel decided to issue tenders for the construction of 1,200 settlement housing units in an area of the West Bank.

Disputes between Israeli settlers and Palestinians have intensified in recent months as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces a difficult battle to retain his seat in a general election scheduled for 27 October.

Burnham joined the leaders of Canada and five European governments, including France, Germany, and Italy, in signing a statement that condemned the housing plan as “unacceptable” and urged Netanyahu to withdraw the tender.

In a separate statement, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz condemned a call by Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir for “nightly assassinations” in Gaza.

Burnham is eager to demonstrate early to the Labour Party that he is adopting a more critical approach toward Israel than his predecessor, Keir Starmer.

Although Starmer hardened his stance against Israel during his two years in office, including by formally recognising the State of Palestine, his initial refusal to demand that Netanyahu halt military operations in Gaza divided the party.

This division led to a decline in Labour’s poll ratings and boosted electoral gains for the Green Party across the country.

Burnham’s return to Parliament last month led to Starmer’s resignation. Burnham apologised for Labour’s handling of Israel’s military operation in Gaza under his predecessor, stating that the party “did not adopt the right stance”.

Last month, Burnham’s new Defence Secretary, Wes Streeting, who faced intense competition from a Muslim independent candidate in his northeast London constituency at the last general election, stated that Israel had fallen “short” of international standards.

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told the BBC’s “Newsday” programme that there would “undoubtedly” be a US response.

Accusing the Labour Party of “discriminating against the Israeli government”, Huckabee said: “It is like throwing a rock and not knowing where it lands. The UK is a sovereign country and can do as it pleases, but so is the US.”

Republican Florida Congressman Randy Fine also warned that British firms would be barred from doing business with local governments in the state if sanctions were imposed.

In a post on X, Fine said: “Florida has made its stance clear. Any company—or country—that boycotts Israel will be boycotted by Florida.”

Labour MPs and Jewish groups have warned the government that any sanctions against the settlements could amount to a “de facto boycott” of Israeli goods and compromise the safety of British Jews.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey